Pick your poison. Which would you rather have?
If that was my choice I just wouldn't vote. That, or shoot myself with one of my numerous guns
Sanders is alright. He's too radical in a few ways, but I don't think the system would actually allow him to actually accomplish most of the crazier things he'd want to do, so that's not really an issue.
Clinton is a dangerous sociopath, and the exact kind of shady fuck who gets her way and never has to be held accountable for her bullshit. You probably wouldn't even find out about the evil shit she would pulls. The media is on her side.
Sanders all the way. Even if he institutes every one of his wildest left wing fantasies, he's still better than four years of The Empress.
>>70112871
BERNIE
FEEEEL THE BERN
clinton's corrupt
If I have to pick... I pick poison.
>8 years
>>70112871
At least Sanders Ideia are noble, but he will get nowhere with them.
Clinto is a Corrupt Traitor and a Lying cunt, i hope you burgers know what are you doing.
>>70113429
Still, choosing Sanders means validating all his scumbag supporters.
Lets face it, America is done if the Democrats get another 4 years in parliament.
Immigration would get so bad that Texas would flip blue. The moment that happens it's lights out for the Republicans.
You might as well move to the Rockies and take some guns with you.
>>70113839
scumbags exist in every demographic
>>70112871
>“At a time when the middle class is shrinking, poverty is increasing and millions of Americans are working longer hours for lower wages it makes no sense to me to have an immigration bill which, over a period of years, would bring millions of ‘guest workers’ into this country who are prepared to work for lower wages than American workers,”
-The Bern.
>>70113862
>parliament
Fuck off back to bongland
If Sander's wins and raises taxes for the rich and the republicans block his plans and cut spending, would it be enough to lower our debt?
>>70114329
Parliament sounds a lot more appealing.
>>70112871
hillary, at least she wont be making affirmative action to the power of ten legislation.
>>70112871
The colonel
>>70114416
Sounds like Tyrannical British Bullshit to me
>Hilary
>starts a war with Russia
>also a war with Syria because why the fuck not
>wants to take in refugees from the country she wants to attack
>MORE REFUGEES EVERYWHERE! WE ARE ALL MUSLIMS!
>OPEN BORDERS FOR EVERYONE!!!
Holy fuck no, you can't let her get in the office.
Sanders is a harmless socialist. He would try to make some changes and then the economy would suffer, and he'd change it back before dying of old age.
Bernie
he's not a bad person, but he's a fucking retard
Clinton is both a bad person and a retard
>>70113832
Brazil knows what's up.
>>70113862
>parliament
>tfw americans would rather vote between openly corrupt scum like hillary and rato
>tfw you'll never meme a president into office
>tfw trump will never get to make america great again
why even live
>>70114577
>socialists
>harmless
Latvia...
>>70112871
Sanders and Clinton voted the same on 93% of issues. Sanders voted for every military action except the one proposed by Bush.
Either choice is virtually the same. The people who idolize Sanders are idolizing an image they've created of the man, not the man himself. His actions are in direct contrast to his perceived persona.
>>70114966
>The people who idolize trump are idolizing an image they've created of the man, not the man himself. His actions are in direct contrast to his perceived persona.
fixed that typo for you
>>70115115
Good job, deny Bernie is a warhawk.
Bernie votes along the party line, every time. He would be another 4 years of Obama, who was just another 8 years of Bush.
>>70114906
I am not saying that Socialism is harmless. I am saying that he's a harmless socialist. He's a fucking cuck. If he got into office it would be less Stalin and more like 4 years of Sweden YES.
He wouldn't do that much damage in 4 years. At least nothing worse than what they have already done to America.
Hillary. She's much much worse than Bernie but she would continue Obama's policies, meaning little change. Bernie would completely destroy the country and actually affect my personal life unlike Hillary.
Sanders. His gommunism is too extreme to pass for the most part. I'd rather take an old dumbass over satan selling uranium to the reds
>>70112958
I came here to post this.
>>70115340
there is one thing, I can handle another 4 years of status quo, illegals are being deported at their own rates and people are waking up, after those 4 years things would change radically. As long as we don't get fucking refugees or more goddamn illegals I won't worry """""'too"""""' much
Sanders for a couple of reasons. Aside from the fact that he seems fairly genuine, I think his policies would hurt America so much that voting Dem ever again would be unthinkable for a long while.
>>70112871
Hillary.
