What did this redditor mean by that?
Do women just dress to fulfill expectations that are forced on them?
Do they even like to wear uncomfortable slutty clothes?
They wear whatever nabs them the most attention. Includes burqas
>>69651017
That they're an ugly and lonely faggot that doesn't like putting effort into their appearance.
evolutionary behavior doesn't exist goy
it's just a sexist meme, there's nothing in nature to suggest one gender could ever try to attract the other through non verbal communication
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism#Ornamentation_and_coloration.
>>69651546
Hey, were you in my sexual dimorphism thread earlier that I commandeered to turn into race realism?
>>69651710
No but feel free to do it anyway
>>69651761
>>69651017
I wish these bitches would either be the stupid sluts that they are and we can call them that; or they stop being dumb whores and act like respectable people. Or at least pretend to be.
>>69651832
>>69651857
>>69651857
The width of bell curves accounts for the white-asian achievement gap.
>>69651960
According to this I'm smarter than any asian that could ever exist.
>>69652050
congrats
Nii
>>69651017
Good lord, I want to fuck her footpussy.
>>69652124
I was saying its obviously inaccurate.
>>69651960
That's a meme
the asian bell curve is just as wide as the white bell curve
http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2008/06/asian-white-iq-variance-from-pisa.html
Asians are, in fact, on average, more intelligent than whites.
The reason they are bad at innovation is due to being genetically programmed towards conformity.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113350/Why-individualism-free-thinking-genes-British-people.html
>>69652323
>>69652050
>>69652050
That's not how that works.
It just means the odds of highly intelligent Asians are very, very low.
They're good at mimicking whites because they have the intelligence for it, but they are not good at innovating because they don't have quite the intelligence for that.
https://gwern . net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
http://ttu .e e/public/m/mart-murdvee/EconPsy/2/Lynn_2008_The_Global_Bell_Curve_-_Race_IQ_and_Inequality_Worldwide.pdf
Bell curves don't mean you cannot exist outside of them, they just plot generalities.
>>69652432
Holy shit, no.
PISA scores didn't give proof of that and you know it.
Nor does the individuality theory....
Read HA and return, (person posting the same shit as earlier from a different country, likely a VPN)
This.
>>69651145
I remember asking a fem friend why they would wear shorts like that. They said "well, if your legs are pretty, it would be a waste not to flaunt it". Thats why if a girl wears, lets say, stockings. Many will think she is hiding something ugly under it.
>>69651960
How pathetic are white cucks that they just draw graphs with no source to make themselves feel like they are smarter than asians?
You cucks give white people a bad name, or at least just provide a source.
And yeah I'm white.
>>69652830
I DID PROVIDE A SOURCE.
>>69652438
You didn't read.
Plus, you *must* understand the Pisa scoring was between Han,, and (apparently) 50+ other ethnic groups within China. It was tested again one ethnic group of whites and a much smaller sample size. This is silly.
>>69652953
Wheres the source of the study that produced that IQ spread graph?
>>69653134
Human Accomplishment, Charles Murray.
Part of the many sources he uses.
>>69652546
>PISA scores didn't give proof of that and you know it.
Of course it explains it
It also explains why asians have such a high functioning society while at the same time needing to copy the west for everything and having little to no innovation.
The male female IQ difference is not the same as the east asian/white IQ difference
http://qz.com/441905/men-are-both-dumber-and-smarter-than-women/
So far there is no proof that asians have a narrow IQ bell curve than white.
>Yes the Bell Curve is probably true. No the Bell Curve never stated that Asian IQ stopped at 120. That hypothesis was based on some random person after reading “IQ and Wealth of Nations” and was quickly discredited. And so no asians do not have a lower standard deviation but probably have a higher one.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001460.html
However a lack of creativity would explain why east asian are successful in education but need to copy western ideas in order to modernize.
http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/why-u-s-going-after-chinese-hackers-jobs-n109081
>>69653280
Nope, human accomplishment never stated that.
>>69653341
It's pretty difficult to claim East Asians or unintelligent when you look at scientific output
>>69653341
Read the part comparing bell curves and return
>a study of over 50 Chinese ethnic groups compared to one white group (Finns)
This is faulty. The researcher even writes, "meme," and uses. "???" in his research.
>>69653457
Am I missing the irony or did you just show that they are unintelligent when it comes to innovation?
>>69653475
>a study of over 50 Chinese ethnic groups compared to one white group (Finns)
I'm not sure what you're referencing
Either way Human Accomplishment was about analyzing the encyclopedia not conducting original research.
>>69653536
lack of creativity is not a sign of a lack of intelligence
>>69653341
There is no actual evidence Asians are less innovative or creative than whites. Japan is more innovative than all of Europe except Germany, Holland and Scandinavia. I don't know why you care as your IQ is clearly low. Keep shilling though,
>>69653661
The Pisa study that, "established," Asian IQ bell curve isn't slim.
