Well Well Well...
Has anyone properly taken down this argument?
Seems pretty water-tight tbph senpai.
fuck off
saged
>>70330566
>raging virgin
sorry you can't get laid bro
>>70330539
>compared women to cereal.
Yet he identifies as a feminist and panders to teenage girls. I predict a similar situation like Jared's in his future.
>argument
>about an individual's requirements for dating
>>70330539
His analogy literally commercialises sex, woman are a one dimensional product to be consumed and tossed aside for NEW cereal brand. At the end of it, sex becomes a meaningless experience of going through the motions, just like eating cereal. So you're right, its airtight.
It's just so great that women are finally free and sexism is over! :^)
>>70330539
Sure. I'll stop shaming female sexuality when we destigmatize male sexuality. I like to dominate, I think young women are hot, and I want to fuck as many as I can.
Also people aren't cereal and cereal doesn't give you herpes or babies
>do you think it matters how many people she slept with?
Yes if you care about the identity of your child and not getting horrible STDs.
It's almost as if there's some biological reason they are so distasteful.
It's like a double whammy of "why to avoid sluts when looking for a relationship"
>>70330539
I just don't like the idea that 48 dicks have been in my cereal.
What's the argument exactly?
>>70330539
>>70330539
Gee I wonder if the fact that someone has failed to create many stable relationships is an indicator that I may not be able to create a stable relationship with them.
>>70330539
Would you rather have a new car or a car that's been a rental for the last decade?
/thread
>>70330942
There you go. Suddenly the memed has become the memer. You don't have to refute the argument, you just have to make him seem less than progressive.
>>70330539
Yes. Multiple times infact.
>>70330539
We don't care if John Green likes eating cereal after 48 dicks are in it.
>>70330539
>>70331581
Ha I was gonna say something like that "if you could have an unopened coke, or one that's had 48 penises in it which would you choose?" And also I highly doubt he'd ever argue for the reverse. Like telling a girl who doesn't want to date a player or man whore to "stop being so judgemental of his past! Just cause he's slept around and never really liked any of those girls doesn't mean he'll be the same to you!"
>>70330539
Analogies are almost never water tight.
>>70330539
>Has anyone properly taken down this argument?
Yes
PSA arguments by analogy are always false
>>70331711
this
/thread
Sage it fucker!
>>70330539
How would you feel if your cheerios were full of other men's semen though coupled with a bunch of STDs huh riddle me this you cunt
>>70330824
go reply on trump general then
>>70331305
>>70330953
His argument is about the general double standard people have on this issue
try reading between the lines once in a while
>>70331495
>>70331558
If someone has stds or a baby that's a different story. Someone who simply has had a lot of previous sexual partners is not the same as someone who had lots of partners AND got sick or a baby. Don't equivocate.
>>70331581
>>70331711
>>70331819
Cooties. You can always identify the teens who join this thread because they argue, cooties.
Next time you hug or shake hands with someone think about all the places their hand has been. Also good luck using silverware at a restaurant or hotel sheets. LOL
>>70330539
>people and human relationships are comparable to consumer goods
Sums up modern degeneracy pretty nicely.
>>70330539
Well, there's that thing with flys . . . Where unprotected sex having sperm affect the genes of a completely different pregnancy with a different man.
If that is true. Hahah holy shit hilarious.
>>70330539
It's not about the number, its what the number represent. If I've eaten 48 different cereals and now I'm eating Cheerios, how can Cheerios at all trust that I won't just abandon them for another cereal, something I've done 47 times prior.
TL:Dr John Green is a pedo cuck
>>70330539
Also it pretty much shows either poor impulse control (if it's casual), lack of long term planning (if she was constantly getting played) or just a different value on sex than what I have if she's just so "open" about hooking up with guy friends or whatever. Not to mention most likely she has low self esteem and it's just a way to convince herself she had value. Also statistically more likely to cheat, have std/sti etc
>comparing cereals to sex
Would you eat soggy cereal?
>>70330539
Good thing a dick doesn't get more stretched out and mutated every time you use it.
If someone was putting their dick into my cheerios, there would be a fucking problem.
>how to modern feminist
>find something that vaguely supports your stupid opinions
>post it everywhere
>OMG EXACTLY THIS LOLOLOL>
>>70331986
>>70332303
Yeah way to ignore my point. It rally isn't THAT much of s double standard as I know many girls, who even have had a few sex partners, would NOT be open to dating a known man whore or player, and even if they were that's THEIR choice and doesn't affect my choice of not wanting to date a slut
>>70332303
No one cares what his opinion is. People have a right to date only virgins or only whores if that is their choice. There's no argument to be had about someone living their life when it hurts no one.
>>70332303
> STDs
> Cooties
Whatever.
