Why should women not be allowed to vote? Explain.
>>70066525
literally that filename
>>70066525
Because they cannot independently pee while standing up.
>>70066525
Yes
Democracy
>>70066820
what about it?
>>70066894
Do you have any legitimate reasons?
>>70067013
Expand on that
>>70067322
We live in a democracy
>>70066525
Overwhelmingly leftist and redistributionist.
Emotion-based politics.
Automatically shape civilisation due to women being greater in number.
But don't worry, women's vote is here to stay - until the collapse, at least.
Once a civilisation gave women political power, it never recovered and was shortly conquered. Not a single exception.
You know the drill, he who can't heed the teachings of History be doomed to repeat it and all that.
>>70067322
>>70067014
>>70066525
Because history tells us that women are the downfall of society. By nature, women are emotional creatures, and tend to think with their heart instead of their mind. That leads to any whack job with an I.Q. of 90 to pull thier heart strings and BAM. The whole country crumbles.
See: Hillary Clinton, Roman Empire, Radical Feminism, Marxism
>>70067014
Women typically have smaller bodies than men, which mean they can't handle Jack Daniel's whiskey alcohol content.
>>70067013
>why shouldnt women be allowed to vote
>yes
Classic burguer
>>70067601
But shouldn't the voting requirements be based on IQ rather than gender? Surely there are women that have an IQ above 90 and actually have common sense
>>70067641
Stupid is as stupid does
>>70067758
a high IQ doesn't mean someone makes good choices. I have a genius level IQ and i'm sitting here drunk off my ass shitposting on /pol/ instead of doing anything productive, like i have the last 6 months. And that isn't even getting into the other 1000 horrible choices i have made
>>70067444
>Except that it's utter bullshit.
From a pure factual reasoning, women never had much bias in terms of voting. Actually, they used to be more conservative, and the leftist shift is pretty recent.
If we take France as an example, the radical socialists blocked every attempts to allow women to vote, because they knew women would vote conservative. And that lasted from 1871 to 1945.
Also, the US gave women the right to vote to women well before France did, and they still managed to win 2 world wars with that "burden".
>>70067758
No, the IQ doesn't seem to matter with women, they are a special kind of stupid
>>70066525
They should be allowed to vote, /pol/ is just full of r9k and /v/ rejects these days.
Women need to be forced to deal with the lifestyle options they enjoy vs the depressed wages they endure.
My wife is a director at a Fortune 50. She makes really good money, but she's still in the bottom 50% of her cohort. Three of her direct report women under her have quit or taken FMLA leave that has seriously impacted her department's effectiveness in the past 2 years. It's hurt her raise and her bonus as a director. It sucks because she has to make excuses for women who choose to breed when we haven't. She gets judged by the same standard, and we get punished for it.
She has sworn to never hire another woman between 25 and 40 years old. It's screwed her enough that she's done with giving them a chance. Until women, specifically CAREER women, deal with this truth we cannot have equality. Men don't have this issue, and she intends to hire men from now on.
>>70066525
>Once a civilisation gave women political power, it never recovered and was shortly conquered. Not a single exception
Pretty much this. It would be nice if reality wasn't so brutal but it is
>>70067758
Look at this graph and understand that the backlash means it's impossible - you'd be removing the vote from 70+%.
>>70068198
Why should they?
>>70068198
explains a lot actually.
>>70068185
Explain how they are a special kind of stupid.
>>70068070
>a high IQ doesn't mean someone makes good choices. I have a genius level IQ and i'm sitting here drunk off my ass shitposting on /pol/ instead of doing anything productive
Right so why the fuck should you get to vote but not women in STEM or strong, capable women(that /pol/ thinks doesn't exist because it wants to hide from reality)? You're just some faggoty piece of shit. There are plenty of women I'd rather have voting than you.
>>70066525
They should be allowed but they shouldn't do it
>>70068137
?
You seem to be under the impression that collapse take less than a generation, am i correct ?
>>70068312
meant for
>>70067444
Wisconsin.
