![a-viking-boat-ship-at-sea.-historical-art-print-poster.-sizes-a4-a3-a2-a1-00390--10268-p[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/4CP7IBP.jpg "a-viking-boat-ship-at-sea.-historical-art-print-poster.-sizes-a4-a3-a2-a1-00390--10268-p[1].jpg")
Vikings were immigrants.
Only they were infinitely more violent than black or syrian men of today, raped and killed whites by the thousands, looted and burned churches and took swathes of land for themselves.
Their culture, totally alien to white culture at the time, remains so significant culturally that you utter the names of their gods every single day almost 1500 years later.
And yet stormfags are often proud that their ancestors got cucked the fuck out by these rude northmen.
Only a retard is against immigration and immigrants always provide strength for the society they enter.
>>69770767
they are white. nothing to see here
>>69770984
>its okay when white people commit heinous crimes
and there you have it
racism is the most retarded worldview possible
>>69771132
I didn't say that. But what the Vikings did was millennia ago. In the short term, sure it must have been awful. But in the long term? No problem, still have European genetics.
What you are advocating is something that will be genetically catastrophic in the long term.
Whites are a relatively small percentage of the world population, and with current trends whites will be a dwindling minority.
Now, if we accept your ideas of opening the flood gates to the infinite non white hordes from the 3rd world, in time our genetics will become completely diluted.
Say in maybe 10 thousand years, whites will have the same genetic prominence as neanderthals in Europeans. (Europeans have anywhere between 0-5 percent Neanderthal DNA with them.)
So, do you think whites should be equivalent to neanderthals today in terms of genetic prevalence? I would think that would be a great shame.
>>69770767
>Their culture, totally alien to white culture at the time
>>69770767
Most Vikings were clipping their beards and nails, come off it.
>>69770767
>Vikings were immigrants.
Vikings were raiders. All Norse people were not vikings. You only became a viking when you decided to get on a ship and go on a viking raid. The ones who want to the Danelaw to live there were not vikings, they were settlers.
>Their culture, totally alien to white culture at the time
That makes no sense. Anglo-Saxons and Norse people had different cultures but they were both White cultures.
>>69770767
vikings were no where near as bad as they are shown to be in popular culture. they attacked churches because they were light targets full of wealth. it would have been stupid not to back then.
>>69770767
>Rapebabies need to be okay with being raped.
>>69771638
they were violent fucking polytheists, doesn't get any more alien than christianity
Islam for comparison is far less alien since they, you know, BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST
>>69770984
I typically think they must have made me more white than I would have been. Also quite nice being tall.
Thanks, Vikings!
>>69771807
>All Norse people were not vikings. You only became a viking when you decided to get on a ship and go on a viking raid
Yeah same as you need that couple thousand euro today to haul ass to europe.
>they attacked churches because they were light targets full of wealth. it would have been stupid not to back then.
I feel like I've hit gold with this thread. So much hypocrisy.
Well guess what its stupid for middle easterners today not to go to Europe.
And the best part
>its okay because they were white
>>69771889
>Islam for comparison is far less alien since they, you know, BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST
Europe needs Wotan and Zeus, not Jesus. Christianity has fallen to slave morality.
>>69772021
>Yeah same as you need that couple thousand euro today to haul ass to europe.
Your view on the "vikings" is ahistorical.
>>69770767
They left
>>69772021
>Well guess what its stupid for middle easterners today not to go to Europe.
What is stupid is that Europe has Merkal instead of Charles Martel, Afonso Henriques and Vlad Tepes.
Celts are niggers.
Thank you for making this Island somewhat liveable based norsemen.
It's believed that they didn't rape. There is a lack of rape baby descendants in places like Britain.
The rapist reputation could have been anti-viking propaganda.
Apparently, they liked to bathe and took women with them on raids. Due to their "cleanliness" it is now believed they avoided personal and sexual contact with their victims.
They probably did rape their slaves but not victims during raids or something.
>vikings keep raiding the coast
>continue to live on the coast
Literally nigger behaviour
>no water in the desert
>live in the desert
>help us white man!
