>mfw this is considered a state of the art aircraft carrier in burgerland
>>70307307
Pls don't mate our navy is pathetic
>>70307307
notice how its rear is spread open for other ships. Typical americucks
>>70307307
It's actually got a plane on it it can't be ours.
>>70307414
kekels of shekels my dear lad
>>70307307
>aircraft carrier
>posts amphibious assault ship
>>70307307
At least it doesn't have a ramp, britcuck
>>70307529
Still a piece of garbage
>>70307521
>implying all those ships will be finished by 2020
lel
>>70307307
You don't know what you're doing at all, do you?
>>70307529
I mean, technically the harrier makes it an aircraft carrier... but yeah it's more of a chopper deck that shits out LCMs
>implying the Bongistan Caliphate has a navy
Go face east and pray Ahmed
>>70307521
top kek.
>>70307654
Nah I'm good thanks Juan.
You really picked the worst time to in our entire history to get into a naval pissing contest with the burgers OP.
Sorry burgers op is probably a paki.
>>70307465
NOTE THE BODY LANGUAGE, THE SIGNS ARE ALL THERE
>>70307621
Or indeed ever!
>Britannia rules the waves
MY SIDES
>>70307307
Looks maybe 5 years old which is considered new by military
Also it isn't aircraft carrier
>>70307307
bong pls
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3351736/Watch-Navy-s-largest-stealth-destroyer-paces-sea-trials-radical-design-fitted-ultrapowerful-RAILGUN.html
>>70307915
>mfw one of those ships broke down and had to be towed back to port
>"USA USA USA"
>>70307915
Kek.
FUCKING ANGLE
![97481493[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/BY5dkDC.jpg "97481493[1].jpg")
Implying your aircarriers will help you in Arctis, where next global naval war will be fought
>>70307896
>Serbia
Please, only actual countries may reply.
>>70308000
checked
>>70307307
ships get rusty. Join the Navy as an undesignated Seaman and you will spend four years of your life to remove rust.
>>70308031
Implying anybody has to worry about Russia any more
>>70307915
>600 ft 15.000 ton 'destroyer'
That's bigger than a WWII heavy cruiser.
>>70308067
Reading your media, thats what you do all the time.
>>70307307
A fucking RAMP XD
>>70308111
We invented the hydro bomb.
It's okay.
>>70307307
>guess i'll bite at this bait
Actually it's a amphibious assault ship, designed to ferry a good amount of expeditionary ground troops (marines), to a region near a coast. It's aircraft compliment is limited to helicopters and V/STOL, but the marines are planed on decommissioning the old as fuck harrier in 2015 but it got extended indefintely until the F-35 becomes operational... which looks like never. Same reason why standard F/A-18 hornets got extended to 2025's and the super hornet into the 2030's.
also, the one in your picture is 25 years old. It's service life should be only for 10-15 more years at which point, it will be like milking a dying cow until the utters bleed and it falls over and dies
>also pic related. one of our newer amphibious assault ships, commissioned 2 years ago and much more modernized.
>>70307614
Stop b8ing, it makes the Canterbury look like car ferry
>>70307307
USS Essex is an amphibious assault ship and nowhere in the same class or even league as a state of the art aircraft carrier like the recently launched USS Gerald Ford. The Gerald Ford is the lead ship of a new class of state of the art aircraft carriers.
>>70307915
How long until this becomes a real life metal gear?
R A I L G U N
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/embed/video/1090065.html
>>70307915
Wait a second
>Star Wars railgun
>railgun
>Star Wars
What the fuck
> the only aircraft carrier in the UK
> not even a real aircraft carrier
>>70307973
>Oh no a new thing broke. Must be a complete failure.
t. typical bonglogic
>>70308576
If it's not an aircraft carrier what are those twirly-wurly bumbler-rumblers doing on it?
