>Completely rational arguments supported by facts
>Knowledgeable in a wide range of topics
>Dismisses emotional bullshit
>Excellent speaker and debater
>Not afraid to BTFO socialist fucks
>>70439003
Not sure if you noticed but all of his retarded nonsense is aimed at wannabe top 1%-er two bit monkeys whose brains are incapable of thought even just slightly more complex than 'muh r/K-selection theory', 'muh hierarchy', 'muh the whole world is about welfare leeching plebeians (i.e. them) vs. all-producing aristocratic gentlemen (i.e. us)'.
It's nothing more than channeling a superiority complex-fueled self-centered paranoid worldview to his fans.
>>70439545
>Anarcho capitalists
>Self centered
Typical emotional ad-hom socialist """"argument"""".
Please come back with an argument.
>>70439723
>le 'not an argument' may-may xD
XDDD
>>70439831
The meme becomes reality when you don't provide a rebuttal to anarcho-capitalist philosophy.
>>70439003
he's a blood sucking faggot, look at him in that turtleneck.
No this is not an argument, I'm just dealing in facts here.
>>70439994
He's married and has a daughter.
>>70439893
I don't give the slightest of fucks about your quack-habblery. It should've been painfully obvious to anyone above the -1 s.d. mark after having watched a couple of videos of his that he's just trying to make his subscribers feel like if they were genetically high IQ, 'K-selected' purebreed noblemen, victors of history, whose very existence is threatened by the uprising of the aesthetically challenged, 'r-selected' unwashed peasants, the lesser strata of low IQ commoners, the polar opposite of you, his precious little snowflake.
He doesn't really have anything else to say... he just keeps uttering these same words over and over again in every single overly long video of his like if he had some very advanced Tourette's.
He's doing nothing more than feeding your inner narcissistic and you fall for it.
>>70440810
literally not an argument.
>>70440810
Maybe he makes you feel that way. He doesn't put his callers on a pedestal regardless of whether they agree with him. He has some very valid points backed up with evidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noruglsb7yk
>>70440810
Its funny how people like you literally cannot make an argument
I like his videos but I feel like his speech patterns are bit brainwashy. He has a cult leader type of speech pattern. He is also a bit of a prick to his guests.
But he makes good entry level content.
>>70439003
>>70439545
>>70439723
>>70441143
in before someone posts that photoshopped picture of the youtube comment implying he made about his own video but forgot to change use profies
>>70441361
>bit of a prick to his guests.
Not an argument.
His videos take way too long to explain basic concepts, but other than that he's alright.
>>70439003
ONE FUCKING DOLLAR
>>70439003
>>70441552
They have to be long because most people's understanding of basic concepts come from the culturally marxist media, and contradicting information is harder to accept than new information.
>>70439003
He's a jew
>>70441541
>>70441143
>>70441084
>>70440966
Do you people actually feel smart or edgy upon typing this much-trembled line into your comment box?
>inb4 'not an argument'
>>70441361
Please explain how he has a brainwashy speech pattern?
>>70439003
DAILY REMINDER THAT ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT STEVEN MOLYNEW IS THAT HE PERSONALLY COMES HE EVERY DAY TO SHILL HIS GAY VIDEOS.
SAGE GOES IN ALL FIELDS
>>70441680
He hates judaism seemingly more than he hates Islam. Also half jewish does not mean you are jewish.
>>70441710
of course, just present an actual argument.
>>70441710
Dude, all you do is describe him as wrong and his supporters as idiots.
You aren't proving anything and pointing it out isnt edgy.
Again, not an argument lol. Your brain is totally fried
>>70441763
I'm not Stefan Molyneux. That's not an argument.
>>70441654
Most people don't have the attention span to listen to a guy discuss a topic for 45 minutes.
>>70441710
Why do you hate Stefan so much? Does his rational Anarcho-Capitalist voluntarism trigger your socialist and collectivist tendencies?
Do you have stockholm syndrome from the USSR? Need Papa Khrushchev to massacre you again?
