My professor drew this chart today
Is he right?
>>70369806
A FUCKING ARGENTINA
>>70369908
My professor is well versed in international politics, he got a Masters from the University of Arizona and he's been the head of the department for 3 yeas
>>70369806
>professor
>Argentina
KEK
>>70369806
Your Argentine professor drew that in English?
>>70369806
>A FUCKING WHITE MALE
>>70370003
No, in Spanish, I translated it
>>70369806
Seems fairly accurate to me.
That would convince me to support Trump
>>70369806
Yeah that's about right. Trump also believes in American Exceptionalism
>Clinton as far left as sanders on social issues
wut
>>70370289
I believe in fucking your sister's gaping twat you fucking nigger loving jew bait.
>>70370473
clearly to the right
>>70369806
That is very accurate. It's just like the political compass threads you see here all the time. Although, having Libertarian right next to Conservative on the Society part kind of gives a false impression that they are similar. They may both be right wing, but really Libertarian views on society are closer to progressive than conservative
Is becoming slightly more independent of foreign trade whist loosening domestic regulations Mercantile?
Not sure about that one.
>>70369806
This is a drawing?
>>70370565
that's pretty much the point of mercantilism
to become a exporting nation
>>70369806
Sounds good to me.
>tfw Trump supporters are the moderates and everyone else is a crazy extremist
>>70370531
On my second view of this I'm not sure how the Society part relates to inclusive collectivism vs no collectivism. What are they are they are they talking about in the society part OP?
>>70371288
'Collectivism' confuses me. I always assumed it meant unity of the countries people and the opposite of individualism and had nothing to with economics.
>>70371288
progressives focus on a lot of people (women, retards, homosexuals, bisexuals, otherkins, blacks, Mexicans, Muslims)
liberals usually focus on working adults (a smaller subset)
nationalists focus on working adults of a nationality (a smaller subset)
conservatives focus on working adults of a religion (a smaller subset)
libertarians don't focus on anyone (a non-existent subset)
>>70369963
When you say Arizona, do you mean the u diversity of Phoenix?
>>70370505
>ID: b8pMkTP4
>b8
it looks right to me, but i'm a fucking idiot so it's probably wrong.
>>70369806
I love how every single one of those economic systems is pure shite.
>>70369963
There's no such school.
That's how I'd chart it too. I wish I was a professor in Argentina
>>70371705
what do you mean focus on them though as far as society is concerned? giving them gimmedats would surely fall under the economic category.
I don't see how you can have a collectivist/non-collecitivist difference between social liberals and libertarians.
the law applies equally to everyone. It's all about the individual for both.
>>70369806
That's not bad, however Trump isn't really a mercantilist, and there isn't a linear spectrum from liberal to nationalist to conservative as this would imply. I think the only way to do things like this is and be totally accurate to have many more spectrums. The Left-Right dichotomy is usually an awful descriptor of ideologies outside the mainstream.
>Nationalist Mercantilism
We israel now
>>70369806
Expressing these ideas along a line is retarded and inaccuracy places some ideas close to unrelated ideas.
>>70372250
Damn, your Proff hit the nail on the fucking head.
Good stuff
>>70369806
I just feel good knowing our country is so important that you have to learn about our elections while we dont even know who your chieftan or whatever is
>>70369806
What the absolute fuck is that scale of economies?
/pol/ BTFO
>>70373315
>have to learn
umm, it's not part of the program
someone asked and he replied
>>70369806
Political beliefs aren't one-dimensional.
>>70369806
Why is he equating cities with people?
>>70369806
thats actually fairly accurate
>>70372632
To defeat the Jew you must first become the Jew
>implying political ideologies can be placed on a spectrum
It's actually pretty accurate though
Wow, I'm impressed.
Cruz supported Keynetian-ish economic policies before tho
>>70374630
It has to deal with economic policy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Boys
>>70374630
There is a chicago school of economics, as well as an austrian school of economics.
The chicago boys went to places like chile and estonia to give them advice on their economy.
they turned out quite well imo
>>70369806
Clinton is not a progressive, and liberalism should not be placed anywhere on the left.
And cruz is a republican, not a conservative.
>>70369963
Oh, I've got some bad news for you Argentinian bro....
>>70372318
It's in Tucson, my man. what are you talking about?
>>70369806
Seems very accurate. Props to your prof for not pushing propaganda
>>70369806
I don't disagree with it. Mercantilism has become the way that the talking heads have used to describe Trump' economic values. I think that's a little simplistic. We should be patriotic about our economy with a concern for the wealth of the nation as a whole and our ability, together, to compete with the rest of the world.
