Trump states he won't rule out Third Party run. /pol/ will defend this.
IT'S OVER!!!
HILLARY WINS!!!!
HILLARY WINS!!!!!
IT'S OVER!!!!
>>69636904
DELETE THE BOARD IT'S FUCKING OVER
What if Sanders and Bloomberg also run third party?
BUILD WALL PACO
It's over anyways. The #stoptrump people in the media will just hype up Johnson to make it a 3 way race if Trump is nominated.
>>69636904
What's 3rd party? Independent?
>>69636904
How is running independant NOT the right thing to do if the GOPe keeps sabotaging him at every turn?
>>69637094
Then we have a working democracy.
>>69637309
Answer me you faggot trump dick lovers
>>69637353
It is exactly the right thing to do in that scenario.
Fuck the GOPe
Let em burn
>>69636904
HAIL CESAR
Its been over desu. No matter who the Republican nominee is 1/3 of them will be so pissed they refuse to vote for them.
>>69637353
He should have from the beginning. He would have been alot better off.
He just has to stop saying stupid shit like making abortions illegal.
>>69637309
>>69637385
Probably independent.
Still think this general election is going 3 way no matter what happens in the Repub primary though.
>>69636904
> Trump runs as independent
> wins presidency and breaks the two party system
How is this a bad thing?
>>69637385
Yes... it's independent
>>69637309
Libertarian. Gary Johnson is the big ticket guy.
>>69636904
>party spends weeks openly discussing ways to deny him the nomination
>he mentions he would go 3rd party if they fuck him over
>"AHA YOU SEE HE CAN'T BE TRUSTED"
>>69636904
Alt-right Jamal
Praise kek
>>69637385
It can be whatever the fuck. It can be Trump's Chump Thumpers, they can call it OrgyX, it doesn't matter, it can be anything, there's no law that people must be in x party to run for the POTUS.
In fact, most of the founders of the USA fucking hated the idea of a two-party system, and deliberately created legal mechanisms to avoid that, if the people will was for more parties.
>>69636904
Why has nobody considered that if Bernie runs as a third party he might siphon away enough votes from Hillary to let Trump win?
>>69636904
vote for bernie
The Trump train has no breaks. Its going to be a wild ride!
>>69636904
Good, he needs to start filing his paperwork though or he won't get on the ballot. He's been outsmarted
>>69637597
In that case it would be a great idea and just call it make America great again.
I will build a wall.
>>69637605
Bernie isn't as vainglorious as Trump, he'll go back to Vermont.
THE PARTY OF LIGHT.
>>69637605
Bernie won't run third party though. Also, even if he did, the winning candidate would still need a majority of delegates, oerwise the senate gets to pick the president.
>>69637512
Except Trump will never crack Shillary as independent.
I am not even shilling but people always want the "safe" pick.
>>69637512
>wins presidency and breaks the two party system
Fucking delusional. The most based two-term president ever tried that and failed to break 100 electoral votes. It's not happening.
>>69637747
You seriously think the senate would pick Hillary?
>>69637696
He'll just get on the Libertarian ticket, they are on the ballot in all 50 states.
>>69636904
I feel this is a threat since he knows if he doesn't clench they'll JEW him out of the nomination
>>69637094
Sanders won't do it because he and Hillary share many SJW values. So does Bloomberg, he knows he would split the dem vote so he won't run, he was just flexing his tiny, cut kike cock.
>>69637790
Nah... but they won't pick Trump either.... probably be Paul Ryan.
well if he was going to be kicked out of nomination i was going to vote hillary anyway
>>69637739
WILL BE UP ALL NIGHT
>>69637772
Bet he will if he gets bullied in the next GOP debate. Witch he will.
Anti abortions and locking the women up really hurt him. If he never said all the stupid shit he has said in the past and run independent from the start he would have had a really good chance.
But he will sat more stupid shit and lose more votes.
>>69637868
The house would be constitutionally bound to select someone who actually won electoral votes. So no Ryan unless he was the GOP nominee
>>69638001
>next GOP debate
>>69636904
Trump the nationalist joins forces with Bernie the socialist...
