[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why is it..
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 55
Why is it that when a woman expresses her sexuality, she's a "slut" or a "whore, but when a man does it, he's a "suave" and a "playa"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjxqtvWbLv4

Double standard much?
>>
>>69726551

Here's your (You)
>>
man != woman
>>
Maybe women should start calling men sluts instead of making being a whore ok.
>>
>>69726551
Why is it that when my girlfriend sucks my dick, she's being a good lover.
When OP does it, he's a cock sucker.
>>
>>69726551
this is a worksafe board idiots
>>
File: image.gif (10 KB, 420x420) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
10 KB, 420x420
>>69726551
Actually they're both STD riddled cucks
>>
Men and women are different.

Thus they must be held to different sets of standards.

How this is not obvious to you, is beyond me.
>>
>>69726551
Because women have great reproductive value than men, and a the long human gestation period is a big consequence for poor sexual choices.
>>
File: guccimane.jpg (10 KB, 235x215) Image search: [Google]
guccimane.jpg
10 KB, 235x215
>>69726551

its easy to be a slut, its hard to be a stud.

to be a stud you have to be tall, fit, good looking, have a good job, dress well, etc

to be a slut you just have to be "there"

there are plenty of fat ugly sluts in the world. but there are no fat ugly studs
>>
>>69726551
Both are bad. Now watch as I'm called a bitter virgin who is jealous of other men and wanting to control women.
>>
>>69726551
Why is it when a woman is a virgin she is respected, but when a man is a virgin hes considered a social pariah.
>>
>>69726551
Because women are more valuable than men.
The only part a male plays in reproduction is insemination. A woman has to carry the child for 9 months, and risks death during child birth.
A woman is expected to be more selective in her mate because it is a huge investment of time and life.
If she chooses a bad mate, its representative of poor critical thinking.
Men are sluts and whores as well, but they don't get pregnant so it really doesn't matter.
>>
When I express my sexuality I'm creepy and misogyny
>>
File: 2gxwMzo[1].jpg (40 KB, 750x1334) Image search: [Google]
2gxwMzo[1].jpg
40 KB, 750x1334
>>69726551
>>
Why is it that when a woman is a virgin she's seen as "pure" but when a man is a virgin he's seen as a loser nerd?
>>
>>69726782
Counterpoint.

Ron Jeremy.
>>
File: slut.jpg (128 KB, 667x1000) Image search: [Google]
slut.jpg
128 KB, 667x1000
>>69726782
>related pics
>>
>>
benis :D
>>
>>69726551
Cause men aren't women. For a man to be a stud he has to work at it. His charisma, his body, work etc These are the men women wanna fuck. For a woman to be a slut, she simply has to exist and choose to do it on a whim.
>>
>Men who have 1-nighters with bar sluts
>women who have 1-nighters with barfags
Both are equally trash
>>
File: 1456345845154.gif (858 KB, 240x228) Image search: [Google]
1456345845154.gif
858 KB, 240x228
>>69726551
UK (((women))) genuinely make me sick.
>>
A lock that is opened by many keys is a bad lock.
>>
>>69726801
god what a bitter virgin who is jealous of other men and wanting to control women
>>
File: it-takes-strong-man.jpg (32 KB, 480x400) Image search: [Google]
it-takes-strong-man.jpg
32 KB, 480x400
no one wants to raise a bastard
>>
>>69726551
Because women have to raise a child, men just have to spray and pray. I think any excess "expression of sexuality" is degenerate though, regardless of the source, because it signals hedonism and a lack of civilization.
>>
>>69726895
This
It's biology. Is it sexist? Yes. However, who fucking cares? It is not going to change. Deal with it.
>>
If all women were sluts, then sleeping with a lot of men would be the norm and the term "slut" wouldn't exist.

Ugly fat girls and dudes that don't get laid are the ones responsible for that double-standard. Women love sex as much as we do and any 4/10 chick would gladly hop on the Chad cock carroussel
>>
File: 1458582681529.jpg (65 KB, 527x655) Image search: [Google]
1458582681529.jpg
65 KB, 527x655
>>69727169
>>
>>69726551
Because being on the recieving end of sex makes you more likely to contract an STD
>>
File: 1458577349848.jpg (84 KB, 508x826) Image search: [Google]
1458577349848.jpg
84 KB, 508x826
>>69727243
>>
>>69726551
If you had actually tried being labelled as a player by women in a set social circle you would know that there isnt a double standard at all.
The only ones who think its impressive are betas, women think you will trick them into bed and dont engage you unless they want to get fucked without commitment.
>>
File: 1458577901673.jpg (70 KB, 609x503) Image search: [Google]
1458577901673.jpg
70 KB, 609x503
>>69727279
>>
File: 1448391784042.jpg (224 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]
1448391784042.jpg
224 KB, 960x960
>>69727169

The woman who wrote that quote wont even step up to say she wrote it and she expects a man to step up for her fatherless children? Lmao.
>>
>>69727042
I said that to my teacher for an acting class and I got kicked out for the day lel
>>
>>69726551
>le womyn and mens are all de same and should be treated the same maymay xD
Fuck off
>>
>>69726551
Both are bad things, however in the case of a man it actually requires some effort or charm to be promiscuous.

