Why can nobody on here fucking explain how the towers collapsed at terminal velocity even though there was a fuckton of resistance from all the floors and steel fucking beams installed deep into the ground? There is no fucking way the beams weren't 95% precut so that when the planes did crash that last 5% gave. Didn't Jeb Bush have some influence over the security of the Trade Towers a few months before 9/11? What a fucking coincidence.
>that perfect slice
>>69768317
Magical Jet Fuel did it.
>>69768405
>people are dumb enough to argue against the this
The trade centers were designed to survive a plane crash.
>>69768405
that beam is at floor level anon, the towers didn't collapse there. they started at the top. that beam was cut during the cleanup of the debris, after the towers had already collapsed
>>69768630
>>69768834
>that beam was cut during the cleanup of the debris
WRONG.
Fire figters only first few say. That beam was cut day one minute one.
FUcking shill.
how many times do I have to post this before you troofers get it?
>>69768834
It was precut probably months before 9/11.
>>69768405
>>69768630
>>69769329
>>69768317
why didn't they just fly a plane full of water into the tower to put the fire out wtf
>>69769397
>heat travels downward
anon i...
>>69769485
Yeah this guy is just
>>69769451
kek
The real question no one ever seems to ask is why WTC 7 fell even though it was never hit by a plane. Some debris fell on the rool and a little while later BAM! it collapsed just like the towers
>>69769451
Because then everyone in the towers would have drowned.
>>69769485
oh, right! jet fuel disobeys the laws of physics and floats into the atmosphere when it's not being held down inside airplanes
>>69769620
Dude, this isnt fucking plasma that it just falls through all the floors and reinforcements left and right. This is fucking fuel. It set some shit on fire big fucking deal, it didnt melt the fucking building.
>>69769600
It caught on fire didn't it? Falling thermite and debris
>>69769397
Heat would travel up and out due to pressure differential, not down.
Oh look, this thread again.
Only in America, you need to educate the stupid about the existence of Gravity.
you stupid fucks really did not account for the weigh of the plane and the impact and the fire.
Let's just say, we can magically park a plane without impact right in between the twin towers.
A boeing 777 is only 350,678kg, 775,000 lb.
The twin tower is design for little humans to do their little shitty job in their shitty cubicle.
IT IS NOT FOR PARKING A PLANE.
The weight itself is good enough to crush the building down, BUT NO STEEL BEAMS CAN TAKE ANYTHING.
1)weight
2)impact
3)fire
This is enough to fuck shit up real fast. Basic science faggot.
>>69769800
So you understand this better than NIST? Get real anon
A big part of the reason I'm supporting Trump is I want to hear his 9/11 revelations. I'm guessing he has dirt on Israel as financing the hijackers or being involved somehow. Israel def benefited the most from the situation America has gone broke destroying their enemies in the middle east for them and thats some bullshit.
>>69769397
And the explosions the firemen heard were actually Rudy Giuliani's secret supply of popcorn.
>>69769824
And yet it takes a fucking hour for the towers to collapse after impact. Great fucking logic you have there you dumb shill.
Why don't you go to an architect and ask him or her or it or they or whatever to explain basic building collapse science to you?
It all seems just a little but sketch though
>>69769778
>It caught on fire didn't it? Falling thermite and debris
So falling debris on the roof caused the whole building to collapse, a collapse that like the others looked exactly like a controlled demolition? Huh guess WTC7 didn't need any jet fuel to melt any steel beams just some shit falling on the roof.
>>69769824
Actually they were designed for 3-5x redundancy, so they could have supported more than double their weight, and they were designed to withstand losing one whole side of support.
>>69769999
What a fucking coincidence, the engineers and architects unanimously agree that both towers should have easily withstood the incidents.
>>69770007
Well when the towers came down they spilled over I assume on WTC7
>>69770070
Unanimously? Or are you sitting in a echo room?
>>69770178
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/210207designers.htm
>>69768834
>>69769329
That doesn't negate:
>>69768630
That they were designed to take a full sized commercial plane crash and survive it. Despite that, they fall at terminal velocity.
On top of that, WT7 fell at terminal velocity due to debris from the other two hitting it.
>>69768317
The towers didn't fall at terminal velocity.
Watch the bits of debris that are truly free falling away from the building.
They are traveling faster than the building is collapsing.
Sooooo the tower fell at less than terminal velocity.
>>69769600
The real reason it fell is because there was an investigation into the DoD for 2.3 trillion dollars which was unaccounted for. The evidence for which was housed in WT7.
>>69770568
What was the investigation about?
