https://www.washingtonblade.com/2016/04/06/clinton-sanders-speak-out-against-miss-religious-freedom-law/
I've been waiting with baited breath to know what these two twats think.
Fuck hillary, I hate that sour cunt bitch
>>70205429
>Fuck hillary, I hate that sour cunt bitch
And she'll be your next president
>>70205315
Why would any of that be in jeopardy?
>>70205554
>Why would any of that be in jeopardy?
Because Republicans are bigots.
>>70205315
Also, regarding the article, I wonder what Clinton and Sanders would say about this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgWIhYAtan4
>>70205315
>>70205473
>>70205592
Just let your shit thread die, already.
>>70205554
because anyone with half an ounce of common sense would get rid of them
>half the poster is about money
If homosexual gayness is so great how come they keep asking fo mo shekels fo dem programs
>>70205639
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgWIhYAtan4
According to Republicans, religious freedom only applies to Christians.
does it include freedom not to serve muslims?
i dunno why they front these laws as relgious freedom, with a freedom of association law you could win the support of christfags and regular fags.
>>70205971
>does it include freedom not to serve muslims?
No
>>70205892
I wasn't asking about Republicans. I was asking about Sanders and Clinton's reaction to this. If Republicans want to give Christians preferential treatment, I'm against that. The law should be universal, however, so if Sanders and Clinton are not speaking out against this, then they are hypocrites, too.
Personally, I feel that each business should be allowed to do whatever the fuck it wants. If it wants to turn away a customer, that's their loss, and a gain for the business that IS willing to take them.
Kind of odd that I specifically asked about the two democratic candidates, and you immediately started talking about Republicans, though..
>>70206055
>I was asking about Sanders and Clinton's reaction to this.
There is no reaction to it because Muslims make up less than 1% of the US population and it wasn't Muslims passing modern day Jim Crow "religious freedom" law in Mississippi. It's CHRISTIAN law, passed by Christians in this country.
>>70206156
Oh, so it's ok for some people to turn away gay people, but not others?
>>70205315
>the blade
>>70206055
>I wasn't asking about Republicans.
But you are talking about Democrats, so I naturally bring up Republicans. Eat shit conservatard.
>>70206232
>Oh, so it's ok for some people to turn away gay people, but not others?
No, it's not ok for anyone to turn away gay people, PERIOD.
>>70205592
>MUH BIGOTRY which is perfectly fine when muslims do it because they're not white
>>70205315
>progress to trans military service
>>70206262
That had nothing to do with my question. Would you bring up cats if I asked a question about dogs? What relevance would that have to the question? It seems like you're trying to draw attention away from the very subject that you brought up (Democrats' position on refusing to service gay people)
>>70206282
Ok, so where is the outrage about Muslims turning away gay people? Also, is that rule without exception? If so, you think that if a gay person came into a restaurant naked, and started shitting on another person's table, that the owner shouldn't have the right to refuse them service?
>>70206282
Why not? You run the business, it's your profit your throwing out, so why shouldn't you be able to have a say in who you serve as long as you're willing to give up profit for your beliefs? Seems pretty fucked up tbqh senpai
>>70206448
>Ok, so where is the outrage about Muslims turning away gay people?
What percentage of the US population are Muslim?
>>70206502
>Why not?
>>70206156
>modern day Jim Crow
It's honestly revolting the level of hysterical hyperbole the left stoops to.
>>70205315
This hateful law is reprehensible and not at all consistent with the level of tolerance for gay queer and trans people that we have established in the modern United States.
The only solution is to kick Mississippi and preferably the entire south out of our blesses Queernation country.
Goodbye southern hick hillbillies!!
>>70206538
How exactly is legally mandated segregation of business the equivalent of allowing businesses to choose who they serve my histrionic friend?
>>70206515
What does it matter? If it happens EVEN ONCE, by your own logic, it's an atrocity against gays. What percentage of Christian businesses have refused to service gays?
>>70206538
And the business that does this will soon go out of business, because people will be so offended that they will not frequent the stores. Also, nowhere in the bible or Quran does it say to distance yourself from Blacks, so there is no religious belief backing that system.
>>70206629
>legally mandated segregation
Stopped reading here. Private businesses would have discriminated regardless of what the law said or didn't. Look up de-facto segregation in the North you stupid fuck.
>>70206551
>It's honestly revolting the level of hysterical hyperbole the left stoops to.
GOP is literally the modern day Nazi Party. The fact Trump will be your nominee says everything I need to know about you conservatives.
>>70206879
>I'M ENTITLED TO SHOP HERE GIVE ME SHIT
>>70206990
>I'M ENTITLED TO SHOP HERE GIVE ME SHIT
>NO GAYS ALLOWED
>WE SHOULD LIVE IN A SEGREGATED SOCIETY!
>>70206879
>would have
>using hypothetical history to try and prove your argument
How long until my comment is pulled and my employer is notified?
>>70207036
>Segregated society
>A couple private small businesses that make a lower profit because they refuse to serve certain people
you're absolutely delusional, my man.
>>70206538
Yet blacks and colored groups can still continuously deny any white membership
>>70205315
free market will fix it
>>70207067
>How long until my comment is pulled and my employer is notified?
