does /pol/ approves sugar daddy-sugar baby relationships?
Both are ugly
I have a sugar daddy! AMA. :]
>>70502067
That's why their sugar daddy left them.
Free market my man.
As long as it's not with kids or with women being forced by other people into paid sex, feel free to spread that sugar around.
Only $4 ? Sure I'll just put a paper bag over their heads
At least with sugar daddy/prostitution relationships women are finally admitting that the only thing of value they possess is their cunt.
>>70502067
left one has 10/10 legs
Probably got a good body too but can't really tell when she's sitting down like that
Butterface
It's degenerate and creepy but if they have the ability and lack of self-respect, sure. A step above prostitustion basically, I don't have any strong feelings.
>>70502010
Nah. It's basically prostitution. They should get married and start a family.
The terms are creepy, but there's nothing wrong with this type of prostitution.
Just stop calling them ''sugar daddies''. It's so fucking creepy. If someone is paying money to fuck you then you're a prostitute.
Next you'll see stripped calling themselves ''brother fuckers'' or ''baby diddlers''. Stop with the stupid terms and call it what it is.
>>70502010
probably not a good idea but who cares at this point.
> $4 tuition
>>70502010
Both are ugly
>>70502527
You mean whores who fuck for money want to hide it? shocking
>no hookups
>>70502843
There's hiding it and then there's just making it some kind of a creepy incestuous daddy issues thing.
I'm sure they desperately need money for their aeronautical engineering degrees so they can join the men in working on building stable rockets to explore the cosmos.