>>69770339
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center
You can just Google how wrong you are.
>>69770624
Can you not read?
>2.3 trillion dollars which was unaccounted for
>>69768317
Don't ask such basic questions in the face of zionist confusion
>>69770624
>What was the investigation about?
How a amount of money representing 14% of our current national debt just disappeared I'm assuming
>>69769600
You're not going to mention it was burning uncontrolled for 4 hours?
Why would you leave that fact out?
>>69768317
How come this building didn't have the same outcome ?
>still standing .
I wonder who did it.
>>69770660
>>69770458
>>69770354
>>69770178
[Frank A. Demartini:] �The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.� Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001.[8]
Any one care to tell me why this building didnt free fall ?
Anyone else ever hear that several 10s of billions in gold also disappeared from a vault in the WTC? The gold was never recovered during the cleanup and the theory I heard was it was heisted via a unused subway tunnel.
>>69770568
You realize they had computers back in 2001, right?
>>69769824
You get it. Faggot christian amicans think they are suddenly physicist with a PhD.
>>69769419
delete this
>>69769824
>The Boeing 707 was the largest in use when the towers were designed. [Leslie] Robertson conducted a study in late 1964, to calculate the effect of a 707 weighing 263,000 pounds and traveling at 180 mph crashing into one of the towers. [Robertson] concluded that the tower would remain standing. However, no official report of his study has ever surfaced publicly.�[9]
>>69770761
So a building that wasn't hit by a plane caught fire and that was enough to cause it to collapse to the ground like the others because the office furniture burned hot enough to melt steel. Ok you can believe that I don't. Really don't care any more I doubt we will ever know the truth about all this.
>>69770849
The same article also states that he says "at 180 mph, not 600. No real knowledge on fire, etc". How retarded are you?
>>69768405
Holy shit
>>69771093
>melt steel
How do people still think this, after 15 years?
Did you guys really had a clue how fuckin massive the world trade centers were built? It was like a mosquito net and could probably even stand two impacts from a fucking 777.i have the uncut naudet brothers tape were several fire fighters claim that there were explosive devices set in the towers.also mathematic profs sayin that the whole event was too calculated
>>69769917
It takes time for the beams to weaken. Are you able to cook an egg in 2 seconds? Great fucking logic faggot burger.
>>69770761
Prior to the WTC buildings, no steel tower in the world, ever, had collapsed due to fire. And guess how many have since??
>>69771321
>Did you guys really had a clue how fuckin massive the world trade centers were built?
Do you? Hearing it on Youtube doesn't count ;^)
>>69768630
>People are dumb enough to argue against this.
>I have loads of factual evidence, investigation and reports to believe that the 9/11 attacks were....
>SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FILTHY NAZI,COMMUNIST,MUSOGYNYSTHH,LITERAL-HITLER,TRUMP-SUPPORTER,GAY,RACIST,SEXIST,-smacks lips-,BIGOT.
>but i jus...
>SHUT THE FUCK UP 6 GORILLIONS DIED IN THAT TERRORIST ATTACK, NEVER FORGET IT.
This is the reason why you cant touch certain subjects with normalfags, it gets way worse with the holocaust.
>>69771213
ok office furniture burned hot enough to weaken steel and caused the collapse of WTC7 in yet another straight down collapse that looks exactly like every controlled demolition I've ever seen on video. Got it.
Redpill me on WTC 7
>>69770874
It wasn't owned and insured by a Jew.
Idiots. The false flag is not the way the buildings fell, but who financed and who knew about the attacks and did nothing or facilitated them.
The murders require justice, and you memiots are worried about weight ratios...
>>69771405
It didn't look like a controlled demolition.
Maybe to the most uninformed layman.
Read the NIST report.
inb4 reading is hard
>>69771387
Does fire weigh 300.000 kilograms? Because a plane does.
How did a plane survive a banked turn that was well beyond the plane's capability and was piloted by someone who supposedly couldn't fly a light aircraft all that well, then crash into the pentagon and leave a smaller hole than the plane itself while simultaneously vaporising itself?
>2.3 twillion dollars announced missing
>building with all financial records goes poof up in flames
>money unaccounted for
>mass surveilance act established shortly after
>artificial war starts for destabalization of middle east
>and for economic reasons
>specifically the lost of said trillions
>Middle east turn into terrorists
>WMDS supposley found in desert
>middle east in chaos, turn into refugees
>refugees invade europe
>new poker player (Trump) has a shot at holding all the cards but no one invited him or likes him
>nationalism is on the fall, middle class getting smaller
nothing is out of the ordinary for the new world order
Pray for true peace
>>69771464
Idiots. It's not about lives that were taken and justice. It's about the UFO I filmed 10 seconds before the collapse. Is it the illuminati?!?!?!?!?!