I really hope you are fired for that bigoted comment shitlord.
>>70207139
>Yet blacks and colored groups can still continuously deny any white membership
Name ONE historical example of this happening.
>>70207198
What's next, the making it illegal to post "no shirt, no shoes, no service"?
>>70207219
Sure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_Greek_and_fraternal_organizations
>>70207036
I hate to break it to you anon but we already live in a segregated society.
>>70206947
nervous?
>>70207132
>you're absolutely delusional, my man.
Why should gays have to sit on the back of the bus?
>>70206947
And the troll reveals itself. Alright.
>>70207053
>would have
It's not would have, we already have proof of it in the North, were there was no laws mandating Jim Crow, but Jim Crow existed regardless.
>>70205592
>muh strawman
kill yourself, no one cares what you think
>>70207493
That was a state law, not a private company choosing to do what it wanted.
>>70207493
>Transportation
>Private service
Doesn't work like that.
Why are you entitled to shop at the store you want to?
>>70207036
>WE SHOULD LIVE IN A SEGREGATED SOCIETY!
You're implying that we dont which is pretty amusing
>Affirmative Action
>diversity quotas
These alone prove that society still sees race to the point where non whites are seen as poor downtrodden souls that need to be lifted up not by their own merit or hard work, but by the genetic lottery which they were granted at birth. Just because rules dont put the black man down/empower whitey doesnt mean its not an inherently racist rule.
>>70206538
>segregation
So a great and wonderful thing? Sounds good, let's do it.
>>70207572
>not a private company choosing to do what it wanted.
My private company says gays should sit on the back of the bus. What now?
I'm almost tempted to vote democrat so that we will be overrun with muzzies like Germany. It will be a glorious day when they start throwing fags and trannies off of buildings and bridges
>>70206947
>>70207664
Refuse to use the service that the company is providing and seek an alternative.
>>70207611
>Why are you entitled to shop at the store you want to?
Because it's 2016 and I shouldn't be denied service to any place simply because I'm GAY
>>70207744
2/10 there's more bait than hook
>>70207664
Is it a publicly owned company? If so, that is (and should be) illegal. If not, then I ask what your basis for this rule is. Religious belief? Quote the chapter and verse that tells you to service gays, but to treat them differently. Refusing service is different than accepting the job, but not giving them the same level of service, after all.
>>70207664
You're probably going to get shit for it by the general public and lose out on some profit. You might get people in your court to use your services a la Chic Fil a, but by and large your business will be scorned for a while. But its your freedom as a business owner to take that risk.
>>70207664
Now you faggots can take advantage of their mistake and start your own gay-sensitive bus company, your customer base is already given to you for free.
>>70207744
Depends if it's a publicly owned service, or a privately owned one. Private owners have the ability to choose who to service.
>>70207744
IT'S
>>70207843
>Private owners have the ability to choose who to service.
Not under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 they don't.
>>70207827
>tfw the chic-fil-a around here quadrupled in customers ever since that controversy
>>70207939
>An act to enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States of America to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had nothing to do with privately-owned businesses. But you already knew that, master baiter.
>>70207939
No, it maintains that right, with several exceptions (race, color, religion, sex, or national origin).
Refusing service due to you being gay has nothing to do with any of that, and forcing them actually violates the religious aspect.
>>70208062
Rather, nothing to do with the services these businesses provide.
>>70208074
>Refusing service due to you being gay has nothing to do with any of that,
Yes it does because the sex part covers gay people and trans people.
>>70208137
No. That is sexual orientation. You are still a man or a woman.
>>70208137
Since when is what you want to fuck and what mental disorder you have the same as whether or not you're a man or woman?
>>70208137
I'd also like to point out that Curves gym maintains a woman-exclusive gym, without getting shut down, so, even in that law, there are plenty of exceptions.
>>70208137
Except gay isn't a sex.
>>70208275
SEXISM REEEE
>>70207219
Got btfo now go back to riddit you intellectual retard
>>70207744
And people dont have to be forced to serve you faggot
Liberals have been hopped up on this progressive drug for over the past eight years. The detox is going to be no so pleasant to that group, but getting this shit back in order will have to happen unless you want us to go full Wiemar Republic.
Pic related is a triggered lib over some tranny decision in a nearby town's school. This bitch threatened some guy's job. smdhfam
>>70211211
>xxy
>intersex
It takes 2 seconds to educate yourself on this
TWO SECONDS
And they can't even put forth that much effort.
>>70212191
Probably because they don't want to be educated.
>>70212223
They sure love acting like they're mentally and morally superior, though.
>>70205860
Ayy lmao
You have a weird fetish jew friend
What's wrong with conversion therapy? Are homos so attached to there fetish that they can't handle the possibility that they can be fixed?
>>70205315
>Trans military service
Yes because the only reason I don't want a LITERALLY INSANE person armed to the teeth is because I'm a bigot :^<>
>>70205315
Fairly certian trump will defend my rights as a gay guy
>>70206262
>so I naturally bring up Republicans
Dysgenics is real. Let me get your mother's phone number so I can berate her for not swallowing you.
