As a christian board, which one would you rather go against in a Holy War, /pol/?
Jews or Muslims?
>>70284814
Cut the head off the snake.
Muslims are bad, but guess why we're so involved with them in the first place
>>70284814
>As a christian board
I think you're lost.
>>70284814
Does changing the term 'Jihad' into 'HolyWar' make it more palatable....
When will the "/pol/ is a Christian board" meme die?
>>70285155
No he's in the right place, You're the one who is lost. Fill in the blanks
__ ____ __ ______
>>70284814
Nobody, man, why?
Unite with the Muds to kill the Jews, make a deal that they have to leave our countries in return for their Holy Clay.
>>70284814
I have more general hatered for muslims due to muh heritage but as >>70285093 said Jews are priority. However I want 'em all to go.
>>70284814
I'm an atheist, but fuck it. I'll Deus Vult against the Muslims.
>>70284814
>As a christian board
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>70284814
>As a christian board
/pol/ is an anti Christian board, /pol/ makes fun of all religions but especially of the Abrahamic religions.
>>70284814
/pol/ is the board of Allah and his messenger
The sand niggers should die first
>>70286943
TAKBIR (insert your fev Nasheed here)
>>70287221
Allahu Ackbar Walilahil Hamd
PROTESTANTS.
>>70285093
>>70286851
>implying /pol/ is one person
I've been here from the start and I've always been a staunch traditional Catholic during that time.
>>70284814
Jerusalem belongs to Christ alone.
DEVS VVLT
>>70288282
Oh, so you're the one we always laugh about.
>leave the removal of kebab to us
>>70284814
Both, at the same time.
>>70285155
Fuck off heathen faggot
I thought about converting to Catholicism once but then I discovered they are pro-niggers.
>>70285155
Jew/Mudslime detected.
muslims. I fucking hate muslims so much,
Synagogue of Satan, that's all I'm sayin. We all know who should go to judgement first.
>>70285517
When degenerate pagans like you pry /pol/ from our cold, dead fingers.
Sandniggers because there are many more of them and they're much racially further from whites than Jews. But ideally it'd be like the first Crusade where they clobbered jews all along the route to Palestine then when they got to Jerusalem if it was brown it was going down, regardless of religion.
/pol/ is a christian board
>>70284814
Yes.
>>70284814
I'm not CI but I miss all the Christian Identity threads that used to be here. I'm more like a deist, but pagans are annoying, and care more about trying to re-create a loosely defined group of religious systems we don't seem to know much about (and most of the more educated pagans seemed to be closer to deists anyway). At least Christianity is organized and better defined, and actually has the history of the Crusades, justifying slavery, killing kebabs, etc. and putting it in a racial context like CI does is a pretty good set up, and I like the Crusader aesthetic. But it'll be a cold day in hell before I'm cool with a sandnigger or chink fucking a white girl because he's "my brother in Christ." You know what the Middle East would be like if it were Christian? Fucking Mexico. Save for maybe places like Lebanon and Jordan that are kind of white-ish thanks to Hellenes and Crusaders. Culture/religion as part of racialism is cool to help organize it but cultural nationalists can choke on a Christian African chode.
>>70285155
>>70285517
>>70286739
>>70286851
>complains about Christanity being cucked despite the fact there is a direct correlation between European secularism and desire to be enriched
>complains about Christians killing and Dark Ages despite the fact it's been only 200,000 unjust deaths since the first crusade... Literally NOTHING in comparsion to any relevant ideology today
>then complains about slave morality or "muh Vikings".... Showing true motives is to be niggers
When will finally accept the conclusion that's right in front of you?
Actual Christians on /pol/, do you guys still believe in creationism ?
>>70289676
>You know what the Middle East would be like if it were Christian? Fucking Mexico.
Don't they already cut heads off all the time there?
>As a Semite board, which one would you rather go against in a Holy War, /pol?
>Semites or Semites?
>>70289787
No, there's a direct connection between Christfaggotry and a desire to be enriched.
