![RiodeSolBikiniPipa1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/XudFjO5.jpg "RiodeSolBikiniPipa1[1].jpg")
Why do women act like bra and panties is such shameful nudity (which it is), but are completely okay with walking around in bikinis?
Are they all sluts at heart? If your GF wears a bikini then everyone has seen her in her bra and panties.
>>70397891
Why the fuck do you care? You must be a virgin or a literal faggot. Sage
Swimming attire, Achmed
>>70397891
Women are sheep. If it was trendy to eat your first born child they would be doing so.
>>70397944
>Swimming attire
Meaning...?
>>70397933
>he lets other men look at his GF, mom, and sisters in their underwear
>>70397891
Trying to understand the female mind is not going to be a fruitful endeavor. Read the words of the greatest philosophers. They never try to explain the female mind. They all tried to understand it, but they couldn't come up with anything that made any sense, so they remained quiet about it. What makes you think you will succeed where they failed?
>>70398011
Attire that serves a specialized and localized function, namely fucking swimming you autist
>>70398051
Confirmed virgin. Enjoy your delusions
Often underwear is sheer (means see-through) but bikinis are thicker and have layers of fabric.
Nipplepoke
>>70398155
If the purpose is the reason, then why are male and female swim bottoms different?
>>70398155
>>70398011
>>70397944
>>70397933
Also, this is now a dubs thread
Well why do you feel vulnerable in your briefs but not in a speedo on the beach?
>>70398242
Sexual selection places pressure on women to appear physically desirable in order to attract a mate. Men must appear socially desirable,
Honestly just fuck off, you've never taken a college class and it's showing
>>70398003
It's sorta trendy to eat your placenta, or at least some chick tried making it be.
>>70398353
How does that explain the difference in professional attire, again with men completely covered and women half naked?
>>70398353
>appeals to evolution
>can't explain why women just don't walk around naked
>will have some convenient excuse that justifies thongs but explains lack of nudity
>>70398288
>Well why do you feel vulnerable in your speedo but not naked on the beach?
Why is he dressed like that, and she is dressed like that?
They're all whores.
If I'm going to expend my violent alphaggression on anything, it will be a slut who loves it.
Why is it that when men express their sexuality by wearing skimpy clothing, they are considered a faggot?
In Western society, the women are sexually liberated, and the men are like Muslim women who must cover themselves.
>>70398621
Same pressures at work, you aren't disproving my point.
>>70398639
To stay warm, because fashion is a social and status symbol, because attracting a long term mate involves signaling some degree of modesty.
Evolutionary psychology is the basis of the redpill.
>>70397891
Because when they go to the beach they make sure they're clean and properly shaved.
>>70399213
OK, but does your theory explain different outfits for men and women in professional ice skating? Those women don't choose those outfits. They are the Olympics rules.
>>70398621
>How does that explain the difference in professional attire, again with men completely covered and women half naked?
>Sexual selection places pressure on women to appear physically desirable in order to attract a mate. Men must appear socially desirable.
You literally just gave an example to back up his point.
If you don't like seeing your gf in bikinis you are a literal faggot.
>>70399367
No one wants to see a fag but they are the only males that figure skate so compromises had to be made.
>>70399213
Misogynism and slut shaming isn't incompatible with evolutionary psychology. I don't get the point of this thread. There's no feminists here to answer OPs rhetorical questions...
>>70397891
Because they are fucking dumb. It was a slow process, they got sluttier year after year. Ten years ago a girl walked into a restaurant I worked at and everyone was talking about how you could see her buttcheeks. Now this is 100% normal. Do girls even realize "they want to look good" really means they want everyone too see them virtually naked?
It's no wonder Muslims come over here and sexually assault them. They think it's 100% normal to walk around like that
>>70399139
Because men can't wear tank tops and shorts.
Or take their shirts completely off and walk around in public
>covered up like muslims
Women can't even do that
>>70399368
Women aren't choosing the dress code. It's set by the organization. Women on TV don't choose their clothes.
Plus these circumstances are not ones for enticing a mate. They are ones where the men and women are trying to do the same thing: either appeal to a TV audience, or persuade the board members about something. So why do men and women wear different attire when they are trying to achieve the same goal? (assuming their wardrobe is even up to them, which many times it's not)
>>70397891
Women with small-to-medium size tits also don't need bras.
>>70397933
What kind of bikini does your sister wear?
>>70399509
>If you don't like everyone seeing your gf naked you are a literal faggot
It just shows how women dress is becoming more and more immoral for both little girls and grown women, men have always had the same attire a nice clean dress suit with a tie, yet look at women on news for example the tightest skirt they gave to show ass.
>>70399576
In professional attire, men are covered up, but women can express their sexuality. How can we say that this isn't oppression of men? If professional American women were forced to cover themselves like men have to, it would be called "oppression." So why isn't it oppression to make men do it?
>>70399604
Just state your theory already and stop with these idiotic rhetorical questions (by the way the answer is a combination of evolutionary psychology and culture)
>>70397933
>>70398162
>This much projection
>>70399139
clothing for men is a status symbol.
there's a reason that women post all those stupid "there's nothing sexier than a man in a suit" image macros.
A woman shows up to the office like this, and it's OK. But if a man were to show up like that, it would be considered inappropriate because it's too skimpy. Men have to cover up. We can't express our sexuality at work like women can. Why not?