Cleanse the anglo
Holy goatmilk batman, this thread is fucking pointless
>applying modern day critical theory to world/culture and group of people who lived over 1000 years ago
Eat a bullet, please.
>>69772378
>It's believed that they didn't rape.
Dude everybody fucking rapes, with or without having conquered first.
>>69772378
The Danes were generally rapist pillaging assholes. This is pretty undisputed. Look up Danegeld, for example; they were the original mafia men. Demanded huge sums of money from the native Britons in exchange for not waging war/etc; and even when the native Britons paid it, they proceeded to ask for more extortionate amounts.
Norwegians were less so. They sent many of their Kings/Princes to be educated in Britain, for example. Swedes and Icelanders were generally chill.
Great points pole
>>69771889
>>69770767
Vikings did that 1000 years ago, back when raiding and pillaging were the norm
Go fuck yourself polecuck
>>69770767
So you're the same leftist who was using a Russian proxy and you're just making things up. Got it.
>>69772378
It took like a week to cross from norway to britain and the journey in a longship was fucking miserable, these guy weren't anything like clean on the shore
And every single culture raped on raids its just shit you do when raiding.
these guys would routinely show up at a village out of nowhere, kill the men and children, fuck women and take back the ones they liiked plus all the valuables they found. To the guy saying its ahistorical - its historical.
Slavs got the worst of viking raids so much that its in the historical record and viking shit is found all over the place here
>>69770767
b8 pls
>>69772040
>debating on which Myth is better
>>69772162
After the english got their shit together and chased them out tbf. They didn't volunteer to leave.
>>69770767
1000 years ago, weak b8.
>>69770767
I don't fucking remember anyone welcoming our raping and pillaging with open arms either.
>le violent pillagers meme
I'm not going to pretend like Vikings were peace faring people but their conquests and raiding is ridiculously exaggerated, they were not unique for the period of history but Vikings are one of the rare exceptions were the victors didn't write the history
>>69770767
>viking culture was good
>vikings invaded a culture
>muslims are invading a culture
>therefore muslims are good
what a genius conclusion
>>69770767
That happened thousands of years ago and is no longer relevant, like slavery
>>69771586
Actually in the long term, it's much more healthy(mentally and physically) to have come from a larger gene pool than from a smaller one.
I'm at a loss here.
Do you think the people who were culturally enriched by raiding Vikings were happy about it? Do you think they welcomed the raping and pillaging?
As for stormfags and their cucked ancestors, many of us here in the UK have Viking blood not through rape babies but because the Vikings settled here.
I'm not seeing the correlation between them and the shitskins though. One was thousands of years ago in a time when raiding was a necessity and when no one knew what countries there were. The other is a group of nigger tier animals trying to get gibs because they're too fucking stupid to get their shit in order.
Neither would be tollerated today.
>>69770767
The reason Vikings strengthened the society is because they fought and beat people actually fighting against them. Sandpeople are coming in droves and if anyone says anything about it they're instantly silenced by the powers that be so they just come in with their inferior genes and replace the superior genes, literally the complete opposite of Vikings. If you weren't retarded you would probably understand that, then again this is coming from a country who thought 50~ years of Communism was a better alternative to handing back a completely arbitrary strip of land, so expecting your "people" to understand logic is basically a waste of time. Enjoy your grass soup while you can because you'll be lucky to even get that within the next 5 years.
>>69772798
t. Herman Laquisha
>>69770767
If you think about it, they're sort of our version of mongols. Instead of the horse they use boats.
>>69772840
Ayyyy
>>69771586
>Whites are a relatively small percentage of the world population, and with current trends whites will be a dwindling minority.
That has nothing to do with immigrant, there would be just as few whites in the future without them. White people don't want to have children with eachother. When someone gets pregnant its abortion time, except if they get pregnant with some immigrant, because the immigrant talks them out of it. But that does not mean that there are less white people than there would be.
>>69772798
t. Shekels SteinStein
>>69772840
That's the short term, 200 years from now the races will be so mixed that you can barely define what race someone is. But I would assume there will always be 3 classes, low middle and high. The low class will still be "niggers" and the high class will still be "jews", not racially but sociologically.