>>70289876
lol Right, more or less what I'm saying. Mexicans are (mostly) non-white Christians and it's still a disgusting cesspit, same with Liberia and a million other places. American blacks too.
>>70289958
Lol, tell that to Sweden, France, Belgium or even Norway(which is the leading single mother capital of the Western world).
Anywheres secular apathy goes, death and ruin follow.
>>70284814
4chan is a haven for christ-fags to spew their hate anonymously while they trap fap. If this is a christian board then baphomet has you in his grips.
>>70284814
why not both?
two rats with one hammer
>>70290251
>>>/b/
I found the board you meant to post this to.
>>70290175
Lol, France (2.01 fertility rate), Sweden (1.9), Belgium (1.8) and Norway (1.9) have a higher birthrate than Poland (1.39).
Christians = Death, they support every feminist demand on the planet except abortion.
>>70290568
>Muslism enriched countries have a artificially high birthrate
>colour me surprised
>>70290746
Doesn't change the fact that Christian women are coal burners and don't want to get children.
Christians are literally the scum that brought us feminism, let alone the fact that Stalin and Hitler were Christians.
>>70290568
>They support every feminist demand on the planet except abortion
Except divorce
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2384.htm
And contraception / artificial birth control
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2370.htm
And homosexuality
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2357.htm
>>70290948
>>70290568
>>70289958
>>70289735
>>70288580
>>70286851
>>70286739
Holy shit, The Russkies are turning into shitposters.
Well, so long as their shitposting is fun and joyful like the Aussies and not autistic like the leafs, it's cool.
>>70291621
Russians have always been shitposters, but Semite religions are a joke and so are the "white" people that believe in them.
>>70291824
>Russian
>Judging people for not being white
>>70285885
>>70284814
both 2bqh
>>70291952
I am not Russian, you aren't white, please stop posting.
>>70284814
muslims would be more satisfying but jews is the one that needs to happen.
>>70291824
Maybe I just never noticed it because their shitposting got swamped out by the Aussies and the Leaves.
>>70292100
All you need to do to make the Jews safe is to keep them away from banking.
>>70291457
Are you stupid? Of course Christians support gays and divorce.
>>70284814
>/pol/
>christian board
L M F A O
we're Muslim if anything
>>70284814
>Asking to choose between one or the other
You do know you're in /pol/, right? /pol/ literally doesn't make any distinction between the two as both as perceived as enemies.
>>70285517
>When will the "/pol/ is a Christian board" meme die?
It never was a meme. /pol/ IS a Christian board.
/thread
>>70284814
I became impressed with Mexibros ones I read up on their 1992 Religious Associations and Public Worship Act.
>>70292235
Fair enough. But those are the Christians who deny 2,000 years of Christian tradition on the matter in order to reconcile their liberal beliefs with their "Christian" label. So I would say the problem is not Christianity itself, but rather a hostile takeover of the religion by 'progressives.'
>>70293053
No true Scotsman at its finest.
>>70293053
>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/03/17/im-a-presbyterian-minister-who-doesnt-believe-in-god-2/
>I’m a Presbyterian Minister Who Doesn’t Believe in God
>“How can you call yourself a Christian, let alone a minister?!”
>I get asked that question frequently and the questioner is hostile more often than not. Still, I like to answer it if I believe the questioner is sincere.
>Though I self-identify as a Christian and I am an ordained minister in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), I raised eyebrows a few years ago when I posted an article on my website about how my personal beliefs don’t align with those of most Presbyterians.
>For example, I believe that:
>Religion is a human construct
>The symbols of faith are products of human cultural evolution
>Jesus may have been an historical figure, but most of what we know about him is in the form of legend
>God is a symbol of myth-making and not credible as a supernatural being or force
>The Bible is a human product as opposed to special revelation from a divine being
>Human consciousness is the result of natural selection, so there’s no afterlife
>In short, I regard the symbols of Christianity from a non-supernatural point of view.
>And yet, even though I hold those beliefs, I am still a proud minister. But I don’t appreciate being told that I’m not truly a Christian.
