Not this bullshit again. Is this the same girl from tedX?
>>70078024
>consent
It's a fucking machine... I guess literally and figuratively
That machine may not pass the turing test, but neither will most women.
>>70078024
>>70078024 (OP)
The backlash against sexbots has ALREADY STARTED.
Will western men do what they've been doing since 2013 and submit to women? Or will they finally grow some balls and push back?
All these memes like the fedora meme and virgin memes just serve to give women more power over men, Western society is set up to serve women at the expense of men. Men are supposed to be chivalrous towards women yet still comply with feminism and not complain at all about it.
Will western men get their sexbots and stand up to women? Or are we forever doomed to lick the feet of m'lady?
>>70078024
If someone made a sex robot from the likeness of your mom or daughter and made a big deal out of it in public, would it still be OK?
Paste the article please
>>70078498
https://youtu.be/ZJYVtPLDY80
>>70078024
>"she winks, wears a crop top and giggles when you tell her she's beautiful
So.. just like real women?
>>70078024
>Feminists want you to get consent from sexbots
I thought feminists getting bootymad at the future existence of sex robots was a meme, but holy shit it's real.
>>70078630
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/theres-consent-problem-scarlett-johansson-201600137.html
>yfw the jews will never let you be with your waifu
>>70078024
>cunts already complaining that they're being starved of attention
Cry more biocunts. Sexbots will make you all effectively obsolete.
>>70078498
The boys from Brazil at it again.
>>70078024
Women turn themselves into disgusting creatures, and men build replacements...the free market works.
The article isn't about the robot consenting you fucking illiterates, it's about getting the consent of a human when you create a robot in their likeness.
I wonder if dildos consent to being repeatedly plunged in the the gaping holes of women everywhere
>>70079675
which isn't a problem
it's a robot
>>70078024
>Hey boys pay attention to me *giggle*
>W-what? S-sexbot?
>N-no pay attention to me
>Please
>Call me pretty
>Buy me things
>STOP!
>MISOGYNY!
>PAY ATTENTION TO ME RIGHT NOW!!!
>>70078887
This version is objectively inferior to the "Don't be tsundere, Miko-chan" version where both man and bot completely ignore the hysterical woman.
>>70079675
Don't you see that is just a way to attack the manufacturers?
Take the capital out of them and force them to sell the patent to some robotics company so sex robots can never be made again?
This has nothing to do with the dignity of Johansson. She has tons of merchandise of herself. She'd not mind a robot.
It is a mean for an end.
The end is to take the robots away from the public OR monopolize them for the right manufacturers.
I've seen enough of these tactics in the patent market.
>>70078024
Pretty sure it's a violation of her image or likeness or something
>>70078630
Yes. If someone thought my mom or sister was hot I would rather them fuck a representation of them than actually fuck them
Public figures are allowed to be artwork - it only becomes a legal problem if he wants to sell his iterations of his automaton.
>>70079675
so where's the problem, faggot?
>Ehrenkranz
>>70078024
SJWs are 100% going to fight tooth and nail to secure human rights for robots, even in their most archaic state.
>>70078140
Feminists shit their pants over sexbots with AI.
They know nothing about AI or programming, but the second you bring up sexbots they start bawling about "muh slavery" and "muh robot rights".
Whichever anon said that feminists would kill sexbots the moment they are invented was right. Feminists know sexbots are coming and they're fucking horrifying. If Hillary is elected this fall there will be sexbot legislation passed which makes private ownership of them illegal. Cap this post now and watch it come true in a year or so.
>>70078498
Do it again
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_bombing
We must ask girls for permission to masturbate while thinking about them.
>>70078024
Some other site I was on today was talking about consent laws for sex robots. Also that men who use them should "have their heads smashed in with cinder blocks".
When they brought up the fact that a car doesn't give consent to be ridden, they pointed out that car design was often oppressive of women too.
If proper AI is developed, than we can make waifu bot say she wants to be sexbot.
Imagine feminist trying to say to robot:
>you do not know you need rights
>I have enough rights, I want to please man
probably feminist will stuck in a loop first
About robot consent: It will be a friggin sexbot. She would probably disagree to sex only when low on battery/robovaginal fluid.
Men are superior in tech studies, which makes us superior in programming, which in turn makes it possible future.
If only mediocre woman started dating mediocre man, it could be avoided, but now, extinction soon.
Good.
>>70078630
jerking off to a picture of my mom isn't a consent problem
its strange but its not about consent
>>70078498
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z49iZ0O1bSs
>>70082999
just like the gays, when women see they aren't needed they get furious.
>but I thought y'all hated men and wanted to be rid of us
>>70085935
I know how this feels but women only like talking to me because I am different.I know its only a fucking lie just to get me to give them attention. They literally do nothing they just want attention from literally anyone to get themselves more attention.
>>70086191
They do not want my attention, what am I doing wrong?
>>70086412
You're fat and ugly.
>>70086412
You probably arent gay. I honestly wish people who didnt get alot of attention would get some of the unwanted attention I get.
Seriously women only like me because they get more attention by hanging around me.
This is why prostitution is still banned even though it only hurts the women who engage in it. Because to ban the direct sale of themselves, it inflates the value of the rest of women, forcing us all to want to get married and sign our fucking lives away just to get laid if we're not lucky enough to be seen as alpha and get it for free
No I'm not a fucking virgin and no I haven't paid a cent to fuck any girl, even for dates
>>70082334
They probably got their understanding of what robots are like from Wall-E, it's understandable really.
>>70082999
>>70084508
Even if they have full fledged AI and act and look 100% human they won't have any fucking rights no matter how hard it cries and screams rape
It's A FUCKING COMPUTER holy fuck
>>70078024
is she talking about the robot's 'feelings' or is she arguing that Ms. Johanson has been violated by having her likeness remade as a robot?
would she have rights to royalties on robots made in her likeness?
>>70078024
They're starting to talk about power dynamics between a robot and its creator. It's a fucking machine (pun intended), for Christ's sake.
Honestly, I never had expectations for people with a degree in twerk studies to understand the difference between a programmed sex doll and a human being.
>>70079306
>that """""""""meal"""""""""""
Holy shit I think Instant noodles might be a more balanced meal.
>>70082334
There scared of them because memen won't need women anymore and the bot won't sitnon its fat ass all day buying shoes and wasting your income. AMD the bots won't be programmable to be a feminist so their cause will die out
>>70087910
they did it to Tay.
aposematism virus
>>70078783
They should also get consent from dildos and vibrators.
>>70079675
This was one man making a private item for his own amusement.
You can't criminalize celeb fakes, you won't be able to criticize sex robots personally made in the likeness of some slut.