Unless you are fucking ugly bar whores or have a steady supply of regular whores.

In recent years with things like Tinder and the popularity of anti slut shaming this is starting to not be true.
>>
if you have a key that fits into every keyholes you got the master key

if you got a keyhole in which every key fits you have a cheap keyhole
>>
man those models are really ugly skinny fat monstrosities.
>>
>>69726943
thats a bill hicks joke
>>
File: 1427661249737.jpg (55 KB, 374x418) Image search: [Google]
1427661249737.jpg
55 KB, 374x418
>>69726551
Because women can get fucked at the drop of a hat if they so choose.

Men actually have to work at it and or just be god tier physically.

There is a disparity, women play the game of sex on easy mode, so they receive no praise.
>>
>>69726551
because sometimes the woman becomes a slut, that does not care about anything but sex.
>>
>>69726782
upboat
>>
File: usertestimony.png (874 KB, 1705x1023) Image search: [Google]
usertestimony.png
874 KB, 1705x1023
>>69727421

:3
>>
>>69727421
i read that as william hung asian lover
>>
File: 1446482629772.png (239 KB, 1622x485) Image search: [Google]
1446482629772.png
239 KB, 1622x485
cuck off
>>
>>69727421
That's the girl form the Million Dollar Extreme video.
>describe your style
>kawaii
pottery
>>
>>69726551
>>
>>69726977
>Ron Jeremy.
was a prop. a dildo would have also sufficed.
>>
>>69726644
////////this
>>
>>69727042

ebin
>>
>>69726551

>white woman having similar muscle mass as asian man

holy fuck you gooks are possibly worst than desi indian pussys
>>
>>69726705
that's not porn. Also, why are you browsing /pol/ at work. Most normies think 4chan is pretty much just /b/ and surely the racism (satirical or not) is not suitable for work. Do you browse stormfront at work?
>>
Why is it that women hold themselves to whatever standard men hold?
>>
Keyhole, key etc.
>>
>>69727717
>pottery
poetry?
>>
>>69726551
Because a 4/10 chick can bang guys all day if she wished but a 4/10 guy can't.
>>
>>69726551
It can't be a double standard if the two genders are inherently different on all levels.
>>
>>69727916
t. newfag
>>
>>69727305
This.
>>
>>69727916
>i don't enjoy dank memes
Ok m8.
>>
>>69727169

So what this quote is saying, judging by what it alludes to, is that I should go up to a man's dinner plate who has already ate what he wanted and I am "strong" to sit down and eat what he left?

That's not strong. That's desperation.
>>
A key that can open any lock is considered to be a good key.

A lock that can be opened by any key is considered to be a bad key.
>>
>>69728130
Bad lock*
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nuGPXQt8RU

A man tells this woman to sit down because of how she's dressed and "there's children on this train".

Yet, he calls her a "whore" in front of the children without thinking what they will do to their psyche.
>>
File: 1448782776125.png (1 MB, 1281x1113) Image search: [Google]
1448782776125.png
1 MB, 1281x1113
>>69726551

It's easy for a woman to be a whore. It's much more difficult for a man to be one.

A woman can walk into a crowd of men and say "fuck me" and just about everyone will drop their pants.

A man can walk into a crowd of women and say "fuck me" and about 90% of them will laugh, say something like "when his height starts with 5" or complain about his appearance.

That's just how things work. You could probably go with the Key vs. Lock comparison too. - A lock that can be opened by many keys is a worthless lock. A key that can open many locks is an extremely valuable key.
>>
>>69726551
>Why is it that when a woman expresses her sexuality, she's a "slut" or a "whore, but when a man does it, he's a "suave" and a "playa"?

Why is it you assume if a man is going around fucking tons of women he's a "playa" or "suave"?

Contrary to what you might have been taught to believe, in most social circles of men you aren't high-fived for hooking up with easy STD-riddled women every weekend.

>YEAH DUDE I TOTALLY FUCKED ANOTHER SLUT LAST SATURDAY
>SWEET BRO THATS FUCKIN AWESOME

Real life isn't like this. You're considered rather pathetic, uncommitted, or a douche in most social circles.

All this aside, there's evidence to believe women absorb genetic information from every male they have a sexual encounter with and it will have an impact on their offspring.

Most men just want a monogamous decent girl they can trust who they don't have to worry about every time they leave the house. Likewise, the same for women. Women don't want their man off hooking up with bitches when he says he's out with the guys.

Not so surprisingly, many women date men like this anyways. They see him as dominant and a high quality mate if he is lusted after so much by the opposite sex.

