Did industrialization ruin society?
It has certainly made things much more comfortable.
Yes, it was a game for top capitalists (and kikes). They kind of enslaved the people (loans were barely livable).
Also the middle class was created by them to enlarge the amount of consumers
>he says as he types on his computer
No. The transition into service economies did
On one hand it has made many things a billion times easier.
On the other hand it allowed degeneracy to spread rapidly.
Written language, actually.
>>70465350
If by 'industrialization', you mean 'niggers'...
>>70465550
Go back to bed Karl
>>70465745
This. All these /pol/acks who think Trump is gonna bring back manufacturing jobs. He's not.
He'll bring manufacturing back to the US maybe, but it's gonna be mostly robots doing the work.
Some would argue man is being suppressed under his modern life style.
If you subscribe to that way of thinking then I guess industrialization HAS damaged society.
>>70465350
Yes, it was a huge mistake if humanity isn't planning to go beyond the stars.
Just what's the difference then if we die here as we would without industrialization? We literally accomplish absolutely nothing if there isn't a long-term goal, which implies not staying here until the Sun becomes a red giant (implying that we will still exist for that long).
If there is no purpose, there's no point of development, which will get out of hand and head in the wrong direction.
It has turned us all into limp wristed faggots.
Humanity was damaged immensely in the course of just a century just cause shlomo could never be satisfied with any amount of shekels
>>70465826
Karl was right senpai
The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his 'natural superiors,' and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, callous 'cash payment.' It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervor, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom—Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.
The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage laborers.
The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation.”
>>70465350
no ted, you're not supposed to be on the internet
>>70466399
Did you write that all by yourself??!!
>>70465350
No, the internet did.
yes and no
Yes.
Then the internet made things even worse.
>>70466716
Nah, forgot to green text marx's quote
Guess it depends on how you look at it, considering tribal types are apparently happier than us when disasters and invasions aren't happening. I'll take the position of figuring how to integrate the necessary bush living aspects that are good for us into modern society than just junking it all though. Assuming that's possible at least, but it seems like our biggest problem is utterly failing to foster feelings of community and belonging, which seems correctable to me.