>>70307973
you're actually thinking of either of the LCS variants which have been a disaster. During the first 1000 days of operational testing, 650+ equipment failures were reported.
thats like saying for every 3 days, 2 of those days something fails.
one of these LCS's were conducting sea trials or some testing shit a while back and they intercepted a drug carrying shit instead of waiting for the coast guard and i shit you not. the engines failed right then and there. The ships movement was uncontrollable just a few hundred yards away from a potential enemy vessel.
those need to be canceled and scraped asap. They also cost 3x as much as they were sold to congress for. like they were sold for mid 200's but now for some bull shit reason cost mid 700's of millions per unit and increasing every year.
as for the zumwalt pictured, it's actually performed decently well although its been super hush hush since many of it's systems are experimental. Like the admiral incharge of the entire surface fleet wants the next one built with the rail gun system we've been developing for the past 10 years. he legit wants to skip the testing experimental phase and go straight to operational. srs.
>>70307414
kek
>>70308710
A
FUCKING
RAMP
>>70308718
>Zumwalt
Speaking of naval procurement disasters...
>>70307521
Don't count the patrol vessels please.
>when burgarians pretend the Argus is 'Murican in movies out of shame
>>70307307
What exactly bugs you about the ship?
The fact that a warship in water gathers dirt?
>>70308718
So basically it's like the F-35 kek
>>70307915
Is penetrating 6 1/2 inch steel plates better than penetrating a 3 inch steel plate?
>>70307686
Why bother posting all of those ships when they will be at the bottom of the sea shortly?
>>70307307
Are you dense or just a daft cunt?
m8 that's a marine amphibious carrier not even a full blown nuclear one at that. That's one of the earliest ever of that class and it's a wonder that thing isn't more rusted.
b8 harder
SWEDEN YES
>>70308576
>UK carrier
>carries American hardware
>>70309085
What exactly is going to sink them?
>>70307307
> Hmm, what devilishly cunning ploy can I construct to harass the Americans today?
> By Jove I've got it!
> I'll poke fun at the one thing that the Americans have that objectively leaves my country behind in every conceivable way!
Try harder next time. There's lots of fat people here, and our president is black; other Brits have had success riffing on that.
>>70309257
Jews
>>70308256
>USS Gerald Ford
At least we give our ships better names
>>70307915
That thing's cheating.
OP, we fucked. As it stands the only thing that our new aircraft carriers can actually carry only exists on US drawing boards. By selling our harriers when we did and making our new aircraft carrires F-35 only, we put ourselves completely at the mercy of teh US.
Honestly I could fucking run this shitshow better than the previous 20 years of clowns have.
Rule 1, Self-sufficiency.
>>70309257
Australians.
>>70309257
Ben Garrison.
>>70308576
The have new ones under construction though...
>>70308256
>Essex
Even our ships have British names
>>70309443
Those ones are stupid and lame and smell
>>70309342
Like the HMS Bend Over and Take It?
>>70307307
>>70308031
The arctic belongs to the mighty Norwegian navy.
>>70309192
Weren't you the same guys that made the biggest ship in the 1600's that then sank immediately after leaving port?
>>70308111
>torpedo boats are a threat and cruisers are too big to take care of them, we need a small escort with small rapid firing guns to take care of them, we'll call it a torpedo boat destroyer
>if we stick torpedoes on them they can threaten bigger ships as well
>if we make our destroyers bigger than their destroyers they can beat them when on patrol
>small torpedo boats and submarines are becoming a threat, and a destroyer is too big to take care of them, we need a small escort with rapid firing guns and depth charges to take care of them, we shall call it a frigate
>fast attack craft and submarines are becoming a threat, and a frigate is too big to take care of them, we need a small escort with rapid firing guns and depth charges to take care of them, we shall call it a corvette
Try again, britanistan.
>>70307915
is this an upside down boat?
>>70307307
still so much better than russian navy
>Mocking the US Navy.
>Fucking Britain.
Japan has a more powerful navy than you. JAPAN. Next you'll be trying to mock the airforce.
>>70309443
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""new"""""""""""""""""""""""""""
definitely not 40 year old tech.
Rest of the world, are you even trying?
>>70307307
That's what Carrier Groups are for you dull cunt. It's just a helo platform. It's not expected to go up against a cruiser or destroyer
>>70309257
>>70309286
>>70309192
Americans have always been fucking atrocious at ASW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Happy_Time
>The British recommended that merchant ships should avoid obvious standard routings wherever possible; navigational markers, lighthouses, and other aids to the enemy should be removed, and a strict coastal blackout be enforced. In addition, any available air and sea forces should perform daylight patrols to restrict the U-boats' flexibility.
