is this accurate?
Trump belongs in Chaotic Good imo
Trump belongs in Lawful neutral. His policies are about order, authority etc. Cruz belongs in Chaotic as he supports removing loads of regulations.
>>70280710
trump bottom-right
>>70280964
But he's the chaos candidate, enforcing the immigration laws already on the books is chaos and utter madness.
>>70280710
Clinton is chaotic or neutral evil, Trump is chaotic good, Carson is lawful good, Cruz is true neutral.
>>70281337
>carson
are you actually ben carson I can't think of a reason why someone would still care
>>70280710
>Lawful Good: Rand Paul
>Neutral Good: Ben Carson
>Chaotic Good: Donald Trump
>Lawful Neutral: John Kasich
>True Neutral: Jeb Bush
>Chaotic Neutral: Marco Rubio
>Lawful Evil: Bernie Sanders
>Neutral Evil: Ted Cruz
>Chaotic Evil: Hillary Clinton
Debate me.
>Kasich is lawful good
>Took money from soros
I think not.
>>70282064
Why would Bernie be lawful evil?
"A lawful evil villain methodically takes what he wants within the limits of his code of conduct without regard for whom it hurts. He cares about tradition, loyalty, and order but not about freedom, dignity, or life. He plays by the rules but without mercy or compassion. He is comfortable in a hierarchy and would like to rule, but is willing to serve. He condemns others not according to their actions but according to race, religion, homeland, or social rank. He is loath to break laws or promises."
IMO Hillary is more Lawful Evil and Bernie is Chaotic Good. Not because I believe anything he believes will lead to positive outcomes, but because he believes in revolutionary altruism and has no regard for the social order. I think the flaws with him reveal the flaws with "good" alignment.
I wish they had called it "Selfish" and "Altruistic" rather than "good" or "evil". Otherwise the alignment system is so insightful.
>implying this isn't the only right answer
>>70282891
Switch Carson and Paul and your right.
Rand Paul is the definition of Lawful Good.
>>70282717
Because Bernie is principled evil. He believes in something coherent, an ideology. He doesn't mind oppressing people "for their own good," just like every other commie.
Clinton is literally just in it for all that she can take with no regard to anything else.
