>>69722167
Define "best".
>>69722232
The one that works for all the people of a nation. Where nobody starves and you get to develop yourself economically if you wish, as long as it's not detrimental to the interests of the nation.
>>69722566
well there's your answer, that's why fascism is the best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fotaiky1W8c
>>69722566
>The one that works for all the people of a nation.
No economic system works for all people of a nation because not all people of a nation participate in the production of goods or services.
>Where nobody starves and you get to develop yourself economically if you wish, as long as it's not detrimental to the interests of the nation.
So is the question "What economic system leads to the lowest levels of starvation?" So long as we are debating economics you should propose a question that can be definitively answered with empirical evidence.
National Capitalism
>Free Internal Market
>Fair Trade based on economic conditions
>Minimum, efficient regulation for consumer and labor protection
>Nationalism/Patriotism tenets include character, collaboration, and community
>Nation as a community of communities, a federation of federations
>Culture of charity: "Our social welfare system is so much more than just charity. Because we do not say to the rich people: Please, give something to the poor. Instead we say: American people, help yourself! Everyone must help, whether you are rich or poor! Everyone mut have the belief that there's always someone in a much worse situation than I am, and this person I want to help as a comrade."
>>69722167
System doesn't matter. Only good leadership. That is the final redpill.
>>69725655
wtf? How come I'm the only one with a name?
>>69725655
I think this is true. The Soviet Union did great economically it's just the leaders stole all the wealth.
>>69725741
we don't like you, Grant.
>>69722167
Communism is the best hands down. The problem is people are easily corrupted which causes communism to fail over time.
>>69722167
>corporatism
>good
Nice try you dirty hook-nosed, greedy kike.
>>69723616
I mean the one that doesn't let people starve AND allows you to fulfill economical development. A system where you can start a business if you so wish and where nobody is hungry. In capitalism you have private property and initiative, but there are people in the streets. In communism you don't have people in the streets but you can't develop yourself economically. The ideal system, in my view, is that which allows you to engage in private initiative but makes sure that private property isn't used in a way that's detrimental to the people, by leaving people unemployed or starving. In synthesis, a system that says "you have a right to private property and initiative, but don't take jobs outside of the country, don't leave people without jobs and treat workers well, we want no usury either".
>>69726333
How is communism good? It's anti-freedom.
>>69726745
>Thinking fascist corporatism refers to corporations in the American definition of the word.
That's not the type of corporations Mussolini spoke about. Look at this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism#Fascist_corporatism
>Economical
Unregulated Capitalism, with only small regulations aiming to keep small businesses competitive
Social programs exist so that very poor people don't turn to crime and can enjoy the free market
>political
Generally socially liberal, aka pro-choice, open to LBGT rights , but rewarding people who have many children with tax-cuts so that we don't have a demographic problem
Very strong borders and national defense so that invading armies and illegal immigrants can't progress further into the country. Generally isolationist military policy but not completely apathetic.
Immigration only for skilled people, no more unskilled immigration. Foreign-born citizens should be 5% of the population at best.
"National Capitalism" sounds pretty good, provided that it promotes good relationships with other countries. Trade deals should be made but only on equal terms.
>>69726745
>he doesn't understand the classical definition of corporatism in relation to Benito Mussolini
>he's on /pol/ so he's probably a lolbertarian
>so his idea of a political science 101 is mises.org
American education
Didn't Mussolini say Fascism was "rule by corporations"?
http://www.anesi.com/Fascism-TheUltimateDefinition.htm#B._Didnt_Mussolini_say_Fascism_was
>>69726333
Communism only works when there is no incentive to work. I.e. post singularity
wish it, want it, do it
so simple
>>69727583
post singularity will be hell on earth, people that don't work make stuff like 'The L.A riots' happen.
how much of the planet is white, like less than 8% or some shit, post singularity, when even less people work.. it will be a complete nightmare that make the Spanish Fury seem like a good time.
>>69722566
>Working for all people of a nation
Most of the people of a nation are basically useless and only good for labor and to enable the ruling class to greatness.
>>69722953
This triggers commies.
>>69725462
Actually, that sounds like Fascism. What are the differences between both systems, if any?
what does liberal faggots has to say about outsorcing, monopoly and lack of acutal "free trade"?
the market itself sure doesn't solve all these problems
>>69729144
Capitalism ---- Corporatism ---- Socialism
You can have those 3 within a nationalist state. He picked the first. Fascism picks the second.
>>69729515
But Corporatism is actually a form of Capitalism where private initiative is encouraged as long as it's for the wellbeing of the country, as opposed to Liberal Capitalism. Therefore, Corporatism, as I understand it, is National Capitalism. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>69722167
Distributism is by far the best for encouraging innovation whilst at the same time minimising corporate power in addition to its natural tendency to support the family unit through strong fathers working for the good of themselves and their families. Corporatism is ok, much better than capitalism, but as a conservative first and a nationalist second I believe that the family unit is more important than the state or the nation. Capitalism is ok when it's heavily regulated, socialism is pure cancer.
>>69727503
Lol, that's what I mean, Corporatism is the opposite of greedy kikeness.
>>69722167
On another note, that is some God-tier jaw.
