Why can't /pol/ answer a simple question?
Why is this board full of useless ideologies?
Why do your economic discussion arguments are based on ad-hominem fallacies, or defaming delusions?
Why can't /pol/ debate without using the word cuck as an argument? Is that supposed to promove a better employment or social safety of your country?
Why does /pol/ fall for the same joke called "redpill"? Why can't /pol/ understand that the unique "pill" they would ever need is the "self interest" one?
Why do some /pol/ards think that their board can't be represented aa a person, if the 99% of every thread shares the same useless ideologies?
Why can't /pol/ understand that their propaganda is very inefficient and based on more fallacies?
Why can't /pol/ answer a simple question?
>>69990280
B-b-but the Jooos!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BySI1fti7QA
>posting miley
>>69990280
I AM THE ONE, DONT WEIGH A TON, DONT NEED NO GUN TO GET REPECT UP ON THE STREET
>>69990280
Because of her
>why cant faggot op realize /pol/ isn't just one person
it's a mystery!
>>69990280
>the "self interest" one?
Shut up kike cuck.
>>69990280
cause most of the userbase is teenage twats who don't know anything but edgelord memery anyway.
Most can't even weaponize memes.
>>69990533
How do you know?
>>69990411
Why do some /pol/ards think that their board can't be represented aa a person, if the 99% of every thread shares the same useless ideologies?
Why can't /pol/ards read a single piece of text?
Why can't /pol/ards answer a simple question?
>>69990280
>/pol/ can't answer a simple question
>doesn't ask one simple question
>full of useless ideologies
>unlike muh socialism and muh communism; preservation of one's culture and the system of meritocracy many of us wish to see achieved apparently pales in comparison to drug legalisation, transgenders, cultural grey goo and free shit
>economic discussion arguments blah blah meme defences
>has never once truly discussed politics with anyone on /pol/ runs away when encountering legitimate economic arguments and analysis
>cuck being used
>getting offended by memes
>implying its any different from being called a faggot
>red pill meme
>red pill is a fucking metaphor for swallowing a harsh truth you utter fucking sperglord; when we discuss "the red pill", we're discussing the reality of the world, unseen by anyone in the mainstream
>/pol/ can be represented as a single person
>just like niggers and muslims - or would you disagree with it in those instances? If you'd actually hang about you'd understand a lot of people on this board are actually relatively successful people in the real world
>their propaganda is very inefficient
>brexit yes popularity rising
>trump
>why can't /pol/ answer a simple question
>repetition
>miley cyprus image
>from a shithole nation
>have answered all of your above questions
>all in greentext
>>69990521
Why can't /pol/ debate without using the word cuck as an argument? Is that supposed to promove a better employment or social safety of your country?
>self-interest->family protection->safe environment and economical prosperity
Why can't /pol/ards use their caucasian brain?
Why do /pol/ards keep falling on the same mistakes everytime?
Why can't /pol/ards answer a simple question?
>>69990280
>5pa1n
>talking about economics and employment
W E W
E
W
>>69990667
For demographics?
Reading between the lines. Some threads anons provide that kinda information, like being in college. Have gfs, but not wives. Etc. Some have jobs and are 25+ adults of course, but they're not the majority. And the threads that get 404d because someone is underage.
Weaponizing memes takes maturity.
>>69991370
>Weaponizing memes takes maturity.
This isn't a cringe thread.
>>69991902
ahh that's the spirit!
>>69991271
all i can tell you is this:
Then was the Scold herself,
In a wheelbarrow brought,
Stripped naked to the smock,
As in that case she ought:
Neats tongues about her neck
Were hung in open show;
And thus unto the cucking stool
This famous scold did go.
>>69991013
>socialism and communism.
Why do /pol/ards have a poor reading comprehension?
>never discussed economics
Why can't /pol/ards stop using delusions as arguments?
>"cuck" is used to keep circlejerking
>no propaganda
>80% google results of /pol/ are related to "cuck"
Why do /pol/ards fall for the same mistakes everytime? Don' they know the best method of ideology spread is the propaganda?
>redpill is a metaphor
>reality
Why do /pol/ards think that the international press or a simple blog can't lie?
>generalization
>you agree that niggers are x
Why can't /pol/ards differentiate between politics and biologic polemic arguments?
>trump
Why can't /pol/ understand that the economic potencial legislation of Clinton are actually the same as Donald Trump?
>more fallacies
Why do /pol/ards fall for the same mistakes everytime?
Why can't /pol/ards answer a simple question?
>have answered all of your above questions
I'm sorry /pol/
MODS are deleting my posts.
We will have another discussiona later.
See ya!
>>69990280
>muh fallacies and classical debating culture
Fucking die in a fire, pseudo-intellectual freeloader university leech! Nobody in the real world even entertains that degenerate view of problemsolving.