>>70439003
look it is stefan molyjew shilling again
>>70441902
>Implying it is that short
>>70442078
He wants to get rid of central banking and is anticipating its collapse. Doesn't sound very Jewish to me.
>>70441854
Maybe if I actually wanted to discuss and argue against his exact points I'd do it under his videos, right on YouTube, not on here. Why would I? Do you seriously think this thread is about providing arguments? Not even the original post was about such a thing.
Please, be kind enough so as to read it again:
">Completely rational arguments supported by facts
>Knowledgeable in a wide range of topics
>Dismisses emotional bullshit
>Excellent speaker and debater
>Not afraid to BTFO socialist fucks"
Which one of these >'s seem like an actual argument to you?
If none, please elaborate why you'd treat my opinions/statements with a higher degree of skepticism than that of the OP, if not for your personal bias towards me.
>>70441826
ONE DROP
>>70442500
The thread is a meme, your responses are butthurt ad-hominems against God Emperor Stefan.
>>70442500
Because you've put more effort into your replies than anyone else here. You were insulting people with very specific insults, while not making an argument.
OP was just shilling for Molyjew, taking the OP seriously on pol is somthing that is unheard of.
>>70441979
In this person's worldview, there are two types of people:
People who absolutely love Molyneux, and those irrational commies whose socialist and collectivist jimmies are rustled by His Holiness' incredibly rational approach to dealing with philosophical questions of the utmost importance.
I'm not going to say you really resemble the type of people I described in my first post, but yeah, you do.
>>70442346
not a argument a jew will never go full jew
>>70442878
>Wants to save Western Liberalism and individualism
>Relies on donations
>Anti-state
>Anti commies
>Hates cultural marxism
>Hates Soros
>Hates fiat currency and central banking
>""""jew"""" xDDDDD
>>70442859
>le epic strawman XDDD
Not an argument ;)
>>70442859
You're a lost cause. Enjoy being subservient to a government that takes part of your income by force.
>>70441389
This isn't a photoshop at all, you cuck. That's
NOT
AN
ARGUMENT
>>70442859
Do you support me getting shot?
The butthurt Hungarian commie in this thread was probably spanked as a child by his babushka mother.
>>70441743
Super effusive, hypomania and hysteria, absolutist, lots of dubious self-help content
>>70439003
Isn't that guy some cult leader? David Miscavige?
>>70444054
Absolutism is not an argument against anarcho capitalism. "Hysteria" is justified when liberalism the west fought for is under threat.
>>70444318
Anarcho-capitalism IS liberalism, insofar as it espouses a belief in political rights.
>>70443984
>>70443684
Actually not a communist, nor a socialist.
I'm all for the free market but this bloke is a snake oil salesman and he's taking you for a ride. Stating this was my only purpose for taking part in this thread, even though in retrospect my participation managed to be slightly more insulting than what I planned it to be.
He's pretty good but he can't handle an actual debate, he's more like a cult leader.
>>70444418
When did I say it wasn't? Liberalism is the greatest European invention, and led to the golden age of advancement in the 1800s which has unfortunately been gradually replaced by socialism because people don't remember how bad they had it before the enlightenment
>>70444496
Free markets cannot exist with government intervention.
>>70444496
>Actually not a communist, nor a socialist.
And you're not an argument haver either, because you haven't an argument.
>>70439003
Just another faggot with a superiority complex. Anyone can compile the quotes and PowerPoint slides that he does if they were unemployed with too much free time. Basically copy pasting shit from other websites and presenting them as facts. He does not cite any published research papers and then present a critical analysis of why he agrees or disagrees.
Sophisticated gossip is how I view his rants. Using proper sentences does not mean you are automatically intelligent and right.
>>70444318
>>70444418
Agh, misread the last bit of your post
Anyways, political theory is super dodgey if it totally eschews utilitarian and empirical analysis.
David Friedman is probably the only acceptable ancap, because he actually bears to mind issues pertaining to feasibility and human suffering and flourishing
Not "muh deontological prescriptive truth I have miraculously pulled out from the deep recesses of my asshole"
Once he calls out the jews he's our guy.
