Who would win? How devastating would the losses be? Would Australia and New Zealand betray their Anglo brethren for China?
http://strawpoll.me/7321656
North Korea is fucking lame and gay
If we went to war with them we would win IN A DAY
>>70408653
ISHYGDDT
>>70408653
So basically the U.S. vs China and Russia?
Honestly, it could be the USA vs every other flag there and they would still win.
>>70408693
I dunno m8, NK's pretty tough.
>>70408653
>Would Australia and New Zealand betray their Anglo brethren for China?
No. wtf?
>>70408792
i would be more worried about canada doing that
>>70408752
those are like 2 man subs
Why is there no option for the Jews?
>>70408693
True, and China doesn't care about North Korea, they only care about it collapsing resulting in millions of refugees going across the board and a unified Korea that will result in the US on the border with China. Oh how I'd love there to be a 'mop up' goal where the focus can be on undoing some of the left overs from the cold war.
>>70408752
>nork small submersibles
If I count Hotwheels I could claim I've owned dozens of cars.
>>70408653
Anglo Bros > Ruskies and Gooks
The force projection of our carrier groups augmented by the rest of the bros would choke off China and Russia.
China's economy is based on Western consumerism, a war would cripple their economy.
Russia is more self sufficient but besides a hand full of modern jets, the Russians are operating on older tech.
>>70408693
Didn't they have like 15 million soldiers? I've serious doubts they've enough money to arm them all or even 1/10 of total but, we're still talking about several millions, even if half of them desert/flee, there're always the loyal retards who would fight for Kim till death. It would be much easier if Russia and China sided with the Anglos (they would, Russia is NK ally only in word because they've big numbers and they're neighbors, China already told NK to fuck off).
The world would probably be ruined, but if it wasn't team america would win
>>70408653
Didnt Pooty Poots say he is tired of Fattys shit and said he would invade of they didnt stop being annyoing gooks?
>>70408653
No one. War doesn't determine who's right, only who's left.
kinda get the feeling we'll kill each other so whose the winner there? the rest of the world? Except they get to deal with the nuclear fall out and economic repercussions
>>70409165
World war was a tactical war to eliminate the white race. Only niggers are left to chimp out
>>70409207
If its nuclear then of course no one wins
But if nukes disappeared and it was purely conventional, hands down anglobros prevail
Don't China and Russia hate each other? Why are they even on the same side.
>>70408653
So the USA plus dead weight hangers on vs commies. Hmm, think USA would still win.
>>70409322
Prolly cuz OP went
"hurrr russians were soviets and china's red durrr team em up"
But seriously if WW3 ever kicked off it would be Russia vs China starting it.
>>70409429
More like because I like hypothetical situations where Anglos face off against the two greatest military forces after America.
NK is thrown in for shits and giggles. They are the perpetual enemy.
>>70409549
no need to be salty
>>70409719
>salty
Are you really so sheltered that you can't handle confrontation? Don't be surprised when people call you out when you act like a twat.
>>70409782
Says the clearly angry guy
sodium levels are rising eh ?
>>70408653
The Chinese helped build this Cuntry brudda.... sorry...
>Also, never fuck over a China-man.
Shits remembered for generations...
>>70408653
US should switch sides to the un-cucked side, and btfo the rest of the cucks
US+NORKS+RUSKIES+JAPS+POLLAKS+US'S HAT 4 YEARS AGO= DREAM TEAM OF UNKEKED NATIONS
>>70408653
This is an extremely unlikely situation, but the anglosphere would probably win. However, the losses would be so devasting, even without nuclear weapons, that it would be a pyrrhic victory that would set the world back decades.
>>70408752
>Implying America wouldnt rain down fucking cruise missiles like crazy in the first couple hours
>>70410337
Japs are the definiton of cucks
>>70408653
>buying the nuclear winter jew
Right now it looks like the USA would just roll over and scrape some more resin into its bong. I doubt our shriveled tranny army and Bernie bros would be able to rustle up the testosterone needed for a brutal man on man nuclear guerrilla war that would render most of the northern hemisphere an uninhabitable radioactive dunescape. The entire American piggery would be enveloped in smoke and blood in a matter of hours if the chinks just shut down Google and Netflix and EBT. No need for war. The country would be ripped its own guts out if a few teams of saboteurs just cut off the endless flow of skullfucking digital dopamine.
