This alone is a reason to support Bernie.
>>70234138
The internet is shit.
>>70234256
Still miles better than the fucking MSM.
>>70234138
So your saying Bernie supports globalism? What a POS
>>70234543
>he thinks the MSM hasn't infected the Internet
EL OH EL
>>70234543
Yeah, miles better.
Bernie is a piece of shit. You do realize him and Hillary both want to flood our country with migrants and refugees?
>internet = blacked and gave sjws power they wouldnt have otherwise
it's shit m8
let it die
>>70234543
The same five or ten people that own the MSM also own those lefty 'social' websites that you're getting your pro-bernie message from.
>>70234543
Is it though?
>>70234138
>>70234138
By this logic Trump is fucking amazing because he has almost every single website, news channel, magazine, newspaper, and radio show against him. You probably don't even need both hands to count how many are for him.
>>70234786
You know you don't have to be told which candidate is the best one, right? You can think for yourself.
>>70234660
>m-muh tax money
>>70234138
>>70234886
Yes. The internet isn't as bought off and corporate.
>>70234966
>encouraging thought crimes
Television vs Internet Explorer?
Wew
>>70235069
FTFY
Why are people freaking out about this interview that Bernie gave? The interviewer didn't know what they were even talking about. For example
>Daily News: Okay. Well, let’s assume that you’re correct on that point. How do you go about doing it?
>Sanders: How you go about doing it is having legislation passed, or giving the authority to the secretary of treasury to determine, under Dodd-Frank, that these banks are a danger to the economy over the problem of too-big-to-fail.
Secretary of Treasure
>DN: But do you think that the Fed, now, has that authority?
The Fed
>S: Well, I don’t know if the Fed has it. But I think the administration can have it.
>DN: How? How does a president turn to JPMorgan Chase, or have the treasury turn to any of those banks and say, “Now you must do X, Y and Z?”
>S: Well, you do have authority under the Dodd-Frank legislation to do that, make that determination.
>DN: You do, just by Federal Reserve fiat, you do?
Federal Reserve
The interviewer is >implying that the Sec. of Treasure and the Fed are the same thing when they clearly are not and have different powers under the government. And now the whole MSM is saying that he bungled it and didn't know what he was talking about.
How far would /pol/ go in the rightway direction before even considering going left?
Is there a line?
>>70234138
I'm so fucking tired of this meme. Yes the MSM loves Hillary, but Bern fags think the MSM treats him like shit and purposely ignores him. At its core, the MSM is still driven by profit, which is derived through the amount of viewers a network can draw. However, this does not mean they won't push a narrative (such as trump supporters the reason for violence in every situation). Thus, we can look at what the MSM shows everyday: Trump. Why do they show Trump? Because he makes news by saying something outside of the box or by going on a news program. This will always bring in ratings as people, whether for or against trump, are fascinated by this because it is exciting. Now let's look at Bernie. Bernie says the same old shit about banks, environment, and how he raises funds from stupid college students; once you hear it once, there isn't much more he can say to excite someone. Also, unlike Trump, Bernie does not make himself available to news programs at a rate anywhere close to Trump. Thus, he doesn't get as much time on the MSM. Also his core group, millenials are less likely to watch the news than most groups due to college students not having access to cable, nor do they actually care about current events. Thus, MSM has even more of incentive to not bring him in since he doesn't pull im more viewers. In sum, the MSM is still fucked, but they are not the reason for his lack of media presence, it is his own god damn fault.
>>70234138
>Educated, professional journalists vs redditfags
Yeah Bernie is shit, you don't have to tell us.
>>70235367
>>70235069
>>70234138
A centrist, third way, pro-business democrat vs a left-populist economically illiterate senile moron. Wonder what the correct choice is there.
>muh anti-establishment candidate
Fuck off child
>>70235069
bullshit sanders is like a new roosvelt
>>70235628
So you're saying it would be better if the MSM wasn't driven by profit, and instead delivering news?
Like nationalizing the media?
For journalism and news is has worked great in Norway.
