Based on the preponderence of the evidence, I concur with the 97% that the science is settled and not up for debate.

>>69756109
>because science is made up of consensus like politics
bitch pls

Zero evidence.

>>69756443
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus

>>69756109

you've been proven wrong a hundred times on this very website. Also this is not politics.

>>69756557
>In public policy debates, the assertion that there exists a consensus of scientists in a particular field is often used as an argument for the validity of a theory and as support for a course of action by those who stand to gain from a policy based on that consensus. Similarly arguments for a lack of scientific consensus are often encouraged by sides who stand to gain from a more ambiguous policy.

>>69756620
/pol/ - Climatology Discussion

>>69756666
Does anyone dispute this? Or are you misinterpreting "those who stand to gain" as EVILJEWCONSPIRACY PROVEN LIBRULS BTFO

also hello satan

>>69756940
both sides stand to gain. If you cannot admit this, there is no reason to discuss this with you.

And by gain, I do not mean " What if we build a better world for nothing?"

>>69756109

Who gives a shit about the future? We are flooding Western civilization will Muslim welfare parasites that will continue to reproduce and raise kids on taxpayer money and eventually succeed in White genocide. I am not going to pretend liberals actually give a fuck about the future.