>None of the recommendations were followed for several months. Coastal shipping continued to sail along marked routes and burn normal navigation lights. Boardwalk communities ashore were only 'requested' to 'consider' turning their illuminations off on 18 December 1941, but not in the cities; they did not want to offend the tourism, recreation and business sectors.[2] :p186 On 12 January 1942, Admiral Andrews was warned that "three or four U-boats" were about to commence operations against coastal shipping (in fact there were three),[2]:p212 but he refused to institute a convoy system on the grounds that this would only provide the U-boats with more targets.
>When U-123 sank the 9,500-ton Norwegian tanker Norness within sight of Long Island in the early hours of 14 January, no warships were dispatched to investigate, allowing the U-123 to sink the 6,700 ton British tanker Coimbra off Sandy Hook on the following night before proceeding south towards New Jersey. By this time there were 13 destroyers idle in New York Harbor, yet none were employed to deal with the immediate threat, and over the following nights U-123 was presented with a succession of easy targets, most of them burning navigation lamps. At times, U-123 was operating in coastal waters that were so shallow that they barely allowed it to conceal itself, let alone evade a depth charge attack.
>>70308031
>implying a nuclear reactor in a surface ship will help
>>70309443
>ramp
>>70309557
>400 years ago
Also that was due to the kings meddling with the engineer that led it to being horribly built.
>>70309548
Is that the Norwegian aircraft carrier?
It's like the new pooland.
>Norway can into power projection!
>>70309548
Pic related.
It's the entire Norwegian navy.
>>70309620
>USS Kitty Hawk
>>70309685
It's an ice breaker with a helipad kek
Oh which one is yours we can compare ours with?
>>70309557
Because the king ordered it to be built the wrong way.
>>70309634
>Americans have always been fucking atrocious at ASW
Dude, they've always been fucking atrocious at war. Their only success is in claiming credit for the work of other countries.
>>70309701
Are you mocking the name?
Are you unaware of the importance of Kitty Hawk or why it would be a name for an aircraft carrier?
>>70309192
>not knowing the US gives training wheels to non-american countries in these training exercises so it isn't an overwhelming BTFO by murica
>>70309793
>imagining what a Brit sounds like saying 'dude'
What your gonna do when the Charles de Gaulle comes for you?
>>70309443
>ramp
U.S. realized ramps on a carrier only impede take off around the 1930's. Jesus christ your navy is behind.
>>70309443
So do we.
>>70309620
We have fucking aircraft carriers? SHIIIIIET.
>>70308940
imma need some context on this Nigel.
WTF are you talkin about?
Look at this beauty.
Stay jealous, Old World.
>>70309710
Don't forget CANNONS! Like who else got that? Icebreakers with CANNONS?!?
The arctic belongs to Norway - ARCTIC DOMINANCE!
Im suspicious of all these sudden Anglo shitposting threads
The United States already has 20 aircraft carriers in service right now. Ten of those are Nimitz class carriers. One of those is the state-of-the-art Ford class. There are four Ford class carriers being built with another five planned for construction. In total, the United States will have around 30 carriers in service. China has one carrier. The country with the second most carriers is France with four carriers. If you added up the size of all four French carriers you would end up with a single carrier that is 20% smaller than just one Nimitz class carrier, and the U.S. has ten Nimitz in service.
>>70308829
lol
>>70309012
if not worst
>>70307915
Don't forget their 'cost' is entirely unequipped and you need to fork out further billions just equipping them for their desired role.
Also rail guns are a meme until they're proven to be practical and operable with a ship's powerplant.
>>70309941
Where do they take the poo?
>>70309941
EXCRETE IN THE STREET
>>70309807
He's pointing out that the Kitty Hawk has been mothballed.
But the Ford Class is being rolled out as we speak, so...
>>70309941
Ramps on aircraft carriers are as modern as designated shitting streets, Pajeet.
>>70308582
Why do Americans lack any sense of humour or banter?
You don't always have to be so ultra defensive and prickly. Kek.
