If I have the right to keep and bear arms, why can't I have one of these? You gun nuts always complain about liberals taking away your assault weapons but nobody complains about not being allowed to buy commercial tanks
Where is the line drawn where freedom ends and safety begins?
I must drive a tank to the grocery store. It's on my bucket list.
>>70203639
You can't own nuclear weaponry either, but the state can.
>>70203639
We do infact have the right, and should be allowed to own them, however i don't have 2 mil to drop on a tank. Do you?
militias should have access to tanks and what not. i mean private corporations get to have attack helicopters and all that fun shit
>>70203861
try 20mil
>>70203880
and you can buy a tank with a deactivated main gun
>>70203639
Go buy one. Lots of rich people do. Who's stopping you?
>>70203639
Can't you literally own a tank right now in real life in America?
I'm sure I've seen rich cunts showing theirs off in gun show videos.
>>70203920
oh sorry 6.21 million to 8 million
>>70203920
>and you can buy a tank with a deactivated main gun
what's the point?
>>70203920
>try 20mil
http://www.wired.com/2015/06/heres-can-buy-russian-tank/
50 000 $
>>70203920
>>70203937
>>70203970
>deactivated main gun
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
How do you explain this
![highres_118686052[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/32UWl5B.jpg "highres_118686052[1].jpg")
>>70203988
Id go for an old M60
>>70203639
>American History
>What are letters of Marque and Reprisal
>literally your own warship
>>70204088
Feds are afraid we would fuck them up witch is the point of the second amendment pretty sure if the founding fathers knew tanks were going to be a thing they would have added it to the constitution just saying
Fact: 54% of all private tank murders are committed by blacks.
>>70204088
Your cuck thread was about owning a tank. Are you really going to move the goalposts and make it about the main gun now?
Yea I am sure with that mobile junkyard that you can buy can compete with 3rd generation tanks. Even polish panzer divisions would laugh.
Even cucked Britain-Stan lets their slaves own tanks. You just have to put rubber tracks on it if you drive it on paved city streets. Look up tanks for sale on Google and shut the fuck up you leftist retard and get the fuck out of here.
>>70204095
>m60
>without the baller A1 era package
why even bother? also starship best patton variant
>>70204088
A 50.7 ton tank with a M2 .50 cal in a turret is no laughing matter even with out its main armament
>>70203639
Not being allowed to own a modern tank has nothing to do with safety. These machines are built for a government contract. And these contracts normally stipulate no private/unauthorised foreign sales.
Seriously, just try and get a government issued red dot sight out of the U.S and you'll have the state department balls deep in your ass.
>>70203639
You can legally own a tank though
>>70204353
naw Id just mod the deactivated main gun into a flamethrower say its used to start back fires or some shit
>>70204224
My point is 2nd amendment fags don't realize shit gets outta hand pretty fast when you say "muh guns muh freedom"
Private citizens should be allowed to own tanks. Obviously you shouldn't be allowed to drive it around willy nilly, the same as you can't just carry a rifle wherever you want. There would have to be special laws about where you can drive the tank and fire the gun and whatnot, as well as laws preventing criminals from getting their hands on them.
The whole point of the 2nd Amendment, and with the entire constitution, is to decentralize power. The armed citizenry should be able to BTFO the US armed forces.
>>70203639
A true liberal don't worry about guns and tries to remove them. Only false liberals tries to remove guns.
>>70204381
>commercial tanks
>>70203639
You do realize you can own a fully operational tank right? It takes a hell of alot of time and paperwork, but it is legal in quite a few states. It's just hard as all hell because getting the permits for let's say a 120mm gun are slim to none.
>previously owned an operational m18 hellcat.
>>70203861
>i don't have 2 mil to drop on a tank
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
means government should give them out for free.
>>70204664
I support this... gee thanks feds for the M113 can I has spare tracks and tranny? too?
>>70203639
You can own a tank you faggot. You just need the money.
>>70203639
Fucking damnit, you can even buy one here in Germyny.
But with a disabled gun tho.
>>70204088
You can have an activated main gun you just need an class 3 license.
>>70204920
learned something new
Does the military even sell M1 Abrams?
Isn't the armor of the tank classified?
