>Seven in 10 people, including close to half of Republican voters, have an unfavorable view of Trump, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. It’s an opinion shared by majorities of men and women; young and old; conservatives, moderates and liberals; and whites, Hispanics and blacks — a devastatingly broad indictment of the billionaire businessman.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ap-gfk-poll-americans-overwhelmingly-view-trump-negatively-075414024--election.html
BTFO
T
F
O
>/pol/ ignores this thread
kek
>>70336398
POL ON FUCKING SUICIDE WATCH
HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER FROM THIS?
they also have an unfavourable view of hillary clinton, so if she wins the democratic nomination then trump will have somebody to shit on and hopefully btfo
>>70337335
I guess you want the Democrats to win so you and your 10 kids can live in America.
>unfavorable view
Literally an invention of the media to generate narratives
>he isn't a hillary plant I swear!!!
Republicans are done for. They better hope the can still take the Supreme Court Justice deal obama gave them because they're losing congress too.
>claims to be unfavorable
>winning the fuck out of the primary
lel get this cuck propaganda out of here
I love how the MSM is trying so hard to stop us from MAGA, well guess what? It aint fucking working. I'm going to go donate $0 dollars to Donald becomes out this.
>>70337335
>every mexican has to show his anxiety in a trump thread of building the wall for americans
>WE SET OUT WITH THE PREDETERMINED GOAL TO PROVE THAT TRUMP IS UNFAVOURABLE
>OUR SPECIFICALLY ENGINEERED METHODS TO PROVE OUT PRESUMPTION FOUND THAT TRUMP IS UNFAVOURABLE
Gotta love the MSM's 'doubt yourself' tactic.
>>70337452
Allahu ackbar, am i rite?
>>70337533
>weeb supporting Trump
KEK
>>70336398
Holy shit BTFO
How will /po/ ever recover?
>>70336398
>Unfavorable views
>Still winning
okay bud
It must the Teh Wymins and Niggers and Spics Oh My
>>70337652
>/po/
How will you ever recover?
>>70337642
>>70337335
>Spic asspain.
>7 out of 10 men in southside chicago
this demoralization is propaganda 101
>Yahoo
>owned by successless womyn
>she's literally ruined the joint
>also they run tumblr
>yahoo is basically tumblr
whats the bet the survey was done on tumblr?
>>70337452
>they also have an unfavourable view of hillary clinton,
No where nears as unfavorable as Trump and most Democrats view her favorably. Us elections are about turning out your base.
>>70337492
The highest support anyone claims trump has is around 50% of republican voters. That means half of the republicans don't support him and, since he is a republican, none of the democrats do and there are more democrats than republicans. 7/10 people against trump seems about right.
>>70336398
Yeah im feeling the energy drop rapidly...
I am now a cruzmssile
>>70336398
lol
welcome to every American election between the douche and the giant turd. Nobody likes political candidates in general because there's almost always something that reeks about them.
Shillary doesn't have it any better, and she might even have it worse. She might seriously get recommended for indictment for the FBI. The Justice Department will clear her, but a pall will hang over her candidacy forever if it happens. She'll be as good as politically dead. The Panama Papers expose is hurting her too. The people who are voting for her are either establishment puppets, literally ignorant or willfully stupid (older women voting for her out of identity politics). Few people like her and even among her supporters, only 30% are enthusiastic about a Clinton presidency according to polls.
A lot of people dislike Trump and I imagine a lot of people dislike Sanders and Cruz too, but at least among their supporters there is much more enthusiasm. I can't even say the same for Shillary except among very specific, small (virtually negligible) and narrow demographics.
>>70336398
>Using KnowledgePanel to collect information
This is all the opinion of niggers and spics, who else has time to fill in a questionare worth a $1 payout for a random "marketing" company.
Jesus this is cancer.
>>70337685
>mainstream media
>polls
>>70336398
>implying eople won't say they'd vote Trump in fear of being mobbed by Bernouts and BLM.
>>70338091
>Shillary doesn't have it any better, and she might even have it worse.
See>>70337928
>>70337928
>>70337928
>>70337928
>>70337928
>>70337928
>>70337928
Trump has been doing this with huge success.
Democrat turnout is extraordinarily low.
>>70337928
>most democrats view her favorably
Yes, technically. But 49% vs 47% isn't all that much of a lead and you have to ignore the people who are undecided about her.