You're reducing an incredibly conflated issue into an incredibly binary answer.
>>
>>69726705
/pol/ is a green board, therefore not Work Safe.
>>
>>69727169
Black fathers say such wonderful things.
>>
I'm not a feminist but, I actually agree. Whore enablers should be ashamed of themselves.
>>
File: 1449762572374.gif (2 MB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
1449762572374.gif
2 MB, 500x500
>>69726551
when there is a lock,that can be opened by any key there is,that lock is a piece of shit.

but when there is a key,a single key,that can open all locks,it means that key is actually a master key
>>
>>69726551
Why is it that when I express my sexuality I am called a rapist?
>>
>>69726705
pol is a red board, not blue. it is NSFW and marked so on the main 4Chan website directory.
>>
>>69727949
>>69727932
>>69728013
>>69726551
>but when a man does it, he's a "suave" and a "playa"?
No, he's a subhuman monkey-brained sack of shit as well, OP.

Maybe /pol/ will learn that for their ideology to be consistent and reasonable, they have to stop being hypocrites.
>>
>>69726551

http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf

WARNING: YOU CANNOT UN-READ IT.
WARNING: YOU CANNOT UN-READ IT.
WARNING: YOU CANNOT UN-READ IT.
WARNING: YOU CANNOT UN-READ IT.
WARNING: YOU CANNOT UN-READ IT.
>>
>>69727717
name pls
>>
File: LOLWUT.jpg (723 KB, 4089x4334) Image search: [Google]
LOLWUT.jpg
723 KB, 4089x4334
>>
File: 804021408.jpg (198 KB, 560x373) Image search: [Google]
804021408.jpg
198 KB, 560x373
>>69726551
CHING CHONG LING LONG TING TONG I SEE A DING DONG
>>
>>69728283
There is nothing wrong with teaching children to disrespect whores.
>>
File: 1457028586416.jpg (39 KB, 508x431) Image search: [Google]
1457028586416.jpg
39 KB, 508x431
>>69726551
Because a key that unlocks every door is better than a lock that can be opened by every key

Pic Related-A lock that can be opened by every key
>>
I would honestly prefer that both sexes keep their numbers relatively low. I'm not going to throw out a partner if they'd had 1-3 girlfriends before, but once it gets beyond 5 it's a little worrisome.
>>
File: 1454792242944.gif (3 MB, 190x200) Image search: [Google]
1454792242944.gif
3 MB, 190x200
>>69727042
Yeah, because people are locks and keys right kek
>>
>>69727916
>dat ID
Robby confirmed for newfag
>>
>>69728504
FTN-028 can't remember her name, she does the stupid jap moans.
>>
>>69728718
how do you say?
>>
>>69728610
Me too. I don't understand the drive for meaningless casual sex to be honest.
>>
>>69727638
Don't muh dick the Asians!
How many times I gotta say this
>>
File: youareafuckingidiot.png (55 KB, 786x330) Image search: [Google]
youareafuckingidiot.png
55 KB, 786x330
>>69728415
you must be new
>>
>>69728504
>>69728751
It's Amelia Earhart, she's got loads of videos, here's the MDE one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2WwCzaGo9c
>>
>>69728434
I agree, people shouldn't be whores in general.

But there's a reason why society has attached the stigma of being a whore to women, and it's entirely biological.
>>
>>69728767
Bobby confirmed for ignorant newfag who doesn't know his nation's history.
>>
>>69726551
Yes, clearly no one condemns men for lechery.
>>
>>69728685

>What is a metaphor?
>>
>>69728921

It's just bantz lad
>>
>>69728685
>what is evolutionary roles?
>>
File: 52afa15c6a660.jpg (187 KB, 800x533) Image search: [Google]
52afa15c6a660.jpg
187 KB, 800x533
>>69726705

/pol

>worksafe ever
>>
File: 1431009026242.gif (309 KB, 258x277) Image search: [Google]
1431009026242.gif
309 KB, 258x277
>>69726551
The Bible says promiscuity for both genders is bad
>>
>>69728042

>dank

fuck off redditcunt
>>
File: 1430186837983.gif (815 KB, 332x500) Image search: [Google]
1430186837983.gif
815 KB, 332x500
>>69728928
>all depictions of genitalia are pornography
>>
File: smug anime face #1.png (14 KB, 203x248) Image search: [Google]
smug anime face #1.png
14 KB, 203x248
>>69727421

>well hung
>asian
>>
>>69729000
>and it's entirely biological.
Exactly, which is why using that as an argument would be making a naturalistic fallacy.

