>When asked if victims of a gun crime should be able to sue the manufacturer during an exclusive interview with the Daily News last week, Sanders said, “No, I don’t.”
How does he expect to win over liberal voters when he won't even take a hard line stance against guns?
>>70326501
He doesn't take hard stances, only weak ones
>>70326501
Hasn't this shit already been ruled on by the Supreme Court? Why the fuck are people talking about bullshit non issues!? Same with abortion, same with fucking Citizens United v. FEC, fucking EVERYTHING THEYRE RUNNING ON REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>70326893
Lel
>>70326501
Because he doesn't pander, he does what he believes is right. Which is true, gun manufacturers obviously shouldn't get charged for a crime they couldn't prevent. Plain and simple.
>>70326501
My uncle died in a small plane crash.
I want to sue the manufacturer of the plane, the producer of the fuel, the air and the tree he hit and ignore the fact that he tried to land on a short runway in the woods.
>>70327319
>Because he doesn't pander,
>>70327319
>he doesn't pander
Literally ALL he does is pander
>>70327319
Doesn't pander? I'm dying of laughter now, thanks for that
>>70328262
Cite your proof he panders for votes. Everything he's saying now is the same things he's been saying his entire life. He's a leftwing populist candidate, just because he shares the same core beliefs as the rest of his base doesn't mean he's pandering.
>>70328072
Did the plane manufacturer lobby bribe the US government into allowing the proliferation of assault planes that force other people to acquire assault planes of their own in order to protect themselves?
>>70327063
liberals only care about supreme court decisions when it helps them
He explained it on Morning Joe today, but of courshe the liberal jews in NYC will have none of it.
The NYC rags are in Clinton's back pocket.
>Jew on the cover with "mechants of death" in the corner
>>70328072
>>70328506
Sue the plane manufacturer when the wings break off from a gentle gust, but the rifle worked as intended
>>70328482
Here's him cheating for votes if that works
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DlDgOIdD3BY
>>70328506
except that "assault" rifles aren't predominantly used in crimes try again noguns
>>70328482
From pic related to "I will officially apologize for slavery if elected president"
Pandering to the blacks for votes.
Why don't we punish Dorset basket-weavers for floods in Mosambique? Why don't we punish a US mom & pop store for Hamas rocket attacks?
>>70326501
Why should they sue tho? Its not like the gun had a mind of his own or malfunctioned.
>>70326501
Because if someone sells you something and it works as intended, why do the manufacturers get sued? If you get in a car accident and it's your fault does the other party sue the company who made the car?
I'm Liberal
>>70328506
muh "assault weapons"
>>70326501
Should I have the right to sue the landlord for renting property to someone who ended up being a serial killer?
Should I have the right to sue the car manufacturer because they made a car that a drunk driver drove and killed a pedestrian with?
>>70328506
What you alude to is out of context and seems a very liberal/potato argument.
By your argument we should sue Buick every time a senile old bag runs a red light and causes a wreck.
>>70329103
it's just that it's un-liberal 'n shit
>>70329266
>Should I have the right to sue the landlord for renting property to someone who ended up being a serial killer?
Nah you should have the right to sue the people who built the house, of course.
>>70328963
Because, as a liberal in the US, you don't have a prayer of being elected if you don't pander to niggers.
People who don't have jobs or stable families to worry about vote in mighty impressive numbers if you threaten to take dey gibz away.
>>70328072
Were there any survivors?
>>70326501
I agree with sanders on this point at least.
Unless the gun suddenly decided to explode in my hands when operating under ideal conditions, or some material in the grip turned out to be carcinogenic or something else hazardous, there is no grounds to sue the gun manufacturer.
>>70326501
>>70326501
>mfw Bernie actually said something smart for once
>>70327063
SCOTUS isn't involved in this. Congress passed a law banning these lawsuits 10 years ago and libs want to repel it.
>>70328506
>bribe the US government
Stopped reading there leafcuck
Sanders was raised in a community that hunted a lot so he's okay with guns
>>70326501
But they shouldn't be allowed to, though.
>>70328482
>"White people don't know what it's like to be poor. "
>>70328963
He already sponsored a bill about this in the past.
How is this now pandering?
>>70334498
What bill and what did it say?
