1) Look at pic related
2) Explain to me why this isn't going to end very, very badly for all concerned.*
*hint: you can't.
>>70095668
protip: charts and graphs on /pol/ have no credibility
>>70095668
The problem is that all that growth happened in the third world, so the entire human experience is regressing.
>>70095759
That chart is true
t. Have the ability to google things to verify them
>>70095759
>exponential population growth isn't a thing
disease, birth defects, mental retardation and faggotry
are countermeasures by the universe
It'll stagnate as soon as we sterilize the third world
>>70095668
Thought it was a chart on US debt before i opened it and looked closer.
Either way we are fucked.
>>70095668
stay strong nippon
>>70095668
Humans are a parasite, what's your point?
>>70096205
I assumed it was a chart on wealth distribution at first.
>>70095668
you are just projecting, cuck
>>70096463
Africa and South Asia won't follow the same direction as Japan. Don't be foolish.
The truth
FIFY
>>70096800
Nice.
Idiot shitposter from Japan. You shitpost every day. Every fucking day. Why aren't you banned yet?
>>70095668
every end is a new beginning
there is no end
>death is not the opposite of life
>death is the opposite of birth
>life has no opposite
it's all good
>>70095668
But it will end very, very badly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM
Humans who have never faced any real threats to their survival will be made into a new animal entirely; one so detached from nature and environment that they will be completely dependent on a ruling class to live. I think the mass increases in depression, autism (hue hue), anxiety, and narcissism are signalling this change in man from being a product of their environment to a more disposable commercial being.
>>70096800
I loled
Aus has the best fucking bants.
It's pretty much the only reason I come to 4chan
>>70095668
Globally, the growth rate of the human population has been declining since peaking in 1962 and 1963 at 2.2% per annum. In 2009, the estimated annual growth rate was 1.1%.
>>70095668
Noticed a trend Mr. Roboto.
Also post a disclaimer that you aren't Japanese when posting from a Japan IP.
>>70096800
Not deep enough.
It will end horribly if you project this graph to keep its trend indefinitely
However, Americans are aborting more babies (Blacks in New York aborted more babies than birthing babies in 2015), deaths as a total I imagine hold relatively constant to birth rates in America (mostly due to tobacco and black people, among other things) so our net annual growth is tapering here in America where it matters.
In Africa, well, if they could abort babies safely and cheaply, then the net population growth would most likely be negative.
My point is that black people are the blame for this graph, and we must exterminate them because black lives don't matter
>>70098280
>fertility rates declining therefore population growth stops
american education: the post
>>70096800
kek
>>70097988
Russia please distinguish what you said vis a vis total population, total population growth rate, and total population growth rate rate of change. I suggest p, p', and p'' for short-hand.
>>70098445
you see that area on the chart right around 2.1 births per woman? What do you think that corresponds to?
>>70095668
It's already stabilised everywhere but Africa and they have very slowly begun to develop their economy. They are slow but it's happening.
>>70098445
If every eligible man/woman got married and had 1 kid the next generation's population would be half of their parent's. If they had 2 kids it would be the same. If they had 3 it'd be 150%, so on and so forth.
So yes, if the average birthrate per woman drops to exactly 2.0 then the growth would stop. Below that it would decline, above that it would continue to grow.
>>70099329
Just let him chalk it up to "Haha trolled again by Australian tolls! Haha we're so clever!"
>>70098623
>Butthurt American
>The response
>>70095668
Billions and billions of people dying in a short period of time sounds bretty gud to me, senpai.
>>70099734
Don't worry guy, no one saw or understood your fellow bird-surrenderers post. Your national pride is intact!
2050 onwards will be interesting
>>70101146
why will so many people die? Spooky
>>70095668
the irony is the people over populating are the lowest element of humanity.
>>70101190
Most likely due to services per capita. The graph is based on a modern version of Malthusian theory. It has accurately described the rise and fall of many past civilisations. There is some flaws in this way of thinking though. For example food production will likely not drop to the extent predicted due to major, ongoing advances in agriculture. Another flaw is our inherent reliance on modern capitalist systems. These dictate many of the variables in the graph rather than rely on them, take for example the US housing bubble and it's global effect
>>70101146
tfw when my expected suicide date is sometime in the 2030s after parents are gone
>>70095759
Validity*
>>70095668
>>70098343
>not posting the real graph
>>70104991
65,000,000 what?
>>70095668
PLAGUE! PLAGUE! PLAGUE!
Up to our asses in chinks and indians. All that poo, not enough loos.
Soylent brown is pooooo!!!
>tfw luddites were right
>>70095836
Not really no. It actually plateaus from time to time and then shoots up over a decade or so.
The easiest way to check the veracity of the chart is to see if it dips for events like WWI, WWII, and the plague of Justinian.
>>70107695
>tfw luddites are the reason we haven't solved this problem with technology already
ftfy
>>70102470
That's what I've always thought. Why donate food to niggers, send them condoms and abortion doctors!
