[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
What if we made abortion illegal for white women, but not minorities?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 4
File: white-woman.jpg (494 KB, 849x565) Image search: [Google]
white-woman.jpg
494 KB, 849x565
What if we made abortion illegal for white women, but not minorities? After all, institutionally white women hold much greater privilege and power than non white women, and banning them from getting abortions would be a very effective way to close the privilege gap.
>>
>>70345723
I bet a lot of tumblerinas would agree with this.
>>
It's unconstitutional to do so

No matter the amount of meddling Jews, PC dystopians, typhoons of beached whales or blm shitposters, the law disallows discrimination based on race and ACLU would be up the ass of who ever try to do it.
>>
Are racists really this dumb?
>>
>>70345723
Because that sends out a message that only white people should be saved. Doesn't fucking matter if you think that's true, making a policy like that will NEVER happen in the West.
>>
>>70345723

>White women giving away ANY of their privilege

Thatwillneverhappen.jpg
>>
>>70346208

it's not unconstitutional to ban the murder of white children you nigger.
>>
>>70347414
It is to make a law that does something to only 1 race.
>>
>>70347535

Okay, then fuck your constitution, now what?
>>
>>70348025
Then do it, who cares at that point?
>>
>>70348249

I'm glad we agree on that. Have a good day sir.
>>
>>70346208
>>70347414
>>70347535
>>70348025

This guy >>70346597 makes a good point.

>>70348249
>>70348420
>>
>>70348420
Hey, you too, anon
>>
File: FUND IT.jpg (90 KB, 525x342) Image search: [Google]
FUND IT.jpg
90 KB, 525x342
>>70345723
I've given the solution many times but noone seems to get it;

You need to subsidise minorities' abortions from white abortions, ergo:

If both parents are white, the abortion fee is 300% higher than it is today. If one of the parents is white it gets 150% of the todays price (cause we need even the halfies gonne)

And all the extra money go to free abortions for minorities.

So with a policy like this you are not being depicted as racist but as a fucking progressive who deeply cares for minorities and their struggles while genociding them FOR FREE!
>>
File: All-01.jpg (208 KB, 900x598) Image search: [Google]
All-01.jpg
208 KB, 900x598
Here's a better idea.

>Only allow abortions for women who were the victims of rape/incest and those who are poor.
>Because minorities, particularly blacks and Hispanics, are disproportionately poor, they will be the only ones who will go for it considering poor whites tend to be very anti-abortion

>On the flip-side, do what Nazi Germany did and give large loans (100k or so) to young couples "with good enough credit".
>It's a loan, so you will have to pay it back, but with every child you have, the loan is reduced by 25% or so. It only counts if the babies are born of the two married parents, and the loan forgiveness is repealed if they opt for a no-fault divorce.
>Only allow for these loans to be given to top portion of states that vote the most conservatively, thus assuring that the only people who'll take part in these miniature baby booms will be white folks in states that don't have many liberal areas to them.

And the best part is that because they are all voluntary and are not based on race, nobody can be accused of genocide.
>>
The only races that's keeping the replacement rate up are blacks and hispanics. If you generalize the abortion bans to all minorities, you're actually hurting groups that were already below the replacement rate, and could actually use some help.
>>
>>70345723
This sounds like the next great trolling of tumblr
>>
>>70345723
Black men would rape white women even more than now, knowing that there's no possibility of them ever having a child that way.
>>
>>70347535

Not true. There just has to be a compelling state interest. Obviously nothing is more threatening to national security than white privilege
>>
File: deebly.png (98 KB, 600x500) Image search: [Google]
deebly.png
98 KB, 600x500
>>70348813
Aaaaand once again noone gets it

>mfw
Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 4

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.