I'm pretty sure you can buy old WWII tanks.
>>70205031
yeah you need a security clearance just to be a tanker
>not just building your own tank
>>70203639
Because you are poor.
>>70203639
You can own a tank OP. Watchu talkin bout willis.
>>70205094
wat.
is that from /diy/ ?
>>70205031
It is indeed illegal to privately own a current use main battle tank for the reason you just Stated. Pretty much anything else is fair game. I've seen a handful of leopard 1a5's sold recently. Old, but still.
>>70203639
take it one step further, why is it not allowed to own a nuclear bomb ?
>>70204088
Special pleading, read the fucking sticky you faggot.
>>70203639
You can, retard.
>>70203639
You can though, you just need the money.
>>70204920
>>70205232
Google Killdozer.
>>70204830
>You just need the money
So government just has to increase the cost of firearms by taxing companies (or other shenanigan) making them thus prevent ownership?
>>70204548
You can just make your own without even needing the gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA
What you are gonna say now? You gonna cry to your politician to take away bulldozers?
>>70203639
Got 50 grand?
http://www.mortarinvestments.eu/products/tanks-2/t-72-42
>>70203639
>tfw I will never own recreational nukes for personal use
This is how it feels to be a slave without real freedom...
You can own a battleship in the US if you want.
The 4 Iowa class ships are owned by private charities.
>>70203639
You can privately own tanks.
Where are you at now OP? Aren't you going to post anymore shitposts? You in the middle of making a new shitty thread to clog this board?
>>70204052
I just peed a little...
A T72 for the same price as a cheap vette? Do they finance?
>>70205770
The ride isn't as nice as the vette but guaranteed it'll turn heads
>>70203639
Tanks aren't illegal
>>70206043
>it'll turn heads
tanks remove heads (and other body parts)
>>70206043
Maintenance will set you back A LOT. And apparently the engine needs a lot of love and care.
>>70206196
>tanks remove heads (and other body parts)
nah m8, you got your corvettes and tanks mixed up
>>70206419
10/10
>>70203639
You can get tanks in the U.S. With active guns, even in CA. The only problem is not only are tanks expensive as fuck but each shell is about 2 grand and is an ATF explosive device, so each requires a separate tax stamp. If you can get a good price on a surplus one you can run shit over forever though, or take it to the drive they for some good times.
-T informed American
>>70204817
Better than have them rust.
Honestly a yearly-bi yearly military sale would be nice even if for only the less critical stuff (so no super advanced sensor suites or cryptographic keys)
>>70205280
Prohibitive taxation on firearms is a violation of 2A. They probably would still do it though because the constitution is constantly shat upon.
>>70204221
/based
>>70203639
You can own a tank. You just can't drive it on public roads (or any private roads that forbid them).
>>70205514
Imagine if local militias had their own nuclear arsenals? Tread on that, motherfucker.
>>70205031
Pretty sure you could still buy one without the chobham.
>>70206948
>Tread on that, motherfucker.
Come home white man, come home to freedom.
>>70206969
Isnt that how all the export Abrams are sold? /k/ is always arguing about whether or not export Abrams have DU armour.
>>70205436
killdozer
God bless america
>>70207099
The love of liberty is the superlative emblem of a civilized people.
>>70204419
yes but HEAVY restrictions are applied. it goes w/o saying but no firing the cannon lol
>>70203639
I'm not saying you shouldn't have the right to own one, because you totally should have that right if you could foot the bill, but at the same time, it could be fucking worse - try getting a gun legally here in Germany. Or CC it legally - coincidentally, those permits only get handed out to politicians.
>>70203639
You should be able to own tanks and nukes (even tho there's no proof nukes exist other than faked videos and pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after they were mass firebombed and if you're cognitive dissonance just activated here's one to get it going even more. Nukes obliterate why are the buildings in Nagasaki and Hiroshima which were mostly made out of wood burned and not obliterated? Key well this note is over you'll either continue down the blue pill and believe nukes exist or do your own research since I planted the red pill seed)
>>70204548
Except you're a freedom-hating homo-communist, anon.
There is not "outta hand" with liberty.