No one should be a hedonistic subhuman whore, male or female. This is a consistent ideology that is rational and fair.
>>
>>69726551
why did they use such uglys. look at that ugly cunt, and the women is fugly to.
>>
>>69726621
second post best post
>>
>>69726551
Because degeneracy
>>
>>69726705
Pol is a NSFW board, with the exception of cuck porn, which is banned
>>
>>69728928
Older than you, I assume.
>>
>>69727513
yeah, one of those truths which makes it easy to swallow when it's "just a joke"
>>
>>69729171
What a good little lap dog you are, keep eating up that spoonfed morality.
>>
>>69728769
>69728769
Exactly, the point of a relationship is to see myself eventually marrying the person I'm dating. Commitment is something that seems to be slowly going away, sadly.
>>
>>69729067
Certainly not 'dicks are keys'.
>>69729143
>naturalistic fallacy

>>69726621
>>69729263
>>69729270
see
>>69729206
>>
>>69726724
see
>>69728434
>>
>>69726551
P
E
N
I
S M A L L
>>
>>69729344
I mean I'm not even motivated by religion, I just don't see sex as something you should engage in with anyone but the person you love. Casual sex is distasteful.
>>
when was the last time you saw a man fling his boxer shorts in a woman's face?
>>
>>69726551
Go back to tumblr
>>
>>69729200
Maybe they meant Wei Hung
>>
>>69726551
Who the hell cares.
>>
>>69727087
SUPER RARE
>>
>>69728283
>calling whores whores
>not productive to the child's psyche
>>
>>69727741
this is the biggest lie that holds people back, that everything is just random, that their choices didn't affect the "bigger picture", that they were always going to be suboptimal no matter what they do.

people who are successful always take responsibility for their own actions. this is why sluts are looked down upon. they choose, yet don't want the responsibility for that choice.
>>
>>69729509
Definitely.
>>
>>69728928

All that means is don't start a tranny porn dump thread.

Literally everything else is fine.
>>
>>69727169

>women think step up to the plate refers to food
>>
>>69728928
what you're retarded pol is a nsfw board faggot gas the kikes string up the niggers race war now
>>
>>69726782
>tall, fit, good looking, have a good job, dress well,
Non of that is essential, but you certainly have to work on yourself to attract women, while women are naturally endowed with almost everything men want from a casual sex partner.
>>
>>69726551

>Why is it that when a woman expresses her sexuality, she's a "slut" or a "whore, but when a man does it, he's a "suave" and a "playa"?

You're just insecure because you thought boys would like you for being "liberated", and you still realize that no decent guy wants to date you because you're a slut.

You'll never find a "good guy", because you don't deserve one. Give up.
>>
>>69729172
>#####
>space
>memetext
>space
>non meme text
Nice format newfriend.
>>
>>69726551
I'm pretty sure when a guy does it they get arrested
>>
>>69726551
Because it's not natural. Men are supposed to be the aggressors.
>>
>>69726551
Different things are expected of different people. And that kind of behavior is commonly frowned upon even in men.
>>
>Why is it that when a woman expresses her sexuality, she's a "slut" or a "whore, but when a man does it, he's a "suave" and a "playa"?
See, the problem with this claim is that it assumes the same men who call a woman a slut are those who call a chad a playa.

In reality, playas like sluts and have no isses with them. The men who call women sluts are the reserved and decent ment who are disgusted by the degenerate behaviour of modern women.

A slut is worse than a chad, however, as a promiscuous woman can deceive a man into raising another man's child.
>>
>>69727087
DELETE THIS
>>
File: Follow Your Brain.jpg (22 KB, 640x640) Image search: [Google]
Follow Your Brain.jpg
22 KB, 640x640
Because men must create value, women must preserve it.
>>
>>69726782
Hey there Jim..What you doing outta 'Straya?
>>
>>69729317
there are boards within the misc that are NSFW thats what it means

jesus fuck learn how to read
>>
>>69726551
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbvrGiL_s70

Is Legit worth watching anyway?
>>
>>69726551
only children or unworldy people think that way
>>
>>69727314
>>69727279
This is a joke right? It seems like this guy will take on any trash the woman gives to him, does he realize how cucked he is?
>>
File: 1340906787395.jpg (58 KB, 549x375) Image search: [Google]
1340906787395.jpg
58 KB, 549x375
>>69726705
>>
>>69729792
Fucking this
>>
File: 1456345597814.jpg (105 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]
1456345597814.jpg
105 KB, 960x960
>>69728601
>>
>>69729346
Gender roles exist. Even if the biological structures that would form this relationship were not real and thus there wouldn't be a naturalistic fall, Society today still today emulates/synthesizes this biological structure into social norms, what you're doing is saying that pi =/= 3 when 2.999999 = 3 and the answer is actually 2.9999999
>>
File: gatherer.png (74 KB, 350x233) Image search: [Google]
gatherer.png
74 KB, 350x233
>>69726551
>>69726551
'cause evolution

Women with rich sex lives are a modern invention (motly pill), before that they got pregnant quite easily, especially in hunter-gatherer groups when they propably had literally no contraceptives of any kind. Getting pregnant is serious business for a female, giving birth may get you killed and you need a lot of help for years afterwards. So women had to be quite picky when choosing mates. High value females could afford to be very picky. Low-value were much easier.
High value alpha males were fucking a lot because a lot of women found them attractive.