Women should be allowed to vote, but there should be some requirements that disenfranchise a lot of them. Because there are some politically intelligent women, but on average they just follow what's socially acceptable and sounds "nice".
>>70068357
>>70068357
They let emotions drive them, consciously and subconsciously
In a healthy society, women will be allowed to vote but the majority won't. So I say allow them to vote, allow gays to marry, but those things won't flourish if faith is alive.
>>70068596
I guess I forgot to state my point. I believe women should be equal to men. This includes the right to vote. However, I believe that women should also do certain tasks that are specific to men like mandatory military at age 18 etc.
>>70066525
It's not that suffrage is inherently a bad thing, but no one really talks about the devastating impact of female entry both into the workforce and the voting public.
The workforce was doubled, halving wages and available jobs, decreasing the quality of life for ALL workers who now had to compete even harder just for basic employment. Add on top of this even greater welfare "reforms" and you have a system that demands an incredible amount from the individual worker while allowing them to accumulate very little wealth in return. Women wanted the freedom of working, certainly, but by flooding the workforce unilaterally with women, the value of work was reduced immensely.
It's funny that women complain about wage parity, when by nature of their presence in the workforce, the cost of living has been increased tremendously for EVERYONE.
Of course this is all judgment made in hindsight, as female entry into the workforce was a necessity of total war.
Now for the voting public. By granting women, as a body, the right to vote, you introduced new avenues in which politicians could pander; and when politicians are given huge new groups to sway, this of course leads to massive shifts in the political landscape. Humans naturally tend to vote for their own interests, and so women naturally will vote for the candidate who claims to be a proponent of women's rights and privileges. Even if that person is actually horrible for women's interests. Sadly, women's suffrage simply boosted the sleaziest politicians to the forefront, since they could simply wave the flag of women's rights and garner millions of votes.
This is why the DNC has worked very hard to paint Republicans as patently "anti-woman", to ensure that they get the majority of the female vote, as many women have been made to believe that they are voting against their own interests if they vote conservative.
>>70068509
If it takes too long, then the collapse cannot be rooted to that only cause. It would be like saying
"My dog died two years ago and it's raining today, told you".
They can't make decisions based on logic and reason.
They let emotion and feelings cloud their judgment.
And on top of that, they take forever to make decisions as well.
Guaranteed at least 80% of the women in line today to vote are "undecided."
>>70067758
Woman detected.
Fuck off you stupid vile cunt. Go be offended somewhere else. I want to run you over with my lawnmower right now.
>>70068137
>Rome was built in a day
>Rome fell in a day
You're a retard
>>70068312
Cheer up.
The artificial womb will enable to remove women from the equation ( the incentives to do that are multiple, >>70068321 for starters, more soldiers for the same amount of food, more productivity per capita etc ).
Now, i'm not talking the next civilisation will do it, it's going to be a progressive thing.
But once the thought caught on, and the benefits manifest themselves, the point of no-return will be reached.
>>70068649
>They let emotions drive them, consciously and subconsciously
Right, but /pol/ does the exact same fucking thing. You're talking about a board that trusts infographics implicitly, people who never spot that OP's post is a fake link for like 100 fucking posts because nobody here actually reads anything, and people that just get angry based off of rumor and stupid shit.
You can't give me this "all men are creatures of cold logic" horse shit when you post on a board like this. This board is pretty much pure bullshit and anything but logic. It's irrational kneejerk reactionary gut morality, which is every bit as emotional and stupid as anything you can put on women.
>>70068972
By your reasoning, shouldn't men who let their emotions cloud their judgement not be allowed to vote? Shouldn't anyone who actually has common sense and understands politics be allowed to vote while others be shunned away from doing so?
>>70069020
You seem mad. Are you letting your emotions trump your logic and rationale?
>>70066525
because women base their political positions on their feelings instead of a criteria based in logic
instead of doing research on a candidate, they determine their vote on what they think of their personality not policy
>>70066525
Why stop at women?
Heinlein had it right, only people that have proven they are willing to make personal sacrifices for the good of society should be given enfranchisement.