>>70208060
Nukes don't obliterate. Most of the damage is from the heatwave giving you really bad burns, the shockwave knocking over buildings, massive fires, broken glass and radiation. Its not like in the movies where they just obliterate everything - thats only at the epicenter.
>>70203920
I live close to a gun range that has an annual machine gun shoot and a private citizen showed up last year with Vietnam Era Patton tank in good working condition . It's main gun was fully functional.
>>70208557
You're not wrong, but, to be fair, the epicenter is pretty fucking huge.
>>70203639
You can't afford one faggot.
>>70208666
That's true, Satan.
Hiro + Naga were tiny though, so of course there would still be standing rubble rather than just obliterated wasteland.
>>70208557
See
>>70208666
Ground zero in the epicenter it was burned not obliterated. Won't believe nukes are real unless I see a blast with my own eyes in person.
>Some magic death bomb that kills and destroys everything exists
Or
>The US government came up with a fake fear tool like usual to spread propoganda of a magic death bomb which is also used as a waste money tool against enemies as several countries will try to make nukes and fail until they realize it's impossible and just pretend to have then like everyone else
North Korea already figured out nukes are fake.
Imagine the fucking fear in the cold war. The US actually thinks Russia may have finally figured out how to make nukes but when they both figure out it was all a big goof those threats shifted to things that were more realistic.
Also I'm not saying the Jews are behind this but they probably are.
>>70203639
You can buy tanks. Only requirement is a non functional cannon.
>>70209030
Defeats the purpose. Its like saying you can have guns but triggers are illegal.
>>70208060
>>70209009
>>70209604
Way to refute me.
>>70209723
Burden of proof is on you.
>>70203639
You can own anything OP, why ? because money is above the constitution.
A tank, artillery, a gunship, a missile destroyer, a fucking bomb!!!
So long as you've got the money to pay off the right people, who already own such toys (illegally).
But you're just a poorfag that can barely afford a glock. Much less even imagine what money and the right contacts can get you.
>>70209543
That's not what the OP was arguing. Should you be able to purchase fully-functioning tanks? Yup. But that's not what the thread is about?
>>70209543
>buy tank
>mod it yourself
>>70209543
Didn't say I agreed with it but you can own a tank. In a land where people dont have RPGs a tank is still a pretty effective weapon without a cannon.
>>70209816
Good luck taking it for a spins to impress the bitches, you know how much fuel those things eat in order to haul around such massive tonnage?
Just get a civilian humvee for fuck sakes.
>>70209723
A big laugh is all it deserves. It's tinfoil hat bullshit. It's just one part of the vast Illuminati conspiracy am I right? Physics much?
>>70203858
>>70205241
>you wouldn't own a nuclear bomb, would you?
To hell I wouldn't.
>>70206948
>Tread on that, motherfucker.
FUCK YEAH! 'MURICA!
>>70209009
If nukes aren't real, explain pic related.
>>70209777
I want to argue about how cunty that shit is and how much willful ignorance a statement like that is when you could literally just go down the rabbit hole yourself and do your own research instead of me spoonfeeding you videos you probably won't watch anyways and shit but since that'd prob just waste a lot of time here's 1 video on the subject. Not the one I'm thinking of that had the best info but it is the most popular on the subject so take that as you will.
https://youtu.be/sULjMjK5lCI
>>70209009
How can E = mc^2 when E is not real, m is a mirror, and c is cottage cheese?
>>70203858
My dick is a nuclear weapon, I own it.
And I nuke your wife's vagina while you're away at the refugee camps, hansy
>>70203639
if the weapon is likely to be used again the middle class its legal and subsidized and even kids can have it at walmart or online
if it could be used against the 1% its illegal
any questions?
>>70209997
>muh conspiritard
Keep taking that blue pill retard. Consume, obey, consume, obey.
If you can't have an honest debate or discussion about a subject or even consider that a part of what you perceive to be reality might just be wrong you're part of the problem. I never said to just listen and believe or that fucking reptilian shapeshifters from Mars are sending zeta waves to brainwash us and only metal can stop it. That's a slippery slope.
>>70210340
>muh illegallity
thank goodness for corrupt politicians and loopholes.
aye joe
You think all those latin american drug cartels using US military grade weapons manufactured those themselves?