Hence, in pretty much all cultures I know of a man who gets a lot of female attention is admired as a role model and an easy woman is looked down upon.
>>
>>69727243
>>69727279
>>69727314

apparently this is better than never having sex.
>>
>>69729346
>naturalistic fallacy
that's not a real fallacy you dumb cuck
>>
File: 1828071_0.jpg (27 KB, 540x309) Image search: [Google]
1828071_0.jpg
27 KB, 540x309
>>69726782
>>
>>69727243
i just want to punch this nigger in the face for some reason.
>>
>>69728601
Who said a person's vagina is supposed to be a lock though?
>>
>>69726551
Why is it that when a Granny Smith apple is green, it's "ripe" but when a banana is green, it's "not ripe"?
>>
>>69730359
Okay try this one.
Men are the atheletes, and women are the trophies.

If an athlete wins many trophies, he is a very good athlete, but if every athlete wins the same trophy in a race, well no one wants a fucking participation ribbon!
>>
>>69727741
DUDE WEED LMAO
>>
>>69730359
slutty whore detected
>>
I don't think men or women should be sleeping around. It is degenerate to be a slut, regardless of your gender. I'd rather marry and have children with a virgin man than a man who has slept around.
>>
>>69727741
>random universe

They really mean chaotic right?
>>
>>69730359

Hi, honey. Metaphors sure are tough!
>>
>>69729885
>naturalistic fallacy

see
>>69728434
>>69729206
>>
>>69726551
You're making a lot of assumptions on how we deal with man whores.
>>
>>69730359
Locks are something that another thing called a key, fits inside of perfectly, to unlock something important.

It's the most apt comparison.

Women are gate keepers. Their job is to make sure only the most worthy males may use their master keys to unlock the treasure behind their gates.

When you see a gate with a line of dudes in front of it, ain't no way you're gonna want to wait in line to unlock whatever prizes are left after the parade of key masters have had their fill.
It just makes sense.

If it doesn't make sense to you, your brain is fucked in some way. Get help.
>>
>>69730359
Confirmed for loose pussy
>>
>>69730596

It's a shit metaphor though. The human reproductive system has nothing to do with locking things
>>
>>69730689

Jesus christ.
>>
>>69730596
It's not a metaphor because it doesn't support any related point. Dicks aren't keys. It's a false comparison. see >>69729206
>>69730260
Bottom row, third from the left in the /pol/ sticky, dumbass.
>>
>>69730671
Who's "we"?
>>
>>69730689
absolute retard or complete whore whose also a retard detected abandon replies gents
>>
File: image.png (62 KB, 689x448) Image search: [Google]
image.png
62 KB, 689x448
>>69730628
Except those aren't examples of the naturalistic fallacy. Furthermore, the naturalistic fallacy isn't even universally accepted among philosophers as a logical fallacy.

Just because someone references biological realities in their response doesn't mean you can just shout "naturalistic fallacy" and pat yourself on the back for being "right".
>>
>>69730628

>fallacy fallacy

Haha. I can do it too!
>>
>>69726551
It literally does not matter because both men and women have choices. You can be a man or a woman and sleep around constantly just as much. Likewise both men and women have the right to reject someone or find them unattractive due to their number of sexual partners.
>>
>>69730689
>put key in lock
>have access to treasures
>put penis in vagina
>have access to treasures

The only difference is the treasure. One could be material things, the other is obviously the joy of having a family, a spouse, kids.
>>
File: 1452474518759.png (354 KB, 725x684) Image search: [Google]
1452474518759.png
354 KB, 725x684
>>69730799
>still no argument
>>
>>69730909

It's a false comparison though.
>>
>>69731050
>Except those aren't examples of the naturalistic fallacy.
>Just because someone references biological realities in their response doesn't mean you can just shout "naturalistic fallacy"
'But men are supposed to fuck lots of bitches and be aggressive because nature' is literally a naturalistic fallacy.
>>
>>69731290

>These mental gymnastics
>Locks inherently have treasures behind them
>>
>>69731464
just how many hot dogs have flopped around your meat hallway whore?
>>
>>69731464
Alright, no metaphors this time. When a man fucks several women, he's a stud, but when a women fucks several men, she's a slut. Not a question. It's the answer to the question. Now quit your bitching.
>>
>>69731183
No, stupid, that's not a fallacy fallacy, because I'm not saying:
"You've committed a naturalistic fallacy and therefore your view is wrong."
I'm saying:
"You've committed a naturalistic fallacy and therefore try a new argument."

>the more you know
>>
>>69731446
Sounds more like a facetious comment to me rather than an argument in and of itself. But let me ask you this, why is the naturalistic fallacy a fallacy?
>>
File: 20061117_ps3line_bestbuy.jpg (36 KB, 400x333) Image search: [Google]
20061117_ps3line_bestbuy.jpg
36 KB, 400x333
>>69730673
>When you see a gate with a line of dudes in front of it, ain't no way you're gonna want to wait in line to unlock whatever prizes are left after the parade of key masters have had their fill.

