Should people be considerably softer on DUI cases, including those that involve death or injury?
Why should I let some irresponsible fuck walk away after doing something as stupid as drinking and driving? Idiots deserve the shit they get.
This is a rather stupid question.
>>70479653
No. Dummy.
majority of DUI are just money makes for the countys and lawyers
meanwhile they still putting parking lots in front of every bar in town.
drive by a bar at say 7pm, then drive by again around midnight, how did all those cars get out of there without dui?
>>70479653
It's illegal to drink and drive.
Bars have parking lots.
>>70480843
Yeah, but most people drive out of those parking lots and back home bro.
A lot of people are already bad enough at driving without being drunk. They should crack down even harder on drunk driving and raise the driving age to 18, as well as make it mandatory school curiculum.
>>70479653
I don't care how shit your life is, wagecuck, don't ruin other peoples' lives by your selfish act of assholeness by drinking alcohol.
>>70479653
they shouldn't be able to tie Multiple ones for same offense because of blood alcohol level neither in any case
instead they should issue stupidity tickets if you get too many stupidity tickets you are banned from drinking
>>70482320
I'm not saying people should be let off the hook for hurting or killing someone, I'm asking if the laws are too harsh, including for those who don't actually hurt anybody and are pulled over for driving intoxicated.
>>70482594
>banned from drinking
Oh yea that always works out well
Should put them in jail and take their license away for life.
>>70480843
You can't be drink while driving or be drunk and drive. You can have a beer and drive home, only losers go to a bar to get drunk.
>>70483592
Drink while driving I meant.
every six pack should come with a gun. if you get pulled over then we see who wants it more; the cop or the drunk with a gun