What is the future energy source?
Fusion hopefully.
I also have high hopes for hydrogen if we can figure out how to produce it cost effectively.
>>70018878
Kebab
nothing will ever replace oil
>>70018878
Harnessing the power of fapping.
>>70018878
Coal and Oil.
Burning Muslims
Poo
India will find a way and that will be what ascends them to superpower status
>>70019270
>>70019321
You're both fucking retarded. Obviously windmills and solar panels aren't the future, but we will eventually run out of coal and oil, then what? Nuclear and hydrogen are the future.
>>70018878
my dick:
renewable, clean and efficient heating and kinetic energy
>>70019348
http://www.sciencealert.com/bill-gates-is-backing-this-waterless-toilet-that-could-revolutionise-sanitation
>>70018878
Nuclear. Fucking obviously. I have no idea why this is even a real debate.
>>70019270
it will run out eventually, you know that, right?
>nothing will ever
is a loong time
Nuclear/LNG, with eventual transition to Nuclear/Hydrogen/Orbital Solar.
>>70019447
You call others retarded yet run with your shit mouth with pure speculation.
Choke on a dick you god damn teenager.
The OP not state how far in the future we are talking about he simply said the future.
Die
>>70018878
dude windfarms lmao
>>70018878
We had a thread about this like a few hours ago.
Nuclear is by far cleanest, most efficient, most cost-effective and safest energy source.
>>70019581
>I have no idea why this is even a real debate.
>>70018878
hydro and nuclear
>>70019746
dude solar panels
why do libtards hate nuclear so much?
>>70019910
>muh chernobyl
>muh fukushima
>muh nuclear terrorisms
They are retarded
>>70019818
Yeah but liberal faggots control everything and they do not want nuclear power period.
>>70018878
slaves
>>70019818
But it has a scary name and that makes me afraid because I can't understand basic science.
>>70019022
Problem with hydrogen is that it diffuse through most gas pipes.
>>70019910
Because of the "le nuclear energy kills people" meme
>>70019986
>CHERNOBYL WILL BE IRRADIATED AND UNLIVEABLE FOR THE NEXT 40 000 YEARS
>25 years later and it's pretty much fine in most places
>>70018878
Coal, oil and gas will need to increase to make up for the parasitic unreliables . Nuclear will eventually end up a decent chunk not for 30-50 years though.
>>70018878
WAVES
A
V
E
S
>>70019551
bluepilled liberal sjw faggot
>>70021367
We cannot safe energy at the moment
So all your wind/sun/waves bullshit is not a solution right now
>>70021389
>>70021540
>H0MO
man what the fuck
>>70021638
sup fag
>>70021638
faggot
>>70021540
I agree nuclear is the best option RIGHT NOW (and for space shit) but if we could harness the power of natural forces like waves or stars or wind, that would be based
The one thing I hate about environmentalism is the opposition to nukes, when it's in fact superclean and safe if its in a competent country and away from natural disaster zones
>>70021389
>>70021540
>>70021638
homo
>>70019348
This. They will be a world superpower by 2030.
Huge methane reactors! Who control Barter Town now?
>>70018878
Aussie bantz and leaf shitposting
>>70018878
When we're able to utilise solar energy efficiently that is when we'll have near limitless energy
>>70018878
Orbital energy, they are going to create a track that surrounds the planet and then they are going to attach satellites ot that track with wires that connect them after sending them into space, and then the rotation of the earth will power the planet.
>>70018878
Mostly coal, oil, and natural gas for the next hundred years with small but incremental increases in solar. Nuclear will forever be kept down by bureaucracy.
Might have the first useful fusion plant in 100 years.
>>70022176
I.e. Never.
>>70022060
That's a secure energy future right there!