She is the one Silicon Valley shills for, since Silicon Valley is going to bring us robot workers who will inevitably lead to universal basic income, I would pick her.
>>70112871
Bernie,
Hillary would just help corporations and lead to even more corruption.
Sanders.
The US will get a relatively quick and painless death this way, compared to Shillary.
>>70115271
This. Bernie wouldn't be good but at the bare minimum it is a jab at the establishment by the voters.
>>70115340
>She's much much worse than Bernie but she would continue Bush's policies
Fixed that for you.
>>70112871
Sanders. He wouldn't be a good president, but at least he isn't the oligarchs' puppet.
>>70112871
If i was forced, i'd rather have Shillary just to piss off Sanders' annoying supporters
>>70112871
Sanders. Might as well get baked and comfy.
The status quo is working for now so Hillary
Bernie is a suicidal
>>70112871
Sanders
to see the rivers of tears when he turns out to either do nothing or be just another politician
>>70112871
Fucking give me 4 years of the real Obama, not the radical senile kike Obama or the watered down vagina Obama
Hillary, because I don't want to pay 2k more in taxes.
>>70114512
says the police state
>>70112871
Sanders. He is the lesser of the two evils.
>>70112871
Sanders because he wouldn't be able to pass any of his bullshit.
Sanders. He's too much of a cuck to use executive orders and both parties hate him. He'd never pass any of the legislation he would aim to, nor would he get congress to pass his proposed income tax.
>>70116388
This guy brings up a good point. Hopefully he would destroy the Democratic Party.
>>70112871
I'd say Bernie, most of his ideas would never pass congress, so he'd be a pretty much do nothing for 4 years.
>>70112871
Sanders. Maybe the UK will finally be able to stop being the gimp in the relationship and take charge occasionally.
>>70112871
Fuck Sanders, I want plebbit to burn with me if Trump isn't the nominee
>>70112871
I'd pick Sanders over the lying sociopath hag.
>>70114175
Sorry, I can't find your citation
>>70114352
So take out all the benefits he's raising the taxes for? I'm MAGA all the way, but that's idiotic no matter how you see it.
>>70118386
Presidents cannot raise or lower taxes on their own. They have to get congress to pass it. That's not going to happen with what Sanders proposes.
>>70112871
Clinton
I'll take corruption over Marxism any day. That being said, its like choosing cancer over aids
>>70112871
Trump
it literally makes no difference, they both would follow the agenda to the T.
>>70112871
>false choice dilemma
neither.
>>70113521
How about when he loses and it's Hillary vs Trump?
>poison
give me the cyanide
>>70112871
Hillary with Sanders coming close to winning. Butthurt bern-outs will be important key to a republican victory, especially for Trump.
If you mean pick who will become president and not the nominee then Hillary. I can't have a crazy extremist Jew be the first person to represent my people in the white house. Plus he'd fuck the economy up really hard and push the stock market out of the US with that nonsense second capital gains tax for simply investing money.
All of you Trump supporters in the states that haven't primaried yet need to vote for Bernie. Hear me out.
Trump is likely to win New York and maybe some other states but won't get the nomination. The GOP will hand the nom to someone else. The only way Trump will run in the general is as an independent.
That said, you're banking on Trump running/winning as an independent. If he does that, it will split part of the right-wing vote and hand the victory to whoever the democratic nominee is.
Conclusion: Continue, by all means, supporting Trump and trying to get him the victory in the generals as an independent but realize that it will almost certainly be Hillary or Bernie as president if you do that. In that case, do you really want a pathological liar and sociopathic power hungry madwoman as President or do you want a good honest person whose ideas you disagree with to be President?
Almost want to vomit saying this but Hillary. Like it was said earlier it's just Obama's 3rd term
Bernie a year ago was less of a social panderer han he is now.
He used to have very tough ideas on immigration, because he knew he needs controled immigration to fund his social demorat policies.
He was also relatively pro-gun for a Democrat because of the influence of Vermont Republicans.
He has interviews where he says he was forced to move to the right to win the Vermont election. This entire election cycle has moved him to the left that he used to be in.
>>70112871
Hillary will lead with an iron fist. No one doubts that. Bernie gets cucked by black lives matter, couldn't find a voice b congress and shills about shit he will never get past congress. He would be DOA at the White House, leader of all and master of nothing.
I'd rather have the corrupt iron fisted witch.