>>69771495
looks pretty controlled to me.
https://www.jewtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
>>69771584
Wow, 300 tonnes?? That's, like, a tank measuring 10m x 10m x 3m deep full of water. That isn't alot, and the engineering FOS on structures is 2.5 or greater. That additional mass is fuck all.
>>69770890
I did, but the police was busy elsewhere.
Something about a bomb in a school or w/e.
THEY WERE BUILT TAGETHER
THEY GONNA DIE TAGETHERR!!!!
'MURICA
REMEBER NINE ONE ONE!!!!!!
>>69769740
>>69769397
>>69769419
>be chemistry major gook
>chemistry teaches you basic thermochem and thermodynamics for rx rates and complex reactions/ synthesizing buffers
>See this thread
>Retarded burgers everywhere muh pressure muh hold down heat
Heat displacement isn't something we can definitely figure out how it exactly works yet in a non controlled environment. It's kind of similar to trying to figure out and develop an equation for how a feather might move when floating down. We don't have equations or laws that can apply to this yet, only general trends.
The Twin Towers were indeed built to survive a plane crash, but not the explosion of the jet fuel. The explosion most likely occurred naturally. There is lots of fuel: paper, plastics, wood in some desks. Printers and fax machines would also contribute to minor smaller explosions. Many factors that go into this. To assume the explosion was set up is retarded. I'm not trying to shill or say the jews and Bush didn't do it, but they didn't probably install motherfucking explosives is what im trying to say.
you burgers and leavess and everyone that posted here needs to grab a basic chemistry book.
Also that chart is... well it's not wrong but it's not right either. The heat doesn't "move" but it certainly dispersed downwards and just about everywhere
>>69769397
wouldn't the height of the fuckin towers cause them to shift either way and fall sideways to some extent, instead of straight down like a demolition?
i mean, i get it, shit melts, it falls down but how on earth did it fall down perfectly straight
>>69772323
Why then did the building collapse 6 stories below ground level? Why was the rubble still smoldering for 3 weeks after the collapse.
Thermitic reaction.
Millet found proof of Thermite in samples but no one wants to publish his studies because this topic is in the realm of conspiracy.
So Muslims didn't do it? Or they did do it but the US let them
>>69771772
why the fuck does no one respond to the posts that are more than likely 100% true? instead of rimming each others assholes about HOW they fell, think about it on the grand scheme of things like this anon.
9/11 whether or not it was a dank conspiracy (which it probably was) happened. what the powers that be decided to do with this event reshaped most of the world. it passed the most intrusive and blatantly unconstitutional surveillance act in history, it was basically americas holocaust to an extent. anytime we lose our freedom, it's FOR MUH SAFETY and 9/11 is mentioned. the government wants your data, wants to watch you constantly and already do. it's just one step towards a governmental change and it's damn near close to happening with these manufactured george soros movements and the RISE of nationalism in america (the only part i disagree with you) in opposition to the radical left. two polar opposites are at war, and more and more people are coming over to the right because the left has went batshit crazy. in my opinion, it's working exactly as it was planned. the republican party will stem off into something else, because i'm sure like many of you here it's either trump or nothing
>>69770053
Were they designed to hold double their weight, as well as structural impact damage, as well as fucking fire burning (making more and more debris) as well as the structural damage of weakened steel?
There are so many differentials that can explain why it fell, but apparently it's more logical that like 500 people organized and operated the biggest false flag conspiracy in the entirity of ever, and in the growing age of the internet this cabal of conspirators have managed to keep it all under wraps, save for the efforts of a brave few TRUE INTELLECTUALS who will not be silenced by stupid shit like facts or numbers because 'm-muh thermite!'
>>69771584
>Because a plane does
That's irrelevant though because they just disintegrated anyway, it's pretty difficult to see I grant you that because of the amount of rubble, if you take a look at the Pentagon you can see what I mean much more clearly though :^) You realise 300,000kg compared to the 500,000 tons (roughly 450,000,000kg) of one WTC is literally nothing by the way right? To put it in perspective, would you collapse to your knees if a bird landed on your shoulder? You fucking niggers are unbelievably retarded.
>>69772458
>thermitic reaction
You mean thermite reaction?
That doesnt last weeks without enough powderized/fine iron III oxides you fucking burger. stop spewing retardation out your shithole and grab a goddamned book.
its also not explosive, which would debunk the MUH EXPLOSION theory.
