reposting,/pol/ is being slid and this is worth some attention.
Silicon Jihad: How Silicon Valley elites and the American progressive ruling class formed unholy alliances with Middle Eastern powers to foster the modern rise of extreme Islamic terrorism, mortgage the safety and personal wealth of America's working class, and reign in the demise of domestic independent energy producers.
https://infamy.org/
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
>>>69705967
bump
That link changed my already shitty opinion of the clintons to even worse, if there is such a thing.
Bump.
Youve got a good message here. Make this thread during the day
>>69759766
I agree.
I think that the facade the US government puts on is starting to crack.
More and more often you see stories like these putting the pieces together and it's astonishing how deep it goes.
>>69759797
I'm not the OP, but I might post this tomorrow a couple times because this shit needs to be read by anyone that's still left on /pol/
We're getting spammed pretty hard by cuckposters and inflammatory posts with zero or one reply. I think this might be the reason.
bump
Gonna put this back on the front page.
>>69759246
Daily Reminder /pol/ backs the groups responsible for the rise of extremism in the Middle East.
Assad and Co. have been manipulating Sunni jihadists for years. They've been focused on destroying democratic opposition forces, both secular and religious, leaving the choice between them and the jihadists dictators create.
>>69759246
The sliding has been out of control for days.
Worst I've ever seen it.
Fight. Bump good threads and contribute.
>>69746964
>>69746964
>>69760608
>> us backed jihadis
>> "democratic opposition forces"
I don't think its democracy when you shoot eachother.
welcome to the thread!
>>69759246
Definitely noticed the sudden shit influx
>>69760763
It's been pretty hard to navigate lately with all of the crazy shitposting going.
What a time to be alive, gentlemen.
Bump
up
bump
Bampen this seems big
>>69760789
How counterrevolutionary Americans have become
>>69762013
It's yet another facet of the globalist agenda.
I'd be interested in knowing who is behind the infamy website, but it seems to connect a few dots.
>>69762086
The ME is one giant cluster fuck. Sometimes, I have a hard time making heads or tails of it.
I knew there was something sinister going on with Silicon Valley as a whole, Google specifically.. obviously Facebook and Twitter too, I wish I knew how to dive deeper into this.
There should be an IRC or something for this
>> https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
If anything has changed since those words were written, it is that Silicon Valley has grown restless with that passive role, aspiring instead to adorn the "hidden fist" like a velvet glove. Writing in 2013, Schmidt and Cohen stated,
"What Lockheed Martin was to the twentieth century, technology and cyber-security companies will be to the twenty-first."
>>69762849
It's really an information overload. Reading and digesting that much material can be demanding, especially if you're looking at it from a fresh perspective.
People who do this kind of investigative journalism do lots of digging, keep really good records and archives... After you connect the dots and skeleton a sizable piece of work together you're left with things like this.
I will say that the wikileaks article has a shit ton of footnotes and is pretty well cited. This takes dedication.
This is bigger than just Google, but Google is an interesting starting point.
>> https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
"its penchant for luring people into its services trap with gigabytes of “free storage” produces the perception that Google is giving it away for free, acting directly contrary to the corporate profit motive. Google is perceived as an essentially philanthropic enterprise—a magical engine presided over by otherworldly visionaries—for creating a utopian future.68 The company has at times appeared anxious to cultivate this image, pouring funding into “corporate responsibility” initiatives to produce “social change”—exemplified by Google Ideas. But as Google Ideas shows, the company’s “philanthropic” efforts, too, bring it uncomfortably close to the imperial side of US influence. If Blackwater/Xe Services/Academi was running a program like Google Ideas, it would draw intense critical scrutiny.69 But somehow Google gets a free pass."
>>69759246
>https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
What am I supposed to gather from this exactly? That google has power beyond a normal company? Doesn't everyone know that?
Nice sliding
>>69763951
It's more the length of detail the article outlines. It's not necessarily about how much power Google has, but what it's doing and who it's doing it for.
It's just the new right arm of the globalist agenda. Wars are increasingly unpopular. The last time we officially went to war there were literal riots in the streets.This is a detailed account of how its moved beyond boots on the ground. Now that they've lit the fuse, they're pushing and pulling by different means.
This is just some information that will hopefully let us further unravel the agenda.
>>69759246
thx & bump while I read this
>>69764199
The sliding is pretty intense.
I believe this is /pol/ related. At the very least it's infinitely more interesting and on topic than cuck/kangz/trap/slutshaming+porn threads.
That degenerate meme, when combined with the hivemind mentality, is really fucking effective at stirring this particular pot of shit that we call /pol/
The only thing that is a little odd is it only targets google. MS, FB and twitter are probably involved as well.
>>69764585
That's actually one of the only things that bothers me about it. Clearly, Assange is trying to promote his new book about Google and the information on that page is an excerpt from it.
So while I question the motive, I welcome the information. I figured that something like this might point the amateur sleuths on /pol/ in the right direction.
bump for unbearable truth. This needs to be known by more peoples.
>>69764965
What really freaks me out about it is how many pies Google has their fingers in.
They're getting all kinds of govt cheese and a lot of it appears to come from DARPA. Hell, they're even making robots for the US govt. They're trying to be the federal government's best friend.
>>69764882
>That's actually one of the only things that bothers me about it. Clearly, Assange is trying to promote his new book about Google and the information on that page is an excerpt from it.
Could be marketing people payed by MS, they hate google more than anything, they will route the money through shell companies and contractors to avoid being blamed for attacking hillary.
Though if it hurts islamist interests I don't really care who made the website.