>>70205094
Too prone to overheating.
It's legal to own tanks with functioning weapons you just need the proper ATF stamps people can and do own howitzers and all sorts of strange and expensive ordinance
>>70203639
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvkLaa9bogU
>>70210256
Rather that than some refugee using his biological weapon to plow German wives' vaginas.
>>70209543
>Defeats the purpose.
Not entirely. A tank with NBC filtration is pretty much impervious to local police forces. Same goes for citizens...or zombies...in the event of a total breakdown of society.
There was a guy in San Diego who stole a tank in 1995. He shredded everything he hit (except a bridge support). Only reason police were able to stop him is because he got the tank stuck AND he didn't have the hatch locked in a way that would prevent someone from the outside from opening it. So while he was trying to free the tank they opened the hatch and shot him.
Had he been smart he probably could have driven into Mexico before anyone even had a clue what to do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_Nelson_%28plumber%29
That said, I would rather own a modern, nuclear powered attack submarine. To attack you an enemy would first have to find you. Even if they do locate you, there's a good chance you'll sink their shit first. Properly stocked you could spend years at sea. The ultimate survival tool.
But of course you need the tank to get to the docks.
>>70210880
>Same goes for citizens...or zombies
Arent citizens classified as zombies under martial law initiatives?
>>70211092
Probably. In America we're classified that way for tax purposes.
You can own a fully operational tank and ammo - you need a class 3 DD stamp for the gun and each shell
You can own a nuclear missile - you need an NRC general license for the fissile material and separate class 3 DD stamps for the explosive lenses, the rocket fuel and the rocket assembly
You can buy reactor-grade uranium from any radioactive supply company, and you can buy centrifuges from any industrial plant supplier
So shut the fuck up, enjoy your freedom and go build us a nuke-launching tank.
>>70210488
Like the Aussie above said, the burden of proof lies upon you. What evidence do you have that supports your position other than an opinion?
>>70211173
>enjoy your freedom and go build us a nuke-launching tank.
Don't tempt me Aussie bro.
>>70211336
Oh I'm tempting you. Do it faggot.
It's 100% legal. And if they made it unduly burdensome to acquire some necessary part you could take them to court and win.
>>70208190
what part of well organized militia is too complex for rednecks?
>>70203639
You make a very good point, why the fuck CAN'T I own a tank?
I would also like some legal nukes too.
>>70203639
>Can't
You can tho.
>>70211712
The part where "militia" is explicitly described as consisting of every American
>>70211282
See
>>70210140
You can but each one costs 7-8 million $ and is expensive as fuck to maintain.
>>70206911
Can't you make them street legal with rubber treads, seat belts and all that? Or are they too heavy for roads?
>>70204664
No fuck off.
Welfarism is welfarism no matter what it is providing.
>>70203639
>you can't buy modern fully armed tanks.
The only thing stopping you js your checkbook.
Now what is bullshit is that we can't arm helicopters planes and ships legally.
>>70212147
They are too heavy. It's a 60 ton machine. You can drive light ones though, like British Scorpion.
>>70211783
So how do nuclear reactors work then?
>>70212147
Depends on the individual road.
>>70212263
You do realize that commercial trucks can easily hit 110 tonnes on a normal day?
>>70212218
>tfw /pol/ and /k/ will never buy a fully loaded battleship to patrol the med
>>70204548
Except we've been living in one of the most stable countries ever for 200+ years. But ok.
We also don't have a bloody history on our own soil like Europe over that same amount of time
>>70212294
Why are you even acknowledging him?
He's either a troll or a lunatic. You can't do anything either way.
>>70211712
I could switch that part of the sentence with "Due to antigunners being a bunch of illiterate faggots, the right of the people to keep and bear arms Shall not be infringed" and it would have the same meaning as it does now.
>>70212354
Really? I thought they were below 30 tons.
>>70203858
Do you have any idea what a nuclear weapon would cost?! the major parts are figuratively made of solid refined diamonds. Can you imagine the cost of a solid flawless diamond the size of a soft ball? that is waht makes nuclear weapons go, there is a reason it takes the combined industry of a country to make one and you can make a gun with a bit of pipe in your shed.