>>70069093
Its about averages, the average woman is far, more likely to base an opinion on emotions
Look at how many women are pro immigration or open border because of their empathy alone
>>70069135
You literally can't even compare the two.
Every woman I know is so uneducated about politics, it's absurd.
>X candidate is unattractive, so I won't vote for him
>I will vote for X woman, because she's a woman and girl power XD
>Buzzfeed told me that X candidate is bad, so I won't do my own research on the subject
At least the nu males who vote for Bernie have convictions.
>>70068855
Whether it's merely a symptom or a cause, not one civilisation recovered from giving women political power.
This also mean you have no reason to defend female vote since they'll never lose it, let me repeat it : civilisations don't recover from giving women political power.
>>70068596
>Women should be allowed to vote, but there should be some requirements that disenfranchise a lot of them. Because there are some politically intelligent women, but on average they just follow what's socially acceptable and sounds "nice".
You could make the exact same argument for men you dumb shit. Based on this retarded, emotional anecdotal bullshit opinion, you shouldn't be allowed to vote. Clearly too emotional and stupid.
>>70069194
I want to fucking crack your skull open right now and then leave you there and get like 70 guys to rape you and then we'd rush you to the hospital and do our best to keep you alive then bring you back to the same spot and do it all over again but then we'd throw you in a burning building
>>70066525
Men got the right to vote because they were forcefully drafted and expected to die for their country in wars. You at least should get to choose your leader if you're going to die for them.
Women got to vote because "come on, it's the current year".
That's the basic idea.
>>70069433
So you are making your point based off of experience alone? I've met some women at my school who actually had legitimate points as to why they were voting for him while I met some men who were voting for a candidate based off of the reasons you listed. (Although they were faggots so Idk if you would consider that as a male)
>>70066525
either more women are coming here recently or more women are identifying themselves. go back to fucking pinterest plz and get out of my safe space.
>>70069643
best post
Equal Right means Equal Responsibilities
Care based morality.
>>70069590
Go back to /r9k/. You seem almost desperate to try and convince me to be angry. Pathetic
>>70069730
>I ask a question as to why women should vote
>Automatically assumed to be a woman because of this
Ok
>>70069771
Let's be honest : if shit go down, the ones doing the fighting and dying will be men.
Not only are women incapable of being decent soldiers, men won't want to have women fighting due to protective instincts.
This whole situation would be laughable if it wasn't so disgusting.
>>70069834
I don't browse /r9k/. I want to fucking rape you. You are such a BITCH and a slut cunt whore.
>>70069373
>Its about averages
Averages do not and have never mattered. The only people that cite averages in arguments like these are losers that must cite averages to prop themselves up. "I'm part of this random group of people, and on average they do x better, so I should get to vote and people like me should, but not this other group that is different." Dumb as shit logic, and more proof that you shouldn't vote according to your own dumbshit logic.
Saying "There are fewer high IQ women compared to men, so they shouldn't be allowed to vote" is like claiming that whites shouldn't vote because on average, other races have higher IQs. It's a stupid, pointless comparison and it does nothing to prove they shouldn't vote.
>Look at how many women are pro immigration or open border because of their empathy alone
And yet you ignore all of the men that support this as well. Even if women support it more often than men, you're ignoring that an enormous male population supports the same thing.
>>70069979
So I assume you are gay then? Would you like to be the receiving end?
>>70066525
Only citizens of America that own property or a business should be allowed to vote, regardless of race or gender.
>>70067601
>women are the downfall of society
Fair enough
>That leads to any whack job with an I.Q. of 90 to pull thier heart strings and BAM
You lost me there mister. Women have never traditionally been in positions of power; the reason they contribute to the downfall of society is that they tug at men's heartstrings (and [spoiler]dicks[/spoiler]) in order to seduce them into making irrational decisions that favour the woman in question at the expense of the group they're leading.
>>70070136
That pretty much eliminates everyone under 40.
Do we really need more boomers voting for cuckservatives?
>>70066525
women by definition and nature, are nation destroyers, traitors and selfish
women dont even know the advanced concept of honor and loyalty. they will open their legs to any invading army. they will see who is winning and suck the cock of the winning team without resistance because they are parasites whose only goal is to live, not to forge nations, culture, or advance humanity towards a noble goal.