>>69653686
Actually Japan is less innovative than France, Germany, Austria, Iceland, Belgium, Norway, Netherlands, UK, Denmark, Finland, Switzerland, and Sweden.
Attractive women wear attractive clothing and ugly fat women look like shit in that clothing so they get mad.
>>69653686
other than genetic evidence
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113350/Why-individualism-free-thinking-genes-British-people.html
and history
and the massive east asian cheating epidemic
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/chinas-culture-of-student-cheating/article/2581245
and Chinese espionage.
http://www.newsweek.com/2015/09/25/why-us-cant-stop-chinas-cyberspies-372890.html
>>69653882
kek none of this is true source? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Innovation_Index
>>69651017
>Forced like rape because god forbid a woman not be a victim
>Exceptions, bullshit I don't expect anyone to dress proactively and neither do their grandparents
They wear slutty clothes because it gets them attention. It's that fucking simple. People love attention, especially women. Literally listening to a girl talk is the best way to get her interested in you.
>>69653916
Japan is way more innovative than britain so your point is moot. Historically Arabs were ahead truly they are master race. When we look at the highly competitive advanced world of today Japan>>>>Almost entire west.
>>69653661
>more research papers in south america than in eastern asia (aka china and korea)
The fuck is going on here?
>>69653977
>>69654109
>>69653977
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Innovation_Index
Take some raw scientific output, mate. No bullshit metrics.
Pic related.
>>69654109
>Arab Golden Age meme
Book disproves it. The amount of innovation they had in that time period disproves it. Logic disproves it.
>>69654109
>Arabs
>master race
>>69653977
>>69654109
>Innovation inputs included government and fiscal policy,
Talk about flawed
>>69654109
Arabs were never ahead
Even during the Islamic Golden Age most innovation came from Persians not Arabs.
Arabs not being camel fuckers is a meme.
>>69651017
That's not the beach, it's the desert and it's probably cold, so the pantyhose served as extra unoticed clothing for the model to stay warm during the photo shoot.
>>69654109
t. teriyaki
>>69654109
>>69653661
>>69653457
>>69653475
Totally didn't read any of this thread in any detail, but "meme" has a meaning outside of "funny internet shit."
>>69652050
>150 IQ
>doesn't understand normal distribution
sure buddy
>>69654260
LOL!
How did this turn from beauty standards to IQ?
Also the bitch in OP isn't on the beach
>>69654236
This book needs to die. This is based on some arbitrary thing called "significant figures" Is napoleon a significant figure is Bismarck? This doesn't actually measure innovation by country. Am I supposed to believe Italians, Spaniards, And Russians are smarter than the Japanese. Would anyone in their right mind believe this rubbish? White supremacists have no judgement or base in reality.
>>69654193
Wtf are you talking about japan is ahead of nearly the entire west in every innovation study http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-innovative-countries/
>>69654229
>>69654236
You both are too stupid to understand the point.
>>69651017
>screenshot Reddit posts
>links to Reddit threads
>talk about subreddits
When did this become acceptable behavior?
>>69654507
Thanks, Friedman, we know but if you read it he used it like we do, not like a memetic.
>>69654557
Sexual dimorphism and race realism are 1:1 here. They always happen.
>>69654605
Your, "innovation," measure isn't raw scientific output or per-capita output. Some measure that includes fiscal policy is complete bullshit and has *nothing* to do with research.
Oh, and if you READ THE BOOK, it lists EVERY INNOVATION and major figure over the course of about 90 pages of pure text.
>>69654710
Beauty standards don't have much to do with sexual dimorphism
I mean you could make an argument about women getting physically more attractive every generation but that's about it
>>69654605
>This is based on some arbitrary thing called "significant figures"
It's based on the encyclopedia the most comprehensive record of scientific and mathematical figures in history.
>Am I supposed to believe
Not an argument
>>69654701
You don't seem to have a point
>japan is ahead of nearly the entire west in every innovation
You just used the same flawed index that measures "fiscal policy" as "innovation."
You should be focusing on STEM output the only thing that matters
see the image
>>69653661
here
>>69654316
>the organization that gave obama the nobel peace price
>>69654316
Japan has been winning nobel prizes every year in hard sciences like physics since about 2000. Nobel prizes are usually awarded for work done decades earlier. The people who are getting prizes in the 2000's is for work they did in the 70's and 80's. Japan just recently became industrialized. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Japan
pretty much every year is an award in physics, not medicine or some other bs.
>>69654875
>implying the Nobel science prizes aren't some of the highest awards you can get in science
>>69654899
>Japan just recently became industrialized.
Japan was the earliest non western country to become industrialized becoming industrialized in the early 19th century.