>>70336398
Glad they went round the entire country, and asked every single person who was of voting age!
What a dedicated team, to delve into the ghettos and establish the truth!
After this I'm surely becoming a ratto rambler.
>>70338212
>Democrat turnout is extraordinarily low.
In primaries, as Nate Silver already pointed out, primary turnout =/= general election. Only 30% of Republicans support Trump. Trumptards are in the minority in the GOP, and he will not be the nominee. EAT SHIT TRUMPTARDS
>>70338176
You remind me of my dad who says that Obama doesn't mean the things he says he is just afraid of being criticized by other people.
And just for the record, negativity mostly drives people to stay at home and be buttblasted on election day rather than fervently vote against the candidates they dislike. Enthusiasm is what drives people to the polls in mass numbers. That's what Obama had in 2008. It's not what Hillary has in 2016. It is, however, what Trump and Republicans in general have in 2016.
>>70337428
I don't get this image.
>>70338238
>But 49% vs 47% isn't all that much of a lead and you have to ignore the people who are undecided about her.
A lot of Republicans said they would not vote for Trump if he's the nominee (protip: he won't). 20 percent said they would vote Libertarian Party, 10% said they would vote for Hilary, and another 10% won't vote.
>>70336398
Reagan had numbers worse than Trump's at this point.
Shill harder faggot
>>70338278
>Putting your faith in Nate Silver
>Putting your faith in a man that has been consistently BTFO this cycle
>Only 30% of Republicans support Trump.
The same argument can be made for any Republican candidate running, right now.
>Trumptards are in the minority in the GOP
Polling data has, for quite some time, indicated that Trump would beat all others (including Lubio) in a two way primary.
>Eat shit TRUMPTARDS
I know this is b8, but Constitutional Conservatism is cancer.
>yfw trump loses
>>70338346
You seem to be missing that Trump is the only candidate that can provoke liberals to vote just to prevent him from becoming president. They may not have enthusiasm now, but they will if Trump gets the nomination.
>>70337959
When the republicans realize he's the only way to beat shillary they'll support him, as will the people who aren't in either party, and even some democrats
>>70336398
>Article says that more people have an unfavorable view of Cruz than Shillary
Yeah, I don't believe this. Cruz is just the GOP's useful idiot. Cunton is actively malevolent
>>70338491
>>70338501
[Citation Needed]
ITT: "Haha yes I can't wait until white western civilization dies once Trump loses, ebin"
>>70338110
>niggers and spics
Says Aruba
>>70338483
>The same argument can be made for any Republican candidate running, right now.
Trump isn't the same as the rest of the GOP candidates. He's not a Republican anon and said several times he will run third party.
>Polling data has, for quite some time, indicated that Trump would beat all others (including Lubio) in a two way primary.
His polling numbers are collapsing nationwide since last week. He's campaign is collapsing, and he will not win enough delegates to get the nominee.
>I know this is b8, but Constitutional Conservatism is cancer.
I agree, that's why I'm a Sanders supporter.
>>70336398
>le politically correct survey man
Did they do this "poll" in the middle of Detroit?
Everyone I know loves him and I live in a blue state.
>>70338491
fuck off Rachid
>>70338659
Your mad is showing, faggot.
>>70338681
>Trump isn't the same as the rest of the GOP candidates
That's not a refutation, nigger. It's completely irrelevant.
>His polling numbers are collapsing nationwide
No, they're actually not.
>Sanders supporter
There's a good part of me that actually believes you're being serious, now. Only a Sanders supporter would be stupid enough to have posted the arguments you've made in this thread.
>>70338091
>but a pall will hang over her candidacy forever if it happens.
It won't. Unless the media makes a constant shitstorm over it, the indictment will fade into the memories of most voters. Meanwhile the media will be blasting the airwaves with
"Trump did some something irrelevant and now we're going to spin it into a week long expo on his secret racism" and secure shillary the election.
>>70338661
Says America, you have more.
>>70338737
>Everyone I know loves him and I live in a blue state.
What state you live in? Everyone in my blue state hate his guts.
>>70338621
The same can be said about the post I was replying to. Or just about any post in this thread. That is the difference between having a conversation and writing a paper.
>>70338659
"White western civilization" is already dead in the US.
Don't care what anyone else thinks...
Only care what I think...