>Why is that so many people think my affirmations are antithetical to Christianity? I think it is because Christianity has placed all of its eggs in the belief basket. We all have been trained to think that Christianity is about believing things. Its symbols and artifacts (God, Bible, Jesus, Heaven, etc) must be accepted in a certain way. And when times change and these beliefs are no longer credible, the choices we are left with are either rejection or fundamentalism.
The modern church. EVERYTHING is about "identity" now. He "identifies" as a Christian, so he believes we should all have to call him one.
>>70285658
>implying the muzzies will ever stop
As long as they live, they will try to counter the world. That's one of the defining things about Islam, they want to take the world by force.
At least the Jews have a specific piece of arab clay that they want to make greater Israel.
I say we remove kebab and allow Jews to take the nuclear wasteland so they can establish their PROMISED LAND.
They have a prophecy that says when they get their greater Israel, God will come and kill all the evil people.
If their prophecy is true, Jews get God blasted. If it's false, the Jews will have proof that everything they ever believed in was a lie, hopefully snapping and trying to destroy the world out of spite, giving us a reason to nuke them all.
Win win if you ask me.
>>70285517
As a Christian I can say that /pol/ has never been Christian and that the meme is definitely psyop noise to create internal struggle. Thankfully /pol/ is way too nimble of navigators
>>70293418
See:
>>70293695
Certain terms describe certain states of being. For instance, if I say I am a cardiologist, yet I am a high school dropout, have never been to college, have no medical degree or experience, have no medical license, have no medical practice of my own, and haven't been in a hospital since the day I was born.... I would not be a cardiologist. The fact is that the world should not have to start calling me a cardiologist just because I "identify" as one.
There are certain prerequisites that one must complete and certain qualifications one must meet before one can be considered a cardiologist. Disagreeing with this would make you retarded. While this may not prove much, it does prove that there are terms, labels, and titles that apply only to certain persons who meet certain criteria.
Being a Christian is the same thing. When one announces they are a Christian, the general view of most people for the past TWENTY CENTURIES has been that one believes in God, at the VERY LEAST. The expectation is also that one carries certain beliefs, observes certain practices, or at least nominally holds to them.
What the guy I linked to wants to do is to take a twenty century old definition, empty it of all meaning, all value, and all power so that he can wear the title as a name-tag because of how he "identifies," which is ridiculous. He should just identify with what he is, a humanistic atheist. What the hell is wrong with that title? It basically just means he is a decent guy that wants everyone to be treated well, but that he does not believe in God. While he is free to praise certain morals in the Bible, it is a beyond to call him a "Christian" just for his feefees sake.
Words either have meaning, or they do not, in which case anyone can be anything because any attempt to attach any qualification to ANY title, label, or office is grounds or throwing out a "no true scottsman" accusation.
>>70284814
Both obviously.
>>70284814
Jews, only reason muds are a threat is because the kike manipulations letting them get close to us.
>>70285421
Hey Kermit's asshole showed up
>>70284814
jews then muslims right after
Muslims more blood for the slaughter
>>70293418
How is it No True Scotsman when I literally provided a link to the Catechism in >>70291457 that confirmed everything I said about the official and historical position?
You mean them killing countless people all over the world isn't a holy war?
>>70294888
Awe yeah I remember that thread.
>>70293418
Someone has no idea of what "No True Scotsman" actually means.
>>70293053 is by no means a case of "no true Scotsman."
>>70295286
>How is it No True Scotsman
Because catechism are only for certain denominations, not for the term "Christians", in your case it was only for those who want to call themselves "Catholics".
>>70284814
Jews want us to go to war with the Muslims. Once again, we would use OUR resources to clear the way for Greater Israel, while at the same time antagonizing over 1 billion people, guaranteeing an eternal enemy.
I'm not for destroying any of them. I think the only good solution is to cut off all relations with Israel and the Middle East and let them battle it out themselves.