It was already beating Russia at wars in the 1910s.
It also participated in this thing you might have heard of called WW2. You clearly don't even have a basic grasp of history if you think Japan was "recently" industrialized.
>>69655074
>early 19th century.
*early 20th century
>>69654899
>Japan just recently became industrialized
Please don't talk like you know things you don't know
Japan has been making small yet significant contributions to physics since the beginning of the 20th century
All the big shit is still euro and American though
It's such a relief that Britain is being bred out of existence by muslims. No more white supremacy!
>>69654869
>It's based on the encyclopedia the most comprehensive record of scientific and mathematical figures in history.
It literally says "significant figures"
>Not an argument
It is completely an argument if you believe italians spaniards and russians are smarter than the japanese then your argument belongs in the trash.
>>69654710
Japan has more science and innovation coming out of it, If you are talking about research papers. The number of research paper that are counted is less for non english speaking countries as german or japanese papers aren't properly documented. This why the UK has more papers and a higher H-index than germany not because it's more innovative.
>>69655267
>It literally says "significant figures"
Based on the encyclopedic index
>if you believe italians spaniards and russians are smarter
So just ignore all their scientific output then
inb4 there is none
see here
>>69653661
>>69655074
Japan wasn't industrialized in the proper sense of the term. If japan was industrialized in 1910 than china became industrialized in the 70's. Japan didn't become a fully developed country until about the late 70's
>>69655074
Nobel Prizes started in 1901 anyway.
Japan came into the fold right around when they started.
>>69655221
This.
>>69655233
Not this.
>>69655267
>as German or Japanese...
Oh yeah? Why does Germany shit out so many more then?
Your argument is shit. Japan does NOT make as many papers per capita, per year, or in its history by any means.
Italians, Spaniards, and Russians may very well be smarter than the Japanese. If you read the fucking book you would know that Italy, Spain, and Russia did not innovate as much and he shows all countries individually as well and lists every achievement and individual.
>>69655369
He doesn't want to read the book or see the output.
>>69655399
Chonshu Five.
>>69651017
i love her shoes
i want to cum on her feet
that's all. thanks for listening
>>69655399
>If japan was industrialized in 1910
You're comparing apples and oranges since China was under a retarded communist ruler in the 1970s while Japan was already full of accomplishments by the 1910s.
Why are there names on every post nOw?
>>69651017
It's like that guy's never seen what sandy skin looks like
>>69655589
My name isn't Tammy
>>69655369
what the fuck is an "encyclopedic index"
"Japan is ahead of almost the entire west today"
You didn't disprove this. Neither did your stupid bs book revolving around the 18th century.
>see here
already talked about the papers here >>69655267
Not even the eu innovation index takes number of research papers and h-index seriously.
>>69655435
> Why does Germany shit out so many more then?
Can you even read your own material. What you're talking about is research papers based on this data http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?area=0&category=0®ion=all&year=2014&order=it&min=0&min_type=it English speaking countries receive an advantage
>Italians, Spaniards, and Russians may very well be smarter than the Japanese.
Modern japan has contributed more than all these countries combined. You white supremacists can't handle facts.
>>69655685
>"encyclopedic index"
The index in the encyclopedia
>"Japan is ahead of almost the entire west today"
nope see here
anything non STEM is laughable
>>69653661
>already talked about the papers here
you used an index that counts government policy as "innovation"
>>69656070
>Modern japan has contributed more than all these countries combined.
not per capita see here
>>69653661
>>69656096
This fucking image is based on this data http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?area=0&category=0®ion=all&year=2014&order=it&min=0&min_type=it
you fucking mong did your parents drop you?
I'm going to repeat it "Japan has more science and innovation coming out of it, If you are talking about research papers. The number of research paper that are counted is less for non english speaking countries as german or japanese papers aren't properly documented. This why the UK has more papers and a higher H-index than germany not because it's more innovative."
>>69656226
that doesn't measure STEM paper output per capita
this does
see
>>69654869
>>69656325
Oh my god you truly are retarded. You are so thick you literally don't understand. These research publications are documented in the innovation union scorebooard but they are given less value because non english language journals are not properly indexed
https://books.google.ca/books?id=FMyShsq3MhUC&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=research+publications+non+english+speaking+countries&source=bl&ots=jUld0feP4u&sig=taH3t76tLhh0NJzeHVSubUCA9WQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFoc7Rku_LAhWDuoMKHWlHCq44ChDoAQgjMAE#v=onepage&q=research%20publications%20non%20english%20speaking%20countries&f=false
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards/files/ius-2015_en.pdf
The stem score doesn't matter these journals don't fucking matter even the EU doesn't take them seriously.
"This why the UK has more papers and a higher H-index than germany not because it's more innovative."
Do you even know what an H-index is? Do you even know what this image represents?