>>69765817
It's possible but I think Clinton and Microsoft have more than a few ties. I remember reading that Sanders supporters were crying foul at microsoft over primary results. However, as you said, it could be easily hidden.
I think that many of these companies are in on the same Agenda. I hate to be a broken record but it seems to be nationalist vs globalist. I would suspect someone who would benefit from the failure of the globalist agenda to be pulling the strings on the INFAMY website.
>>69766259
Just one thread of the Oligarchs web.
I've read through this thread and have no idea what any of this means.
Op, if you're going to create a thread you need to make it clear why we should care about it. Your thread just sucks...ita not getting slid.
Do a better job next time.
I mean this in a good way.
>>69766805
I really just slapped it up after the last one went down while I was reading the content. I'm not the OP from the last thread, just a random lurker.
This was mainly intended for discussion purposes and gauge interest.
From what I gather, it means that Google and other tech companies are shit stirring for the US got, in both the Middle East and back here at home.
The wikileaks article (and Assange's book snippet) seems to support some of the infamy.org website's claims, connecting tech companies (google) to the US govt, defense spending, and foreign policy.
another bump for discourse.
seems like someone needs to keep bumping and reposting this for a few days to make sure the info gets out there
as i type this from a google browser
>at least i am using incognito
phew
>>69759246
we only have limited time
>>69768795
I was going to post a thread tomorrow morning with a more cohesive blurb. Feel free to throw a thread up if you have a chance.
>>69759937
do it for the sake of views, so much fucking bullshit, google's time is coming.
>>69768949
The election is getting close. I don't think that it's the end of the road, but it's going to be pivotal for the pacing of whats to come.
>>69769039
Feel free to spread the word. I'll do what I can.
Bump. This is cripplechan tier shit.
>>69770417
it's some interesting info. I think a lot of people here would be interested. Makes me almost want to pick up Assange's book... lol
gonna give it another bump.
hopefully someone sees it and looks into this infamy.org site.
isn't this good for Americans in a way though? I feel safer knowing this country isn't going anywhere kek. This is some pretty fucked up shit though, thanks anon
>>69775791
I'm not sure, they very well may do the same thing in America as they are in Europe.
>King Mohammed VI
kek.
>>69776729
they're not going to destabilize their home base. google wants to destabilize other places so they use social media and technology to both overthrow their current governments and then to establish new, "progressive" governments with the helping hand of Google to build a society from the bottom up. They want to maximize users and global influence, not watch the world burn
>Cohen
>Rubinstein
>Lev
>Kissinger
All these Jews.
>>69776939
"they" are not just Google. Google does shady things and greases palms, Google gets to expand its internet empire in exchange for its cooperation.
I think it would be very easy to argue that the destabilization of large geographic areas will have a profound impact on the united states in many ways. It's already caused several terrorist attacks against us.
Those attacks have been used to leverage our rights away in the name of 'safety', circumventing the very freedom that we as a nation stand for. They have cost us untold amounts of money in defense spending and made us countless enemies across the globe.
I don't understand why 'well at least it's not in the us LOL' is even an argument at this point.
They're keeping tabs on us, censoring us, turning us against eachother, and creating new foreign enemies to attack us.
Google is nothing more than a tool being used by these people to fulfill an agenda.
>>69777364
I agree with what you're saying, it's certainly concerning. But what is the plan of action on this? The average person, 1, does not give a fuck, and 2, if they did, they will end up defending Google and globalism 90% of the time. This is a huge bite to try to chew
>>69777565
I think that first and foremost, pointing out that these companies are actively working with the government is a lot.
People are very concerned over things like Apple unlocking an iPhone for the FBI. Knowing that companies like Apple are actively working with the government to pursue an agenda on the global scale, hurting millions of people, that's a very powerful talking point. Not only are they attacking our freedoms here but they're stirring shit across the globe.
It's a lot to swallow but it's out there plain as day. The longer we dig, the more we uncover. Guys like Soros are doing it in broad daylight and with plain, obvious language.
I hesitate to use this but for a lack of better term this is a redpill. It's a subject that you can shoehorn into a conversation with someone and expose a facet of the globalist agenda.
We should be urging our fellow citizens to pursue these intellectual avenues and to apply critical thinking towards things like elections and discussions to allow discourse. It doesn't matter what side of the fence you're on, this is something worth knowing about.
Left or right, both parties are moving away from these globalist "establishment" candidates. People care about their civil liberties, they don't want to be oppressed. People have had it with Corporate America, people have had it with their Government playing world police and when they find out that the tech industry has been doing it for them by proxy they're going to lose their shit.
>>69777565
and it's really important to remember this isn't necessarily NEW information, a lot of this has been theorized before and is slowly being hashed out.
>>69777565
I don't know how the teens and early 20s people will feel about it but I think people that were around before the big online integration still have some distrust in technology. You see it here and there when people finally go into their Google location history and realize their every movement has been recorded andthat you can go back to a specific date several years ago and see exactly where you went that day.
Most people are ok with that under the assumption Google is altruistic, but i think as online repercussions become more and more common they may start to have their doubts.
>>69759332
the internet was a mistake
>>69760608
>democratic opposition forces
how were these "forces" ever "democratically" chosen to overthrow Assad?
>>69764882
>trying to promote his new book
so what are you supposed to do when you write a book, engrave it on stone and leave it in a cave??
>>69759246
If the working class is having problems, they should stop being poor. Why do poor people have children anyhow?
>democratic opposition forces
kek that's a nice way of saying CIA and Mossad armed and trained Jihadist rebels
