The gap is closing up a bit.
This is still doable.
>>69887191
>bars aren't to scale
>trump's bar is closer to kasich's than cruz despite numerically being closer to cruz
>other 4% longer than kasich's 21%
basically within margin of error and probably not accounting non republican voters well
>>69888464
>probably not accounting non republican voters well
Yeah this was GOP voters only. The latest Fox poll shows Trump way ahead with independents and Democrat switchers in WI too.
I think it's gonna be really tight.
>>69889028
Even if Trump loses Wisconsin (Likely 2bh, lets not get too optimistic here), I just want to see the slimey jew rat Nate Silver have to admit he's wrong again like he has been repeatedly
http://www.isidewith.com/map/JrQv/2016-presidential-election-donald-trump-vs-ted-cruz#z8
>>69887191
It's going to be a close one. Open primary will allow Trump to do well with independents and democrats that crossover.
A Missouri miracle will happen lads.
Trump excels in open primaries thanks to the independents and democrat switchers.
El Rato ain't got shit on Trump.
WE HAVE KEK ON OUR SIDE!
>>69887191
>549 voters
>"likely" GOP voters
>>69890912
Oy vey time to recount to prevent weeks of Trump bragging
>>69887191
We really need Trump to win Cheesebros.
I just want the deniers to shut up. I'm tired of hearing them and I simply don't trust them enough for them to ever change my mind.
Interacting with #NeverTrump idiots is really just a waste of my life at point. They have nothing more to say than 'racist', 'sexist', 'unsuccessful', 'inexperienced'. All of which are so false the agenda is obvious.
>>69889190
>>69889028
it doesn't matter we only need like 18 delegates to stay on track.
Trump and Cruz have been statistically tied for a long time. I'm not saying Trump will win, but he's consistently within the margin of error and we have to remember that Trump's voters will have a higher turnout than Cruz's especially with the scandal floating about. Trump wins big with independents and most of the WI polls are of registered republicans. The biggest poll with the lowest margin of error shows Trump winning.
My prediction is that the winner will be ahead no more than 3%, if it's Trump he'll probably win by 1 or 2 percent. Either way, it's not a huge deal if he loses Wisconsin because he's still getting delegates and he will still be on target.
Watch the media on this.
>CRUZ IS GOING TO WIN WISCONSIN THIS WILL GUARANTEE HIM THE NOMINATION AND END TRUMP!!!!
>trump wins Wisconsin
>well Wisconsin isn't important anyway LETS DISCUSS KASICH IN THIRD PLACE HOLY SHIT CAN HE DO IT CAN KASICH WIN?? LOOK AT THIS COMPETITION FOR SECOND PLACE IN NEW YORK!!
>>69887191
Trump is anticipated to lose, but his win in no way relies on Wisconsin. Polls are also broadly underestimating Trump's appeal to moderates and potential Democrat turncoats. The meme that Trump has alienated independents is deeply ingrained, but it may backfire this time.
If he loses, he'll have to fight for delegates in the last dozen or so states, but a win is still, I would say, very likely.
+
>>69891510
Wisconsin is winner take all. If Cruz edges Trump out at all, he wins the whole state.
But, this was anticipated.
Has anyone won a state after losing the polls?
>>69891692
no it isn't.
>>69887191
Trump needs 18delegates from wi to stay on track
>>69891692
>Wisconsin is winner take all.
Wait what???
I thought half the delegates go to overall winner and then the winner of each district gets the rest of the delegates?
>>69891903
it's not winner take all.
>>69887191
Don't forget, this data was collected using land line phone polling, in other words, old people, known for being staunch old school republicans
