Bernie is the best choice for everyone
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Bernie is the best choice for everyone
This man is going to save the world. I firmly believe that he is not only the best choice for America - but the best choice, and hope, for the world itself. If you americans choose Clinton or Trump - give it less than two years and you'll be in another pointless war... Who agrees with me /pol/?
>>69799262
I do. However, I am in college and have no job rn and have never taken an Economics course tho
>srs
>>69799262
>Who agrees with me?
Nobody.
And will he destroy ISIS? No. Not good enough.
>>69799262
>This man is going to save the world. I firmly believe that he is not only the best choice for America
Your beliefs are irrational.
His ideas have been debunked over and over again and every time they are implemented they end in failure.
>>69799262
He literally sucks nigger cock and is the biggest SJW cuck you will ever find. Not only will you get taxed more, but all for nothing. "Free college" just means it will be reduced to high-school tier, filler shit that gives you no real skills. Idiots act as though free college means everyone will magically become skilled or some shit.
The only reason I feel some mild support towards him is because I want Hillary to be beaten, seeing as the shill media is doing everything in their power to bash anyone BUT her.
>>69799406
using common sense, yes
>>69799262
He would be if he wasnt pandering so intently to sjws and free shit people
>>69799369
>69799369
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/09/15/no-bernie-sanders-is-not-going-to-bankrupt-america-to-the-tune-of-18-trillion/
>>69799613
how is it 'free shit' when all he is doing is taking taxes, and then fairly redistributing them?
Its funny how /pol/ became so washed up from the trump memes and the phew right wings around here that turned the whole thing into brainwashed right wings lol
>>69799262
>12% of the vote
>1MP
>>69799782
>giving lazy people muh fair share
Fuck that
im not voting for higher taxes. or a blm apologist white hater
>>69799724
>The answer isn’t quite so dramatic: while Sanders does want to spend significant amounts of money, almost all of it is on things we’re already paying for; he just wants to change how we pay for them. In some ways it’s by spreading out a cost currently borne by a limited number of people to all taxpayers. His plan for free public college would do this: right now, it’s paid for by students and their families, while under Sanders’ plan we’d all pay for it in the same way we all pay for parks or the military or food safety.
The thing is, all that shit he wants to spend in require a massive tax raise, and he's been saying it himself. The more a government spends on the more taxpayer money you need, the more tax payer money you gather the less resource allocation occurs in the markets, the less resource allocation in the markets the less wealth you've got, the less wealth you've got the less money you have to spend and free healthcare, military, public services, infrastructure, welfare and you'll need to raise taxes again.
By doing so, creating aggregate demand without an supply increment will jack education costs up, so you'll need to tax more people to get more money to pay for free colleges.
Why don't you start by restricting demand for education from abroad? also get rid of subsidies (those jack up prices too) and lower taxes for companies who invest in scholarships for people in their demanded fields
Also get rid of those fucking USELESS social degrees
>>69799782
Wealth redistribution means making everyone equially poor.
>>69799262
The problem is people like you who believe that any single politician has the power to "save the world".
>>69799867
Try again, this time in English
>>69799782
Stealing not redistributing
>>69799262
LOL FUCK ENERGY WE CAN SURVIVE ON LOVE
>>69800404
maybe lazy people have no initiative to work.
You would have to be pretty retarded to work your entire live and have $500 saved up in your bank account, might as well be neet.
>>69800747
>You would have to be pretty retarded to work your entire live and have $500 saved up in your bank account
Yes, people who don't save are pretty retarded
>>69800747
NEETs on welfare are the people causing that you lazy fuck.
>>69800817
what if you cant save up with such high taxation and such low wages?
>>69800912
I thought it was the illegal Mexicans driving down wages to a point where its not even worth to work..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl-BV8vrLDU
>>69800933
Taxation isn't high for minimum wage workers
Stop buying so much shit
>>69799262
>it's a reddit posts on /pol/ episode
>>69799262
You're drunk.