But people do this all the time, it's not like if a bunch guys fuck a vagina it's necessarily going to be destroyed. Just like if 20 dudes in front of you walk into a store to buy the latest fagphone or vidya doesn't necessarily mean the store is sold out and you're fucked.

>inb4 muh STDs

No is saying people should be spreading disease.
>>
>>69731794
>Just like if 20 dudes in front of you walk into a store to buy the latest fagphone or vidya doesn't necessarily mean the store is sold out and you're fucked.
yeah because not every guy is getting the exact same game or phone they each get one of their own
You're either a whore or even worse a pathetic pussy pedestal beta
>>
>>69731700
>Sounds more like a facetious comment to me rather than an argument
Well then that's all they had in their comment.

>why is the naturalistic fallacy a fallacy?
Because 'Action X worked in nature and should therefore work for humans' does not follow logically from the premise.
>>
>>69730900
As people.
>>
>>69731464
>obviously correlated things
>mental gymnastics

Please, explain to everyone why a lock would be needed? Pray tell, why would anything need to be locked? Maybe, just maybe, because what's behind the lock is something precious? Something worth protecting from being taken? Like...a treasure, perhaps?
>>
File: 1451024718202.jpg (117 KB, 830x698) Image search: [Google]
1451024718202.jpg
117 KB, 830x698
>>69732044
Nah, I'm just someone that doesn't get butt blasted over women having sex with people other than me.
>>
>>69732498
Do you also get to fuck the women you want?
>>
>>69726551
pardon my ignorance but is that how the average flaccid dick looks like? obviously yeah the dude is asian and the stereotypes but that looks fucking tiny. i always thought my flaccid dick looked small as fuck but now it doesn't seem bad at all if that is not considered ridiculously tiny.
>>
>>69732050
But the naturalistic fallacy can only be applied to arguments which state how things should or ought to be. I don't think he was saying that. He's simply stating that men are more aggressive and have a stronger sex drive, both of which have been proven to be factual. Look up the effects of testosterone on cognition and behavior. Also interviews and analysis of FTM transgendered individuals support this. I don't remember what that poster's argument was but the parts of it I've mentioned in this post aren't inherently incorrect.
>>
File: 1390808993020.gif (278 KB, 450x450) Image search: [Google]
1390808993020.gif
278 KB, 450x450
>>69732614
yep, ur mom is one of them
>>
>>69732460

Females and locks are "obviously correlated"?

Are you retarded? Or just autistic 6 year old with an imagination?

A product of evolution is correlated to a manmade tool?
>>
>>69726551
>suave
>playa
what-a-very-good-soup.jpg
>>
File: b6163.png (233 KB, 332x307) Image search: [Google]
b6163.png
233 KB, 332x307
>>69732883
>>
>>69728289
>Everything you said backed up by "that's just the way it is Bitch!"

Best anwser
>>
>>69726551
A key that opens many locks is a master key
A lock that is opened by many keys is a shitty lock
>>
I don't like the looks of this man's cock. I decline him representing me
>>
File: Peeping-Pepe.png (117 KB, 305x382) Image search: [Google]
Peeping-Pepe.png
117 KB, 305x382
>>69726551

Lewd pictures
>>
>>69726551
They're both going to hell so it doesn't matter
>>
>>69726551
this picture made me realize I like the male figure far more than women's. I might be gay.
>>
I'm a female currently in a long term relationship and I shame my boyfriend for having had past 'casual' encounters.
>>
>>69729792
>implying women even know about baseball
>>
Why are all women such stupid pieces of shit?
>>
Why is it when a girl withholds her sexuality she is pure but when a man does it he's a creepy neckbeard?
>>
>>69733242
She's just ugly.
>>
>>69733242
eh, most human sculptures are male. i think it has something to do with cocks making a naked body more balanced. the female body looks a bit empty for lack of better term with just a snatch in the crotch area. doesn't really make you gay unless you think of wanting that dick up your arse.
>>
File: 1458545244327.jpg (840 KB, 2456x1570) Image search: [Google]
1458545244327.jpg
840 KB, 2456x1570
>>69726551

Because sexual promiscuity harms men far less than it harms women.
>>
which is better?

Skeleton key vs key that opens none lock with no key vs master lock
>>
>>69726551

Holy shit! That guy has a small dick and tiny balls.
>>
File: image.jpg (16 KB, 259x194) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
16 KB, 259x194
>>69727638
Why must we behave like niggers
>>
If a man acted like the sluts you posted he would not be considered a stud, he would be in prison.

Even in this situation the double standards are against men.
>>
>>69726551
The distinction arises from a simple feature of our evolutionary history.

Women always know that their child is theirs. Men do not always know.