>>70066525
why should they be allowed to vote is a better question
>>70070043
It's the inverse, when talking about populations the average is all that matter, outliers are irrelevant.
You may point out to genuises and such, but the frequency of outliers can be predicted by merely gauging the average.
>>70066525
Because on average women let their emotions dictate their actions
Because the majority of liberal voters are women asking for more government programs
You need living examples of why women shouldn't be involved in politics just take a look at Europe's free fall into tenth circle of hell happening right fucking now
Sweden is set to become a third world hellhole in less than 15 years after being almost utopic and Germany is not far behind them and all because the women in power and the nu male pussies they lord over feel "sorry" for those filthy fucking savages that are washing over their homelands
You can cherrypick women with common sense until the cows come home but saying women can do good in politics is like saying Muslims can do good at peace with their neighbors, some will but the vast majority will not
>>70066525
Every adult should have the right to participate in the political process, even neo-nazis, radical leftists, and loonies.
[spoiler]and women[/spoiler]
>>70070043
Averages have always and will always matter, don't let your emotions get in the way of cold facts
COMPLETELY irrational, deluded, coddled since birth, no ruthless instincts, makes for poor decisions and reckless choices when it comes to important decisions
>>70070332
See prohibition in the US
>>70070459
No, you idiot, I'm talking about in regards to law. Averages don't matter to law. You can't pass laws based on X or Y race having a better or worse average. It's unconstitutional and frankly stupid and inhumane. Imagine if courts decided "Whites only get 3/5th of a vote, because they're dumber than asians." It's not a valid argument.
Arguing that women are somehow uniquely emotional is invalid. Men support leftist ideals too. Men that are more intelligent and capable than you.
>>70066525
The real question in current year is:
Why are women and effeminate nu males allowed to vote?
>>70068385
(that's his point you fucking moron)
>>70070650
Any factual evidence?
who the hell says women should have inferior voting rights? as a national socialist I believe both should have the same voting rights. No voting.
>>70070120
No I'm straight you stupid fucking SLUT. You came here because you are threatened by /pol/ and like all women you just had to bother men. You couldn't leave us alone and let us have our spaces, you just HAD to ruin everything
I am literally fantasizing about the whole 70 guys raping you/throwing you into a burning house thing right now. We will have world class doctors keeping you alive and awake each time so we can do it over and over again you fucking CUNT!!!!
>>70070360
Note that, to be fair, this is unavoidable.
Any women resisting invaders get killed, along with the children and men. And there have been a lot of invasion in Humanity's History.
I remember about that city in Hispania, where the women suicided instead of submitting to the roman army. obviously, such women would be wonderful, yet obviously they didn't reproduce.
Treachery is an automatic result of this selection.
A shame, but it means removing women from the equation is the only true option - well there's also eugenics but somehow i think "loyalty" traits are not going to be prioritised, especially since it's somewhat hard to test.
>>70066525
Because they are impulse voters/emotionally driven. They will vote for whatever their boyfriend, family, friend circle/society tells them to vote. I have still to meet a single woman that actually thinks and speaks for herself. If you get a girlfriend you will experience this. They have no identity.
Women are like big children, and children can't vote. Women are helpless without men and his inventions (which they can barely manage to use as it is).
If women couldn't vote, we'd have to give them all sorts of special privileges to make up for it:
1. Women shouldn't have to pay taxes at all.
2. Her relatives must take care of her if she can't cope.
3. And the state must take care of women if they are destitute and don't have any family that can
afford to help.
>>70067014
>>70066525
Women tend to have an impair sense of reason and social responsibility. They also lack in-group loyalty. Instead they slavishly follow social consensus, hew to their own selfish interests, or succumb to pathological altruism.
>>70070634
>Averages have always and will always matter, don't let your emotions get in the way of cold facts
You are such a fedora core fag. And since you've ignored an enormous chunk of my point I'm guessing you're too dumb and lazy to make a real argument.
>>70066525
Nobody should vote. Democracy is a sham, and the only way to a truly free society is anarchism.