>>70309941
So both China and India need to rely on Russia for their carriers?
>>70309192
"All warfare is based on deception."
Sun Tzu
If you can make your enemy think that you have a false weakness, you can exploit their false judgement.
Also
>thinking military testing is subject to freedom of press
NEXT
>>70310072
They always get butthurt and desperately shitpost about their perceived superiority
>>70309941
That's wonderful. You even have an on-board street for shitting in.
>>70309941
>A fucking RAMP
>>70309941
Are...Are those SHIT STAINS on the deck?
>>70309535
mein gott
>>70310038
They use it as fuel instead of nuclear energy.
>>70309941
Which one is the designated shitting deck?
>>70309941
nice ramp
"however, ski-jump launches cannot match the payloads made possible by high-speed catapult launches."
>>70307414
>>70307307
>>70307494
>>70307521
>>70307621
>>70307614
>>70307647
>>70307686
>>70307716
>>70307741
>>70307811
>>70307814
>>70307973
>>70308000
>>70308036
>>70308067
>>70308154
>>70308218
>>70308576
>>70309085
>>70309360
>>70309629
Is it time to trigger the commonwealth AGAIN?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHeZzx7qpi4
>>70309989
...The Ford class will replace the Nimitz class.
>>70310125
It's because they're constantly told how amazing they are, and it triggers their superiority complex when you even dare consider them not oh-so-mighty.
>>70307307
Look at all those cool fucking domes and planes and helicopters and other pointy things and the boat they're parking inside the boat. How could it not be state of the art?
>>70310028
Are you bringing up cost as if it's a barrier to the US military? They need more money and they cry to Congress and they get it right away.
>swipe typing on phone
>trying to spell Congress the first time resulted in 'Chinese'
>they need more money they cry to Chinese
Perfect.
>>70310192
yeah well you have a Negro for a president.
>>70309793
>Iraqi government
>"Puppet government"
To Iran, maybe.
>>70309793
hilarious.
did you come up with this shit all by yourself Nigel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VL7XS_8qgXM
>>70310038
>>70310041
>>70310064
284 metres of designation. An Indian dream come true. Butthurt engaged.
>>70309941
POO IN THE SEA APOO
>>70310155
Indians take "poop deck" quite literally it seems.
>>70310308
he's mulatto
>>70310263
You can waste whatever money you want on ships that have more maintenance hours than operational ones.
I'm saying that money would be better spent on practical ships rather than lining the pockets of General Dynamics (whom all your generals go and work for after they retire as payment for allowing this shit to continue)
>>70309793
>>70310176
All Of Them.
>>70309793
>dude
kill yourself
>>70309989
>muh carriers
The Post.
>>70310388
We aren't butthurt, we have comfortable toilets.
>>70309989
I think we only have 1 carrier?
>>70307307
Technically it is. Would be too expensive to make it look fancy.
>>70310433
y-yeah well at least we have some frigates!
>>70307307
I'm not military genius, so I don't see the problem. Is it because of the slight bit of rust seen on it?
>>70308496
Probably Star Wars the Reagan program
>>70310192
How many battleships did you lose to surprise air attacks in December 1941?
>>70308496
It refers to the Star Wars defense initiative started by Reagan, not the movie franchise.
>>70309989
1 Nimitiz carrier is by itself the 5th largest airforce in the world.
:)
>>70310562
don't worry, NZ. you're still in the club
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement
im sorry how many aircraft carriers do you have in service
>>70310636
That's not the point, my precious little bong. The point is the attack in the video I linked sealed the fate of global British naval dominance. Your navy never recovered from WW2, your most feared capital ships were destroyed, and hundreds of years of british naval dominance ended, to be replaced by the US.
>>70307307
>a bong post about the navy of all things
are you even trying?
>>70307686
Is that a literal sailing ship?
Like a ship that uses wind power?
Can't tell if OP is a Britbong shitposter or just a Britbong sperglord. OP's pic is of the USS Essex, classified as an amphibious assault ship and not an aircraft carrier.
>Behold, a pair of Nimitz-class carriers.
>>70310927
We lost 3 out of 17 battleships in the war, the post war economy was what killed the RN not WW2 losses.
