What do you think of this /pol/, is this true?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/04/06/is-rule-34-actually-true-an-investigation-into-the-internets-most-risque-law/
oh and the editor at WaPo, you're probably reading this, because we know you really do lurk here.
Why would you ever think it was a good idea to do this story? Why?
Somebody wanted a reason to browse porn at work
>>70120542
True
A few months ago WaPo linked a live /pol/ thread in a article before. God.. Idiots.
>>70120415
It's over a decade old and now they discover it?
>>70120415
>wapo just NOW learns of r34
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH WOW
>>70120415
Another attempt at journalism by the Huffington Paint
>>70120415
>Delaney, for one, is determined to keep the law alive: His most recent story is about Microsoft’s racist chatbot, Tay
HA
Requesting Rule 34 of Washington Post logo
I didn't believe rule 34 until
>Helga from Hey Arnold
&
>Plank from Ed, Ed and Eddy
>>70121332
please someone
Brain Washington Post trying to stay relevant. Fuck off already.
WaPo goes full Australia sometimes.
>>70120694
[citation needed]
>>70120415
Clever way to plant the seed so that normal people start jerking it to 2D
>>70120415
>White privilege
no images meet your criteria
Hand in hand with rule 34 is rule 35, which states if there is no porn of it we will make porn of it.
>>70120415
HARD HITTING JOURNALISM
>rule34.paheal.com
>if it exists, there's porn of it
>"female wage gap"
>no results
>>70121546
There is no rule 34 of Yeb's wife.
>>70120415
Really, it took them that long to figure it out?
Bravo WaPo for publishing something many people online know already.
>>70121332
>>70121670
>>70122336
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/09/02/in-search-of-the-darkest-most-disturbing-content-on-the-internet/
>>70123099
god damn it mohammed
Ms Caitlin, if you are following this, would you consider a interview with /pol/?
Wow. Sure is 11 years ago in here.
>>70125068
It's cute seeing normalfags talk about how scary the internet is.
>>70120415
>>70126363
>there's holocaust porn
Gotta hand it to the jews, they cover all their bases.
>>70120542
Written by Caitlin Dewey
>>70120415
Whelp. Couldn't follow rules 1 and 2 and this is what you get.
>>70120542
This.
>>70126363
Wouldn't actually be that hard to make
>>70123099
Actually it does exist. Under the "prostitution" tag
>>70126302
this
also, source for pic please and thank you
(obligatory
>a fucking leaf
reference)
WAPO = overpriced bird cage liner
>>70120415
Don't forget rule 35:
>An addendum of the internet rules stating that if there is no porn of it, it will be made.
>>70120415
>Is Rule 34 actually true?
Did I hop in a time machine this morning?
Is it 2003 again? Why is WP doing an article on a internet meme that's older than dirt?
>>70123906
Someone with a throw away email, send this to her please >>70125532
>>70127509
because they have nothing else better to report on like all for-profit media outlets.
When did WaPo set such low standards for journalism? So much trash recently. The only good artcle's were the Trump editorial interview (which was a transcript) and the O'Harrow piece on Clinton's email scandal.
>>70120501
this
trying to be with the times? up to speed with what those crazy kids at ebaumsworld are up to?
>>70126302
ha ha yes meanwhile us twisted interent pros have known it for YEARS!
>>70123195
Yes there is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9ESOwChw0I