>>69651017
>beach
looks more like desert to me desu senpai
>>69656768
>t they are given less value because non english language journals
English is the international language of science and has been for a long time.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-10-06/how-did-english-become-language-science
>The stem score doesn't matter these journals don't fucking matter
Of course they matter if you want to look at STEM output.
>>69656226
Not in scientific achievement or cultural advances. Sorry, Shlomohammed.
>>69652050
You're pretty smart for a guy who doesn't understand distribution models
>>69657100
Are you legitimately retarded? >>69654869
In this image "STEM" isn't even mentioned. Second the UK is greatly ahead of germany. Nobody believes the UK is contributing more to science.
just read this https://books.google.ca/books?id=FMyShsq3MhUC&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=research+publications+non+english+speaking+countries&source=bl&ots=jUld0feP4u&sig=taH3t76tLhh0NJzeHVSubUCA9WQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFoc7Rku_LAhWDuoMKHWlHCq44ChDoAQgjMAE#v=onepage&q=research%20publications%20non%20english%20speaking%20countries&f=false
Non English language journals aren't properly indexed. This is why countries that publish their work in English in international journals get recognized not because they are more innovative. Countries like japan that do their work in japanese and usually publish in japanese journals aren't properly accounted for in the scopus study. Please shut the fuck up you have no idea what you are talking about.
>>69657634
Tonnes of people believe the UK is contributing more to society.
>>69657634
because it's based on STEM paper output, just reverse image search
http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18767/research-publications-per-capita
you seem fairly mad that English the the international language of science
see
>>69657100
>>69657924
Here's another fun image
notice how per capita isn't taken into account so even Spain and Italy have a higher per capita output than Japan.
as shown
here
>>69654869 (You)
>>69651017
>expected
Special kind of dumb nigger over there.
American women today dress to impress other women* id est stake their claim on their man that they probably abuse.
*or no one at all (see tights,t-shirts,and Uggs being most popular attire in public high schools and colleges)
>>69657924
THAT IMAGE DOESN'T EVEN MENTION STEM. The data is from the fucking Scopus. The innovation union which monitors these journals says
>1.2.2 Scientific publications
among the top-10% most
cited publications worldwide
as % of total scientific
publications of the country
Number of scientific publications
among the top-10% most cited
publications worldwide
Total number
of scientific
publications
The indicator is a proxy for the efficiency of the
research system as highly cited publications are
assumed to be of higher quality. There could be a bias
towards small or English speaking countries given
the coverage of Scopus’ publication data. Countries
like France and Germany, where researchers publish
relatively more in their own language, are more likely
to underperform on this indicator as compared to
their real academic excellence.
>Annex C definition of indicators
>From every innovation union study.
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards/files/ius-2015_en.pdf
There are actual studies into this like the one from 2002 published in nature. Please shut up shit for brains.
>>69657729
Maybe the reards on /pol/
>>69658060
Are you trolling or legitimately retarded? The indicator is a proxy for the efficiency of the
research system as highly cited publications are
assumed to be of higher quality. There could be a bias
towards small or English speaking countries given
the coverage of Scopus’ publication data. Countries
like France and Germany, where researchers publish
relatively more in their own language, are more likely
to underperform on this indicator as compared to
their real academic excellence.
From the innovation union. If yo publish in underground japanese journals in japanese your data won't be properly accounted for in scopus.
>>69658225
>>69658453
>THAT IMAGE DOESN'T EVEN MENTION STEM
right here
http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18767/research-publications-per-capita
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IP.JRN.ARTC.SC
also English is the international language of science
see here
>>69657100
>>69658597
Do you still not understand? The EU doesn't even take this data seriously. Are you actually retarded.
This data is from scimago which I already linked and mentioned numerous times, nothing new. Much of the data includes research in medicine.
>Saying English is the international language of science
Completely misses the point. Maybe this is too much for you. This quote >>69658453
Is from the innovation union which I linked. This paper is meant to monitor innovation within the EU. The EU doesn't take it seriously for the reasons I mentioned and the reason I quoted from them.
Here's some more
https://books.google.ca/books?id=Xo7FBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7&dq=index+non+english+science+journals&source=bl&ots=CUlmud6lpY&sig=Adm0__zbyCQBRFjXdHnNkWs28Kc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2sMjBm-_LAhVosIMKHUvIA4o4ChDoAQgzMAM#v=onepage&q=index%20non%20english%20science%20journals&f=false
also the book I previously linked talks about it>>69657634
Saying English is the international language of science shows how far removed you are from the conversation I am discussing, and the evidence placed in front of your nose.
>>69651960
lol what there's no way the bell curve is that compressed
my sister has 130 IQ and she's dumb af, there's no way she's smarter than literally 99.9% of other Asians
at least 1/2 of the Asians at my school had 130+ IQ