>>70307414
>Britannia rules the waves
>>70310636
not enough clearly
>>70311054
USS Constitution bruh.
>>70309941
So, what part of that ship is the poop deck?
Masturbation Time. HNNGGGGG...
SOUND WARNING LADS- VERY LOUD.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CL8KGSHYZE
>>70310086
We're commissioning INS Vikrant in 2018. Indignenuissss.......
Stay tuned Nord and stop taking pictures of our ships secretly please. Not cool.
This is a state of the art aircraft carrier from Bongland.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Habakkuk
>>70311163
Sure. There was still a final loss. The fizzling out of the british navy, at the hands of the japs no less.
>>70311214
we are still the strongest army in europe..france is a close 2nd...we have the island advantage though.
>>70309443
>building this ultimately for muslim seamen
>muslim semen
>>70307915
too bad you forgot to galvanize it; causing it to cost quadruple what it was supposed to. You could have had 4x those for the same price if your military industrial complex wasn't so corrupt. On that note; what the fuck is going on with the F-35s?
>>70310636
to be honest, the destruction of our battleships was the best thing to happen to the US navy and military. It forced us to become reliant on using aircraft carriers
>Which actually is far superior, just look at PH attack, i doubt it would have been more effective if the japanese decided to use their surface battleship fleet instead of planes
furthermore, we conquered the pacific and all those little islands through superior air power.
Battleships have become increasing more irrelevant when you have air superiority, anti-ship missiles and mines. The three biggest threats to a surface vessel. although with the introduction of the new railgun increasing the effective combat range ten fold does open up the concept of "boat-tillery" which surface ships have been designed to over look since ww2.
>>70311331
forgot pic ...
>>70311054
> USS Constitution
> oldest active service naval vessel on earth
> 222 years old
> still more powerful than the british navy
>tfw we're going to build couple of mining vessels in the upcoming years
:3
>>70311436
BAE from the uk built that railgun no?
>>70307307
1st largest air force: US Air Force
2nd largest air force: US Navy
Nice try teanigger
>>70308496
Star wars uses blaster bolts; which are bolts super-heated plasma. The US Navy's rail gun is so powerful it can also generate bolts of superheated plasma (alongside a hunk of metal)
>>70311544
surprised this wasnt posted sooner
>>70311458
Ive heard of you guys keeping that old boat going which is cool..also with USS america that titanic looking one.
and our fleet aint that bad! we will remilitarize when usa pulls out of nato...some ships are on the way and some trident subs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMwGX7ftBoo
>>70311422
probably better to spend the money building boats than housing mohammeds like you kek
>>70311499
The eternal angled btfo!
>>70311499
Angled means they can take off at a lower speed instead of using more fuel for a vertical take off no?
>>70311544
although i don't disagree that OP is a retard you really shouldn't be calling anyone a nigger considering all the chimpouts, police witch hunts and political cuckening thats happening over there
>>70307414
>>70307915
The only interesting thing about this ship is that its Captained by James Kirk.
...And the rail-gun I guess
>>70311447
nobody cares about your obsolete russian pile of junk with turds covering the decks.
india hasnt been a military force since The Pointed Stick was state of the art weaponry.
india exists solely because the brits were too softhearted and didnt really want to exterminate your street-shitting asses.
pakistan is gonna fuck your shit up.
PAKISTAN
the faggots who cant even keep their tribal primitives in check.
india is a sad little third world shithole (in the very literal sense) and when your crap covered country is finally wiped off the map, everyone will celebrate your demise.
all of india is DESIGNATED, so fuck yourself with a durian.
>>70311671
>shouldn't be calling anyone a nigger
baka
>>70309443
Can anyone tell me what makes a ramp shit?
>>70310192
Every time i hear the ronald reagan mentioned I always think back to that fukushima disaster.
>>70311701
You seem insecure, lardy.
>>70311458
This is what happens when you have a frigate set to auto-explore and forget to upgrade it after 200 years in civ5. kek
>>70311598
>tfw my shithole is buying your broken ass 1970s subs that leak if you look at it the wrong way
>>70311604
>tfw my shithole is turning our military bases into mudslime towns and making our soldiers be their butlers
>>70307307
swedish stealth
>>70311499
>flat
It's not fucking flat, the whole ship is on an angle so you can't tell.