Still voting Trump!!
Suck it OP.
>>70338954
You're going beyond having a conversation, you're arguing a point.
Existing data does correlate with what the other anon said. Meanwhile, you have nothing to back up what you said.
>>70338769
Not even close baby.
>>70338091
I've actually heard that Obama is likely to just blanket pardon her once the FBI recommends indictment, and then have Biden step in to run.
>>70338501
I'm not missing anything. That may motivate some people to vote him down but it won't energize most of the base. There have been plenty of Republican candidates who liberals have hated throughout the years. In many cases they were so disillusioned with their own horse in the race that they still decided not to vote. According to polling, 33% of Sanders' supporters already decided they won't vote for Hillary if she gets the nomination with another segment of them being undecided. A lot of them will stay around and fap on election day and some might protest vote for a third party (negligible numbers probably, though).
Campaigns of negativity don't drive people, dude. They just result in elections with dismally low voter turnout. Clinton's message is not resonating with some very important demographics that she cannot afford to lose. She's missing out on a lot of the bread and butter of the Democratic base. Trump's message is really resonating with his key supporters, and I think he can win over the rest of the Republicans (maybe minus evangelicals) and moderate independents.
and your logic doesn't work anyways, because Shillary is detested among Republicans. She ought to be just as galvanizing on their side.
What Trump really needs is a better organizational apparatus. His ground game has sucked in a lot of primary states. He needs to work on that and getting his voters to actually haul their asses to the polls. Honestly, Hillary's campaign has not done such an outstanding job of getting her supporters out to vote either. Even though she's winning the primaries, most of the innovation for driving support on the Democratic side has come from the Sanders camp. They've created apps and done all sorts of shit to get the vote out. If it wasn't for Clinton's name recognition and the support of the mainstream media, she might be losing right now.
>insulting Donald Trump didn't work
>let's release a bunch of fake polls to trick people
Soros isn't very good at manipulation.
> every network and both parties are terrified of him
> push news stories literally calling him Hitler for months
Gee I wonder why?
>>70339060
Then post the data that says liberals won't go to the polls to vote against Trump. Show me that I'm wrong. Until then you are making an assertion and mine is as valid as yours.
>>70338903
No way dude. There was a firestorm over her emails. There will be hell over a recommendation of indictment. She will be finished. There are many things she can cover up, but if the FBI seriously believes that wrongdoing took place and recommends it, her campaign will tailspin. This is one thing the media will not ignore. They've played patty cake on a lot of other things with her, but there's too much drama from the headlines about how the Justice Department will handle her indictment, etc. When the average voter finds out about it, many will be appalled, particularly independents (not so much Democrats). That's really bad for Hillary because she's already losing the independent vote as it is.
>>70339354
I'm not the one making the claim, nigger. That's you.
>>70339510
There will be a recommendation of indictment for sure from the FBI, at the very least there is criminal negligence with Top Secret information.
>>70339632
I think so too. The timing is important though. If it's recommended after she's secured the nomination then the whole Democratic party is done. Trump will coast to the White House. If they do it quickly then the Dems have time to sort it out and maybe use a brokered convention to install their new favorite pick (maybe Biden will rethink taking up the mantle).
>>70336398
This just in: New study reveals OP is in fact a faggot and loves to have cocks in and around his mouth
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ap-gfk-poll-OP-takes-many-dicks-at-same-time-07541488--generalnews.html
Trump is going to lose, get over it. You're all going to be mocked and derided for the next 8 years.
>>70336398
>Online polls
>Useful for anything
Literally ANYONE can vote on those things, and I'm willing to bet more than half of those are people who can't even vote for our next president.
>>70337959
I think its normal, desu. Usually I hate repub nominees and don't bother voting even in primaries. I sat out a number of elections. Let the usual scum sit this one out, they are not a majority anyway. They disenfranchised half their electorate, what do you expect?
>>70337492
>>70337549
once trump wins the nomination and starts blowing sjw cock to beat hillary this wont be an issue
>>70336398
>>70336398
>Yahoo
~1,000 people was the sample size.
>>70340439
Most likely
They'd never widely publish a poll that shows Trump winning on a mass scale (as evidenced by his support)
>>70340613
No, I read the report. It was around 1,000 people.
>>70338278
>Nate Silver
Oh yeah I remember when he thought Jeb would win even when the primary elections got going
>>70340825
In the OP link or from another source?
