>Mississippi passes legislation to protect Christians if they don't want to serve homosexuals
>New York and Vermont literally ban official state travel to Mississippi
>Multiple state businesses issue statements of disapproval.
Why are liberals so fucking childish? Is it so hard to accept that some people disagree with you? Not everyone wants to sign off on the sinful, aids-infested, nihilist, orgy lifestyle of gays.
http://news10.com/2016/04/06/new-york-vermont-ban-official-travel-to-mississippi-over-lgbt-law/
I'm sure mississippians are very upset about a bunch of northeastern liberal faggots refusing to travel to their state.
This is bullshit, the 1st amendment protects their right.
>>70214970
I know. It shouldn't even be controversial imo. Businesses should be able to refuse business to anyone. The liberals wouldn't give a shit if a muslim bakery refused gay business (it's happened and didn't make the news).
If I walk into a black bakery wearing a klan hood should they be forced to serve me?
Liberals just cannot comprehend that people have a different worldview than them.
>>70214930
I'm not Mississippian, but I'm upset by the childishness of our countries elected officials
>>70214990
kek
>>70214801
"""""Progressive""""" left
>>70214801
Damn I am sick of their bitching.
Curb-stomp the queers, fag drag now!
>>70214801
based south
time to hoist the confederate flag
>>70214801
You would think that the point of having many states would be to have diverse laws and to be different from each other. Guess not EVERYONE MUST BE THE SAME AND OBEY.
They have the kikes that own America behind them.
>>70217410
it's sad that Massachusetts of all states doesn't give enough of a shit to complain about what the south does.
Walsh tried to ban state travel from Boston to North Carolina here and he got ridiculed for it, all we wanted here was fag rights for our own state. No one here gives a fuck about the rest of them.
Mississippian here
Should have labeled it as something other than religious and it would have gotten less flak.