Therefore, men can be duped into raising and providing for a child that is not theirs. From the perspective of the "selfish gene" this is a losing scenario.

Men who tend to only raise their own children and who shun children that are not theirs have a selective advantage over men who indiscriminately raise any child a woman brings to him.

What distinguishes these two groups of men? It is NOT the type of women they mate with. It is a trait in the men themselves.

The men with the selective advantage have a trait which helps them to avoid raising children which are not their own.

This trait is slut shaming.

Men who slut shame women assert their dominance over their woman, thus discouraging the woman's tendency towards sexual promiscuity. This discouragement happens through beating, social ostracizing, or outright killing.

Men with such a trait are more likely to keep their woman honest, and less likely to be stuck with children that are not their own. These men have a selective advantage over the men who do not have this trait.

TL;DR cucks are at an evolutionary disadvantage; alpha men who slut shame women are more likely to pass on their genes
>>
>>69730842
Dicks are keys. They perform the same functions and more.
>>
>>69730842
>Bottom row, third from the left in the /pol/ sticky, dumbass.
That guy is an idiot for thinking the naturalistic fallacy isn't a real fallacy, but you are an idiot for not knowing what the naturalistic fallacy is and using it.
The naturalistic fallacy is not "all arguments about nature are fallacious". Nor is the naturalistic fallacy the same as appeal to nature. The naturalistic fallacy is closely related to the is–ought problem (i.e. it would be fallacious to explain that which is good reductively in terms of natural properties such as "pleasant" or "desirable".), while the appeal to nature is "a thing is good because it is 'natural', or bad because it is 'unnatural'".
The naturalistic fallacy is even rejected from some philosophers saying that it is possible to derive "ought" from "is".
Regardless, their argument has nothing to do with the naturalistic fallacy or the appeal to nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature
>>
>>69733992
As in 'a key that opens many locks is a master key, and a lock opened by many keys is a shitty lock'?
>>
>>69732900
A vagina is correlated to a lock, moron.

It's a slot into which a phallic object fits into in order to get past a barrier
>>
>>69731464
Why would anybody lock something in the first place if there wasn't anything valuable on the other side? You wouldn't lock your front door when you leave your home if you didn't want to protect your belongings from being stolen. You wouldn't lock your door at night if you didn't care about strangers coming in and murdering you. So yes, locks do inherently have things of value behind them.
>>
clean unused holes are valuable holes
>>
>>69727243
Why would he say that? He looks like a typical scrawny 3.5 year old.
>>
>>69734100
That's the gist. It makes feminists but thurs because it removes their power and puts them into a corner with few choices.

The problem is they fail to realize it's much better to be in that corner with only 2 choices, than it is to be surrounded with thousands of choices.
>>
If I could tell you that you could have an unopened can of Coke or one that had had 7 penises in it, which would you prefer?
>>
File: arab fail.jpg (23 KB, 436x328) Image search: [Google]
arab fail.jpg
23 KB, 436x328
>>69727717
>>69727638
>>69727657
>>69728971

What did I miss?
>>
Because being a slut is easy. Any fat ugly bitch that wants laid can easily do it. Women just merely have to be there.

Being a stud is fucking hard. You have to be fit, witty, have money and be interesting. There are no fat ugly studs. It takes work to be a stud.

Thats why people make fun of sluts and not studs. Slut = low value, Stud = High Values.
>>
>>69734471
The unopened coke. But to reverse it like in OP's post:
If I could tell you that you could have a penis that hasn't touched any coke or one that had had been put into 7 coke cans, which would you prefer?
>>
>>69734043
How exactly is the naturalistic fallacy a fallacy though? Just wondering
>>
>>69734664
The former, clearly.
>>
>>69734739
It implies because something is natural that it is good.

Go take some cyanide and see how good it is for you.
>>
File: 1456512436637.jpg (620 KB, 1500x1500) Image search: [Google]
1456512436637.jpg
620 KB, 1500x1500
>>69727671
Except evolution is a theory dumb fuck, nice try though.

I got one simpler that I figured out by myself. I never saw a man get a train ran on them by women. I never knew of a group of women calling up a man whore they knew to come over and take turns on/run train. After you lived it/seen/heard about it it's much simpler.