The only definitive way to do it is this:
>Make people take a test to be eligible to vote
>general knowledge, US history, government branches and their functions, amendments, etc.
>if you fail, you aren't allowed to take it again for 5 years to allow yourself gain more knowledge or wisdom
Wisconsinite here, my mom just voted for Kasich, that should be reason enough.
>>70067758
>But shouldn't the voting requirements be based on IQ
Yes, but that would be racist.
>>70070953
stop shitposting. It was never funny to begin with
I believe that people who have an IQ below 120 should not be allowed to vote.
>>70070743
Oh but it matters, statistics about sentences for the same crimes for example is overwhelmingly in the favour of women.
Equality have never been a reality, on any level, in any way.
The meme sure helped reduces direct, visible, obvious tyranny though, i'll give you that.
>>70071114
Kek.
On a serious note, you're basing that off of generalizations. Also, I assume you don't want minorities to vote?
>>70071189
IQ is Jewish pseudoscience.
You can't gauge someone's intelligence by their ability to arrange patterns.
We won't see an accurate scientific way to measure intelligence in our lifetimes.
>inb4 you get a low score
>>70071358
But you can judge someone's ability to recognize patterns and see what comes next in the sequence. If we only allowed people who could recognize patterns and see what comes next in the sequence to vote, Bernie Sanders would have been forgotten about a long time ago.
>>70066525
I'm so glad Hillary is going to get in. Women have been held back by their perverted American men long enough. Anti abortion, anti equal pay, reduce women to sex objects, disgusting cat calling is rampant on American streets. We men of new zealand provide comfort and support to the women of America where we can. Proud to say we were the FIRST to give women the vote and we will continue to look out for womens rights world wide.
Male landowners should be the only ones who can vote. Prove me wrong
>>70067601
>leads to any whack job with an I.Q. of 90
>Hillary Clinton
Mad you didn't get into Yale?
Faggot.
>>70071555
wait what. What makes you think Hillary actually gives two shits about women?
>>70071690
Just because you get into Yale doesn't mean you are intelligent whatsoever. It just means you sucked every teacher's dick just to get that grade bump and rec letter.
The fact that women are overwhelmingly left-leaning indicates that there is a problem. Men are more evenly distributed across the political spectrum, with almost equal proportions of conservative, liberal, and centrist, while the number of conservative and centrist women together is roughly equal to the number of liberal-leaning women.
Obviously this is not an inherent gender issue, because roughly half of all women still identify as conservative or independent; rather, it is a societal problem. In the West, women are overwhelmingly targeted by leftist and "progressive" propaganda typically packaged under the guise of "women's rights." Men are largely immune to such propaganda because no male equivalent exists.
This is not to say that "women's rights" are a bad thing, but they are frequently touted in the political sphere as *THE* premier social and political issue, to the complete detriment of literally every other issue, from the economy to foreign policy. This simple but extremely insidious pandering draws a disproportionate number of female voters to the left, and begins to skew what should really be a more equal distribution across the political spectrum
>>70069135
This is why I support vote scaling based on mandatory civics tests that would be administered every time people vote.
>>70071564
Who are citizens, and have both parents be citizens, and have no other nationality.
The goal is to make sure the political power think on a temporal level, not just national.
But even then, the equality meme is far too easy to push, and far too attractive to the empathy of said landowners.
No, the cycle cannot be broken.
There are only temporary measures.
>>70066525
>Jack Daniels
What am I poor now?
>>70071160
I'm not shitposting. You are a worthless slut who is invading a male space and I want you to SUFFER for it.
>>70066525
Women have no stake in national defense. Women are also not biologically suited for boots on the ground combat as well as males.
They think with their feels rather than logic.
>>70072070
But I'm a male
>>70071358
Wrong
>>70066525
Because everyone right wing is without question Hitler. Anyone who wants to accept immigration waves that could possibly endanger the lives of someone's family because Muh nice shouldn't be allowed to vote.
