If Hillary/Bernie wins in the presidency, it will most likely mean we end up with a liberal majority supreme court. Thus, if a big gun case comes up, and the supreme court rules in some way that second amendment no longer valid, what will happen?
I think about this from time to time, and would be ready to revolt, would you /pol/? Or would we just end up getting cucked like most of Europe? Would the U.S. armed forces and Police join the revolt side or back the courts ruling?
>>70182471
Not at all I support making guns illegal.
>>70182471
If I took off your anonymity would you die?
No one would ever think of revolting against our government. They love us too much and are just looking out for our own good.
And the government certainly isn't tracking all the IPs in any threads here about open warfare in the united states. They only care about terrorists.
>>70182471
Do you enjoy blogging about your fantasies on this Nepalese basket weaving forum?
The pro-gun crowd has been winning decisively for decades.
>>70182471
We'd break the world record for number of boating accidents in one year.
Honestly America would be a lot safer place without the millions of guns that is in american hands. The Democrats are honestly trying to do the honest good for the average people, but you guys fail to acknowledge it baka.
Bernie's from Vermont
He loves guns
>>70182471
you even thinking this could ever happen shows that you should stop smoking meth. there are more guns than people in this country. it is a certain impossibility of this scenario happening.
>>70182471
The military would risk certain imprisonment, however, they are still citizens of the US like us. If shit hit the fan, like an actual American revolution I have no doubt we hold the militarys power. LEO's are men and women just like us, we could easily take small towns over with our local sheriffs departments no problem. This would be a good start.
There is actual numerous militias spread all across the US and Alaska that are armed to the teeth with military weapons ready to prevent a tyranny. The resources are there it's really just a matter of organization and the proper communication of what is about to happen. Obama has gathered the flint and tender, if we have either of these two Democrats there will be a real uprising soon, I guarantee this. As for the 2nd Amendment, they may try to "enact" stricter gun control laws but it's really not going to do anything. When it comes to disarming 150 million plus Americans, there is just no way, this would be nothing even remotely like Australia even if they tried to surgically do it.
>>70183179
"We have got to get rid of every gun designed to kill" - Hernie Panders. Yeah, nah.
>>70182471
No, I'd probably go into politics and try to reform the system from the inside. More efficient and more likely to succeed. I'd be a terrible soldier anyway.
>>70182929
Winning at a state level. That doesn't matter if gun change comes from the federal level. Plus just because gun control is down currently doesn't mean it always will be. If the court set a precedent that carrying guns was not the right of all citizens (as 4 of the 8 justices and Obama's nominee all believe) we could start to see restrictions being imposed 20-30 years down the road and be helpless to prevent it.
The Constitution is very clear. It's sad we're even having to entertain this as a possibility.
>>70183163
That's nonsense.
CDC studies have shown that guns are used for self defense orders of magnitude more often than in crime.
Gun crime itself is almost universally confined to small geographic areas with very specific demographics.
>>70183163
I don't know if you're trolling or not Canuck, but cross reference violent crime rate with
>Blacks per capita
And
>Gun owners per capita
>>70182471
Of course not. The white man has shown time and time again that he will back down and not put up a fight.
>>70183163
>when you outlaw guns they magically disappear
lots of paid shilling from Canada lately, please send the message up to Soros that he has fucking nothing on an armed populace. when the shit hits the fan, at least 50% of the police force and military abandons and swings to the favor of the people immediately.
the second America repeals the second amendment (see what I did there?), is the second the country collapses. there won't be a Western world for the Jews to exploit anymore.
t. had my home broken into and handled it on my own
Deus Vult
>>70182471
Wouldn't need to revolt.
>>70183068
Basically this.
>>70182471
revolt is a strong word.
more like take random pot shots at shit like the electrical grid or trains to cause mischief.
i dont wanna hurt anybody, i just wanna shoot my guns.
>>70182536
2edgy m8
almost sounds like your a traitor m8
>>70182471
it's not worth living as a slave, and seeing my country raped by the left, so yes, I would, and so would most of us, I would just hope to see the liberal elite BURNED before I die and I don't give a SHIT who knows it.
>>70183307
>CDC studies have shown that guns are used for self defense orders of magnitude more often than in crime.
I think you're thinking of the biased "crime survey" that any lawyer would laugh out of court
>>70182471
The left needs to stop spitting on cops before they beg them to die disarming people in the name of the feelz before realz.
I'm sure the cops will side with the people spitting on and assaulting them, for 'justice' of course.
>>70182471
It would mean that the government no longer trusts the people. It would be the final straw. Texas would likely outright leave the union, along with a few others. The NRA would throw a shit fit before running off into the mountains of Montana. It would mean that the government is ready to begin stripping more and more rights, ushering tighter controls over its people. Such an idea is completely unconstitutional.