>>70336398
Polls are a joke. They should be banned in democracies. They are all privately owned and have the sole intent of manufacturing a false consensus.
>>70336398
>no one likes trump
>that's why he is winning
juden, pls
"People selected for KnowledgePanel who didn’t otherwise have access to the Internet were provided access at no cost to them."
>>70338381
The reality of truth sets in
Registered dem I'm NY, feeling the bern at the primary (didn't switch in time) but supporting trump in the general. MAGA faggots
>>70341044
The OP link links it to this: http://ap-gfkpoll.com/featured/ap-gfk-poll-americans-overwhelmingly-view-trump-negatively
Where it says it was close to 1,100 people and doesn't give any other information about the poll.
>>70341441
>feeling the bern at the primary
What is actually wrong with you?
You can win the presidency with 22% of the popular vote if your prioritize low population states
https://www.squarefree.com/2004/11/01/winning-an-election-with-22-of-the-popular-vote/
>>70341563
Wow. That's a new level of media lies.
This needs to be spread everywhere. This "poll" is rendered bunk when compared to your average Trump rally. Which usually gets no less than 10k. 30k at larger venues.
If Trump is hated that much then all the other candidates must be hated more.
>>70336398
>The AP-GfK Poll of 1,076 adults was conducted online March 31-April 4, using a sample drawn from GfK’s probability-based KnowledgePane
>1,076
HOLY FUCK, IT'S OVER
TRUMP IS FINISHED.
THE 7 OUT OF 10 PEOPLE OUT OF THE 1076 HAVE SPOKEN.
JUST SHUT EVERYTHING DOWN, CLOSE THE BOARD.
>>70336398
I've been dilligently doing my missionary duty so I'm going to assume these pols are fallacious.
>>70336398
only 7 out of 10 that must be skewed polling 11 out of 10 normies I know wouldnt piss on donna tramp just to drown the dumb bitch
>Trump has hundreds of millions spent on negative ads against him
>has the entire GOP establishment conspiring against him
>has the entire media constantly screaming REEEEEEEEE at him
>still only marginally less unpopular than Hillary
I think we'll be fine.
>>70341661
Interesting but that will never happen. Some "small states" in the article would never go to Trump ie) Colorado.
>>70342303
>online poll
DISREGARDED.
>>70342303
>Not knowing how stats works
1000 is generally a good representative sample
>>70342303
>online
>using a sample drawn from GfK’s probability-based KnowledgePane
>GfK
>literal shilling company
You can't make this shit up.
>>70336398
No fucking shit. Trump doesn't stand a chance in the general election.
>>70337492
>>70337549
I bet if they showed Trump having a favorable view you wouldn't say that.
>all this damage control in this thread
>muh reagan
>muh shill
>lalalalalal I can't hear you everyone loves Trump lalalalalal
Clinton will be the next president and it will because of shitty Republicans pushing their shitty candidates. When the Republican's rights go away they only have themselves to blame for pushing such unelectable people
>>70342303
>1076 adults
How brilliant and influential must these people be to extrapolate so much from their opinions?
>>70336398
So why haven't all these people who have unfavorable views of Trump voted against him in the primaries?
>>70336398
>Verbatim the first sentence
>"For Americans of nearly every race, gender, political persuasion and location, disdain for Donald Trump runs deep"
>every gender
stopped reading there
Hee hee! Jewpa gump can't stick it to us. He fucking IS us now. With jewbabies to prove it. Counting shekels.....
We own his fat ass.
>>70337521
>doesn't account for democrats
>on pace for a brokered convention
>>70339510
>This is one thing the media will not ignore
they swept her emails under the rug. what makes you think they won't do the same for the indictment?
>>70343490
I have one that can see!
>>70342581
No but the point is that combined with the expected low D turnout this year, pushing in small states blue you don't normally push in could be a big factor
>>70343730
Dems are already defecting more than ever just for Trump. All we need is that Webb endorsement.
>>70336398
Yahoo literally owns Tumblr and relentlessly shills against Trump, I don't think there's a single positive article.
>>70336398
Democrat here voting Trump. I don't care what he does. I am not voting Hillary and all the name-calling in the world won't change that. They lost my vote.
>>70336398
Reminder that the writers of the article: Emily Swanson and Julie pace are commie hivemind