>>69637868
Who actually supports Ryan? He's attractive but his policy is basically dismantling the government. Why would the senate of all places support that?
>>69638001
>Bet he will
Bet he will what? Run independent, maybe, but sure as hell not win. If Teddy couldn't do it then Trump most certainly will not come close.
>>69637385
Reform party you cuckneedan
>>69638078
O there are no more? What will happen next 3 party debate.
>>69637772
This, people have no idea how hard it would be for Trump to even get ballot access due to sore loser laws.
Not to mention if he DID happen to run third party, he'd be siphoning off mostly Republican votes. Fine, whatever.
But when he does that, it's only going to make it so the vote is split and Hillary gets away with a plurality.
Want to know how to win the presidency with only 43% of the vote? Ask Bill.
I don't want Shillary to win but jesus fuck the GOP makes it hard for me to not just want to see it all burn to the ground lately.
>>69638100
>the Senate
The house, not the Senate
>>69637868
The House chooses the President, and it has to be top 3.
Then the Senate chooses the VP from the top 2. This would probably have resulted in VP being a different party from the Pres.
>>69636904
At least we can have a civil war now.
AND YOUR DAMN RIGHT I'LL DEFEND THE CHAMPION OF MY PEOPLE.
He is the only one that is fighting for us. So fuck off shill.
>>69638001
>do something illegal
>don't want to be punished
>>69638322
That meme is 48 hours old now.
>>69638100
Don't kid yourself, the establishment LOVES Paul Ryan, and they're already feeling him out here via Romney's camp sending solicitation letters asking us to contribute to Paul Ryan for big "upcoming things we'll be hearing about soon".
That fucking traitor doesn't deserve shit and will help sink the GOP fast if they prop him up via brokered convention, so either way, the party dies this year if they push Trump out, because Ryan will alienate EVERY actual conservative who knows what a turncoat faggot he really is.
>>69638322
>illegal
>>69637502
Abortions should only be done out of necessity, not convenience.
Bring back the Bull Moose party
>>69637605
Bernie won't do it, guy is a fucking cuck. He'll endorse shillary.
>>69636904
Even if he doesn't run, there are a lot of people who won't vote Republican if Trump doesn't get it. Pic related is the isidewith graph of a friend, who is DIEHARD conservative, and is ready to give up on the party.
>>69636904
>>69637818
>implying the libertarians aren't cucks
>>69638496
That's not the problem the problem is having a free will to do with your body as you pls.
Once you cross that line what's next you can't believe in that religion it's now illegal?
>>69636904
If Trump doesn't get the nomination, then Hillary will be president.
>>69637502
He never said that. He was asked, if abortion were illegal, how would that be enforced.
>>69638588
>Implying the GOP is any better.
I'm guessing the meeting with head of GOP went horribly.
>>69638395
nice dubs
>>69636904
>yfw Trump has made the Gop commit suicide
>>69638676
They are so cucked that they won't ever consider Trump is what I am saying.
Not to mention they are open borders cucks. Sure they are better than the GOP only because they aren't Democrats-lite.
>>69638652
That assumes that Hillary still gets 270 electoral votes. If she gets less than that, the Republican controlled House/Senate gets to vote in the Republican ticket.
>>69636904
If the establishment steals the election the republican party deserves to burn
the neocon menace must be vanquished
>>69638679
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/reince-priebus-turn-over-rnc/2016/04/01/id/721909/?ns_mail_uid=44574961&ns_mail_job=1662178_04012016&s=al&dkt_nbr=uscujshk
>>69638657
And he should have said abortion will never be illegal if I'm president, next question please.
Even if it is a lie and plans to make it illegal you don't say shit like that running for president ffs
>>69638804
There's no way the vote will split that much.
>>69638652
>If Trump doesn't get the nomination
She will be President even if he does get it. Trump has no chance in a general election contest.
