http://www.snopes.com/craigslist-ad-trump-rally/
> The claims about a conspiracy to disrupt the Trump campaignlacked any real proof thatsuch a campaign was actually afoot, much less that any figures such George Soros or Republican rival Ted Cruz were behind those efforts. Nearly all these claims pointed to the above-citedCraigslist ads as evidence, but all of those ads simply sought door-to-door canvassers during an election year; none of them advertised positions as paid agitators or protesters.
Is this true /pol/?
>>70115398
>snopes
>literally a couple of jews "researching" everything with no empirical process and shit-tier citations
You seriously believe snopes?
>>70115552
I assume you have proof then?
>>70116857
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/anti-trump-protesters-admit-answering-craigslist-ad-and-getting-paid-to-protest-trump/
>>70116857
>>70115398
these protesters do it for free
also, there is proof that some of these protesters work for or belong to the OpenSociety Foundation. I don't have it saved, but the Indian chick that bike locked her neck to a truck in Arizona is a literal employee of OpenSociety
>>70116857
Well there's the fact that moveon was the group leading the protests and their primary donor is soros
But that's just a coincidence right?
>>70117068
well now you do >>70117006
>>70115398
Snopes has thrown out objectivity years ago
There are thousands of documented cases of Soros funded rent-a-mob and actual employees at anti-trump rallies
Everyone knows the paid shill are here.
TRUMP GENERAL PAID SHILL EDITION.
>>70116952
But then how do you know they aren't getting paid to say they were paid to protest trump.
>>70115398
>Snopes as a credible source
>>70117068
>these protesters do it for free
Whether they want to or not!
kek
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ferguson-Missouri-paid-protesters/2015/05/25/id/646587/
