These studies suggest that genetic factors underlie about 50 percent of the difference in intelligence among individuals. Other studies have examined variations across the entire genomes of many people (an approach called genome-wide association studies or GWAS) to determine whether any specific areas of the genome are associated with IQ. These studies have not conclusively identified any genes that underlie differences in intelligence. It is likely that a large number of genes are involved, each of which makes only a small contribution to a person’s intelligence.
So why do you all say that white are better than blacks?
source:https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/traits/intelligence
>>69779266
We have the better large amount of genes
Clearly
>>69779581
But I just proved you wrong faggot.
>>69779746
And yet the average and observed inferiority persists
Look at Africa now look at Europe.
It's not hard to see.
>>69780946
Racists have lower IQ, as well. Is it lack of intelligence causing racism, racism causing low intelligence or some other factor? Don't know.
And yet the average and observed inferiority persists.
>>69781110
Did I hit a mulatto nerve?
>>69781073
One thing that really bothered me about GGS was the fact that Diamond implies that there wasn't the dissidence within the Qing Empire to cause technological progress. It's counter-factual history for two reasons: The Qing dynasty was literally one mass revolt after another and dissidence doesn't necessarily fuel technological progress.
>>69779266
https://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
get fucked kiddo
Not sure what your point is. No sane person believes solely genetic(or solely environmental) factors cause all differences in intelligence. 50% sounds about right. It also makes sense that it's a spectrum rather than a single gene.
How does this prove /pol/ wrong?
>>69781216
Not an argument.
Still, I'm not from Lisbon.
>>69781416
>t. Alberto Barbosa
>>69781237
Europe was also a mess of constant strife so I wonder if it was more the use of coal reducing the reliance on fire wood paired with the invention of the steam engine that was finally able to let any civilization advance past roman/ming level
>>69781110
'Racists' hide there power levels with such studies,
Ergo, that study was bullshit
>>69781110
>Racists have lower IQ, as well
That's actually been disproven. Open racists have lower IQ, but racists, in general, do not have an outlier of IQ on either side of the spectrum. TMYK.
>>69781462
Doubtful. Europe was already beginning to advance past Chinese civilization in the 17th century, over a century before steam power. It seems closer to being paired with competition between states, which existed internally and externally in Qing China, than a single breakthrough.
>>69781110
Only in the US, shitskin. The stupider you are the more likely you are to be our, and thus, live with niggers, making you a "racist".
@OP you literally stated the study was not conclusive. That means they were unable to reach a consensus and form a conclusion.
>>69781659
To be poor*. Autocorrect.
>>69781416
Neither was yours. No evidence presented what so ever.
NOT....
AN
ARGUMENT
also for any evidence you do show i can show 1 to the contrary.
Heres a good video on this shit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODZ-RUufHgI
learn some shit
>>69781457
>>69779266
complaining
>>69781825
>Linking Black Pigeon Speaks videos
Now you're getting desperate
>>69781110
Because racists are so dumb the Americans and Soviets spent millions to kidnap those evil racist Nazis for their obviously inferior science.
Lmao
>>69781983
Ok link me your evidence
>>69781659
This is for the UK.
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/01/04/0956797611421206.abstract
Same could be said for race vs IQ.
>>69781762
you seem dumb.
i would actually like to see it
>>69781983
Spurdo pls
>>69782291
>>69781983
"You're getting desperate"
"You seem dumb"
both aren't arguments.
>Don't provide evidence
either you're both retarded liberals or you're just trolling. Im outta here
http://judgybitch.com/2013/05/20/harvard-phd-student-finds-a-correlation-between-race-and-iq-harvard-students-says-even-if-its-true-it-shouldnt-be-a-topic-of-research-everybody-is-wrong/
>>69782394
>cites a blogpost with a correlation study as evidence
>claims he's not dumb
at least admit you don't know shit about statistics lol
>>69781110
>>69782595
Are you black?
>>69782787
Statistically, an american is more likely to be non-white than a portuguese.
>>69779266
GWAS are notorious for possessing low statistical power. Furthermore, intelligence is obviously not determined by a couple of genes; intelligence is an emergent property of complex interplays of multitudes of genes. All this is clearly indicated by studies on genetics of g. Also, your number of 50% is wildly off, heritability of g is commonly estimated to be 80%.
>>69783078
why? are you racist because you are white?
>>69783096
You are both darkies. The difference is in Yankeeland some people are white, some are black. In Portugal you are all a shade of brown.
>>69782291
wasn't that """""""study""""""" debunked years ago? just social science bullshit. you can basically get any result you want.
http://wmbriggs.com/post/5118/
the idea is also absurd, since most niggers and mexicans support liberal policies despite being considerably less intelligent than whites, who are generally more conservative.
white men over 25 in the U.S are overwhelmingly conservative, and make up the 10% most intelligent population group in the country.
>>69783306
It's called a tan. If you are exposed to the sun, you are white and you're not pig skinned, you get one.
Portugal and Spain are the european countries with most sunlight.
>>69782291
not that I take these bullshit studies very seriously, but here's another one:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130811005342.htm
>Smart enough to know better: Intelligence is not a remedy for racism
>Summary: Smart people are just as racist as their less intelligent peers — they’re just better at concealing their prejudice, according to a new study.
>>69783527
I don't trust statistics done by psychologists because they rarely know what they're doing.
Still, I presented the study to see how you would react. Finding good studies about this shouldn't be too hard if you use google scholar.
And don't forget that the point is to assess whether racist individuals have lower intelligence, controlling for other factors. That is, racist mexicans are dumber than the typical mexican and racist whites are dumber than the typical white.
I would say that you would probably find a small effect between racism and intelligence because highly educated people are more intelligent and they travel far, far more than those with lower education, especially for work. At the same time, the places they work in are much more diverse than the general population of the country they live in. Hence, their bubble is a bit larger. This would be particularly true in Europe. I don't know about the US.
>>69779266
IGNORE ALL SLIDE/ DEMORALISATION THREADS, GET IN HERE!!!! EU CALL FOR NATIVE GENOCIDE THE JEW IS ATTACKING;
>>>69777204
>>69779266
I'm sorry that black Africans were never exposed to an environment with the selective pressures conducive to fostering intelligence, like Europeans and Asians.
>>69784403
The point is, no one managed to define intelligence.
>>69781110
Is an IQ of 139 low to you?
