http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/04/08/google-under-fire-over-racist-image-search-results-for-unprofess/
>>70408505
>>70408505
OY VEYY SHUT IT DOWN SHUT IT DOWN
THAT SEARCH ENGINE IS ANTI-SEMITIC
WHEN I SWEAR "HOLOCAUST" IT TALKS ABOUT THE GOYIM THAT DIED INSTEAD OF THE POOR JEWS.
>>70408505
Do these people even know how google search works?
I hate niggers.
>>70408505
What's racist? I see white bitches in there too. Or can nobody ever critique niggers?
>>70408691
when white people criticize afro-americans, it's ALWAYS done from a position of power, and is thus an act of racist anti-black violence perpetrated against black bodies in this country
this is your privilege being checked
>>70408627
Obviously not, but she may have somewhat of a point, and it is possible to screw around with what comes up. Go google "Whitest man in Argentina" and look at the results.
>>70408505
AYO
*smacks lips*
HOL UP
*steals bike*
AYO
*shoots neighbor*
YALL NIGGAS SAYIN
*buys crack*
AYO
*muh dick*
AY
*tucks gun in pants*
DIS RIH HERE
*steals watermelon*
YO
*denies parenthood*
DIS RACIS MAI
>>70408505
>>70408627
Niggers are not people, and neither are women.
>>70408505
>SJW are oblivious to the fact that it's software with an algorithm
>Stormfags make these exact posts here
>>70408505
Now watch google buckle and give into their demands. I promise you there will be some new feigned outrage in the future. You cannot appease left
>>70408866
>Think this is fake
>Its not
GET ME OFF OF THIS RIDE PLEASE IM SO SICK OF THIS SHIT
>>70408886
algorithms are racist n shieeeeeeeet
>>70408771
i did 5 years in a prison with 80% niggers, i know what its like to be a minority and can say the majority the nogs are fking idiots
>>70408505
19:25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq_MZEECq68&nohtml5=False
>>70408951
What is there to promise? There is literally a daily occurrence where some shit lord gets offended and blows whatever it is completely out of proportion. The Left, in their insatiable appetite, are not only bringing shit up on a daily occurrence, but are beginning to eat their own kind. Google is a massive Hillary lover, so fuck them regardless- let them cave to the butthurt bloggers for all I fucking care.
>>70408771
I hate niggers so god damn much.
>>70408505
In other related news, Mein Kampf no longer shows up under google image results when you search for "crippled america".
>>70408772
That's come to fruition because /sp/ spams the shit out of it
>>70409420
I'm sure it's just a bug, it will be back shortly.
>>70409131
BTFO. Got damn the level of stupidity, denial and lack of personal responsibility is out-fucking-standing.
I thought black people wanted to be represented more. I don't see a problem here.
>>70408984
Google white women as well
:^)
>>70408771
Sheboons are the most repulsive creatures on this planet.
Jesus fucking christ. The search algorithm just shows all pictures where "unprofessional hairstyles" is mentioned. One of the pictures goes to this page
http://ai-yo.tumblr.com/post/99325661069/privilegetoengtranslationservice
Which is a bunch of faggots whining that calling nignog hair "unprofessional" is racist.
SJWs are literally forging data to push their agenda.
btw, I think that black people natural hair is normally equivalent to white people messy hair, because messy hair is generally your hair in its natural state.
Of course, you can have hair in its natural state that isn't messy, but that normally only works for short hair that isn't affected by sleep.
>>70408866
>Change white for caucasian
>Results are the same with the addition of Black/White gay couples
What.
>when the poll btfo the article
>>70409952
Please tell me this is real.
>>70408866
At first, I noticed some of these pics are in a forum saying "google white american couple", and for the ones that aren't, I've noticed that they were described as "African-American couple on white". That seemed to explain things, so then I did what >>70409868 did and made it caucasian, and I got more blacks. So then I searched caucasian couple, and all was resolved. Seems that most of these sites use "african american" to refer to blacks, so any term involving "american couple" will get sent back to pics of nig nogs because we have to call them "african american" instead of black, because apparently that's racist.
>>70408505
Having neon-colored hair is not unprofessional? Just because pictures of black women show up in the search results that makes it wayycist?
Ironically it's the same circles that are outraged by this that contributed to those results in the first place. It's an algorithm, not a conspiracy.
>>70408987
>diri noir avec banan
>>70408505
boycott google
>>70408505
you just know some sjw was typing all kinds of shit into just to start something
>>70409784
>>70409952
>>70410120
Doesn't seem to be working properly. Just voted too and saw 100% no with 1 voter.
>>70408505
The real problem is the misuse of inflammatory metaphors in article headlines.
"Google under fire..."
No, there are no shots being fired. No one is "under fire".
An accurate headline would be:
"Several people on the internet mad about what they found on the internet"
>>70408505
A kike actually tweeted "wtf baka this is awful. What's "unprofessional" is entrenched #racism"
S M H
M
H
>>70409131
those are some soft spoken negroes
>>70408772
Thanks for the kek.
>>70409131
They are like spoiled children that will take a tantrum over anything. The older guy seems pretty logical.
Shouldn't have gotten unprofessional haircuts then.
>>70408866
Kek. Well played mexico
you wanna see some real racism?
google image search
>terrorist
>>70408987
This one never fails to make me laugh.
>>70408505
Amerifats will swallow it.
those people will have decades trying to warp algorithms to reflect their world-view
wow how can google be so racist what were they thinking making this conscious decision that has nothing to do with a computer program
>>70409025
might be getting baited, but what were you in for?
>>70408563
I always wondered if the captions was made up or really related...
>>70408505
>>70408505
I'm sure google will fix this soon.
this isnt real
im just reading orwell's book
>>70408505
Want to be blown away? Go to tumblr and search for thin.
>>70420011
how the fuck is that real? jesus christ
>>70408772
Darkest man in Argentina
>>70408505
if all you anons google search this term and click on the black people there isn't much google can do about it and you will force the algorithm to show niggers with nigger hair
>>70420138
wtf? I expected a bunch of thin privilege posts but this just blew my mind.
wtf man i want to see the world burn
>>70408772
Thank
>>70420713
>getting rustled over tumblr
Kek that's newfriend tier bruv
The funny part is that if you go to the sources of the images, they are all articles written by black people about whether curly hair is unprofessional.
>Not liking my awful hair is racist
Sure is a shame they can't change their hairstyle, isn't it?
I wish I was still surprised by this shit.
>>70409769
Looks pretty normal to m...
What? Why is that even related to this search
>>70421179
rofl that wink
>>70408505
"Algorithms promote racism"
