Why the fuck haven't we converted to nuclear energy yet?
These tree hugging fucktards keep going on about alternate energy sources but all they want is plebe tier solar panels
>>70234830
Wouldn't nuclear energy be danderous?
>>70235144
Thorium
>>70235144
No, but communism and tsunamis make them go boom-boom leaky-leaky
>>70234830
>but all they want is pleb tier solar panels
Nice straw men.
>>70235661
ur so fuking dense iv had this before solar is the only way forward but but muhh newks we can make rrrradiation n it wil make us warm
>>70235945
radiation not dangerous ...kek
>>70235661
Breeders and LFTR's indeed.
Solar is retarded except for in the fucking sahara and wind is pretty much always shit tier.
Nuclear power sounds great on paper but in reality it cannot produce the amount of carbon free power we need. A typical nuclear plant has 50 year lifespan and are rated at 1 GW of electric output. The world needs 1 terrawatt of energy at minimum.
That means we would need to build 10,000 reactors. The terrestrial supplies of the current fuel used in nuclear reactors, uranium, would only last 10 years in the 10,000 reactors needed to fuel the planet.
You say solar is pleb tier but in reality it is the most logical way forward. The sun provides the earth with 120,000 TW of energy, enough energy from the sun hits the earth in one hour than earth can use in an entire year.
>>70237175
Oops
1 TW should be 10 TW
>>70234830
>>70235144
Once we figure out nuclear fusion, we'll be set