>>70408653
You can kick the other 4 faggots out. We got this.
>>70411040
But we got some new toys to try
>>70408889
Jews will just wait to see who wins, then claim to have been on their side from the beginning.
>>70408693
Like in 1953?
>>70411040
>>70411599
dont know why they didnt just nuke it t͏bh
>>70409085
They did some test in NK ages ago, gave the kids an app that allows them to anonymously say anything about Kim they want, and it was typically pretty negative shit. Can only guess it's the same for everyone else.
I think once the portion of the army that's actually armed is killed or defects, they'll take that as the incentive to surrender.
>>70411818
cuz the soviets started helping
>>70408653
Any team with the U.S.A wins.
>>70408653
We're already China
>>70408717
Underrated post
Britain and Co. would win, don't forget that the Common Wealth and NATO would be in this too
>>70408653
>>70408745
This.
It would be incredibly bloody, but the Anglos are almost always winning throughout modern history.
UK/England has only lost 2-3 wars in the last 500 years
>>70411818
If we did that then we cant tell our soldiers and folks back home that we are the good guys
>>70408653
Muslims. Muslims would win if we start killing eachother.
They would have no survivors.
>>70408653
>Including my country in your battle
We never asked for this. Leave us be.
>Who would win?
Nobody
>How devastating would the losses be?
Best case: Quoter of planet population will be obliterated.
Worst case: Planet will be destroyed
>Would Australia and New Zealand betray their Anglo brethren for China?
Doesn't really matter, such war will be completely different from WW2 or even any "special operation"-tier wars, like syria afganistan and vietnam.
But if ground forces will embark to australia - that will be the end of their
sovereignty. I don't really think aussies can withhold a ground war on their turf. They will be occupied and best thing they can do in this case - use partizan squadron's tactic. And they don't have expierience in it at all.
If nukes then australia wins because no one would care enough to nuke it.
>>70415203
Tsunamies from nukes will devastate the coast of australia. And coast are most populated and infrastructured.
>>70408653
>on the same side with NK and China
Fucking REEEEEEEEEEE
We would better be on or own.
>>70414817
>implying anybody believed that from the start
It's pretty comfy being on USA's side to be honest. Feel sorry for all you chinks and commies who DARPA are gona test their death rays on.
>>70415174
>halp
>what is an ocean
>I can't into geography
yeah nah cunt, your combined navies are less than the us alone, and being forced to statically defend transports would end the war in a day
>>70415656
Nobody asked your opinion, Yaponskay oblast.
>>70415656
Nuclear strikes end wars in a day, but we didn't need them to wipe the floor with GRORIOUS JAPANESE ARRMY
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Japanese_War_(1945)
>muh ching chong samurai shittu
>muh kuriry and porth arthur
>604 000 POWS
>>70410337
wut.
US is the first one to start the multcult crap.
>>70415831
MUH MURRRICA PROTECTS
>>70410827
>The entire American piggery would be enveloped in smoke and blood in a matter of hour
Roll Down The windows then.
>>70408653
Would RU/CN/NK even be a thing? Recently china and north korea havent been on good terms and chinas just trying to avoid them, and russia idk isnt that huge ass part above china that belongs to russia wanted by them
Russians and Chinese win NK is irrelevant
>>70408752
>78 submarines
How many of those are sunken fishing boats?
>>70409207
I have 32 acres of land I could farm so I'd just fuck off there if the world went to shit DESU
Anglo team brothers in arms. Mongol team more likely to fight each other than anyone else. 100% guarantee for China or Russia to switch sides.
>>70408653
the UK has already betrayed their brethren - they now arrest people for not liking muslims
If there was a third world war Australia and/or South Africa would win.
They have a lot of Uranium to mine.
>>70410644
But they cuck themselves, Europeans are being cucked by Africans.
>>70417673
77. The last one is a warship that sank.
>>70409165
what i expected from someone with a Fruit Stripe flag
>>70410446
Without nukes it's basically "America air raids everyone and cruise missiles them too. Then gets hungry and eats up the rest of the world to create Pax Americana. 6 billion dead globally, 1 million Americans dead."