Evolution has been disproven, they teach you in high school because it makes dumb niggers like you not believe in God. That is it's sole purpose. Satanists rule this world
>>
Yeah it's also a double standard that virgin men are looked down upon but virgin women are looked up to. Society is full of double standards. But it's social double standards, not legal double standards, so there's no reason to give half a fuck. People can think whatever they want of you, they're not forcing you to live a certain way. Only way that men and women are unequal in the United States is that men are allowed to be topless in public while women are not (and women absolutely should be allowed to be topless in public), other than that women and men are treated as having equal rights.
>>69726705
No it's not fuck off
>>
>>69726551
Men are oversensitive to being rejected. Women are oversensitive to being objectified. Put them together and you end with with anger and name calling.
>>
>>69734824
Wouldn't that mean that it's humanity's interaction with nature that decides the moral outcome, not an inherent trait of nature itself?
>>
>>69734664
The one that was dipped in the coke. Give it a sweet taste and familiar flavor.
>>
>>69729966

You're an idiot and also wrong.
>>
>>69734894
No, it's a fact now like the Earth orbiting around the Sun is. There is no question about it now. You're just a dumb fuck who cannot reason and who is so ignorant that they can't even look at the physical proof in a museum or textbook on the subject at all. And even if you did, do you even understand what's being said?
>>
File: 1459399629061.png (720 KB, 942x1054) Image search: [Google]
1459399629061.png
720 KB, 942x1054
Unlike most on here, I have an equal amount of disrespect for both genders that have no idea what fidelity or abstinence is.
>>
>>69734815
That's opposed to what OP said though.
>>
File: nsa.png (209 KB, 718x718) Image search: [Google]
nsa.png
209 KB, 718x718
>>69727087
Oh shit the NSA is here!
>>
>>69735086
Nature isn't good or bad, inherently.

If someone wants to say something is good/bad, fine; but it can't rely on something as faulty as, "Well, it's good because it's nature."
>>
>>69734824
But aren't the vast majority of things that are natural proven to be good for you? Do exceptions change the rule?
>>
>>69734894
Do you not know what a scientific theory is?
>>
>>69734894
Wow. It's amazing that you could sit there and use the results of science in an attempt to disprove science.
>>
>>69726705
This is fine where I work. We are racist all day every day.
>>
>>69727087
WITNESSED
>>
File: 1458389057787.jpg (139 KB, 680x707) Image search: [Google]
1458389057787.jpg
139 KB, 680x707
>>69727169
kek
This was probably written by a woman.
>>
>>69735278
Yes.

Because there are "bad" things in nature, that disproves it's tautologically "good" -- as the fallacy would have you believe.
>>
This will explain everything

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6I7Lnwkev0
>>
>>69735262
I'd argue otherwise. Nature is always good unless a concious entity decides to start manipulating shit for an agenda.
>>
>>69735122
I've been to all the museums, seen the fossil evidence first hand and experienced it with my soulless pathetic father that holds no value in human relationships or living life. I did the research on the level required with an open mind nigger.

Are you sure you have the mental capacity to do the research necessary with an open enough mind to even begin to accept the truth? Take a look at yourself dumb fuck, I know where I stand.

If it was a theory fifteen years ago when I was in high school, how come they didn't give us some other theories to bang around and determine the truth from there? You are missing it and you are too ignorant and blinded, faggot.
>>
>>69727087
ayy lmao
>>
>>69735569
You're essentially saying all of nature is good, which is tautological, i.e. you're being nonsensical.

Which is why it's a fallacy.
>>
>>69726551
Any woman can be a slut. Not every man can be a player, for example you.
>>
women don't see penis as something valuable, men see vagina as a prize, something of value, something to be hunted for and devoured. why would other men shame each other for being a successful hunter? we shame women for it because they suck at running away from hunters. easy to catch, not valuable after so many other hunters have had a taste.
>>
LOL SMALL ASIAN DICK
>>
>>69726551
Because its fucking pathetically easy for a woman to get dick. A man needs skill and swagger to get some pussy.
>>
>>69735581
>my soulless pathetic father that holds no value in human relationships or living life

well that was a depressing tangent but a valuable insight into the mind of an evolution denying slut defender
>>
File: IMG_20160207_182814.jpg (2 MB, 4160x2340) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160207_182814.jpg
2 MB, 4160x2340
>>69726551
No and I'll show you why;

Man has sex with 1000 women, they have sex with him.

Whose the dad? He is.

Who is the mum(s) they are.

Reverse this. Woman has sex with 1000 men.

Who is the mum? She is, who is the dad?

Who knows?

If you were to extrapolate this to two tribes say in the former you could breed your own women and have a load of bastards with the othet (see the merger of ancient Rome and the Sabines), the opposite and your people literally are wiped out in a generation. Note it was called the rape of the sabine women and not men.

Why do you think it's always the propaganda binary >African male, >European female (pic related) you idiot goy?

OP BTFO forever.
>>
>>69736414
Even in OP its >european female, >non European male
>>
>>69733830
Not only this, but it comes before humanity. We can observe behavior like this all throughout the mammalian kingdom. We're taking about millions of years of evolutionary programming.
>>
>>69726551
>Why is it that when a woman expresses her sexuality, she's a "slut" or a "whore, but when a man does it, he's a "suave" and a "playa"?

Because being a slut is easy. Even a big fat pig can get fucked. Being a guy and getting around is hard work. You have to work out, eat right, have a fat wad of cash, speak well and say what women want to hear...

Nobody is going to give women a trophy for whoring around when it is easy for them. Sorry.
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 55

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.