>>70021994
yes

>>70021994
It's already collapsing, dumbo.

>>70021994
You should edit that image to make "the spray" into "the deodorant", since that is an example he has actually given. The image will have even more impact that way.

it would take a heavy hit cause people would be forced go pay way more taxes and couldnt buy as many things on the free market anymore

>>70021994
No, nothing major will happen. Same if Trump, Hillary or Cruz are elected. The President is actually very limited in power.

>>70022537
to whom does power belong ?
democrats and republicans in the congress ?

The reality is that even if he wins the presidency, Congress and the Senate still have a Republican majority so he'll be blocked on most of his measures barring the possibility they're replaced with Democrats in the future congressional and senatorial elections.

Proposals he does manage to pass, will most likely cause most small businesses to close and larger ones to offshore even more. His stock tax will virtually destroy pension funds and the retirement of millions and most likely move all trading overseas to the London Exchange.

All of the "revenue" that's projected from his policies is a naive dream.

>>70022269
An example he has given? Can you explain?

>>70024776
http://reason.com/blog/2015/05/26/bernie-sanders-dont-need-23-choices-of-d

> You don't necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants or of 18 different pairs of sneakers when children are hungry in this country.

Bernie seems to think that 23 kinds of spray deodorant is somehow standing in the way of feeding children.

>>70023186
I'd say the answer is close to this. The good news about his presidency though would be that tipping culture would be abolished and servers have literally zero reason to bitch.