>>70203920
You can buy a fully operational tank and nobody can stop you.
You have to pay a $200 tax stamp for rounds though. I really wish people would brush up on their laws for once.
>>70212389
I just want to see this played out. I always want to engage the crazy homeless screaming about lizards in real life, but I also don't want to get stabbed. This is a happy medium.
>>70212371
>tfw youll never win the loto and buy an old destroyer and hunt pirates with your mates
>>70212421
Used to work in trucking. The prime mover can be 6t, a trailer 11t, container 33t, dolly 4t, another trailer and cont and you get 98 tonnes without breaking a sweat. Add fuel and you're over 100
>>70204920
True but you still need to get an FFL first which means you must be a business trying to turn a profit. They don't even accept the application if you admit you're not trying to turn a profit.
>>70212428
Actually making a nuclear detonation is relatively easy. The hard part is the delivery system and getting a yield past 5kt
>>70212428
Nukes cost about 2 mil a piece.
>>70212526
And another 1t for the steering wheel attendant
>>70203639
You can, just buy some old discount soviet stuff.
>>70212526
That is spread across two dozen wheels though, a 60 tonne tank has the footprint much smaller and a ground loading much greater.
>>70211712
You realize "militia" is explicitly defined in American law as all men of age, right? I guess you could use that argument to deny women the right to own guns, but then you're a shitlord.
>>70212485
lel, okay then
>>70212526
Didn't know that. But still, it's more spread out pressure isn't it?
Tanks ruin roads.
>>70212642
Treads are vastly more efficient than wheels for spreading weight.
>>70211712
"A well balanced breakfast, being necessary for a healthy body, the right of the people to grow crops, shall not be infringed"
What has the right to crops? A well balanced breakfast, or the people?
>>70211712
The populous is the militia you retard.
>>70204088
You can buy one with a fully operational DD attached to it.
You just need to also pay the DD tax on each and every round you carry on it.
That's the only bullshit part is the "destructive device" tax they put on everything they don't consider to have a "sporting use"
>>70212777
Was waiting for this one.
>>70212635
looks like the previous Jewish major of san diego.
>ITT: People who have never read DC v. Heller.
>>70210488
>calls others blue pill
>is spreading cointelpro well poisoning crap designed to paint everyone who questions government as nutjobs.
Next you're going to point to Simon shack or Judy woods and authorities on 9/11 aren't you?
>>70212557
>Actually making a nuclear detonation is relatively easy.
yeah, just pop down to the hardware store, pick-up some pipe, a hammer, some gunpowder and a pound of weapons grade uranium (they keep it next to the fertilizer). 2 hours in the shed and you done right? you just cant throw it far enough to make it safe to use? the fact that is took the US gov $26 billion and a machine that filled up the largest building on earth at the time and used more power than several states combined makes me question how easy they are to produce.
Could I get a tank, do all the paperwork, buy 120mm HE rounds, drive to the White House, and just point a gun at Obama's office?
>>70212977
Sure but Pennsylvania Ave is going to have a large you-shaped crater before you get close enough.
>>70212371
It isn't entirely impossible
http://www.sovietarmor.com/catalog/armored/n_14_1.html
>>70212977
Yes, but they have rocket launchers mounted on the white house roof and you would be turned into shrapnel the moment they figured what you were up to.
>>70212977
you'd have to do a lot more paperwork for each round and good luck finding a place who would sell it to you
And your tank would be fucked before it ever reached the white house I would think
>>70212963
The hardest part of anything is first inventing it or building up the infrastructure to do it yourself.
This applies to anything not just nuclear weapons.
>>70212963
The only difficult part these days of building a gun type nuclear device is finding enough 235. The hard part of the Manhattan project was figuring out all the math and engineering specs the first time.
>>70213080
$700,000 for a Hind
Well i have a life goal now.
>>70212963
it's relativ easy to make it explode. take 2 parts weaponized atomic matter of your choice and let it collide to create a unstable mass. chain reaction will start and it blows off.
hard part is not to die of radiation before you can make it explode.