>>70072181
More like nu male
They vote based on emotion, not fact
>>70066525
They literally get their politics through celebrity bullshit TMZ-tier TV shows and what not. It's the only thing worse than getting your news through a comedian.
That being said I do know one (1) female who actually knows or cares about ANYTHING about politics.
Ideally they should. They should work as well, which means they should be taxed and therefore represented by that tax.
What's not ideal is their collectivism that feminists don't target, but instead bolster. This turns them into single issue voters, or worse voting by whatever their social group groupthinks. This isn't democracy. It's mob rule.
Because men always vote for their family's interests.
Women always vote for their own interest.
When men start voting in their best interest women start bitching.
>>70072181
I bet you wear problem glasses , scarves, and prolly have a beard too. Faggot
>>70072709
>implying there is anything wrong with wearing glasses and having a beard
>implying that because you have glasses and a beard you are a nu male feminist
what
>>70072221
Quality rebuttal.
>>70066525
Because you vote with your vagina.
>>70069030
Women won't let the artificial womb become a thing, my man. And there's nothing the government can do about it, because they know women will vote for whoever is against it.
Why do you think there are no male birth control pills for sale even tho they've been ready for mass production for ages?
Women vote for security over liberty. Every time. This is because women have never taken care of themselves and never will. Given pure freedom, women would mostly die because they CAN'T take care of themselves. They're not strong enough physically to be independent, etc. so someone ALWAYS needs to take care of them.
Women voting has a predictable result, and that is that they always vote for the government to start taking care of them.
>>70072898
Kek. What's next?
>just because I wear shirts with shitty obscure bands on them and have retarded tatoos doesn't make me a nu male! I swear#!
>>70073236
They cannot control east asians, the pic was from a japanese lab.
Women only think with their emotions, some of which is good but in a lot of cases it's better for Men to take control, we're not emotionless but you women tend to by melodramatic and just love to moan.
>>70073437
Believe whatever you want if it makes yo feel better
>>70066525
The regular woman should not be allowed to vote because the regular man should not be allowed to vote either. Voting should be important, yet the more people vote, the less yours count.
>>70073988
**sips micro brew**
Women have no in group preference. In other words they are born traitors. Democracy is retarded no matter what though since deciding your countrys leaders the same way you choose a prom queen is the most retarded fucking idea ever.
Iron Fist of Truth and Reality?
Oooorrrr...
Psychotic Crocodile Tears of Insanity and Hypocrisy?
your choice motherucker
You reap what you sow.
See > A FUCKING LEAF
>>70066525
>>70072181
That leaf is angry
But you are kind of a faggot, anon
>>70071046
This.
/thread
>Go to university to study international politics
>Something I feel strongly about
(Yeah i know muh stem fields and shit)
>Liked the idea of getting a Girlfriend with similar intrests
>All girls I meet are far left feminazis
>Only issues they care about are abortion and gender quotas
>As for international politics the only thing they care about is more migration from muslim countries
>Girls at my university literally do not care about things like wars, economics, philosophical issues etc
>If you even try to open a discussion they get either bored or offended
>Just abortion and gender quotas
>These are the only two issues and other trivial things for example gender neutral children
>MFW these same people complain that women aren't taken seriously in politics
Women shouldn't vote because women are followers, not leaders. They almost never think freely. They mainly think about how to fit in with a group. A woman will "believe" what ever she has to in order to fit in. There is no point in giving power to someone like that.
>Freshman english class at college
>need to present our thesis on an essay to the rest of the class
>essay is on a current political issue
>all the guys have topics ranging from Iranian sanctions, solving the Korean conflict, US-Saudi relations
>the girl students focus on shit like texting while driving laws, abortion, wage gap bullshit, and social media developments
same shit happened in my international relations course
>>70071821
What other excuses do you tell yourself when you sleep at night?
FAGGOT.
>>70077346
None, but if it makes you feel better then keep telling yourself that going to an ivy means nything
>>70077534
I fucking hate you so much right now. FAGGOT!!!!!!
>>70066525
The majority vote for their feelings, and that inevitably leads to destroying the country they gain the right to vote in.