Finally! I vote for Bernie now. #feelthebern
>>69637737
>>69637747
>>69638539
I feel like even if Hillary gets it, there will be enough people writing in Sanders that it could negatively impact her. You even have HuffPo advocating that right now.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/writing-in-sanders-clinton-democratic-nominee_b_9514188.html
>>69638844
That would have sent whatever Christian voters he had left scrambling for Cruz.
>>69637368
But we don't anon. Not unless those parties can field a candidate in every house district and 1/3 of the senate.
>>69638844
>what is the Republican primary
No you have to pander to christfags to win the nomination. He did it poorly though.
>>69638886
Not true.
http://primarymodel.com/
>>69638886
Why do people say this?
Literally you have no way of knowing. That you stupid nigger trash
niggertits
desu desu
baka
senpai senpai
>>69638993
Because they think general election polls matter right now.
>>69638971
Can't be to many Christfags left or trump would have the 1250 delegates by now. He needs to be at a middle ground getting both to vote for not just one.
>>69636904
The Republican party died back when George W. got elected. They'll never escape the legacy of neocon shills.
The US needs a conservative party that isn't 50% white evangelical Christians who vote on 3 social issues.
Trump is the greatest political troll. He planned this all along. Enjoy Hillary
>>69637772
He might be able to win if Hillary gets indicted and the Republicans either run a weak Cuck like Ryan or a bible thumper like Cruz.
*might*
As in it would still take a huge effort. I don't think anyone has even put that much thought in to electoral votes with three serious competitors(an unusually strong 3rd party and two weak main party candidates)
>>69638800
That's one of the bigger issues I have with libertarians. I'm not against open boarders, but I AM against Open Boarders AND Welfare. It's pretty obvious they're not gonna shut down welfare, although they could pretty easily get open boarders.
But even without welfare, I'm somewhat skeptical of completely open boarders.
Good.
Trump is a liberal.
He will pull away the dem votes and the true conservative will win the white house for the Republican party.
Good riddance, Trump.
>>69639152
Most Republicans are pro life though. Don't be a dummy.
>>69639177
Lol America is so fucked. Hope they don't drag the rest of down with them.
>>69639301
Then he never should have ran republic
>>69636904
I'd abandon the elephant party.
>>69638971
>it is a statistical model that relies on presidential primaries and an election cycle as predictors of the vote in the general election
Holy fuck this triggers me.
There is NO RELATIONSHIP between primary votes and general election votes. This model is flawed as fuck. Trash it.
>>69638993
Trump is hated by huge majorities of virtually every demographic group outside of the ones who vote republican. Except maybe white men. Trump does not have the wide ranging appeal needed to win, not even close.
>>69638912
Honestly this will probably be the most polarizing election in a long time.
They should really just advocate votes for Jill Stein just so the green party can get funds.
I just think that, in the end she would most likely win unless the Republicans were set up for a Reagan-like landslide to begin with.
Hell, if Trump managed to win states nobody could reach 270 but I think what is more likely is the scenario here >>69638208
He'll pull away votes and maybe get within a nats ass in some states but ultimately Hillary will have a simple plurality. You could see a blue Georgia, blue Arizona, blue Texas even if he pulled away so many votes.
Our system was never made for 3 or more parties. It would be an absolute nightmare for ANY third party to get 270. They would need billions upon billions to pump into the campaign.
>>69639187
man do you guys realize how hard it is to actually win electoral votes third party
>Former Democratic Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran on the American Independent Party line. Wallace received 9,901,118 votes for 13.5% of the popular vote, receiving 45 electoral votes in the South and many votes in the North. Wallace remains the only third party candidate since 1948 to win a state.
ross perot got 19% of the vote but didn't win a single state in 1992
>>69637480
faggots, the lot of them.
Can't believe people can't see through Cruz's sleazy televangelist demeanor. Oh wait, the retards sending their social security checks to buy private planes for their local megachurch minister is his core constituency.
>>69636904
Trump has finally confirmed the republican establishment is full of globalist cucks and is running 3rd party.
