>A 2011 study showed that libertarians experience morality differently than other people. While narrowly valuing individual liberty above all other types of morals, libertarians often identify as rational and unemotional and react to certain issues with less moral concern. A 2012 study of libertarian morality found that they were less empathic than both liberals and conservatives. For example, violence and suffering concerns liberals and conservatives more than it does libertarians. Libertarians also report less of a moral identification with their communities than other members.
Why are libertarians so autistic?
>>70201019
>Why are libertarians so autistic?
They are not autistic. They are psychopaths and want to destroy the mechanisms protecting people from their intraspecies predation.
>>70201019
>Why are libertarians so autistic?
Not an argument.
>>70201019
>being a cuck who allows emotions to control yoir life
>>70201019
WE WUZ NOT AN ARGUMENT AND SHIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!
>>70201232
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism#Criticism
>>70201019
>Empathy
Oh no! we need to help these poor refugees! I'm going to pay way more in taxes so that they can have free housing, food, education, women, cars, TV licenses, and clothes. That certainly wont destroy my society :^)
makes sense
I never gave a fuck about anybody before
but now I know we need strong borders and more white people in order to have a better society
WHY DO YOU SUPPORT ME GETTING SHOT
>>70201379
A true ubermensch would have tremendous empathy for their struggle and yet have the fortitude to still make the correct decision despite its difficulty and pain.
>>70201019
>promotes the non aggression principal
>not concerned with violence
>>70201151
>They are psychopaths and want to destroy the MERCHANTs protecting people from their intraspecies predation.
Who would say such a thing?
>>70201530
>A true ubermensch
>empathy for their struggle
somebody didn't read their Nietzsche
>>70201698
dont really care about him, just hijacking his term
>>70201541
the NAP is inconsistent with reality
>>70201019
>describes basing opinions on reason
>calls it "autistic" because it doesn't parrot normal social interaction
>>70201019
>less likely to make irrational decisions based on muh fee fees
>>70201019
Anyone remember the study that measured five different types of morality and showed conservatives weighed them equally while liberals were slanted towards only some of them?
>>70201019
Emotion is largely the death of reason. While it is possible to be both, one usually takes precedence over the other. I'd take logos over pathos any day. The empathy part i'm gonna call bullshit on, at least on an anecdotal level.
>>70201967
Hur hur what are guns you faggot?
>>70202232
things that not everyone can afford
>>70202384
>Cant afford a gun
>Lives in a socialist country
Correlation or causation?
Hi everybody Stefan Molyneux from freedomainradio I hope you're doing well!
Spanking your kids is the direct cause of all the world's evils, specifically wars and the government, which is an immoral system centralised around the monopoly of violence to commit taxation, which is nothing else but theft at gunpoint, a gross violation of the Non-Aggression principle. Any arguments against these are actually not an argument because of my own moral framework that I invented that you cannot refute because speaking to me is proof that my framework is correct and evidence of Universally Preferable Behaviour. Therefore I literally cannot be wrong because everything is literally not an argument. The only way we can slay the great beast that is the government is for you to donate more than one fucking dollar. If you call in we will have a discussion about how your daddy's rich and your momma's good lookin', but she was an evil vile woman who is a child abuser because she fought with her husband in front of you once. If my mother weren't my mother she would be FUCKING DEAD! I would have FUCKING KILLED HER! You must go to therapy and defoo because spending time around people that WANT YOU SHOT is suicidal. Throughout the call I will constantly interrupt you, and scold you if you do the same to me, but that's okay because I have the largest philosophy show in the history of humanity. However, I will not hesitate to hang up on you if you admit that free will does not exist, because I don't debate with robots.
P.S. I don't want to fuck you.
>>70202458
not an argument
>>70201019
In other words, evidence of humanity growing up, abandoning its primitive tribalisms, irrationality and fears.
>>70202384
you can buy a second hand ting ting for like $20
>>70201530
I think you will find that they may well struggle but they suppress that emotion so they can come to better conclusions. That's how I personally role, but I am not a libertarian.
When you cruz along suppressing emotional knee jerks it becomes an instinct. When I was little I would cry over shit like dead insects and other silly shit. That becomes shit after a while.
>>70202463
>P.S. I don't want to fuck you.
FRESH MEME over here boys
>>70202463
Monumental strawman. This is probably the most obvious I have ever seen.
>>70201967
NAP is not pacifism.
But if you'd actually read the fucking thing you would know that.