> men having the right to vote sometimes leads to the same
> women having the right to vote guarantees it
>>70066525
Easy. They make poor decisions.
>>70066525
Women are far more emotional than men, especially in the face of dire situations. We need those situations to be dealt with logic and a clear head, not with emotion.
>>70066525
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__5BCUTzzpQ
>>70066525
Would you let your cat or house vote? Women are legally the property of a man, property cannot vote.
>>70077346
You're a degenerate cuck who has never accomplished anything. Your opinion in anything politics is null.
Please kill yourself.
>>70079519
FUCKING KEK
>>70079594
>>70079519
are you responding to yourself on purpose?
are you a shill trying to demoralize
they use emotions instead of reason
>>70067444
this.
/thread
>>70066525
universal sufferage was a mistake
>>70079308
TL;DW
>>70066525
If they pass an IQ and history test yeah go ahead and vote.
T. a mexican who knows what happens when you let them vote. pic related.
>>70066525
Women can't convince their husbands to vote a certain way easily, so they would rather skirt round them to have their cake and eat it too. That means they will tend to be voting the opposite to the husband wants on key issues - why else would you need the power?
How is that a good dynamic to found a family on upon which society relies? by creating more adversarial notions at home and risk dissolving the unit which is necessary for children. With women voting at best you are in the same boat, at worst you ingrain deep disrespect for the wishes of either partner.
The sexes have different values for prediction, verification, self-preservation and this predictably translates into how they vote. Leadership is rarely shared equally and effectively by two, one will find a way to rule over the other.
>>70068797
Yeah that way all our daughter's will come back with Jamal's baby because they didn't want to be in the fucking military. You're a fucking idiot, the response to feminism shouldn't be "yeah let's give them real equality!!!" It should be giving them the opposite of what they want.
>>70069349
he was right about that maybe but he was a total cuck on other things
>Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.
>>70077085
What uni ameribro?
They're easily manipulated because they're way more sensitive to group pressures than men
>>70066525
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assemblywomen
>>70066525
Most people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
>>70066525
>muh feeling muh emotions muh opinion fuck facts
vid related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3XqRhfLpg8
>>70066525
They don't have to sign up for the draft. They have special protection from genital mutilation. Etc.
Imagine being a woman and just coasting through life on a free ride. They just want to butcher men out of boredom.
>>70068286
what do you do anon?
>>70066525
Daily reminder: Gravity Falls tried to redpill kids about the illuminati.
>>70066525
Only women with family contributing to the war effort. No harlots, no women with lazy husbands, and no Germans. That was the deal.
>>70066525
because
>teehee lets vote for hillary no matter what! first woman to be president! one large step for fem-kind!
>let's vote a gay guy in next!
>let's vote a mexican guy in next!
>emotions, feelings, and political correctness matters more than logic, facts, and reason!
>>70086670
Gravity Falls also tried to redpill neckbeards about being degenerate
>>70066525
historically they have destroyed empires by getting involved into politics
>>70066894
They can do that thing African women do were they squeeze their vag so the pee comes out in a consistent straight stream.
>>70088089
>my dad's a tentacle monster
>that hentai joke on a Disney show
>>70088256
This they destroyed Rome.
>>70066525
Geer I wonder why.
>>70090298
Why the fuck did the think women should any say in stuff like national defense? Holy fuck I hate this fucking world that my boomer parents generation have destroyed
>>70066525
they let every type of tribe & group in
why?
because the more groups there are the more conflict there will be, the more conflict there is the easier it is for them to choose the winning tribe to mate with, if there was no conflict, women would have a very hard time to choose which tribe has the best genes, which tribe to mate with. It's much easier to be lazy & invite conflict into your country where you don't have to move a finger until a tribe emerges victorious
women crashing nations with no survivors is coded in their evolutionary behaviour
>>70068137
>women votes
>had anything to do with us winning two world wars
>forgets it was male soliders who won those wars, not women staying at home licking lead paint
Fuck off retard
>>70066525
They best of any woman in anything besides childbirth can always be bested by a man.
I'm talking skills, not something stupid like (manipulate you with their pussy skill)
Prove me wrong.