I don't give a shit who's the next president, I'm just in it for the memes. Therefore, Trump vs Bernie is the ultimate scenario.
That said, whilst Bernie supports the moronic idea of socialism, at least he is an honorable guy who sticks to principles unlike that nasty piece of shit Hillary who will pander to anyone for votes.
>>70114038
This
>>70119921
>do you want a good honest person whose ideas you disagree with to be President?
This is why we hate you. You base your decision making on how the other person makes you FEEL. I'm sure Jimmy Carter and GW Bush were nice guys but were they good Presidents? NO.
Bern, Hill, and Cruz supporters generally base their decisions because they FEEL it's right.
Trump supporters generally base their decisions because they KNOW it's right.
>>70112871
>>70112871
Bernard at least has the decency to lie and promise change, Hilary offers nothing but more of the same Corporate Ruled America. I will vote for literally any other candidate than Hilary
>>70112871
Hillary is far more corrupt, but I think she would maintain the status quo. Sanders would do immense damage to the country.
At least he cares. You wouldn't see Hillary doing this.
>>70120870
>Trump supporters generally base their decisions because they KNOW it's right.
You have picked the wrong candidate to make that argument from. Trump makes very few concrete policy proposals, when he does they are often completely absurd, and there's a good chance he'll flip-flop on Twitter within hours of having made them. And I say this as someone who genuinely hopes Trump wins the nomination.
Like almost all politicians, Trump is pretty much nothing but rhetoric - the only thing that sets him apart from the average establishment Republican is that Trump's rhetoric is about issues Republican voters care about, while the average establishment Republican's rhetoric is about issues Republican donors care about. His candidacy represents a fight for control of the Republican party between the voters and the corporate sponsorship. Trump needs to win because even if he is completely devoid of substance his win (exactly like all of his competition) this is the only chance to purge the Republican party of its blatant corruption and take back control from the people who've been renting it out these past several decades years.
I'd take the batshit commie over that witch. At least I feel as though Bernie is sincere in his insanity, while Hilary is just a lying scumbag.
>>70112871
Neither both are equally horrendous and completely unfit to be president
>>70112871
Depends. My gut says Hillary but my heart says Bernie. Hillary is the embodiment of corruption, but Sanders is the embodiment of socialism breaking through. Both are equally horrible in different ways. If we can't save America I'd rather it be destroyed as quickly as possible so we can rebuild it from the ground up.
>>70121781
>Trump makes very few concrete policy proposals, when he does they are often completely absurd
As opposed to Cruz copying Trump, and Hillary copying Bernie on policy. Your (and the TV's) meme about Trump is more vague than you claim him to be. It's all bullshit. You're a big boy, you can go to Trumpgeneral.com on your own, but you REFUSE to because you FEEL it will make a case for Trump. And that will make you a bad person in your circle of friends.
Bernie's rhetoric about people's entitlement to many absurd things (Watered-down healthcare / education, windmills vs. nuclear energy, etc.) and how he plans to pay for all of it his foreign policy scares me more than even the status-quo candidates do. It's a plan for entitled champagne-socialists like Carl the Cuck and AIDS Skrillex and yourself.
>>70121154
Policies comparable to Sanders' exist pretty much everywhere else in the developed world, and basically none of those countries have imploded or show any signs of imploding. Hell, the worst crisis in Europe right now is the horribly broken and totally mismanaged currency that is the euro - and the euro was and is a bipartisan project, with its only opponents being on the fringe left and fringe right - proof that our worst problems are the ones our politicians can agree on.
At the end of the day, Sanders is a really boring candidate. There are a lot of people who get paid to predict that the other teams' candidates are the end of the world, but they're basically never right. Hyperbolic predictions of doom scare people, and scared people make passionate voters.
>>70112871
But anon-kun, how can we pick Clinton when she's is jail?
how do you like your merchant, cucked or post menopause ?
>>70121154
True. Very likely
>implement socialism in a country that's multiple trillions in debt, has a population of 320M+, and has a rich class who are too smart to get fucked by taxes.
Nope. Then again, Hillary had a hand in destabilizing the middle east and she's a corporate shill. Both of them would be disastrous, Bernie might be less disastrous though seeing as how he wouldn't be able to get much passed.
>>70112871
>first response isn't immediately pic related
>>70117216
This.
>>70112871
Bernie. At least he pretends not to be a corrupt asshole.
Move to Poland