>>70202913
>arguing with a retard
why senpai
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/6/15/876205/-
http://www.franklycurious.com/LMNucleus/indexBase.php?itemid=9413
>tfw libertarianism leads to fascism and autocracy
Who /crypto-fascist/ here?
>>70201019
http://righteousmind.com/largest-study-of-libertarian-psych/
>Libertarians have the most “masculine” style, liberals the most “feminine.
Cucks btfo
>On this and other measures, libertarians consistently come out as the most cerebral, most rational, and least emotional.
Muh feels btfo
>Libertarians, more than liberals or conservatives, have the capacity to reason their way to their ideology.
Retards btfo
http://www.medicaldaily.com/autism-genes-linked-higher-intelligence-treading-fine-line-between-intellectual-325798
>Autism Genes Linked To Higher Intelligence
Sure, it sucks to risk autism but libertardians are clearly superior.
>>70202963
Same reason Stef does it, for the benefit of the gullible and uninformed in the audience.
"The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles."
>>70201019
Empathy =/= morality.
>>70201019
>How dare a political position apply logic instead of emotion to a subject! It's 2016, this is unthinkable behavior!
bleeding heart pls
>>70201967
>Non Aggression Pact
>Non Aggression
>Aggression
>root word Aggress: 1. to commit the first act of hostility or offense; attack first.
>>70203414
40 Threads, 4000 posts, and this is the first argument I've seen.
Pack it up boys, meme's over.
>>70203034
>crypto-fascist
why not just go full fash? who cares what others think.
>>70203074
Libertarianism is useless in a country that refuses to acknowledge the inherent inferiorities of lesser cultures and races.
Cultural hegemony is the only trustworthy foundation.
>>70201019
OP is just butthurt that no libertarian wants to fuck him.
>>70202598
That doesn't apply to all posts. It only applies to posts where someone is using fallacious reasoning to try and deflect a point without a valid counterpoint.
>>70201019
Wow totally mind blowing that an ideology that emphasises independence over cooperation has people with less empathy/emotional response
>"conservatives may be evil, but at least they're completely ruled by their emotions instead of logic, unlike those terribad libertarians!"
Lmao, fuck this world. I never thought I'd see so many people fighting against reason and logic like this.
>>70203034
I too use libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism as a cover for some of my more autocratic/feaudalist beliefs.
>>70203547
not an argument
What situations were presented and what were the selectable responses?
>>70203632
A FUCKING LEAF
>>70203542
I find that the people who are uncomfortable with libertarians are the same people who are uncomfortable with being responsible for themselves. Whether this is a man who is unsuccessful (whether this is in dating, his job, or both), or a woman who just instinctively craves free shit, the reasons are always the same. They want the reward without the risk. They want the payout without the investment (which is why the majority of happily married women vote conservative or libertarian; they don't want to share their husband's shit with strangers).
>>70203448
It's like common sense is a foreign fucking concept to these people. Why would a political party be pacifist and rabidly pro-gun?
>>70203173
Yours clearly shows your libertarian.
What the fuck am I?
Do not let emotion cloud your judgement. It is highly illogical.
>>70203664
NOT
![[SEVERE CONTEMPT].gif](https://i.imgur.com/49HByPk.gif "[SEVERE CONTEMPT].gif")
>>70203632
>>70203576
What aspect of modern culture makes this a surprise? In what sane society are Trump, Clinton, and the Kardashians major public figures with huge devoted followings?
I've been watching him for a few years now threw him a few bones last year after i realized just how hard I was memeing
JUST 50 CENTS!
>>70203576
This, frankly.
>>70203696
Bleeding-Heart Nationalist Authoritarian Individualist?
What the fuck, Straya?
>>70203696
I'm not clearly a libertarian. I'm closer to a conservative when it comes to Fairness, Loyalty, and Purity. My liberty score just increases the distance to all other parties astronomically.
And your test tells you that you are closer to a Conservative. I'd just leave it at that. Doesn't mean you need to vote GOP. Just like I don't need to vote libertarian.
>>70201019
B grade psychologist in calling the right dumb SHOCKER
Reminder that sociology, psychology and the humanities in general are marxist through and through.
>>70203960
Mother is a PhD psychologist, very conservative and more racist than me.
Can someone in this thread, preferably an Ancap, explain to me how the NAP is supposed to work + act as a basis for all human interaction? Because my issue with Libertarianism is that, like Communism, it seems to depend upon social cognitive theory (the idea that human beings can have their nature fundamentally re-written). What if the NAP starts getting in the way of profit for a mega-corporation?
