How do these "democratic" socialist faggots see private ownership transitioning to "democratic" ownership? No literature ever addresses this. They talk about private property going away and the workers owning businesses, but what exactly is the mechanism for that?
I can't even conceive of what legal process they would use to get that started. And if there's no legal process, are they just going to say "nope we own this now" and somehow that will make it so?
Bernie is a social democrat and not a democratic socialist.
Even I know this.
>>70500333
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOkXnC8EqlY
>>70500444
He self identifies as a democratic socialist. https://usatelections.wordpress.com/2015/07/08/qa-with-bernie-sanders-what-he-means-by-socialism/
>>70500444
So what if Trump [Nationalist] and Sanders [Socialist] both run for Pres. together? Does that make them National Socialists?
>>70500896
>>70500333
ok i'll bite
what means of production has Bernie sought to nationalize?
>>70501277
I have no idea. He's a self proclaimed democratic socialist. His followers all extol the virtues of "democratic socialism." All literature about democratic socialists say that the workforce should won corporations democratically. I'm asking how that would even be possible to transition to.
>>70501277
He says he wants to keep his organization going after " he wins" maybe he plans on seizing the means of production with his army of libcucks.
>>70500333
its like you never even heard of collectivization
just open up a history book and see how it turned out
>>70501640
"maybe"?
>>70501734
I wouldn't put it past a communist like him.
>>70500333
It means that the property will be in hands of intermediary parties working for the government which is supposed to represent the prolet... I mean people. Gee, what could possibly go wrong.
>>70500444
Didn't he identify as a plain old "socialist" before he got involved in the election? Are there any sources where he called himself a "democratic socialist" or "social democrat" before 2014?
>>70500444
That's a meaningless distinction in actual terms. Our Labor party calls itself both for example.
