http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-pernicious-myth-of-the-oppressed-european-muslim/
>"...and more than half are “economically inactive."
Muh economical worth of immigration.
When remove kebab?
>>69679395
>The problem isn’t intolerance. It’s the multiculturalist socialist paradise that the entire European Union affords Muslim immigrants.
We all know this but nothing will happen.
>>69679688
Spread the message to normies as best as possible.
>>69679395
>" Muslims claim disability more than any other group.'
>>69679869
we all should but the truth is that the majority of /pol/ is just as passive as the normie when it comes to even the least of political engagement.
>>69680089
I do what red pilling I can but it's important to do it 1 on 1. Otherwise you get the "you're wrong because we agree you're wrong" responses.
>>69680218
indeed
I do try the same but the redpill takes a lot of doses before it becomes even remotely active
>>69680218
Holy shit, this
>I don't have a good answer to the point he's made, guess I'll just take cuck Carl's word on his "facts" he's shouting incoherently
>>69679395
more than half is a nice way of saying 100%
>>69680424
Takes energy too.
Biggest annoyance is;
"You don't have proof so it's not real"
"Here, read this proof with sources"
"Nah I'm not interested. I just believe 'original lie of conversation that's dispelled by evidence'"
Happens surprisingly often.
>>69680513
Most common """"counter argument""" I get to deal with is: yeah but what's the authors point of making this article? He is probably just right wing.
Or they see it's not mainstream media and think it's some backward tinfoil blog...
>>69680513
The """counter argument""" I most often see is: " yeah but the author is probably just right wing"?...
Or: "they are probably just cherrypicking facts"...
>>69680726
>>69680819
Weird my post didn''t show at first.
>>69680726
I like using the left for right objectives.
Everything as equality phrased at natives without mentioning natives.
>>69680887
Coming back at the passive thing.
/pol/ is more attracted to clickbait posts or tabloid level of " political coverage ". Or the " look what this tranny said " of the 1000000 "degenerate" thread. Even here it's hard to redpill people.
IRL I just start conversations with people and micro feed them facts and where to find these, but not to much because they get tired of "agenda pushing" real quick.
>>69681050
I try to keep Soros away from conversations unless he's directly mentioned in the news.
Problem is, he is really so far into the levels of comic book super villain that unless you're already familiar with him, it really does sound tin foil level.
However, some things are easier to kick off here, especially with the upcoming vote. Just have to remind people of 2005, when the Dutch vote was 'honored' by the exact same law passing under another name without a vote.
Anti-EU sentiment is rising naturally though so that's also nice.
>>69681281
I don't even mention The Eternal One. It's to high level redpill. I just point at the EU as being an opaque institute with no direct input from the people, and that's when people start agreeing. (because it is) And from there I work my way down to some other topics.
>>69679395
>Orthadox, Hindu and Catholic refugees
Cause I'm sure they're there
>>69681461
You can mention him but only lightly.
He is visibly lobbying for open borders, just play the greed card.
>buys up apartments
>has government pay rent for refugees
>100% occupancy in contract
That alone is enough to get some to start thinking about it in a new light and you don't have to go full ball.
There is still bad blood here in places because the Dutch voted to keep the constitution and it was taken anyways.
But especially the farmers are anti-EU. Makes imports cheaper through subsidies than what local producers can supply.
>>69681050
I'm slowly red-pilling my family.
I haven't seen my uncle in a long while but found out on Easter he's Pro-Trump
>>69680218
This. And most of the time it's a long process. I've red pulled my girl friend. It didn't happen by coming out full on /pol/ and getting her on board. It was a drawn out endeavor that mostly consisted of presenting facts and asking her what she thought.
SWEDEN YES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4HIEy-OIcQ
>>69680887
I like to use their lgbt and women rights beliefs against them
>>69682312
Especially easy when discussing Islam.
Catholics/Christians might not like it but they accept it (even if there is name calling) in their own countries.
In any Islamic country, LBGT movements don't exist because they're immediately executed.
Also the same in many African nations (to expand with the current influx).
>>69681790
Indeed. Can also do it with humor and then justify the joke with fact afterward. Been using similar thing with family and most are at least on the way to being /pol/ users.
>>69679980
because, due to people like you, belgium they have gotten sharpnell everywhere, their arms ripped of by belgian bombs and so on.