I'm a libertarian because I just want to be left the fuck alone.
Reason is blind. It's just a tool. Only emotions can guide you and give you any meaning.
>>70201019
I bet it looks like this on a scale of morality:
1.National Socialists
2.Liberals/conservatives
3.libertarians.
>>70203875
Just leave me alone and I'll leave you alone.
>>70202598
not an argument
>>70205199
>no authority, loyalty or fairness
Either lying or just plain fucked up senpai
In a libertarian society, who will enforce net neutrality, securing the personal freedoms of everyone on the internet?
>muh logic
Logic is useless without an emotional foundation. It's like a wrench lying on a workbench, it can't do anything on it's own.
There's no logical reason to prefer life over death without emotional justification.
>>70201692
Oh, I don't know...
>a study
i just took a study and liberals are evil.
>>70207451
net neutrality isn't a libertarian position because 'net neutrality', as phrased by certain political groups, is not neutral as the title claims
>>70201019
not an argument
>>70208036
Not having net neutrality is like having tax. Going to that specific web service? Pay us more. Buying alcohol? Pay us more.
>>70201019
Comparing 50% of the political compass to liberals and conservatives is stupid, basically you're comparing extreme anarchy and objectism to both of those.
I'm a libertarian because I believe local governments are more effective and sensible on most issues
>A man orders a custom-built sex doll designed to look just like his niece.
http://www.celebritytypes.com/morality/6/test.php
My sides
>>70202463
SAVAGE
>>70201151
you mean guns?
I think don't libertarians want to destroy those.
>>70208339
sounds like a free market
>want to use this thing i have pay me
I find it funny how socialists call themselves empathic yet their empathy is all about using other people's money so they feel better with themselves.
How can you have empathy if your recipes destroy countries and compromise future generations wealth? hurr, im so empathic I want my country to become Venezuela, this guy who wants to reduce absolute poverty like Singapore has in the last 30 years is so evil because muh inequality.
>>70201019
>Steals from everyone
>uses the money to bomb the world
I'm totes more moral than you LOLbertarians haha LOL get it
>>70204565
It's not about rewriting them it's just a moral framework and guidelines for morality/law.
Just asserts that any behavior/system/action that uses or relies on the initiation of force is immoral and unjust.
>mega-corporation
Can't exist in a free market way too unstable with either competitors being able to improve and change quicker, and companies wouldn't agree to artificially inflated prices because it's unstable and the first one that violates it and sells for cheaper would make a huge amount of money while the others would fail.
The actual application of the NAP differs alot by what sort of libertarianism (minarchists say goverments job is to enforce the NAP while ancaps say goverment inherently violates it)
Not at all reliant on rewriting people, more just specifies which parts of their behaviors shouldn't be incentivized by whatever systems are in place. Ancaps generally want to just spread philosophy of the NAP and private security and social/moral systems would incorporate it.
i am not really that knowledgable though past watching some videos though.
Left-liberalism and libertarianism are mental disorders. Especially left-liberalism.
>>70208479
How the fuck does this test work? Am I supposed to rate whether it's okay or not for the people to make the choice they're making, or whether I agree with their choice or not?
>>70209179
Do you consider the behaviour morally acceptable?
Libertarianism is pretty good as long as it provides a basic social safety net for poor people.
You don't want them becoming criminals.
>>70204828
And yeah, we have a different morality sometimes, because we understand economics.
The socialist sees a poor person begging in the street and they think they should use that rich guy's wallet to get the beggar out of his situation.
The libertarian thinks the rich person (in a free market) is someone who serves society and who can multiply wealth, we understand pareto optimality, and think about how the money in the productive's hands will lead to more opportunities to get out of poverty for the poor than simple handouts. It's better to have the apple tree in the expert's farmer hands than to give 1 apple to everyone, there will be more apples and with more sustainability with the first. But since the first consequence of a handout is easier to see than the consequences of proper allocation of resources, we're seen as amoral people who eat babies.
>>70201019
>They fell for the Ryan the Lion meme
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cZNPCdJujk
>>70203565
Independence and cooperation are not antonyms. You can promote both at the same time. The antonym for independence is dependence
>>70201019
>study finds everyone I disagree with is a horrible person
>(me, 2011)
>>70203565
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_society
The government replaced this and the relevance of syndicates, which used to take care of unemployment aid, medical bills, etc before the government took over. Life before government was way more cooperative than now.
Funny how the government, which is a system that isolates you from direct cooperation due to not needing to interact at all in order to receive help from others, is seen as the pinnacle of cooperation.