>>70284814
the muslims are way more unstoppable
>>70295733
The only thing stopping the West from completely wiping out Islam and its worshippers is our own morals. We have the technology, but not the will to use it. The Saudi money also keeps the finger off the trigger.
>>70295498
>Someone has no idea of what "No True Scotsman" actually means.
Lol, if someone claims that Europe has problems because it gets less and less Christian and then talks about catechisms, then he'd better prove how many "real" Christians existed before Europe got into trouble.
If you go by cardinal dogmas = supposedly those teachings that every Christian must believe to call himself Christian, then the US is maybe now 1% Christian or so and maybe was previously 3% or so. If you think that the US got into trouble because the number of real Christians dropped from 3% to 1% then all my lols.
>>70295568
Clearly Anon is a Catholic then. So he must mean 'Catholics.' You should have caught on to that when he posted links from the Catechism, yet you persisted in calling out a fallacy where none existed.
>>70295881
>its worshippers is our own morals.
No, it's mainly women's influence. Women are the cancerous element in Western societies.
>>70284814
Why do modern day "nationalists" and neocons cling to religion? Are they really THAT desperate for a Western identity that's morally conservative?
>>70295902
>calling out a fallacy where none existed
Yes, it existed, because he switched the topic from Christians to Christians as defined by a cathechism of a certain denomination. It's a no-true-scotsman and a strawman fallacy.
>>70284814
At one point I was heavily in favor of allying with the jews to defeat our eternal enemy, the mudslimes, After all jews will kill the world over time while mudslimes will kill the world now.
But I am not so sure about that anymore.
Jews are doing far too much damage to our society. They are destroying our culture and religion, turning them into..degenerate filth. Even the pope fell to the Jews.
So, I will have to go with the Jews. They've been far too proactive recently. They need to be stopped.
>>70295989
See pic
>>70296198
>moral degeneracy
Edgy.
>>70295286
>How is it No True Scotsman
It isn't. No True Scotsman applies only to denials of one's status based on relatively small details or reasonably minor technicalities. It is NOT to be used to defend absurd claims from criticism.
>I am a professional tennis player.
>You are? How long have you been playing?
>I played just one time with my grandfather 20 years ago, and haven't played since that one day.
>Well, then how can you be a professional tennis player? You only played once.
>GEEZ, TALK ABOUT NO TRUE SCOTSMAN!
Doesn't work. The claimant certified an absurdity, and when called on it he used the No True Scotsman improperly to defend his absurdity from criticism.
To be a "professional tennis player", one must play tennis professionally. That is what the title implies and requires. It is the same thing with Christianity. The title implies certain qualifications (belief in God, Jesus, the resurrection, etc.). If one does not meet even the most minimal criteria as established by twenty centuries of history, then one is not a Christian.
Words have meaning. Perception is not reality. Certifying membership in an identity, even though you do not meet the accepted criteria, does not qualify one for said identity.
>>70296084
Conflating "Christian" with "Catholic," while wrong, is not an example of "no true Scotsman at its finest."
>>70295949
sounds like you'd feel more at home in an Islamic country, friend.
>>70296360
>Conflating "Christian" with "Catholic,"
That was not the point. The point is that I posted "Christians support gay marriage" and the reply was "They are not real Christians then, no real Christian would support it".
Typical No true Scotsman.
>>70296372
Christfaggotry is Islam with a Western flavor.
It's okay because the people doing it are white, apparently.
>>70296326
the "no true scotsman" fallacy is one of the most abused and misunderstood fallacies, especially lately. Pseudo-intellectuals like to throw around fallacies like buzzwords, in attempt to disqualify the opposing argument.
>>70296372
Welcome to /pol/, newfag.
>>70295881
>morals
Actually it's immoral to protect your people, land, and culture
What's stopping us is that the west has become one giant pussy
>He's a protcuck
>He thinks he's Christian
This meme needs to die.
>>70285155
No brother, you're the one that's lost, but you can still find the lord.
>>70296326
>To be a "professional tennis player", one must play tennis professionally.
You don't understand the No true scotsman fallacy. It's about moving goal posts and redefinitions.