>>69639425
Dems have superdelegates and being super progressive is in right now. Stop posting you dumb leaf if you don't know anything about our politics.
>>69639439
This. I have donated more and all the fundraisong events locally. I will vote straoght democrat if the party is db enough to do this.People i know aren't necessarily ready to do what i do, but good luck getting them to vote in December.
>>69639491
>For the record, the PRIMARY MODEL, with slight modifications, has correctly predicted the winner of the popular vote in all five presidential elections since it was introduced in 1996. In recent elections the forecast has been issued as early as January of the election year.
>Presidential elections going back as far as 1912 are used to estimate the weight of primary performance. It was in 1912 that presidential primaries were introduced. That year the candidate who won his party’s primary vote, Woodrow Wilson, went on to defeat the candidate who lost his party’s primary vote, William Howard Taft. As a rule, the candidate with the stronger primary performance wins against the candidate with the weaker primary performance. For elections from 1912 to 2012 the PRIMARY MODEL picks the winner, albeit retroactively, every time except in 1960.
There is a relationship actually. If you put up a better fight in the primary than your opponent, you're a lot more likely to win. Sanders and Clinton split the vote much more than the Republicans. Also, the 8 year cycle is in favor of the republicans.
>>69639545
Well to be fair he did say it would require weak shit on both sides.
But it is almost impossible just because most third parties usually end up pulling more votes from one side over the other. Trump could get some Democratic votes but more likely they will just say "EWWWWW HITLER!!!!!" and vote Shillary.
Democrats are sheep for the party, most of them will vote for the candidate no matter who it is as long as they have a D next to their name. Whoever shekelstein the union boss tells them to vote for.
>>69637309
Bull Moose Party
>>69639740
>That year the candidate who won his party’s primary vote, Woodrow Wilson, went on to defeat the candidate who lost his party’s primary vote, William Howard Taft.
Oh my god are you seriously trying to use the election of 1912 to argue for this flawed model? 1912 had a popular two-term president running third party and actually winning more ekectoral votes than the GOP candidate, Taft. That election was an outlier THAT resulted in a democratic landslide due to a split Republican vote. 2008 was also an outlier. There is no relationship between votes in a primary and votes in the general.
>>69636904
Kys Caesar
>>69637635
>Ted Cuevas
>>69639999
What the fuck is wrong with you? Can't you read the whole thing.
>As a rule, the candidate with the stronger primary performance wins against the candidate with the weaker primary performance.
This is true and the model successfully picks the winner at a 96% accuracy rate.
>>69636904
Good, if the GOP fuck him in a contested convention they deserve to be fucked back.
>>69640153
He's triggered by anything that isn't Cuck Silver.
It's not like Cruz has any chance of winning the general election anyway, so this really doesn't matter. It's either Trump or Hillary.
Trump is doing the Republican Party a favor by making sure they understand he's their only viable candidate.
>Trump states he won't rule out Third Party run.
In the same way that he won't rule out nuking Europe.
>>69636904
gop is perfectly content giving hillary the wh, trump gets the nom or ww3
>>69640153
>It's right a lot because the website says so
How about you fuck off with this shitty model?
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/primary-turnout-means-nothing-for-the-general-election/
>>69640264
They are pushing some massive shill campaign saying that Trump will hurt down ticket Republicans.
Honestly, I don't see how he hurts them any more or less than Cruz would.
>>69636904
if there is one thing I cant stand its a man who cant keep his word. if God Emperor Trump goes back on his word I am voting for the Rat.
>>69640382
>FiveThirtyEight
You mean the site that was wrong? You mean the fuckface Silver who does nothing but look at RCP and writes autism is your source?
>>69640382
Why can't you read that either? The article only looks at turnouts and change in turnouts in respect to the general election. The model I posted looks at how well the candidates perform in their respective primaries and uses that. It is also extremely accurate, so you can stop being butthurt.
>>69638080
implying?
>>69640621
Actually reading up on his 2012 prediction he got it right on the nose for Romney.