>>70330539
The example he used with cheetos isn't exactlty comparable. Women are degraded upon for having slept with multiple partners because women create eggs, which they can only create every so often before pregnancy, and they have to choose wisel their partner for darwinian reasons.
Men on the other hand have a potentially
Infinite amount of sperm and don't have to be as careful.
>though this sterotype does exist, it's still fuckin gross on both genders who have had multiple partners.
>AIDS, Don't get it, its bad for you
>>70332303
It's not about having STDs or kids, it's about taking that risk with little or no insurance. In my experience most promiscuous women haven't enforced safe sex with me. Their birth control is abortion and their STD prevention is "hey you're clean, right"?
I'm no pure soul, and neither is my wife, but these ideas aren't hard to grasp. Risky behavior is a red flag and both my wife and I are spending our 30s cleaning up messes we made in our 20s which risky sexuality behavior is absolutely a canary in a coal mine. If I were a higher caliber person I would have the right to demand a higher caliber mate.
>>70330539
Yes it does matter how many people you have slept with especially woman. A man alone can inpregnate thousands if not more woman by himself in a short spam of time, that's why having men fucking around a lot of woman its endorsed. Woman on the other hand can have just a handfull of kids in her life time, that's why they have to choose only the best males to have children with, and that's why being a fucking HO is not good.
Is just evolution really just think about it.
>>70330716
>not being a celibate monk
Sorry you can't think of anything but sex bro
>>70330539
Key and lock "problem" you can fool yourself but you cant fool nature.
>>70330539
>implying we can overwrite evolution
Men are meant to fuck lots of women to spread the dominant genes, if women fuck lots of men then they cannot guarantee it is the alphas baby, and as such are a failure to their species.
No argument can really trump this, we cannot escape our nature entirely.
>>70330539
It's a bad analogy. The way to look at is this:
Hey, I heard you like to have a delicious sandwich. You can have this one. It was only touched 27 other people. And someone took a bite out of it. But you should be grateful for a sandwich anyway.
Statistics show that the more sexual partners you have had, the more unstable you are. Based relationships i have been in and the people i have met this stands true in my eyes.
I also consider having had a fuckton of sexual partners nasty as shit and it hurts my pride as a man to date you. I hold myself to the same standard and also have COMPLETE understanding if you don't respect my stance on the subject.
Look i posted it again!
I don't like to eat a bowl of cereal that 10 guys have already chewed.
Sexuality, modern sexuality in particular is largely dominated by women in terms of the selection process.
It has always been, and still is the status quo for men to appease and impress females to attract mates It's a natural process in all mammals, and even fowl for example.
The shaming stems from the fact that males in today's society are the ones that court while the women select the mates. When a woman is particularly promiscuous it counteracts this basic natural hierarchy and the fact that she doesn't appear as selective sends the signal that she's somehow unable to uphold the genetic status quo which is of course mostly frowned upon.
A lock any key can unlock is a shitty lock but a key that can unlock any lock is a master key if you get what I mean
>>70330539
It's crazy how this man is so cucked he forgot a relationship's goal is too last
If you just say "I enjoy you like I did with the 10 past ones and will with the 10 following you", you aint giving an impression of wanting that
Of course it matters. Having lrge numbers of sexual partners spreads disease, risks creating unwanted children, cheapens emotional attachment, and decays the social supremely of the family unit.
Women should be more judgmental and choosy over promiscuous men, not men less judgmental and choosy over promiscuous women.
>>70330539
THE SAME REDDIT SHILL POSTS THIS EVERY DAY THE SAME REDDIT SHILL POSTS THIS EVERY DAY THE SAME REDDIT SHILL POSTS THIS EVERY DAY THE SAME REDDIT SHILL POSTS THIS EVERY DAY
>>70332303
>If someone has stds or a baby that's a different story. Someone who simply has had a lot of previous sexual partners is not the same as someone who had lots of partners AND got sick or a baby. Don't equivocate.
I don't get in the car and ride around with friends who drink and drive, speed, and run red lights all the time. It doesn't matter if they haven't yet has an accident, that's just them being lucky, it doesn't mean that they are making safe, pro-social decisions.
>>70330539
does it matter if i want to fuck you and you have fucked a lot of other people... kinda. you have a increased likely hood to have some std.
you might have the herp about 63% of the population of the planet has the herp
besides that however its not a issue unless we are talking marriage. you are not marriage material if you have fucked to many people. you like to browse. odds are you will never be happy and you will need to change sexual partners often until nobody wants you anymore
>>70332303
>KEK ALERT
Did you really just dismiss every instinct in your body telling you that sluts are cancer because some jews told you to? Ignore the studies that say women with more past sexual partners are more likely to cheat, less likely to be happy, and more likely to get a divorce. Complete nonsense, I'm sure.
Ya bro, I have no idea why men and women, two completely different creatures with different minds, bodies, and roles, are held to different standards. Real fucking mystery to me.
