What is this all aboot? What is the argument here?
Women suck, there's the argument
>I'm going to make a statement with no basis and if you dont engage in what I am saying then you agree with me
>>69965146
that. i daubt you will get any counterargument in /pol/
>We are all X. Even those who don't think they are X are actually X.
What's that? You don't think you are X? Then you must be X haha looks like I win this one better luck next time
>>69965146
Gay as fuck.
>>69965249
>I'm going to engage in what you're saying but I'm also going to avoid making a substantive argument and seeing the irony in that for the sake of tipping my fedora and stroking my intellect for practically no effort
wew I didn't know women posted here
>>69964817
>>69964817
>Silence means consent
uhhhhh okay
>>69967676
In the future we will have to sign papers to have sex in advance, with a signature of both parties to the authorities. Sex will happen in dedicated government-funded clinics. Another pair of signatures is required at the clinic. Acts performed inside the clinics will be filmed, and if the woman so desires, the male can be sued afterwards (regret rape). Sex outside given clinics is automatically declared "brutal, merciless rape and genital mutilation" and will result in the male going to prison.
>>69964817
>no women are feminists
>because all women are feminists
This is the exact sort of reasoning I expect from modern feminists.