>>70182471
As someone in law enforcement in a major metropolitan city, that will never happen with the military or police force's approval or support. Anyone who understands weapons beyond emotional stimuli knows that they are a necessity. If they even try, it'd cause a war. And any reasonable person I know in the police or military will back up the rights of the people that we swore to serve.
Not violently at first, but I`d join any protests about it, and probably bury my nugget in a crate in my backyard
>>70183752
Pretty much yeah. They don't seem to realize that while they shit on the army/veterans and the police they're also totally depending upon them to enforce their socialist big baby safespace rules.
If there was an actual civil war type split the lefties would have literally nobody to protect them and are too riddled with emotional and mental problems (which they are proud of) to fight back.
>>70184389
Bump
Absolutely!
Because we can no longer trust the government to protect the constitution. It will be up to us. If we don't revolt, then we, in a sense, approved the corruption.
>>70183738
The lowest estimate of defensive gun use is roughly 55,000 instances per year. Higher estimates range well into the millions.
Which lives matter more?
The people who died or the people who potentially saved their own lives?
>>70183738
You whiny cunts bitch about the CDC not being funded to study gun crime, then when they do, you bitch some more.
Pathetic.
Supreme Court has already decided on this. I can't see them gong against it, unless they just want to invalidate the whole justice system.
>>70183752
>The left needs to stop spitting on cops before they beg them to die disarming people
This about covers it.
Safespace faggots are going to cry and whine for some big, strong mens to save them from the thought of ebil guns, and receive a very rude awakening in return.
>>70182471
Absolutely.
ABSOLUTELY 100 PERCENT
I know I will end up dying in a hail of gunfire and I accept it.
The tree of liberty will be watered so much it will submerge it.
>>70184389
They would also be riddled with bullets.
>>70182471
If America doesn't revolt if our guns are taken away we don't deserve the 2nd amendment anyways
>>70182724
It would be extremely shitty
>>70185480
This basically.
I would be more than willing to die to protect my constitutional rights. Any of them.
>>70183290
Based red states would openly ignore and or nullify rulings of the Supreme Court, as would gun owners who already ignore their own state laws e.g. New York Safe Act.
>>70184992
Yeah, I suppose 55,000 who had a "defensive gun use" by pulling out their guns after hearing a board creak are more important than the 33,000 who died from them. Not potentially died, but died.
That's also not accounting for nonfatal gun injuries which are over double the number of deaths.
>>70182755
I would also like to add that our national security and homeland security personnel are not
paid nearly enough. Theyctrulynare great people with huge penis/vaginas
>>70182471
There are a lot more proguns than the vocal noguns
>>70183441
>>70185435
I don't understand you. Who speaks like this, even ironically?
>>70182471
I have absolutely zero loyalty to the US Federal Government. None.
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights granting us our birth right of freedom, gifted by GOD, are another story.
>>70186028
Be careful, you're disrupting the alt-right safe space
>>70182471
what part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED dont they get?
If even a noguns canadian like myself can see that how cant they?
>>70186028
People that have been personally wronged by the state and have had enough of it
>>70182471
Dude, they already did. Arms doesn't mean small arms, except now it does.
We can only have guns. That's not what the 2A says we're supposed to have.
>>70185812
Cool so we get rid of guns.
Does the left stop spitting on the cops and military before or after they ask them to die disarming everyone in the name of progressive liberal feel feels?
>>70183237
>people just like us
It would be half and half (maybe) of patriots and people that want to bring the boot down on the average joe. You're being optimistic.
We should have revolted a long time ago.
The government has been disarming the U.S. population very slowly.
It will come to:
"You can bear arms. All we're making illegal is semi-automatic guns with calibers larger than .22."
Then it will finally come to:
"There is no need to own guns."
>>70186565
Can you elaborate?
>>70182536
heres your (You)
>>70182471
>“Just as we fired the first shot to start the revolution, this might be the first shot – no pun intended – to start a movement against assault weapons that would capture the state and therefore maybe explode to reach the country.”
>-Robert Rotberg author and catalyst of Lexington’s gun ban proposal.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/23/the-gun-grabbers-are-coming-lexington-massachusetts-now-faces-semi-automatic-gun-confiscation/#ixzz456zpAvUl
>>70184758
god damn what is the music in this nobody ever answers
>>70186977
Dvorak - New World Symphony, 4th Movement
>>70186212
>noguns
Go get your PAL you fucker
>>70186838
Gun owners put up with a lot more 20 years ago because the mood of the country was a lot different and they didn't really believe just how far the anti gun crowd wanted to go. Times have changed.
One of the next steps: We're going to get suppressors off of the NFA list.
>>70186925
>Rotberg
>>70187270
fuck me, i love dvorak. right up there with beethoven and mozart.