If someone says he's a pro and he isn't then it wasn't a fallacy but a falsehood.
Christchan had been working hard all day long in the corn field. She was dirty and exhausted. Alone. Her man gone to fight 30 odd miles away. It is stupid to stay so close to the front line but sometimes sacrifices have to be made. For God. For Country. For Family.
As she walked back to her cabin on the edge of the cornfield, she saw a wonderful sight.
Her love standing at the porch to meet her! A massive man, he picked her up in his arms and gave her a kiss on the lips. Then he disrobed her and began to wash her body... feet first. She laid back and succumbed to the pleasure as he penetrated her tight womb. As she fell asleep in his arms, she forgot about all the troubles of the world.
>>70296753
I think you misunderstood the post.
>>70296985
I understood it pretty well and that poster has no clue about the No True Scotsman fallacy. He writes "No True Scotsman applies only to denials of one's status based on relatively small details or reasonably minor technicalities", which is a complete misrepresentation of what that fallacy is about
Wiki: "When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim ("no Scotsman would do such a thing"), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion"
I have shown that indeed Christians support gay marriage, but the reponse was "Oh, then they are no true Christians then", which is a picture book example of the fallacy.
>>70296579
The thing is that we've been brainwashed to think that we're ALL one people, meaning people in Africa, Middle East etc. are basically our people. This is what creates the illusion of transgressing morally when you attack them.
>>70290251
Crowley > Jesus
>>70297242
The Scotsman fallacy needs to respect definitions to make sense. I think that was the point of his post, that if you don't live up to the definition of X, you don't get to call yourself X.
Regarding identifying who is Christian and who is not, it becomes much more problematic as the definition has become very flexible due to having to evolve over the past century, but I still think that there must be some core beliefs that unites all Christians. I personally don't believe that Christians can be defined by a common resentment of homosexuality though.
>>70297242
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18).
It would seem that Jesus is indeed following the law himself.
Do you really think he means that he is the only person who must follow said law?
Lol!
>>70284814
Protestants.
>>70297570
>The Scotsman fallacy needs to respect definitions to make sense.
No, that's not what the fallacy is about.
>>70285517
/pol/ is Catholic.
>>70284814
>As a christian board
>>70284814
all of the above. lets nuke that fucking desert and make the "holy land" look the part
radioactive glass is a good start then we just need to use it as a open dump for toxic chemicals ...
pools of day glow fluids on top of the radioactive glass would be pretty come dusk
>>70297823
It is. If you don't adhere to established definitions, anyone can claim to be anything. To claim otherwise is to argue for the complete opposite of what the fallacy is meant to address. The goalpost becomes mobile rather than immobile.
>>70298396
>It is.
No, it isn't, I gave you the Wiki quote what it is about. It's about being BTFO and then changing to another subject/definition.
>>70298571
>I gave you the Wiki quote
Oh God. Okay. You're one of those people who skim the headlines of a Wikipedia article and then proceed into the world thinking you've figured it all out.
To prove the logical fallacy, you NEED to establish definitions. In order to claim someone is not a Scotsman, you need to define what a Scotsman is and match the person up against it.
Read this article, Boris, perhaps it can explain it better than I have the patience for.
https://thecriticalthinkingmovement.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/the-use-and-abuse-of-logical-fallacies/
>>70298833
I know this link and it confirms everything I wrote.
Picture book No true Scotsman fallacy: Switching from "Christian" to "true Christian".
>>70299268
I tried. Have fun Boris.
>>70299436
>I tried.
You have failed and you got BTFO.
>>70299483
Boris once again confirming the inferiority of his people.
>>70284814
Both. Jew and Muslim skin accepts bullets and bombs all the same and we have no shortage of ammo or targets.
both
Jews will get whats coming to them, vengeance is for God not us.
Don't mean we have to support them fiscally though.
People thinking this is a christian board unironically is a classic case of Poe's Law.
This whole fucking board is probably the best example of Poe's Law on the internet.