Only a small part of the British ship is angled, while the rest is flat.
>>70311709
It's just not new tech. There isn't a massive difference really apart from bragging rights
>>70311800
The ones we used in the falklands? free pirate flag included lel
>>70307915
shit that thing sank in feb
>>70310562
C U T E
>>70311643
No.
angled decks slow the aircraft at takeoff, increasing fuel consumption and raising the hazard of a stall.
flat decks are superior.
>>70311839
I think you mean anglo'd
>>70311839
you're retarded. id expect such a thing from an Australian, but not you
>>70309257
Sick bantz, you know Americans can't take a joke.
Alternatively, probably the Hillary government.
>>70311800
>>70311858
At least they are the only nuclear subs to ever have combat kills. So you know they worked, well 40 years ago at least
>>70311839
>that filename
whoa clam down there m8, it's only a meme :^)
>>70311643
Ramps are for cucked navies.
1# Ski ramps add additional weights to the bow of the ship and cut airflow over the deck.
2# Aircraft are highly limited in take off weight with Ski ramps
3# Aircraft need more deck space to get up the speed which increases launch time between fighters.
4# Can't launch and land aircraft at the same time.
5# Can't launch aircraft fast enough in an emergency. A US carrier can launch a fighter every 15 seconds.
6# Aircraft has to use considerable more fuel and more stress on the engines in order to guarantee the plane gets up to speed. A catapult can airborne a plane without any engine power.
And here is a big one!
7# Can't launch aircraft during even medium rough seas, winds or bad weather with ski ramps during combat conditions. Catapults can keep a fighter on a direct straight line path by keeping it locked to the deck.during launch.
Most of the problems with Catapults are being reduced with the phasing out of steam systems for electromagnetic.
>>70311962
Kek'd
>>70311709
No catapult.
>>70312061
I see. Can you get catapult-like performance by doing rocket-assisted takeoffs?
>>70309941
>poop deck
>>70311997
they aren't even the nuclear ones
>>70311054
Wow. Please kill yourself
USS CONSTITUTION FAGGOT
>>70312061
Well fug...
Least we got our new toys on the way at least lol
>>70312061
#8 they look lame as shit
>>70311757
poo in loo navy power
New DARPA drone submarine hunter.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/02/16/member-of-german-left-youth-party-apologizes-to-refugees-on-facebook-after-alleged-sexual-assault-by-migrant/
>DARPA today is holding a christening ceremony for the technology demonstration vessel it has designed, developed and built through the Agency’s Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) program. Taking place in Portland, Oregon, the event marks several recent successes in a program that seeks to develop an entirely new class of ocean-going vessel—one able to traverse thousands of kilometers over the open seas for months at a time, all without a single crew member aboard while still remaining under human supervision at all times.
>>70311458
> USS Constitution
> oldest active service naval vessel on earth
nope, that's the hms victory. the constitution is the oldest still sea worthy naval vessel.
>>70309989
I'm going to miss the Enterprise (CNV-65) that thing was sexy af
>>70311821
Is that used to deliver refugees into Sweden without the rest of the population knowing?
>>70312156
you might as well use a catapult if you're gonna go that far.
>>70312286
Wrong link. Kek
http://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2016-04-07
>>70312172
HMS victory would rape the constitution desu
>>70312185
weasel....
>>70307307
>aircraft carrier
>posts an amphibious invasion ship used by the marine corps
Don't you have some fish and chips to eat?
>>70312239
ohh snap!
India: shittiest nation on earth!
>>70311983
I'd expect to fuck your mum, but wouldn't want to push past the innumerable rolls of fat bugerstein
>>70312239
hahaha bermuda loo
all ship hullls corrode and breach
>>70309257
Planet X
>>70312156
RATO are placebo that require modernizing plane so it can use them. Not only that, most of the time they are just a extra weight for aircraft after takeoff and take space on pylons for the extra armament you could put in. Also they function like a droptank because they are useless while airborne so might as well dump them into sea and that is another extra cost.
So yeah.