>>70333080
>Wikipedia
>His family was Jewish, and his grandfather was an Orthodox rabbi
LIBS ARE WAKING UP
That's a shocker, considering that modern gun control laws are anti-white.
>>70328506
>liberals
>>70333480
Except for the 90% of them he wants to ban.
>>70328843
>>70328963
>>70334075
A bunch of trumpfags mad because their daddy changes his mind on every position all the time
>>70336038
>this man wants to take your guns and earned income and genderfluid college snowflakes will vote for him to make sure that happens
>>70331989
Yes. His passenger.
>>70326501
>victims of a gun crime should be able to sue the manufacturer
LOL FUCKING HWAT
>>70326501
I'm not even pro gun, to be honest, but why the fuck would you sue the maker of a firearm for something they had no control over?
>>70336047
>deflecting this hard
>>70336703
Name 2 things Trump has been consistent on?
>victims of a gun crime should be able to sue the manufacturer
Idiocracy
>>70336474
I'm not anti-gun, but I think the idea is that some people want essentially ALL guns banned; they see guns as a social problem, and gun producers as contributing to the problem, therefore they will use all available means to attempt to stop it.
>>70336999
The wall and your mother
>>70337663
He even said the wall was negotiable, you stupid faggot
>>70336047
I stand with Rand
>>70327319
>>70328072
>>70328101
>>70328262
>>70328416
Every candidate panders, it's called a campaign. Out of all the presidential candidates, Bernie has stuck with his own ideas whether or not his own party approves of it. You can disagree with him all you want, but at least respect the fact that he doesn't change his entire platform based on whatever's trendy like Hillary and Trump.
>>70336236
>he gon take our gunz
Everyone's been saying that about Obama for 9 years and nobody's had their guns taken away, even when mass shootings have been at an all-time high. It's not going to happen.
People protested against Bernie because he wasn't anti-gun enough.
http://www.courant.com/politics/elections/hc-bernie-sanders-guns-newtown-20160407-story.html
>>70333607
There's a flag.
>>70338838
Jersey has been everywhere lately, more common than Australia actually. It's called a VPN
>>70338666
Don'y be lured into a false sense of security, Satan. The neoliberals have been trying this whole time, and eventually they will make their move. This is an issue that trancends political ideology, both the left and the right know guns are needed so the people have some way to fight back against an oppressive regime, it's the corporatists what want to disarm the people.
>>70333480
They do a lot of hunting in Brooklyn?
>>70339115
>corporatists
By "corporatists," do you mean fascists, private corporations, or do you just not know what you're talking about? Modern liberals are not corporatist.
>>70338666
>Everyone's been saying that about Obama for 9 years and nobody's had their guns taken away
Because the opposing party controls congress.
Are you some kind of halfwit?
>>70326501
>This man attacked me with a spoon
>I'm going to sue the spoon manufacturer
How can people be so retarded they think the manufacturer is in anyway to blame?
>>70336999
>deflecting this hard
(ID is probably different but that same dude)
>>70326893
He takes wide stances.
>>70327319
If we can sue gun makers for what guns do, can we sue nigmoms for what their little dindus dindu?
A guy hit me in the head with a baseball bat. Do I get to sue Louisville Slugger?
Of course they shouldn't, the same as you wouldn't sue a car manufacturer if you got run over. Which libtard came up with this idea in the first place?
>>70326501
This is just retarded leftist justice culture turning onto himself.
According to this line of reasoning you can also sue car manufacturers for people crashing their car when they drunk drive.
You can also sue kitchenware manufacturers when someone does some creative martial arts with a chefs knife.
You can also sue Obama if you get raped by a rabid nigger.
>>70341203
>A guy hit me in the head with a baseball bat. Do I get to sue Louisville Slugger?
Yes, but it probably won't win in the courts. There is no special GOVERNMENT legislation saying that baseball bats can't be sued.
>>70340268
It's a last ditch effort from liberals who want to siphon millions from the gun industry and groups like the NRA, and hope that such industry will eventually collapse in on itself. It's never going to happen because the rationale is fucking stupid, but it becomes another talking point for nutcases to spew out.
>>70339953
Yes they are.
the end, read a book
AbsoutleySubversive.jpeg
>>70336272
Was crashing the plane part of his plan?