>>69773086
>That's the short term, 200 years from now the races will be so mixed that you can barely define what race someone is
What is 23andme for $200, Alex?
Vikings are terrible people.
Never forget Dorestad. Once one of the most advanced trade hubs of northern Europe, destroyed by these savages.
>>69772021
>So much hypocrisy.
It's not real hypocrisy because we are white.
> And yet stormfags are often proud that their ancestors got cucked the fuck out by these rude northmen.
Can't have ancestors who got cucked. Your ancestors are the ones doing the cucking, faggot
> Only a retard is against immigration and immigrants always provide strength for the society they enter.
The Norse invented forms of boat the world had never seen. Also metallurgical innovations. Allowed them to raid from Norway down to the Med, conquer Rus, cross the Atlantic. They had the social organization at home to produce a huge food surplus > population surplus > manpower for invasions and raids to claim new lands. They had the strength and virtues (and the technology) to win, and then rule large Norse kingdoms across the North.
What have the Mexicans invented? The burrito? Do we give Afghans credit for their ingenuity at gang rape? Our states give them permission to come, give them homes and food and education and healthcare, give them bail after their crimes! Give them second chances after their convictions!
They're worthless scum. I will accept the logic of your argument when all the cucks accept our right to machine-gun them as they cross the border, lynch summarily for crimes, arrest and deport them on sight.
>>69770767
>Vikings killed whites
They killed and raped semitized mongrels and ice mongols. Germanics were the only untainted whites at the time.
So ultimately they cleansed land and improved blood.
Cucked european cesspit needs more vikings.
>>69773301
>implying the fiendish dorestadians not having WMD
It was pre-emptive selfdefense.
>>69770767
Bullshit, OP. Vikings were farmers from Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Iceland. They became Vikings when they went "Viking" - as in left the "vik" (shores) of home in search of new land and fortune.
You are right about the violent part, although they were no better or worse than any other culture at the time.
>>69772595
>To the guy saying its ahistorical - its historical.
It's ahistorical. A viking is a raider. A raider is not an immigrant. Therefore a viking is not an immigrant.
>>69773422
>Do we give Afghans credit for their ingenuity at gang rape?
Woah there anon. The Indians are the masters at gangrape, the Afghans are famed for their advanced skills at boylove.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2C3JBdv520
>>69772614
>>debating on which Myth is better
>The stories that a group of people consider valuable doesn't matter
I am certainly hoping you don't think this.
>>69773585
>a viking is not an immigrant.
Shitloads of danes did settle in England tbf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danelaw
>>69773593
>the Afghans are famed for their advanced skills at boylove.
Because we reintroduced them to Aghanistan and made the homosexuals into the leaders. (Because the homosexuals were the only ones who did not want Taliban in power because they risked beheading during the Taliban) They are known for it because WE who are in Nato promoted it.
It's one of the main reasons we removed the religious government and exchanged it with a gay friendly one.
>>69773786
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
>Under the Taliban, bacha bazi was declared homosexual in nature, and therefore banned. The Taliban's opposition to bacha bazi was that they considered it incompatible with Sharia Law, and outlawed the practice after coming to power in 1996.
Huh, guess you have a point.
>It's one of the main reasons we removed the religious government and exchanged it with a gay friendly one.
Those two towers over in New York should probably be considered the main reason, everything else is a minor reason.
vikings weren't pussies that exploded themselves
>>69770767
Sorry.
We're full now.
Try another country.
>>69770767
>>69771889
And yet you've been cucked by a middle eastern religion
>>69772809
>Do you think the people who were culturally enriched by raiding Vikings were happy about it? Do you think they welcomed the raping and pillaging?
the french actually gave them a part of their kingdom, it was called normandy, same in england
>>69770767
Vikings were foreing warriors who acted under laws of war. Therefore they were subject to wrath of their opponents.
Niggers and mudslimes act in their area of residence and are therefore nothing but common criminals. They abuse the juridical system and cry for its protection while playing that they are victims.
Vikings were warriors, refugees are vultures. If you cant see this difference, then you are an idiot or a hypocrite. I will give modern immigrants the same restpect as vikings the day they operate in a country where it is legal to kill them on sight.
