In a true Libertarian society, would pedophilia be legal since it doesn't actually hurt anybody?
>>70042235
Of course, if the father approved. Rapists would get lynched and business as usual for those sickos.
Essentially the free market would fix feminism by restoring marriage. The father could judge if the man is going to be a good husband.
>>70042235
>Libertarian society
oxymoron
>>70042235
no
>>70042235
What the f*** do you mean by 'libertarian'?
Stupid ape.
It's called 'liberalism' and the underlying principles have never changed since the inception, which is why there is 0 fucking reason to call it anything but 'liberalism'.
And to answer your question, in a purely liberal society pedophilia would not be allowed, because children aren't fully rational individuals, and thus require special protection by the state.
>>70042235
>children aren't people
>>70042235
>doesn't actually hurt anybody
>ignores age of consent to make such decisions
I can understand the critical backlash of libertarianism, it has it's flaws. You're putting a retarded spin on it, enjoy knocking down your strawman.
I think you should have been aborted.
>>70042235
The girl's father would decide when she should be married and to who. Sex outside marriage is rape.
Adult/child sex is fine if it's in the family or within marriage.
>>70042377
Basically this.
>>70044290
/thread
>>70047093
>Sex outside marriage is rape
SJW-tier statists need not post in this thread.
>>70047373
What? I think the confusion here comes from you holding to the more modern view of what constitutes rape. Rape is sexing 1)a woman who is married to someone who isn't you or 2) unmarried and living in her father's house. Not SJW-tier or statist view.
>>70048165
Rape is forcibly having sex with someone who doesn't want you to.
The word you're seeking to define is Adultery, not rape.
>>70046244
>>70044290
Is this b8? I'll bite
>I can't understand that language evolves and words change
>What was once known under one word is no referred to by another??? how could that be???
shut up
>>70048371
>Rape is forcibly having sex with someone who doesn't want you to
No, it isn't. If that was what rape was a man could rape his own wife but that doesn't make any sense. Rape is sex with a woman who isn't yours.
But pedophilia isnt illegal, child molestation/pornography is
>>70049808
>marriage is ownership
nigga that shit died before you were even born, get over it.
>>70042235
Libertarianism would allow any private act between consenting ADULTS, so not necessarily. Maybe if the child can be deemed aware and willing enough to consent to a pedophilic relationship, but that's such a stretch.
This is probably bait, but this meme that libertarianism = anarchism is getting.
>>70050402
Getting old
>>70050402
>Libertarianism would allow any private act between consenting ADULTS
who's going to enforce that? going to rent some age police?
>>70050136
CURRENT YEAR
>>70042235
Proud liberal here. Having sexual relations with a child would definitely be illegal. It harms the child.
>>70042235
Libertarianism. Because any state intervention in the lives of private citizens is akin to slavery and rape. But *actual* slavery and rape is ok.
>>70050402
> Libertarianism would allow any private act between consenting ADULTS, so not necessarily.
Who defines adult? And why that caveat? How does having consensual sex with a minor violate the NAP?
>>70048165
>sexing
>>70044290
>0 fucking reason to call it anything but 'liberalism'.
There is in the USA. The Socialists here appropriated the term 'liberal' late in the 19th century. So if you don't want to generate a bunch of confusion, you have to define liberal (world)/libertarian (USA) versus Socialist (world)/liberal (USA)
>>70042235
No, go back to the deep web pedotard.
>>70042235
adult women with small enough vaginas are potentially harmed by intercourse, so you've posed a question with a false information.
>>70042235
Maybe pedophilia doesn't hurt the kids because you have a tiny dick
>>70042235