>>70213233
so you have access to a ready make uranium enrichment facility? Raw materials? Very precisely shaped charges that are the cornerstone of all implosion style nuclear devices? Do you even have the engineering knowledge to make a simple steel casing for it all to go inside of? How about a degree in nuclear physics so you know which isotope you want? Or are you the kind of third world ass hole who melts down a bunch of smoke detectors, sticks then in a pipe bomb and calls it a day?
>>70203639
>why can't I have one of these?
You can.
There's a lot of legal hoops and paperwork to jump through, and every round of ammunition requires its own certificate which carries a $200 fee each, but it is possible to legally own a fully-operational tank. You just need a lot of money.
>>70213545
We aren't saying Joe blow can make it but if some multi Billionaire truly wanted to they absolutely could.
Remember every nuclear weapon in the US arsenal was built by private contractors
>>70213545
with enough money you can buy everything on this planet.
>>70211783
Still waiting on that proof.
>>70213675
with nuclear materials supplied by the los Alamos nuclear facility.
nuclear proliferation is a massive concern to the us gov, Saddam Hussain got put on the US shit list for ordering the wrong kind of pipe because it might have, possibly in a round about way been used for uranium enrichment. A private individual ordering anything that is even remotely related to nuclear weapons will raise red flags everywhere, let alone enough equipment and raw materials to make a bomb. remember Iran and NK have been trying to make them for decades without success.
>>70203639
You dip shit.
You can fucking own an abrams.
Drop like 2.5 mil and it's all yours
Get fucked statist pig
The second amendment cannot be interpreted as a complete right to own any type of weapon.
The second amendment was meant to let militias form and be called into service if the need arises. The basic idea being if you let the general populace train with guns, own them, and maintain them, you'll have a better, more effective soldier, and also the militias may be able to react faster than any sort of federal army at the time.
None of those are really a concern at the moment. But the right should still be available. I think the proper guideline is civilians should have access to whatever firearms is/are considered standard issue for each of the three branches. That being said, criminal and mental health checks are constitutional.
>>70213963
Like I said initially: to make a nuclear detonation is relatively (relatively: relatively) easy. The hard part is putting the device together safely and correctly.
Two hemispheres of uranium in a steel pipe launched at each other with TNT would probably trigger an implosion if they were big enough.
To get a yield big enough for it to be worth building is the hard part. Critical geometry is sculpted down to the atom for megaton weapons.
>>70214418
Does this include tanks, artillery, etc?
>>70214418
>The second amendment cannot be interpreted as a complete right to own any type of weapon
See
>>70212400
And take a remedial English class.
>>70213963
>Saddam Hussain got put on the US shit list for ordering the wrong kind of pipe because it might have, possibly in a round about way been used for uranium enrichment.
Funny joke anon.
Not only were these "aluminum tubes" physically impossible to be used in any nuclear weapons production (and the CIA knew this but their Intel was sidelined because it didn't come to the right conclusions explained in link) but this was pushed in the media by presstitutes like Judith Miller. Also the only "proof" that Saddam was getting uranium was a letter that was immediately proven to be a forgery that was so bad that the forgers signed the name of a prime minister that wasn't in power for over a decade which again the CIA debunking such clear forgery was sidelined because it didn't come to the right conclusions and instead "Intel" from the OSP headed by Douglas feith was pushed to the forefront despite it not only being manipulated "Intel" most of it was outirght forged. Same goes for the "muh Saddam gave Muhammad Atta anthrax" lie. It originated from this same office
Saddam was in the shit list for a very specific other reason.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TMW7x0fLaLA
>>70214814
No. Tanks and artillery are not standard issue.
>>70214944
The context of a statement is important to determining it's meaning. Additionally, reinterpretation is necessary every few decades to revaluate the statement's meaning within current jurisprudence and culture. Finally, the Constitution is more than just it's text. We have 200 years of constitutional scholars on the supreme Court interpreting it as well.
>>70215223
>The context of a statement is important to determining it's meaning
No nigger laws are laws and don't have context.
Even if you read the context in the Federalist papers it is summed up in "citizens rights to bear arms Shall not be infringed." Which is demonstrated by the fact that citizens of the era owned everything from muskets to fully armed and operational warships the world's most powerful weapon of the day.