>>70186212
You have to understand that liberals do not like the constitution and if they had the clout to call a convention they would.
They think the ideas and sentiments expressed in it are primitive. For a comparison they are the atheists to the conservative's reformed Christianity.
>>70183554
This.
The guns would get stashed and hidden away for the chaotic situation that develops when big cities start having serious infrastructure problems which were deliberately caused.
People will just start handing out instruction manuals and tossing around rather dangerous and destructive ideas.
The underground information stream will go nuts and you'll see all kinds of panic about the things your kids have easy access to all throughout the media.
>>70182471
Well we had a federal ban in 1994, here's what it prevented;
•the OKC bombing
•columbine school shooting
•DC snipers
•9/11
•north Hollywood shootout
•gangland shootings
As you can see, it worked!
>>70186028
Normal people?
Are you this out of touch with reality?
Pretty normal where I'm from desu.
>>70182471
When they do finally do it I am attacking either the US mint or the federal reserve in NYC. No lie, I have my reasons.
>>70182536
>she
>>70187891
Team up with a handful of guys and take over a drone base in Nevada and just bomb those two places.
>>70186028
Americans are spooky motherfuckers.
It's a game to some of us.
>>70186028
It's either adorable that you're such an emasculated, whimpering he-she, or deplorable as to what an ineffectual shill you are.
I'd bugout in the woods first.
>>70187607
Dude, most people, liberals included, don't even know what's in the constitution. I'd like to see an exit poll at the general election this year that doesn't just ask who people voted for, but questions like
>How many branches are there in the federal government?
>What five rights does the 1st Amendment afford you?
>Can the president make laws?
>How many years is a US Senator's term?
>Who has the authority to declare war?
>>70182471
It couldn't happen in the US. Too many guns, too many people who feel too strongly about it.
>>70182471
Yes, I think that would finally make a lot of people snap.
Trump and Bernie have awoken the fighting spirit of millenials. The ones on the Trump side would probably start an armed revolt over it, and the whites in the military would probably join em.
>>70183163
Fuck that, why do they get to decide what's best for me. Nobody controls meI go ape shit over things much smaller than that. Knowing that I have the choice to go postal prevents me from going postal! Do liberals understand that?
>>70187891
Because something like that wouldn't happen without people in the banking industry wanting it, perhaps?
>>70187864
I don't envy you
>>70188040
Nope, we want to take the NY Fed in tact for the off chance that it still has AU in its vaults.
>>70182471
I would certainly revolt, and I know the national guard said they would too.
>>70183237
Half the people in your faggot militia are probably atf members. Hell, you're probably with the NSA
>>70185483
For you
How are they just going to up and take all the assults rifles away. People will snap and go ape shit
>>70182471
There are probably some 200 people that read the OP and didn't even reply because it would just sound like edgy Navy Seal copypasta in text.
>>70183179
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTvD0DFYh9s
My position is radical.
I propose nationalizing all gun manufacturing and making the obtaining of all guns, pistols, long arms, etc. completely free. All weapons are allowed anywhere at all times.
The 2nd Amendment clearly states that a citizenry with access to guns is vital to the security of the nation; thus it would be everyone's patriotic duty to possess firearms no matter what.
The nation would be flooded with guns everywhere. Well-stocked armories in every city and town, mandated by law, where guns can be easily and freely obtained for as long as you want. "Break in case of tyranny" glass cases with guns on every hallway just like we currently do with fire extinguishers. No limits on gun ownership and all guns cost nothing to obtain.
We will completely dismantle the for-profit domestic weapons industry in this great country in the name of security.
>>70188384
All they need to know is how to die. If they can use that to their benefit then more power to them.
>>70189162
That sounds like Freedom to me senpai.
Fund it.
>>70189162
That is radical and unnecessary. We have enough privately owned firearms in the US to arm every single soldier on the face of the earth with 5 firearms each. That's nothing to sneeze at.
>>70186791
isn't there some military report floating around that gets frequently posted that says something like 60%+ of the military would side with the citizens?
>>70186028
Free people. Canadians wouldn't know.
>>70189162
>letting the government make all guns
>they make absolute shit guns and sell them to the public while only letting police and military have access to quality arms
>"lol here you go, People :3"
>>70185364
>holding slavshit
>not America's Rifle
Fuck you eternally, that's insulting and I'm triggered
>>70189162
pretty much this >>70189736
>trusting mass produced government firearms
>trusting the government to do anything without fucking it up (intentionally or unintentionally)
>>70182471
Not today CIA...
>>70182471
I would start a shitstorm over it. Not because I'm worried about losing my guns, I'll just get them illegal, but just to get something interesting started and it would be the perfect time to rile up a certain group of people.
