Reminder that if you're a libertarian, Marxist, anarchist, or a capitalist, then you're deluded, brainwashed, and gullible.
>let's save the white race by enslaving it
all forms of socialism are retarded, including the national socialists
>>69749322
Actually, I want freedom as much as you do, probably more
>>69749452
>Actually, I want freedom as much as you do, probably more
Define "freedom".
>>69749078
>He thinks morality can be efficiently legislated and enforced by the threat of violence
>he think autarky isn't a pants on head retarded economic policy
Wew lad
>>69749078
>calling yourself an "anti-capitalist"
Come on now I'm sure you are not THAT stupid
>>69749452
>I want freedom
>I will allow the government to tell people what they can or cannot do
kek
all socialists are the same
>>69749078
In a world where everyone has the same interests, it could work.
But right now, it's best to allow individuals to work as they please, pulling them together will only create more strife than necessary
>>69749517
Freedom to have honor. Freedom to be a people. Freedom from the Marxist idealists who confine our identities and beliefs into "social constructs".
>>69749950
Yet you are just as collectivist as the Marxists you despise
>>69749078
LEAF
>>69749799
I'm anti-capitalist, not anti-capital.
Capital has existed for thousands of years. You'd have to be an idiot, or worse, a Marxist, to deny capital.
>>69749818
The people determine the morality, not the government, and it's something the people will determine, through a sense of nobility and honor, not through politics.
>>69749078
>national socialism
>working in a country that has niggers
yeah nah
finish genocide, then you can come back and talk about that bullshit
socialism is only as good as its weakest link, and the world's weakest link is fucking niggers
>>69749950
>Freedom means obligation under threat of force
You're confused, leafbro
>>69750128
>wants freedom
>just not free markets, political freedom, or freedom to dissent
ebin
>>69750128
Last time I checked, socialism isn't big on respecting the people's morality.
>>69750052
Marxists aren't even collectivists. It's like saying "Democracy is collectivist".A system that benefits individuals, not the greater good of society, is NOT collectivist, it's individualist. Marxists don't want to help the people. Marxists don't believe in the people. If your people were suffering, they'd invite even more people in from different countries to fix the disparity; it doesn't change the fact that a people suffers. They're nothing more than capitalist reactionaries.
>>69749078
reminderO
...pic related.
.
>>69749078
When people ask about your political beliefs IRL, what do you tell them? (Let's assume this is in a situation where you could face repercussions for holding non-mainstream beliefs)
>>69750336
>muh greater good
Let's just hope that the government has the same opinions as you do about what the fuck the greater good is.
>>69749078
>if you're a libertarian, Marxist, anarchist, or a capitalist, then you're deluded, brainwashed, and gullible.
>this coming from a nat-soc
>>69749078
>socialism
FREE SHIT
>>69749078
how in the hell could ethno nationalism even work today?
it's over man, that ship has sailed.
best bet now is for tech to hurry up and make us all hedonistic beings served by androids and such
>>69749078
I am an enthusiastic about National Socialism, but there are two facts that I don't like.
1. Corporativism in Hitler's Germany. It was the way of the jews.
2. The idea that one nation should govern the World. I like it better when pic related. Like in a Crusade against mudslimes or communism.
>>69750540
That's the thing. It takes a fool to run a government. An even greater fool could be elected. It takes a special person whose whole life exists for the sole purpose of leading a country, someone whose pockets arent filled with hands, whose whole life revolves around the job, that it's not just a title, but an honor. It can be a monarch, or noblemen; it can be anything, as long as we can rest assured that they exist for us not for themselves.
I knew a "fisherman" once. He claimed to be a fisherman, but that was only because he went on a boat at the time, and went fishing to make money. And I also knew a fisherman who lived his entire life on the water, and some days he'd go out knowing that he wouldn't make any money, but he'd do it because he knew what he was. Now, who's a better fisherman? Someone that "gets the job" or someone who IS the job?
>>69750592
You're thinking of marxists.
how do you lads justify germany trying to colonise other white european peoples
>>69749717
Autarky worked just fine for most of human history. The only trade that really was needed was for luxury items.
Nowadays, the strongest countries are the most self-sufficient ones. Just look at China.
>inb4 North Korea
Have you heard the term 'outlier' before?
>>69749322
then what is your preference?
>>69751192
the other "white countries" were jew-infected or untermensch degenerates
>>69751192
German version of national socialism is not the same as the NS political core.
Just like Marx ideas and the CCCP reality.
I dont know if antisemitism would apply here tho
>>69750265
How are those free markets going for yeah, Ameribro?
Oh right, all your jobs are disappearing.
>>69750402
> Let's assume this is in a situation where you could face repercussions for holding non-mainstream beliefs
see >>69749078
>deluded, brainwashed, and gullible
What does your question have to do with his statement?
desu I think various systems emerged out of local needs. Germany was in the belly of the beast when it comes to capitalism. At least Russia was a little way out and a sparse empire.
>>69751192
I'm not a nazi. I'm not German. I'm Canadian.
Big difference. If you have a people, if you know what your people are, that maybe your people are the English, or maybe the Welsh, Scottish or Irish, then maybe you'd like if that likeness, the people you are like, should get the benefit of having a say in what goes on where they live. Did they ask you whether you wanted millions of immigrants? Did they ask you whether you wanted to ban knives? They told you it was for the greater good, but it's the people who know what the greater good is, not the politicians.
>>69751112
Nah, you're still looking for free shit. Get a job, leaf.
>>69749950
"Freedom from" is a nonsensical statement and should never be used.
>>69750963
I feel as though Nationalism also means promoting the nationalism of like-minded countries. The idea of a master race is ridiculous.
>>69751457
poland, czech republic etc are looking like the saviours of the white race atm
>>69751714
and how exactly does being lead by an authoritarian dictator remedy that
>>69749078
Not being a Conservative Anti-Strong-Gov World-Federalist
Literally you can only be nationalist if you're world federalist, why not make your nation the ONLY nation?
>>69751817
Ok, if you're in a cage, do you want freedom from the cage? Oh, I'm sorry, that would be nonsensical.
>>69751738
What free shit? I have a job.
The government has a source of capital, the bank that they run which prints the money, and the power to regulate; they can tax and they can inflate, but they choose to subsidize the bankers which cause your economic problems. All money is debt, ALL money is theft, not just the ones that are taxed. A better question is "what to use it on". health programs, education programs, infrastructure. Some things that the government could use with the tax money, like building nuclear power plants and building transportation that is fast and efficient, would pay for itself in the longrun.
>>69749078
ITT: Mediated Resistance
>>69752292
No I just would want freedom. "Freedom from the cage" sounds like the cage is giving me the freedom.
>>69749322
>Brasilian intellectuals