Would it work /pol/, would they crush Shillary? MAGA?
>>70053966
>nationalist socialism
>>70053966
Tastes good to me.
>>70054237
meant this for this
>>70054111
lel.
>>70053966
Have Bernie Supporter really come to this? Accepting that he cannot beat the Democratic Part Establishment, and his only hope of getting in the W-H is to be VP and for Trump to leave office?
>>70054639
Sanders as VP would be a dream come true but I doubt it. I do think a lot of our voters are gonna vote Trump after the DNC steals our election, seriously, we fucking hate Hilary more than Trump. Trump is Kanye tier right now, we can ignore a lot of his bullshit for our own purposes.
>>70053966
Sanders will win popularity within the Democratic Party, but the Super-Delegates will make him lose.
Trump will win popularity, but there will be a brokered convention.
With Sanders experience within the legislature, he would make an excellent VP/President of the Senate.
Trump would be obvious choice for President with his HIGH ENERGY!
But if Trump/Sanders win, then the Establishment might attempt a coup.
Feminists, Cuckservatives, the Cartels, and Weedman, would try to protect the interests of the Corporations and the enslavement of the 3rd World.
This would be one of those things that would make me stop supporting TRUMP!
I think he knows what he is doing and he would never do such a stupid thing.
>>70054994
>The Cartels.
>Weedman
I think if Sanders got the VP, the election would be over. I also think they could work together to avoid the next financial crash, something Shillary would be happy to do to pay off her Wall Street friends. I'd be happy to campaign Trump if this was the case, you don't understand, a lot of our base knows all about Shillary and hate her with the heat of a thousand suns.
>>70055294
Sanders is running on helping the working class, stopping tax evasion, and so much more. You don't have to agree with his socialist ideas but you can't argue that he doesn't have good intentions for the working/middle class.
I'd vote for it.
>>70053966
He's not going to, but yes it would definitely crush Shillary
>>70055850
mah nigga, glad we can at least agree that Shillary's a corrupt whore.
>>70055903
Sadly no, but you will probably get the majority of our movement on your side if you guys play your cards right. I think Trump needs to focus on winning our side over.
>>70053966
Is it feasible to combine Trumps and Bernies political ideas into something that /pol/ would agree with as well?
>>70056205
Used to be I was going to vote for Hillary just to crash the plane. Hoboy you should have seen /pol/'s butthurt over that.
>>70056522
I think so mang, I think so. I'd personally love to see some sort of Trump-Sanders alliance.
>>70056850
That's why I was voting Trump in the general, to crash the plane, Sanders getting cheated out of his nomination will alienate a fuckton of people from voting Democrat, we've simply learned too much. Things we weren't supposed to know about our own party. I'd vote for Trump's honesty any day of the week at the very least.
>>70053966
Sanders already told Jesse Ventura he's going to drop out and take a role as Clinton's VP. It was all a scam.
>>70053966
witness.
>>70053966
that would be kektastic
>republican pres
>democratic vp
I don't think that's even plausible.
>>70057178
Maybe super early on he said that but things changed, this nigga got his own army now.
>>70057237
I feel blessed.
>>70057289
Sanders believes in the will of the people above all else, if his voter-base hounds him to take the ticket, I think there's a good chance he'll do it. I know this guy pretty well by now.
>>70057146
You know it
Trump has a solid and loyal base. Bernie has a solid and loyal base. Democrats and republicans have respectively disenfranchised bases...
Could work. Bernie would have to lay out groundwork for a long distance healthcare and social reform plan while trumps ideas take over the short term.
Theyd have to campaign strongly on international affairs, trade policy, and corporate/political greed because these are their only strong agreements.
Would probably win desu easilly could absorb 33% of the vote.
I like it. I love it.
Some crazy Sanders supporter would assassinate Trump the second after he was sworn in.
>>70054994
You're delusional. Sanders is not even going to win the popular vote because of low information voters and big money corrupting our politics. This entire competition was rigged from the start. Shillary was the presumptive nominee and the party favorite before any votes were even cast.
The reason why Trump was able to do so well on the Republican side is because it was a crowded field with no certain favorite. With the establishment tearing itself apart with several horses in the race, Trump had a much easier time competing. If from the beginning it had been Trump versus a single other establishment candidate, he would have had a much harder time. He did well mainly because achieving a plurality is much easier than achieving a majority.
>>70053966
if he's not controlled opposition, sure.
>>70056522
Very easily.
I've pointed out before on /pol/ that Sanders' message is actually closer to Trump's in many ways than it is to Hillary's. Some examples:
-trade policy
-rhetoric regarding jobs
-both candidates are not taking big donor money and have made that a central theme of their campaigns. The major difference is that Sanders is a major advocate of broader campaign finance reform whereas Trump has remained somewhat mum on the issue.
-their foreign policy is very close to one another on many points including strategy against ISIS (specifically with regard to Syria and not opposing the Assad regime), policy toward Israel and overall probable demilitarization in favor of a more peaceful, less hawkish agenda. There are some stark differences here and there. I imagine Sanders would not favor Trump's idea of arming any country, even allies, with nuclear weapons. However, they share more similarities than differences on foreign policy.
-I don't think Trump has said anything about it, but I doubt he would be seriously opposed to legalization of marijuana. I also think his abortion stance is concocted out of political expediency and is temporary.
Sanders' economic plans for healthcare and free college education are much harder to reconcile. Personally I think they are unfeasible and in some ways destructive. If the government funds universities they will have too much influence on what gets taught, what programs get cut and what is prioritized, limiting the creative freedom of those institutions (imo).
I'm mainly a Sanders supporter because I believe strongly in campaign finance reform and reform of our backwards political system more generally. But he has many commonalities with Trump.
>>70059674
Valid concern of free college but I think Sanders would allow colleges to do what they want considering we would have 4x the amount to pay their tuition from taxing wall street speculation.
Everything else is spot on though, there are a lot of obvious similarities.
Also this goes without saying, but they also have nearly irreconcilable views on immigration. However, in theory Sanders has opposed a lot of immigration bills with the view that the people being brought in were treated like slaves and they drove down the value and conditions of labor. Socialism has always had an uneasy relationship with immigrants since there is a prevailing view that they provide cheap labor and thus upend any gains that workers may achieve.
Trump's idea to ban all Muslims entering the country is nonetheless completely at odds with Sanders' message of inclusion. His plan to build a Great Wall of America on the Mexican border also is not compatible with Sanders' agenda since Sanders would want to spend the money for maintenance/construction of that wall elsewhere.
And yes, Trump says Mexico will pay for that wall but even he admits that there will be costs to the American taxpayer associated with it that cannot be defrayed. Even in the best case scenario, it obviously isn't going to be free. Nothing is free.
>Trump/Sanders reaction images
The overshadowing of Obama/Biden would be massive.
>>70062473
A Trump/Sanders ticket (which is impossible despite their similar populist tendencies; let's be realistic) would have immeasurable levels of meme magic in general.
>Trump/Bernie
The only difference is the wall and the temporary Muslim ban. The way 2016 is going and meme magic, this isn't a impossibility.
>>70054111
Wouldn't a Trump/Sanders ticket essentially be GamerGate 2.0? 4chan and Reddit joining together to defeat a common enemy?
>National Socialism in your lifetime
>>70064035
If by defeat you mean breifly interupt before falling apart and galvanizing all of your opponents against you in solidarity, then yes, that's exactly what it would be like.