So I'll say it again take a remedial English course
Here you can even use this to understand why you're a retard
http://www.conceptdraw.com/How-To-Guide/free-sentence-diagrammer
>Additionally, reinterpretation is necessary every few decades to revaluate the statement's meaning within current jurisprudence and culture.
No it doesn't that just means we don't actually have a system of law.
>>70209009
Do you just not believe in nuclear fission?
Tanks and stuff like nukes are self-regulating.
Those things are expensive to buy and maintain.
Besides you can buy a tank.
http://www.mortarinvestments.eu/
>>70216023
The fundamental concept of self regulating doesn't exist in leftist/general authoritarian thought anon
>>70216232
dammit!
I totally forgot that the idiots talking about "common sense" gun laws lack common sense!
You can own an operational tank, it costs a lot more than just buying one because of government restrictions, restrictions that exist because you refuse to pick up a rifle and refresh the tree of freedom.
>>70208190
Unalienable right, not "human right"
>>70209009
dude
>>70212371
>>70212504
That's my project if I win lottery, I will buy a big yacht and patrol the med to ram rapefugees rafts
>>70204353
starship was a pile of junk tho
>>70203639
You can own the gun, sure. But the tank itself is not a right.
>>70212294
They work the way they work? Just because nuclear bombs aren't real doesn't mean nuclear power isn't aswell it's just them twisting the truth with lies to make it seem more believable.
>>70213939
>>70203639
if you want to ban things like tanks and nukes then amend the fucking constitution
until then
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>>70218437
You can but only if you are at least dan bilzerian level of rich
>>70203639
I'd say it's more of a question of what's road legal and insurance liability.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PHcdn8R4d4
Video related- ex pilot who earned a fortune now privately flies and maintains a Harrier for private flying.
So you can do it - just taking it places is the problem as well as insurance.
>>70218437
This
Nukes just don't detonate like we were brainwashed to believe. They more just meltdown.
Look at the massive propaganda campaign, trillions of tax dollars, North Koreas never ending bluff, the fucking COLD WAR, and how every test has a hollywood team to film it and scare the masses.
They arent as simple as missiles that can blow up entire cities at the push of a button and certainly wont end the world.
Conventional warfare is back on the menu boys
GET HYPE
>>70204610
Previously? That helcat is an awesome tank
>>70208060
Is this shitty bait, or are you legit retarded? This is almost as stupid as the flat earth bs.
>>70219716
Pretty much. Nuclear weaponry can be used to leave a mass Fallout of radiation like chernobyl but I doubt they'd do that because the cleanup is basically impossible if they do it on a large scope.
>>70220998
>flat earth
>garbage
Sure senpai sure
https://youtu.be/1jmWImhNo84
>>70203639
My uncle has one, or at least a tank but it can't shoot.
>>70203639
Its around a tank with firing capability, or an RPG.
As with all policy, a line has to be drawn somewhere.
>>70203639
can you carry that tank in your arms?
then no.
>>70221530
>there are still flat earthers
Jesus christ
>>70221530
you shouldn't not kill yourself.
>>70221530
>he believes people went into space
get a load of this goy
>>70222067
>still
there was a pretty big resurgence late last year when some rapper tweeted about how he believed the earth was flat
>>70222067
It's awoooovement as they say and it's only growing. I actually was the same as you as little as last year. But after watching several videos, reviewing NASA footage and such, and just comparing their math to real world stuff it just doesn't add up. For example did you know you can see the statue of liberty from 50 miles away yet if the earth was round it should be thousands of miles below the curvature.
Eh either way I doubt I'll convince you or anyone who is too indoctrinated it'll just come to you in time like it does eventually it did me I hope. It's hard to come go a realization that most of reality is a lie. Cognitive dissonance is one hell of a cork in the human brain.
Imagine my sadness to find out space is likely just a very very very small little bubble above the Earth and aliens don't exist and all that jazz as someone who enjoys Sci fi and studied science their whole life.
>>70221530
Why not just buy a flight ticket around the globe shaped world and look out the window the entire time?
Theory debunked and case closed
>>70222801
>>70222067
I meant thousands of feet not miles my bad typo.
>>70203639
M1A2 Abrams Tank is not an "Arms," by current understanding and usage.