>>69801092
well, with illegal immigrants and high demand for low skill work the wages will go to the minimum needed to cover your costs.
setting minimum wages wont do shit, since it will just motivate further automation and/or inflation.
you basically work to cover your living cost (slave paying for his own maintance)
>>69801001
And pretty much high taxation and forced benefits is what makes hiring illegals attractive on the first fucking place.
small business can't possibly survive if they have to pay maternal leaves, 1 months of vacations a year for every employee and 20 dollars/hr minimum wage. They are not google, apple or intel.
so what do they do?
they hire illegal people so they won't be forced to comply with those benefits.
why do americans have such high taxation lately?
because they need to spend in all this retarded garbage, forcing companies to move abroad or hiring illegals locally for unskilled jobs most people in america didn't wanted to take anyway.
it is not attractive to invest in american born people anymore and that's entirely the government's fault. you do not fix that with protectionism and welfare you fix that with economic freedom and secure borders.
>>69801545
>you fix that with economic freedom and secure borders.
jesus dude, are you telling me you ageree with Donald Trump on this? Is this a proxy?
>>69801717
>Donald trump
>economic freedom
Donald Trump is right in that America should have a secure border, hell we should help them because it's mutually beneficial. I think he is wrong in demanding we should pay for his retarded wall that won't be of any fucking use anyway. By basically destroying American investment in Mexico the amount of people wanted to move to the Us would sky rocket and with the higher cost imposed by local protectionism it'd be like the bush 'he took meh jab' years all over again.
Americans should implement a flat tax and destroy the welfare state, or fucking restrict it. that way it would be more attractive for companies in america to stay in america and making deals with the productive sectors so that they are allowed to create X jobs in mexico for every Y job they create in america. That way less people would feel the need to go to america illegally since there would be local jobs and there wouldn't be a welfare state to be abused.
For that, mexico needs to cooperate by taking similar economic actions, destroy it's own bureaucracy and focuse entirely of having rule of law. and one huge step for that is the legaliztaion and taxation of illegal drug use. So that americans get high, like they fucking do now without the need of having it imported from Mexico, so that it creates wealth and industries that would create legal jobs and so that we stop exporting violence from our side of the fence.
>>69799262
I agree completely. If we elect Sanders and you fags elect Corbyn, we'll be in a good position.
>>69799262
I should have known it would be a UK flag.
>>69802470
>I think he is wrong in demanding we should pay for his retarded wall that won't be of any fucking use anyway.
well you wont pay directly for it.. even Trump admits he could never get you to do this.
I dont think the future will offer many jobs to low skilled labor though. Sooner or later there will have to be a war, some sort of population growth control or som sort of socialism.
Imagine what will happen if selfdriving trucks become a thing. Waiters are already being replaced.
>>69799262
Nice shitpost ahmed
>>69803026
>Imagine what will happen if selfdriving trucks become a thing. Waiters are already being replaced.
We survived the industrial revolution didn't we? and that basically automated many many of the jobs there were had then. In the end, that's the period that brought more people out of poverty than ever before in the history of mankind. so that automation is bad commie fallacy is bullshit,
why would society try to keep jobs that virtually add no value at all? is as though there was some divine right of stagnation. "My father before me was a waiter, and he could afford X,Y,Z , and I should be a waiter too able to afford X,Y,Z."
people should invest in skills that have high demand and low offer so that they are more valuable,
>>69803657
>We survived the industrial revolution didn't we?
sure we did, but there was no mass immigration or globalization at that time period.
And the industrial revolution produced replacement jobs, which is not the case anymore.
>>69799262
>Brit says an under achiever and lay about is the best choice
I imagine that if 19th century British men were to come to the 21st century they would choose to never abandon imperialism simply out of shame and disgust as to how they would end up.
Would rather see Bernie take Hilary's place because she definitely doesn't deserve to be president.
>69783630
>69786413
>69788378
The other thread was archived so I will put this here.
>>69805516
>>69783630
>>69786413
>>69788378
always screw these