>>70208892
how do you explain the success of socialist countries like norway and denmark? aren't they supposed to be "destroyed countries whose wealth will be compromised in the future?
>>70202463
10/10
>>70210317
Different factors.
First of all, they're not as socialist as people like to think, no inter-professional minimum wage, no fine for firing employees, their taxes are mostly supported by middle/lower classes through consumption taxes while corporate taxes are lower than in most of Europe, they have run low deficits through the years. I'm Spanish, and if some government tried to implement the way nordics build their wealth, people would riot in the streets and kill politicians. They're way more capitalist than the southern european countries.
Second, they built their wealth through capitalism. Nordic countries had lower taxes than the US for the first half of the 20th century, obviously it takes time to destroy what capitalism builds (Sweden accelerated this a lot in the 70s and had to retract all their socialist policies), specially if you maintain a more or less free economy, it's like if Venezuela turned libertarian today after decades of socialism, would you say their shitty situation is because of free market?
Although comparatively with other countries they're much worse now than they were 50 years ago, meaning, other countries have progressed way more than them. Look at wealth in ireland and sweden and compare the differences then and now, ireland is growing 10 times faster thanks to a more free economy.
Plus, Norway has oil and a relatively small population for all the resources they have.
>>70211272
yeah dude, we're so fucked when the Oil runs out, unless we think of alternative solutions. Also immigrants. The more of them we get in, the shittier our country and economy becomes. Our currency is already dropping heavily in value.
>>70207916
There are jews in every political ideology though
>>70201019
Yup it's right.
And it's other people who have depraved sense of morality filed with their own feelings, agenda and ideas.
Logical thing is the most moral thing. Their morality suits only themselves.
Why should we care about others? It's our decision based on our experience who we care about.
If left indeed care about every life they wouldn't imply assassinating somebody or oppressing one group for benefits of the other.
They constantly deny their own claims.
>>70204565
Law based on Dispute Resolution rather than force. So if you break a window and refuse to pay, you recieve that against your name from the DRO, meaning that employers, landlords ect can see you have bad behaviour and deny you services. Kind of like how credit scores work. If you take out a loan with HSBC and never pay it back, it will be almost impossible to get one from Barclays because they share information.
>>70208339
Yeah like romania bro. Its already been proven you can have better quality internet without the state.
>>70201019
My issue with libertarianism will always be that the state is the moral center and weakening it will turn us back into a union rather than a country
>>70201019
Because they are retarded enough to believe that if we let literally anybody in and had no regulations on business everything will magically work out.
Either that, or they unironically believe that a few big business overlords ruling over a population of mongrels is preferable.
>>70212958
why shouldn't it? If monopolies are greedy, people will produce similar products and not charge as much. If their idea is good enough, they will get a credit or people will invest.
Lolbers base their beliefs on human nature and science, not on philosophie and indoctrination
I have read every single post in this thread 3 times over. I still cannot find any arguments.
>>70201019
Where is the source of this study? Or is this whole thread a bait train?
>>70201019
The only reason we show less empathy is because of the shit we're exposed to on this fucking site.
>>70201019
>Libertarians not letting emotion get in the way of their decision making
Literally nothing wrong with this. Are you getting emotional because of this realization?
>>70213143
>If monopolies are greedy, people will produce similar products and not charge as much.
Well at least we know you have no idea what you're talking about.
Monopolies are defined by impossibly high barriers to entry.
>>70213302
We have to argue on whether libertarians are autistic or not? There isn't reallly anything to argue, the beginning statement was just ad hominem.
>>70201835
You are really fucking dumb
>>70213447
>Monopolies are defined by impossibly high barriers to entry.
Like?
>>70213447
What is a 'Monopoly'
A monopoly is a situation in which a single company or group owns all or nearly all of the market for a given type of product or service. By definition, monopoly is characterized by an absence of competition, which often results in high prices and inferior products.
As long as folks want lower prices and better quality, there is a way for competition. Google controls most of the search engine market. There are alternatives like Bing or DuckDuckGo, but as long as Google makes me happy, I stay with Google. Simple as that. You actually know nothing.
>>70201019
Look, Im sorry you got BTFO in an internet argument dude, but ad hominems arent going to make it better for you
>>70201379
Libertarian philosophy generally promotes open borders.
>>70213447
The only threat is that the monopoly could try to buy you out, which you could just say no to.
>>70201530
>Invoking No True Scotsman
Not an argument faggot
>>70201835
>Words mean whatever I want them to
This makes you a retard you fucking retard
Honest question to everyone ITT:
Do you consider the initiation of force against peaceful individuals simply wrong and immoral?