>>70398677
Fuck this is a lot of dubs
>>70399782
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism
>>70399556
Misogyny as in hating women solely because of their sex? That's aberrant behavior. Slut shaming is totally natural.
>>70399367
Those outfits are intentionally designed in order to fulfill an aesthetic. Given what I've been saying in this thread about the pressures men and women have to appear a certain way, is it really surprising that the women was given more revealing clothing? You're dense as fuck
>>70399806
How does evolutionary theory explain modesty panels?
>>70399782
Oh so you're an MRA. Okay yes men are just as 'oppressed' as women. Yes feminism is a hypocritical socially constructed ideology. Everyone agrees with that here
>>70399604
They do it because men are attracted to women who are physically attractive - so the organisation put women in skimpy dresses to get more male viewers. Women are attracted to men who are socially desirable - so the organisation puts men in suits to get female viewers.
It all follows the same basic evolutionary psychology that the other dude is talking about.
>>70400019
No, women are not oppressed. They are free to show their body in their professional dress, but men are not. Women can show their arms, legs, and chest, but if a man did that, he would be told that it was inappropriate. Western men are pathetic that they don't fight for the right to express their sexuality at work.
>>70398677
w-what
>>70399906
Showing midriff in a professional setting isn't acceptable anywhere
>>70400019
feminist and MRA are the biggest social retards in history.
>>70399934
Okay, maybe I'm wrong. Then how would you explain modesty panels?
>>70400049
According to women, the less clothes they wear, the freer they are. So since men have to wear more clothing in professional dress, doesn't that mean the men are less free than the women are? And then isn't that problematic?
>>70400199
Women don't know how to dress themselves, so men have to build furniture that acts as supplementary clothing to make up for the deficit.
>>70399934
>>70400239
Respond, cuck
I know. It is a phenomenon. Context is just THAT strong for humans. That being said, I could understand a guy getting hot and bothered by girls in bikinis, and I wouldn't let my daughter wear one before the age of 17.
>>70400239
Sure, but that isn't really what we've been talking about.
>>70400373
Sadly, your daughter will probably be a huge whore in rebellion
>>70400157
No feminist will argue that oppression is solely based on work attire. I'm not a feminist but come on give us some better arguments than this
>>70399556
I think my point is that women argue that they are freer when they wear less clothes, but actually it's just as restrictive to wear little clothes as it is to wear a burka, the restrictions are just different, but still it's a restriction. Muslim women have to cover, and western women have to uncover.
Muslim and western men cover about the same amount. Muslim women cover more, Western women cover less. In both cases, the women are oppressed. So western women are wrong when they think that covering up is oppression.
>>70400157
A man can freely wear a v neck t shirt with shorts the fuck are you on about?
>>70400437
Lol no, I'll just suggest more modest options that are still fashionable to her. More fashionable than bikinis.
>>70400307
Why do you say men build modesty panels? It isnt impossible that women may build them. Even if we just accept this premise, the conclusion is that women are stupid. Women being stupid isn't incompatible with evolutionary psychology or culture
>>70400719
What about this? The bottoms are more in line with what men wear, so it's more equal, at least for the bottoms.
>>70399367
Her legs are fully covered... You've got the illusion shes wearing a dress doing this complex routine, but its actually a bodysuit.
>this thread has more than 0 replies
You're all cucks.
>>70400502
Western women being wrong about being oppressed because of clothing and the reason why women wear the clothing they do being because of evolutionary psychology are not incompatable
>>70400918
It's not more equal. Men need only wear shorts. Women have to wear 2 piece or 1 piece like your picture (certainly not that outdated style though).
>>70399929
>>70400918
You got fucked man.
I think the problem is that a lot of kids born around 2000 were taught that the genders were equal, so when they go out into the real world and see that clearly isn't the case they throw a shitfit like OP
>>70400987
I don't really think it's women who have chosen to be uncovered in Western society. I think it's men who chose that, and the women have just accepted it as their own desires.
>>70401075
Now you're sounding like a feminist. So it's bc of patriarchy that women choose to dress the way they do?
>Swimsuit.
>They want to show off.
>Underwear.
>They don't want to show off.
It's that fucking simple. Yes they show the same amount of skin.
>>70401379
>missing the point
>>70401267
Yeah, but a different kind of feminist from the modern type. Feminist these days think it's feminist to wear a lot of makeup and skimpy clothes, because this is expressing "their" sexuality. I don't think it's that at all. I think it's appealing to men's sexuality. At any time that women were most "oppressed" by the patriarchy, they wore makeup and skimpy clothes, because that's what men wanted them to wear.
Here are some Victorian era clothes, men covered, women uncovered, quite similar to how we are today, as advanced as we are, here in 2016.
>>70401504
Your position is anti sex positive feminism. Which is a valid reactionary critique against contemporary pro porn free the nipple hyper sex positive movements. I would argue rather that all clothing is communication for the purpose of rationally maximizing self benefit. If dressing slutty gets you a sugar daddy, and that sounds good to you, you'll dress slutty. If you want a classier sophisticated family oriented traditional guy, you'll signal modesty in your dress. No one is oppressed, different groups are up practicing different yet all rational mating strategies
>>70398621
Why are you from my country?