>>69770767
>implying anyone behaved civilized 1000 years ago
okay m8
>>69775238
To be fair, pretty much all of Africa was civilized until the white man came and destroyed it AGAIN.
>>69773067
>When someone gets pregnant its abortion time
Yes because you know why?
white people can afford one
>also
Shouldnt you be getting enriched right now by an immigrant?
Germans = wild slavs.
>>69770767
Are you retarded? The Vikings were (proactively) defending themselves from Christian incursions.
>>69775586
Could you name a single "Christian incursion" into "viking lands"? Actually curious.
>>69775854
Why would that be needed? The Franks banned trade with northerners, trade embarkos like this is exactly what instigates wars in modern times too.
>>69777686
Also, I'm pretty sure the slaughter of the Saxons by Charlemagne was noted across all of the Germanic world. I don't know about you, but I find it not a coincidence that the raids on churches started soon after.
>>69771889
Christians are a bunch of cucks, so they got rightfully fucked over
>>69777826
The problem with that theory is that England was not frankish land and torching english churches didn't harm Charlemagne in any way.
You're making them sound like muslims who blow shit up in Europe because America is bullying the Middle East.
>>69779018
It is though. Lol. The use of the Mjölnir also began around that time. They wanted to distinguish themselves from the Chr*stians.
>>69770767
Nords, celts and germanics have been living in immediate proximity to each other since neanderthal times in a small area of northern Europe until the time nation states were formed. They are all white ethnicities and similar in genetic make up and racial traits, including intelligence. Those people settled down and unified into nations, were christianised and made their own unique and valuable contributions to Western civilisation.
Brown people from the other side of the world are unaesthetic, low IQ and have produced nothing of value. Ever. They have alien degenerate culture and destroy what they touch, including the unique ethnicities and cultures of northern Europe. Whether whites are superior or not (they objectively are) is irrelevant. They will defend themselves according to their survival and reproductive instincts, just like they did against Viking invaders.
You could argue that oriental asian immigration is good for us in a genetic sense, but not in an ethnic or cultural sense. Brown immigration is not good in any sense. It is a demonic evi imposed on us by jews and cucked traitors.
>>69772595
>It took like a week
2 days from western Norway I have read
>>69770767
Also, this is the first time in history that a society has been successfully colonised by a weaker and less intelligent group. The colonisers also happen to be extremely unaesthetic and smelly.
>>69775854
>who is Charlemagne
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne#Eastern_campaigns
>>69770767
>Vikings were immigrants.
Nope, and the ones who stayed in England/France were settlers not immigrants.
>>69770767
You're just mad that you have to scrub our toilets.
>>69780645
Norway-Shetland 40 hours
Shetland-Orkney (Kirkwall) 20 hours
Kirkwall-Inverness 30 hours
>>69779018
>didn't harm Charlemagne in any way
>what is normandy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Normandy#Scandinavian_invasions
>>69770767
Indonesia, pls
>>69770767
But at the end they converted to Christianity, made deals with kings, and became local dukes.
It ended well, they were whites and they blended with other whites.
>>69781395
>converted to Christianity
>made deals with kings
>It ended well
>and they blended
It's like you just described being white in a nutshell.
NO CAVE BEASTS
VIKINGS WERE BLACK http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/articles/the-ancient-celts-and-vikings-were-black-people-by-dr-clyde-winters/
>Mudshit apologist
Cuck thread, filtered.
Anybody ITT into Vikings on the History Channel?
Think it's pretty good history for the noobs- people are surprised and amused to discover Ragnar et al are IRL historical characters.
Bit disappointing that they follow the old historiography of Vikings looking for land and plunder, rather than the defense against the xtians outlined by this guy
Reality suggest there was probably a wide variety of motives over time though- at least the season does focus on the pagan/xtian culture clash
>>69777826
>>69770767
you do realize that the rus tribe and the jomvikings where in Poland?
>>69782416
I sure do :^)
Sucks for the kievs, tho
>>69772798
Wrong. Faroese, Icelanders, Greenlanders, and others are perfectly fine.
>>69770767
Nobody cared to discuss vikings until that post about how they were niggers.