>>70208579
>I don't want to fuck you
I lost
>>70201967
What is the non INITIATION of fucking force? Huh? You fucking retard. Bitch ass faggot. Cunt.
>>70203074
Interestingly, I reasoned myself out of being a libertarian because I couldn't handle the mental gymnastics.
>>70201019
When it says libitarianism does it mean the entire 50% if the compass, or does it mean the right wing subset philosophy?
>>70214100
I consider it nigger behavoir
>>70213921
Libertarianism promotes no government made borders. You can make your own borders with your neighbors in your private property (which has no limits) and have them as closed as you want, you could even discriminate, something you can't do with governments.
Pic related.
Fuck your feelings
>>70214100
Depends on who owns the land and whether or not they were told calmly to get off first before using force.
>>70202226
Its a false dichotomy. Its not one over the other, its just reason before emotion. You need reason to inform your emotions. Otherwise youre going to experience the wrong feels. Like getting butt mad over Trump like a faggot.
>>70201019
the weak should fear the strong
>>70202384
How poor are you that you cant afford a fucking gun? Youre probably poor because youre stupid. Stop that.
>>70203803
WUZ
>>70202463
I kekekekekekekd
>>70214292
This desu.
We value the things we want to value, not the ones we are supposed to or told to value. What does it matter if someone I never knew or could have known suffers?
>>70203526
>No premises
>cucked assertion leads to faggot conclusion
Is being a bigger retard even possible?
>>70203930
>Fairness
>Purity
Are you a woman?
>>70207916
Nice try faggot
>>70201019
A 2011 study showed LubriMatic™ over AGS™ by 2 to 1 !!!
>>70201019
All I heard was that Libertarians put facts before emotions. Isn't that how a society SHOULD run?
>>70213143
It's still a really shitty way of doing things. There are better ways to apply science and human nature than a soulless society based on fucking each other over.
>>70201019
>>70216210
Check out the noses on those crypto jews
>>70201019
Their 'right brain' has atrophied. We no longer live in a society where interpersonal connections are essential for safety and/or success.
You simply dial 911 and a wage slave comes to your rescue.
>>70201019
>Why are libertarians so autistic?
Because they want you to kindly stop serving the military (voluntary service = no service) and focus on things you Want to rather than on things you Should be doing.
They want you to live in a tribal society so that it's easy to create conflict between groups and then reconquer everything again.
Libs are useful idiots, but they just don't know it. Also they're so optimistic that they honestly believe you can teach the world to be "free" and "peaceful".
They're a reformed hippie movement with a severe case of ADD and they cry when their bullshit kike-philosophy is exposed.
>>70217750
>>70217750
What if you decided large governments inherently fuck people over and you didn't want to encourage a large entity fucking people over? Instead you want them to have freedom. How is that inherently a society that encourages the fucking over of people?
Also large governments are more soulless. Regardless, I think there should be some regulations in industry.
How are so many of you opposed to simply having a government that doesn't abuse its powers...
>>70203074
Leftism is kid tier
Then libertarianism for edgy and early 20's
And finally full rightism for proper grown up adults
>>70218397
Haha, yeah, and I also want a chocolate cock that ejaculates money, but life isn't a fairy tale.
>>70218397
>a government that doesn't abuse its powers...
Is there a scientific measurement for when a government abuses it's powers or do You decide when they abuse their powers?
Who decides when the government abuses it's powers? The citizens? The Criminal? The Criminal's family members and friends? God? The Government? The Corporations?
The only place where a government never abuses it's power is a place without any government.
>>70201019
"Libertarians" are what happens to white people when they no longer have a community they feel invested in
> Be white
> Have organic, homogenous racial community
> Feel connected to your neighbors
> Put intellect to use in serving your nation
> But then
> Get "culturally enriched"
> No longer have organic community to feel attached to
> Now instead, use your intellect to justify why no one should ever do anything for anyone else and why anything social is tyrannical
Whites, when faced with a modern "multicultural" community, just use their considerable intellect to put together a political/philosophical system that justifies withdrawing from society. Libertarianism is part of that.
Non-whites on the other hand just retreat into GIBSMEDATS, DINDU NUFFINS and WHEN DA WHITE MAN GONNA PAY FOR MY CHILLUN
>>70218739
If the government violates its citizens' constitutional rights.
>>70218688
Of course my long stabby thing friend, but one can hope/dream.