>ramp
>>70309586
>Only 1 island
>>70312239
Fucking gross India your shits hitting everything around you including Australia and Antarctica
>>70312388
K tyrone
>>70312302
> kraut doesnt know what Active Service means
if your ship cant leave it's port it aint active service.
the victory has spent most of it's service as a "receiving ship", a FICTIONAL berth that serves no function beyond accounting.
the victory hasnt sailed since the 1820's, while the constitution has always been an active duty vessel.
>>70311054
Coast Guard sails it, brah.
>>70309548
Denmark owns the arctic though. We can split it if you are ready for Danmark-Norge 2.0
We can split the arctic, and then the world.
>>70307307
>a fucking ramp
>>70311214
US navy surpassed us in the mid 19th century and we've been having a naval decline ever since the dreadnought revolution.
>>70307686
That list doesn't have the new Ford class carrier on it.
>>70312535
It even reaches fucking new york. Absolute naval poo in loo superiority and they're not even really trying to poo in loo. World's greatest pooperpower
>>70311119
Seems dumb to put all that hardware in one place, a single tactical nuke would take out that entire fleet.
>>70312385
> rotted boat that hasnt sailed since 1824
> cant even leave it's berth
> doesnt even float, rests on pylons under the water
victory is a decrepit old pile of shit, a tourist trap made to look like it is floating.
the USS Constitution is an armed active duty vessel which still trains sailors today, and is one of the more coveted berths in the entire US Navy (the best navy on earth)
>>70312239
This has to be false. Brazil should be looking just as bad, as should several african nations.
>>70312836
We dismantled most of our old ships and built pubs out of them.
>>70312813
How are you going to get that tactical nuke there? The same navy owning those boats also owns the entire ocean around it.
>>70311308
someone had to say it.
>>70312644
Sure thing. I like the sound of 'Norway-Denmark' better though.
>>70312813
> all that hardware
thats just a small portion of the atlantic fleet.
we still got the pacific fleet too, thats what the jappos forgot.
we have TWO navies. dont get it twisted, we will fuck your shit up.
also, who can nuke the US?
NOBODY!
>>70312995
They don't own the entire ocean around it, good luck stopping an ICBM.
>>70312990
dont you mean Kebab Stands?
>>70307307
Maybe in the 70s. Check dem uniforms.
plus new ones have hovercraft.
>>70312836
Its in good nick after restoration
and its fucking old lol im saying back in the day if these ships met the victory would broadside the seven shades of shit out of the constitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_FpYLnNhVw&nohtml5=False
>>70312863
You have no idea how bad it is and how many people are in poo in loo land. The blue colour is already considered to be extremely toxic and hazardous.
http://www.chinasmack.com/2010/pictures/filthy-india-photos-chinese-netizen-reactions.html
>>70307307
If it works, don't fix it
>>70310220
>irony forever lost on the squabbling Amerilord obsessed yuropoors
>>70313084
True, it's a small portion but you can't deny that fact it would still be disastrous is something happened to it. The loss of even a single carrier to any nation would be a huge deal.
>>70313110
what ICBM?
ohh you mean like >>70312239 ?
an Inter-Continental Bowel Movement?
we can wash hindu-poo off the hulls and keep fighting.
cant stop the US Navy.
>>70313084
Also who can nuke the US? What about China? Russia? The UK? Soon to be North Korea..maybe.
>>70313346
I think we have some sort of agreement with the yanks about launch codes so we couldnt nuke em..i think there is a loophole though but why would you nuke the dominant super power whom is our ally?
NK or russia will be the aggressors desu if such a thing came about
>>70313110
We have anti-ICBM capabilities. It's like you're not even trying.
>>70309085
why shoot at birds when you can't even hit them?
Are navies not vunreble as fuck now with the aricraf/missiles that are around?
They just seem like fodder if there was a real war
>>70312752
>pooperpower
my sides
>>70310636
We lost two there, bongm8. TWO. The rest said fuck being sunk and got back to work.
>>70313571
It's not like they weren't vulnerable targets when submarines became the norm, any way.
>>70312385
this would be a tourist restaurant/gift shop if it were in America and it's the pride and joy of your """""navy."""""