>>70374630
>not knowing about the chicago and austrian schools of economic thought
newfag
>>70369806
On society, I'd put Cruz farther over to the right. He has a libertarian streak in him.
>>70371855
Kek
>>70369806
Pretty accurate.
>>70372318
>There's no such school.
Yes there is.
>>70374630
please return with some basic knowledge of economic theory
>>70369806
Trump is LITERALLY GOD
>>70374630
Trump is American School of Economics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)
>It is the macroeconomic philosophy that dominated United States national policies from the time of the American Civil War until the mid-twentieth century.[2][3][4][5][6][7] Closely related to mercantilism, it can be seen as contrary to classical economics. It consisted of these three core policies:
>protecting industry through selective high tariffs (especially 1861–1932) and through subsidies (especially 1932–70)
>government investments in infrastructure creating targeted internal improvements (especially in transportation)
>a national bank with policies that promote the growth of productive enterprises rather than speculation.[8][9][10][11]
Any Mexican warlocks here? What do you think of the chart? Good juju or bad jewjew?
>Trump isn't Keynesian
Top kek, his policies are pure Keynes, which is why economists like Krugman have been quiet this election.
Not a bad thing btw, Keynesian economics is GOAT. The libs only practice a meme tier version of it
>>70377454
That kind of sounds like Whig politics to me. It actually doesn't really strike me as particularly conservative...
why is cruz in red for both
where is bernie in blue
>>70369806
yes
>>70369963
LOL there's no such college moron.
Are you Eddie Murphy in Coming to America?
>>70369806
In purely ECONOMIC terms, yeah.
Entry level high school autists this is the sum total of all social questions and politics though.
>>70377879
Yes there is
It's in Tuscon and has 40,000 students
Are you so retarded you can't do a quick google to make sure you're not posting bullshit?
>>70377618
>Keynesian economics is GOAT
>>70369806
pretty much yes
Trump is a commonsense nationalist
pretty crazy that ideologues like sanders and cruz are taken more seriously by the media
I just hope he redpills people by november
>>70372318
>>70377879
Dumb.
>>70369806
Accurate but a bit too reductive to be very informative.
>>70369806
your professor is pretty smart.
>>70369806
looks like the simplicity of the graph is hurting his thesis. besides I'm pretty sure that collectivism vs individualism is the right way to compare, the word inclusive in the farther left doesn't belong there.
>chicago under conservatism and not libertarianism
>>70369806
the bottom scale. it does not work like that.
>>70369806
Clinton might damn well be a monetarist. The Goldwater never left her system. Sanders is closer to post Keynes and had a few acolytes of them on his staff. Trump has articulated some protectionism so I'd be willing to believe he'd be closer to keynes. Cruz strikes me as a supply sider.
>>70369806
Your professor is an idiot. The bottom scale is just pants on head retarded.
Seems very accurate to me.
If there's one word I would use to describe trump it would be nationalist.
Sanders would be towards marx.
Clinton and Cruz would be your typical dem and neo con.
I would say Trump is slightly right though.
Things are all backwards compared to the rest of the world for what's left and what's right though.
>>70369806
>Clinton
>progressive
>not that shitty kind of nationalism that leads to useless wars because "hey, soldiers are disposable anyways"
uh..
yeah actually
this is the first left-right chart I've seen that isn't shit
>>70369806
>Not using a triangle
Pleb-tier scale.
Real scale:
Triangle between Order, Liberty and Equality.
The Left wants to increase equality at the expense of order and liberty.
The Old Right wants to increase order at the expense of equality and liberty
The Libertarian Right wants to increase liberty at the expense of equality and order
>>70369806
I think its quite good except for Trump being a Mercantilist.
>>70377618
>Trump isnt Keynesian
>Keynesian economics is GOAT
god where do i even start with this
>>70379961
>Mercantilist
Yeah failed economics work in 2016!
>>70380127
>failed economic policies
>what built the country until we decided 'lol lets just print money and see what happens holmes'
>>70379892
you can clearly see how painfully crammed that thing is
wake up and take the quadrilateral red pill my friend
>>70380302
>Square
>Implying you can have both absolute liberty and absolute equality
Nope, dropped.
Triangle is best.
Square is leftist propaganda.
You are always sacrificing something.
Perfect equality is impossible without losing some liberty in the process. (Or vice-versa)
>>70369806
>left-right spectrum
Any one who uses 2-dimensional political thinking is wrong.
>>70377618
>Keynes is GOAT
Enjoy your stagflation faggot
>>70377879
It's real retard
http://www.arizona.edu/
>>70369806
Nationalist is in the middle? Why?
