Why are Conservashills such corporate cock suckers /pol/?
The liberals are right (for once) and they can't tolerate it.
the republican party exists solely to redistribute wealth from the multitudes to a small group of wealthy people, conservashits are just the easily-deluded peons who've fallen for the trick
at least libertarians and religious people have other ideological reasons for being conservative, but the largest faction of conservatives are the low-IQ retards; rednecks, military meatheads, fox news zombies, poor critical thinkers, etc.
call dems sheep if you will, but at least they support people who CLAIM to be acting in their interests.
cable companies can go fuck themselves
i don't care if i have to agree with a sjw
FUCK YOU JEW WARNER YOU FUCKING KIKES
It gave the fcc more regulatory power and helps to strengthen government influenced monopolies
>>69700386
Net Neutrality is just a fancy way of saying the Internet that we all know and love will now be regulated by the government as a public utility.
True "neutrality" would be NO government involvement or regulation of the internet.
Once again, the ignorant public is reaching out for more government control into their lives in the worst ways possible, in the name of "fairness."
This will not bode well for the future of free communication.
Also,
It's ok when libtards do corporate welfare (mandatory insurance)
>>69700900
are you serious? Do you understand what net neutrality is?
do you just hear the word "government" and start frothing at the mouth, dude? The anti-net neutrality faction is LITERALLY the "government influenced monopoly" you claim to fear
>>69701006
>True "neutrality" would be NO government involvement or regulation of the internet.
so allowing telecom companies to just turn off access to whatever parts of the internet they want is "neutrality" now?
kek
e
k
I hope you're getting paid for spouting these retarded opinions
>>69701089
Yes, and you want to give the government more power to enforce these monopolies. Do you fucking hear yourself? The government created the monopolies. The government is and always has been the root of the fucking problem. Stop begging the government to "fix" the problems they created in the first place.
>>69701301
If Telecom companies "turn off" the internet, their competitors will see a massive surge in interest.
It's how markets work literally everywhere else.
>>69701006
You have zero idea what you're talking about.
Kneejerk reactions based on ideology only.
>>69700386
Have any of you faggots actually met a satisfied customer of Obamacare or are you talking out of your ass again?
I've met one person who's had a good experience with Obamacare, everybody else has been fucked, and I'm not talking about rich people either, everybody's prices have gone up.
>>69701451
i thought we were talking about net neutrality
>>69701301
Who owns the media used to transmit information? If it belongs to them, they get to decide how it's used and who uses it. If you don't like it, build your own network. If you say "muh barriers to entry" thank the government for creating an oligopoly.
Hillary is going to enact Licensing and permits for a "safer" and "fair" internet
Screen cap this
>>69701607
Fuck off Corporate Cuck
>>69701006
>Net Neutrality is just a fancy way of saying the Internet that we all know and love will now be regulated by the government as a public utility.
Wait. I thought net neutrality means every packet sent has the same priority? The opposite of regulation
>>69701451
One of my coworkers declined the company provided insurance in favor of obamacare and talks about how great it is. He's also proud socialist with kids by a woman he isn't married to and complains about how hard it is to provide for them on his wage that's literally three times higher than minimum wage. What I'm saying is, the only one I know is clearly retarded.
True neutrality would include relaxing regulations on laying NEW cable/fiber, and allowing more than 1 provider in EVERY GEOGRAPHIC AREA.
If Comcast had to compete against Verizon and Google in all their areas, they wouldn't dare to shut down or throttle service because people would just leave them en-mass and go to their competitors.
As long as the government enforces utility monopolies, we cannot have the free market services we want.
The ONLY thing the government should be doing is preventing collusion and price fixing.
>>69701840
> he fell for the librul talking points
>>69701762
>can't argue
>gets irrationally angry
Yeah, I thought so.
>>69700386
Net neutrality is a cancerous because it will continue to allow Comcast and handful of other ISPs to charge us insane prices for ultra slow internet. Also there is no evidence that they would try to block access to certain sites.
>>69701363
>>69701403
>the private market is inherently fair
>the private market leads to the best result for the customer
>it is impossible to create rules that are fair, let's not even try
>why don't we just let the powerful do as they please?
I see you guys have fallen for the memes
>>69701955
>what is an oligopoly?
They have no incentive to compete against each other and never will.
>>69701840
>every packet has the same priority
That would be disastrously stupid. Streaming audio and video would be impossible if those packets had the same priority as static webpages and email.
>>69702255
You should read up on how mabell became a monopoly
>tfw google fiber is going to come into my area and actually compete with comcast
>tfw we actually already have other decent options too
Feels fucking good.
>>69702255
>I make unfounded implications and strawman my opponents
I see you don't want an honest discussion.
>>69701451
I keep HEARING about satisfied customers, I've never actually seen one.
>>69701607
ISPs only provide the "last mile" or so of infrastructure. They charge for the bandwidth on this part of the network only.
What they want to do is charge based on the destination and origin of the packets. It makes no sense. The Internet backbone is not congested. It is designed to handle the traffic of the whole world, and it does so. Uplink is a minor expense of ISPs. It is designed to be this way. That's what made the Internet a global network.
If your packets go or come from some destination, that's your business, it doesn't affect your ISP. In fact, if the packet routing headers were encrypted (hop-by-hop somehow), they wouldn't even be able to tell, and it would be better that way.
Imagine someone built a bridge, and you ask "How much to cross it?", and they answer "Depends, where are you going?", and you say like.. "Bob's", and they "Oh yeah? FUCK HIM. More expensive then!". It's anti-competitive, and it's not "earned" profits. And you would need to build A LOT of unnecessary bridges before that kind of abuse fully stopped.
>>69702572
A vast majority of those.helped by obongo care are non white.
>>69700386
Because having the FCC nanny what the public has access to has worked so well in the past?
>>69702544
>>69702409
>the earth is flat! WHY WONT YOU HAVE AN HONEST DISCUSSION WITH ME
your premise is faulty, that's why.
kindly fuck off now, my sweet little shills
>Let Comcast create a fast lane for certain websites
>Fast lane is same speed as current Internet
>4chan is a fringe website
>Slow load time
>Want 4chan to load faster, pay Comcast more $
>NEETs have no money
>NEETs forced to become normies and post on facebook
Seems like a good idea to me.
>>69702972
i need /sp/ to watch hockey
i live in fucking west texas, nobody watches that shit here
>>69703773
Maybe you should assimilate with your surrounding environment and start watching football.
>>69700386
>What are Conservashits arguments against Net Neutrality?
Because they get all of their funding from big corporations.
>>69704013
Hockey is literally the god tier sport
Handegg is a close 2nd next to Combat sports
>>69700386
I have more trust in profit-focused companies than the government to create internet infrastructure that serves customers. I like how the same people that were against SOPA and PIPA are all for net neutrality because they think they are sticking it to the EVIL CORPORATIONS when in the end they all accomplish the same thing.
>>69701006
>>69700900
Yeah this. Ironically, government regulations will give MORE power to cable giants since they have the power to influence what the regulation is.
>>69701403
>competitors