>>70218979
>If the government violates its citizens' constitutional rights.
In that case the constitution shouldn't be rewritten. Ever. So somebody should write a perfect constitution that can never be rewritten which is so infallible that it has 0 loopholes that can never be used.
^Leading to a non-adaptive society. You might as well just go full shariah. It's the perfect system of governance since the rules are very clear.
>>70201019
all i see is a average American
>>70218787
Pretty much this. They don't understand the social imperatives of human nature so they try to disregard it by pretending everyone is an individual and that systems and pressures don't exist except in the form of Big Bad Government.
Fun Fact: A government is just an involuntary covenant that happens to own all the land and territories it governs. You would get the exact same result by being born raised into a strict private community. Just as one can leave the community for MUH FREEDOMS, you can also leave government controlled territories or choose whichever nation (lets pretend its a competing private covenant) by offering your marketable skills to said nation. Most nations are also nice enough to allow democratic "referendums" that you don't even have to pay for to participate in.
Libertarians are retarded autists. If muh free markets is such a good idea just organize and create your own community in a stateless territory, but don't expect aid and military protection gibmes when somali pirates rape your ass.
>buh but we can't have a libertarian society as long as states exist
Who the fuck are you to define a state or a private interest that calls itself a state? The exact same negatives from starting your own shitty community exists in a libertarian world fractured into fortified communities that protect its inhabitants from barbarity outside their walls. If they want to leave said community because they don't agree to the TOS they face coercion from immanent danger all the same.
Are people really this fucking stupid?
I'm not even libertarian
>>70201019
I don't concern myself with the often self-induced misery of strangers like you cucked statists.
Only the well-being of my own blood is of interest to me. Helping strangers is only acceptebale if it is benefitial to my cause.
go help some rapefugees and get fucked
>>70219405
All I see is the average designated street shitter
POO
>>70202480
No I guess. Why crawl up carl
>>70214549
A Beretta 92F that goes for 500 dollars max here goes for 1300 euros minimum. And you'll be assfucked to get a license, and you have to pay huge sums for it, on an anual basis. And gunshop owners will probably give you a hard time after you went through all that.
>oh, you're not a soldier or a LEO? Why do you need a pistol? A shotgun is more than enough. You don't need a pistol, just call the police.
>>70220971
>Going to all the trouble of getting a handgun in Europe and choosing a fucking Beretta92.
/k/ would like a word with you out back in the gravel pit. If you're gonna go to the effort get something that isn't shit flavored shit.
>>70201019
From wikipedia, the rest of it
>"There are upsides to such a coolly analytic cognitive style. For instance, libertarians are better at logic problems, says Mr. Iyer, a research scientist at the University of Southern California and the lead author of this study. "Any ideology or philosophy, taken to an extreme, likely resembles some pathology or another," Mr. Iyer explains."
Seems as though it makes sense for logical problems (i.e. policy decisions) to be made by those superior at looking at the problem analytically.
Also, all you faggots in this thread better be in the Stossel LP Debate thread on Friday
Lolbertarianism is just as silly and childish as anarcho-communism.
Only American nerds with autism in their puberty take this shit seriously.
There is a reason only yankees on 4cahn espouse this shit.
This is what happens when you unironically believe in that cringey exceptionalism .
>>70201541
>not understanding the non agression principle
It's about never initiating force against others.
That doesn't mean trying to end all suffering in the world
>>70221604
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/16/all-about-libertarians-mystique-profile-increases/
Proof all of us lolbertarians are autists
>>70222237
If you had a desirable vagina I might care about what you think
>>70222535
great meme. Just a photo from my nsfw folder
>>70214204
>activism is a political position
retarded pic. activism can go hand in hand with pretty much any ideology.
>ctrl+f "Argument"
>0 Arguments found
NOT
Honestly I don't empathise with people as much for two reasons.
1. People abuse appeal to emotion too much.
2. You can't stop human suffering. We shouldn't be completely devoid of empathy, however you have to know when to empathise and who to empathise with.
Depends on how you want to deal with happiness. Maximize happiness or minimize suffering?
Why are socialists and conservatives so threatened by libertarian ideology that they feel the need to attack them on a daily basis?
>>70202106
It's Jonathan Haidts work
>>70201019
>Grow up on hard working family
>live in the south
>Mexicans popping out babies and living near on welfare
>lazy violent niggers living off the state
Why don't you have empathy for these beasts leeching off you anon?
>>70201019
The way stephy says "not an arguement" is so based I love it
>>70223072
because pic related