MSNBC and CNN vs Reddit and Huffingtonpost
I don't know which one is worse
>>70235880
upboat
>>70235628
>>70235954
Just one news network though. It happens to be the most unbiased one.
>>70235069
Shouldn't it be reversed?
Stalin would be more like Hillary, while Lenin would be like Sanders.
>>70234138
Both want to keep the Cold War going, both want USA to keep bombing randomly, both are pro-Israel.
Trump is an incompetent clown, but if he sticks to his word at least he will fight ISIS instead of legitimate states and make proper peace with Russia and cooperate.
>>70235880
This. I'd be voting for her if she didn't support a pathway to citizenship and promised not to touch my guns. Give a fuck what corrupt shit she does, miles ahead of any retarded republican or "unironically socialist in the current year" man
>>70236152
Lenin is uncomparable to these 3 retards.Actually pretty educated, smart, knows when to push and when to pull, follows his ideas and ideals, inspirational.Stalin is just retarded manager who prefers short-term decisions and is the main reason USSR died.Hillary and Sanders are shit-tier.
>>70236260
The idea that Hillary is a bad candidate because she isn't truthful is fucking hilarious. The average citizen is absolutely retarded. Anyone who becomes popular by being truthful is essentially a candidate who's policies are made for lowest common denominator retards who don't understand second level effects of policy changes (AKA the entire Bernie Sanders voting base)
>>70236100
>>70235954
I would say yes, however it would be very hard to ensure there isn't a bias put into it. I'm not familiar with norway's media, so I don't know if you are being sarcastic, but if your not, how does the media work in Norway to prevent biases from slipping in and keep it just about the actual news?
>>70236706
I miswrote.
I meant that it's state-funded. The government doesn't touch that network in any other way. Since people love that network so much from it's informed news, it would be a disaster for any politician to damage or alter it.
>>70234966
People who think for themselves aren't Bernie supporters.
>>70234657
At least they have more devotion to their candidate of choice than /pol/ fatasses who think "meme magic" means anything to anyone other than their neckbearded entourage
If any of you had half the perseverance of Rebbitors Trump wouldn't be at 38% nationally
>>70237254
for its informed news*
>>70236706
>>70237254
It's also the network which usually hosts debates between politicians since it's the most unbiased.
>>70237368
This. I used to make fun of /x/ for legitimately believing they saved the London Olympics from some sort of occult apocalypse via a spell they had cast, but it turns out /pol/ is no better
/pol/ has become /x/-tier, one of the most retarded boards on this bucket of tards, except instead of spell casting its meme magic. Try frogposting for a job you useless idiots.
If you seriously think this you may be clinically retarded.
>>70237639
Trust me they're bias
>>70234138
It's a reason not to support Shillary. That is not the same as supporting Comrade Sanders. Just vote Republican, nerd
>>70235546
If left stops meaning what it does now I'll consider it
>>70234138
To be fair Hillary is way cheaper when it comes to transport.
I mean why would she need an armored limo or even Airforce One when she can just fly everywhere on her broomstick?
>>70239069
Typing what I typed made even me suspicious, but I'm not illusioned.
They really are unbiased and hard journalists.
They are only hired for journalism and journalism only, not looks or entertainment.
>>70236513
You can be honest when talking about complex topics, numbnuts. What a retarded post. Issue complexity and voter intelligence have no relationship with candidate honesty. Next time you want to fellate yourself by regaling /pol/ with another gem of wisdom, just make a blog instead. Or post it on facebook where your personal friends and acquaintances can laugh at what a joke you are.
>>70239188
All the Republican candidates are garbage too though.
>>70240427
All the candidates suck. Vote for the one who sucks least or don't waste your time.
>>70234138
Bernie also had almost all his campaign funding from donations
Hillary and almost all other candidates get the majority of their funding from super pacs which are basically just companies
>>70234930
This is Bernies economical math:
>loan of 2700 $
>payback 2496 $ ($26x4x24) after 2 years
>get 204 donated for borrowing money (a negative interest rate)
kek
>>70240815
I only vote in local elections. Our presidential elections are a shit show of the highest degree.