>>70203639
You can, idiot. You just can't afford it.
>>70222932
The horizon is not proof of a curve it's proof of our eyes only being able to see so far and perspective existing. I have been in several commercial airlines. There is no curve. Funny enough tho some airlines actually have windows that curve the light to really bend the shape of the Earth at curves that should only be possible in space. It's a really neat effect.
>>70222801
>from 50 miles away
Why does it disappear at 51 miles away?
>>70223136
Thats not what I was talking about.
I said fly a plane around the world and wind up right where you started. If the earth is flat you'll just reach the end
>>70223352
No dice, every single pilot in the world is in on the conspiracy unfortunately.
>>70221807
Maybe if I had the right to bear arms, then i could lift it with my new bear strength.
>>70221530
That Israeli Astronaut doesn't even have a moonraker. What kind of shitty golden gun is that supposed to be?
>>70223459
And there goes this retarded theory.
Anyone with a friend that is a pilot can prove this theory wrong.
>my buddies dad did it 13 years ago as a life goal
>>70203639
>>70204353
That thing is badass as fuck
>>70223222
It doesn't if you have a strong enough telescope and have the right clear angle.
>>70223136
>The horizon is not proof of a curve it's proof of our eyes only being able to see so far and perspective existing.
I see somebody's never been out on a boat with a telescope before. My dad did this when I was a kid, and it's a fairly inexpensive thing to try for yourself. Studying science your whole life doesn't hold a candle to spending a single afternoon seeing it for yourself.
As features on land start to fade on the horizon, you can clearly see through a telescope that only the top portion of them are visible. This is especially clear with skyscrapers taller than the other ones in the area. You can see the top of the tall skyscraper but absolutely none of the buildings around it. If it was a case of "it's so far that you can't see it, similar to how you can't see a gnat from across a room" then, like the gnat, the entire thing would be visible when zoomed in on.
>>70223943
It was unsuccessful
Nuclear physics doesn't exist and the world is flat!
>>70210256
wew lad
>>70223352
Ignore the shit posting Australian pilots don't go in a straight line around the earth they follow directions and when people fly around the planet they follow the directions and fly in a circle unwittingly since they're just following navigation.
>>70223985
I live in California and have been on a beach and seen it with my own eyes I suggest you watch the video linked here
>>70221530
While it's addressed to Tyson it covers a lot of things for people in general including what you mentioned specifically there's other videos that go in detail about that specific subject and perspective more in detail tho.
>>70214991
You could argue that grenades and grenade launchers are standard issue.
>>70203861
Tanks are too expensive. We should provide free tanks for the people.
>>70224334
>on a beach
that's not far enough out to see things dip below the horizon you donut
Dis fuggen thread goddammit american edicaushon :DDDDDDD
>>70224149
Yes.. I'm the shitposter.
>>70224501
Hes a disinformation troll designed to make the holohoax truth seem retarded by associating it with flat earth.
Brilliant tactic if people are dumb enough to fall for it
>>70224501
Yes it is? You can see things dip "below" the horizon on the beach and progressively farther away it keeps doing it depending if how much magnification or how level you are with the water because of perception and how light works.
>>70210613
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZbG9i1oGPA
>>70223352
It's actually about Antarctica and the resources contained therein, there is no space picture enveloping Antarctica that are not computer simulations, there are no actual flights from australia to south america going through pacific, also why you as a private entity are prohibited in dabbling and having expeditions to antarctica, also it's why noone has ever circumnavigated AA in a ship (in a close perimeter).
AA wiki:
2015-16 - Henry Worsley died while attempting to complete the first solo and unaided crossing of the Antarctic.
Never. It was also a blow to my ego. It's fair to admit, never too late. But you have to be humble in the face of facts - the authorities are hiding unknown resource in AA. That resource may be artefacts, or merely LAND.
>>70224853
Fuck off shill. I bet you think the Earth is hollow or concave or something.
>>70224436
We give Stingers and vehicles to jihadists living in the mountains of wereverthefuckistan, why not open up a militia repository for large armaments here in the states?
>>70203639
OP is clearly a faggot and lives in a city like New York or is FBI bait.
Quick Google search:
http://www.exarmyvehicles.com/