>>69640506
It doesn't matter if Trump damages them or not. The GOP wants nothing to do with Trump because they view him as the death of their party. They're willing to toss the election and take the huge L in order to keep Trump supporters from gaining any political traction.
>>69637368
america isn't a democracy
>>69640593
You may not like silver, but the data speaks for itself. It's right there for all to see. There is no predictive relationship between primary popular vote and general election popular vote, nevermind electoral votes.
>>69640621
>It's right a lot because the website says so
Take that shit and kindly fuck off. The numbers don't lie, motherfucker. Your model is shit and has nothing backing it up whatsoever.
>>69637597
They hated the idea of permanent factions. Founders being based again.
>>69639545
>man do you guys realize how hard it is to actually win electoral votes third party
Yes. I'm just saying that an unusually strong 3rd guy like Trump with two unpopular main candidates are the best recipe.
Trump's demographics are interesting. He's not just a deep south guy and some states could be wins if the main parties split right.
>>69636904
Do you fucking regards listen to anything this man says?
"Don't ever take any cards off of the table, you can use them for negotiation"
Didn't we just go through this with the whole "TRUMP WILL NUKE EUROPE" nontroversy?
>>69640772
America is a representative democracy, so yes, it is.
>>69636904
All Republicans have to do to avoid that is respect democracy and make him their nominee.
If they don't then they don't deserve to win the election, and it would be better for Hillary to win and teach them a lesson.
>>69640846
>just saying that an unusually strong 3rd guy like Trump
Trump is not unusually strong. He does well among people who lean republican, that's really it. In a general election he's not that great because his unfavorables are incredibly bad. I mean horrible, way worse than even clinton.
>>69640821
Are you going to stop shitposting? The model has a ton of correct predictions (96%) accuracy rate backing it up. Again, the model doesn't use raw turn out numbers. It uses how well candidates perform in their primary with respect to the opponent.
>>69641093
Your so called 96% accuracy rate is bullshit. Some person makes a website claiming he's right all the time and you just believe him. Fuck off.
>>69641018
Honestly the real question this election will be will people actually want third term of Obama?
In historical trends, its usually unlikely the incumbent party wins a third term but honestly with the way the GOP is handling this election they might just be weakened enough for any democrat to win.
>>69641268
He's literally a professor and has received press coverage over his model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyvXUAKEdUo
>>69638646
Bullshit. My labor is taxed and if I refuse to pay my body is thrown in jail.
The moment "bodily control" becomes justification for murder, you might as well just start up the eugenic camps and exterminate the leftist parasites.
It's a moral excuse for a act of sociopathic convenience.
>>69637635
holy fucking shit your name
>Ted Cueves
>Ted Cueves
...
...
>Ted Cueves
>>69641417
He probably believes models like this.
>>69641417
>appeal to authority
Fuck off. The numbers clearly show that using primary turnout to predict general election success is not reliable. One man claims he has all the answers, but that means nothing.
>>69636904
:>Trump states he won't rule out Third Party run.
we elected a gay muslim nigger - why would it be absurd to think a third party candidate couldn't win?
>>69640872
It's a Democratic Republic.
>>69641582
HE DOESN'T USE PRIMARY TURNOUT. HE USES PRIMARY PERFORMANCE.
TRUMP SPOTTED ON /a/!!!
>>69640863
This.
>>69638496
At least 90% of pregnancies should be aborted. It should be the default resolution. Actually birthing a child is what deserves the big fuss.
>>69637368
>Democracy
>working
>>69637094
>you will never have a real election
Kill me
>Trump goes independent.
>Trump decides to join with the Libertarians to maximize the vote.
>Trump allows Gary to run as the President, with Trump as VP... under one condition...
>Trump gets to Build the Wall™, help rebuild American infrastructure, and make good trade deals.
>Gary focuses on everything else, except for immigration because he's a cuckbertarian on that.
>Bernie gets shafted by Hillary at the convention or by super-delegates
>Bernie people get pissed off and rally to Gary as the alternative to Hillary
>Gary now has near half the disaffected democrats and half the republicans from Trump
>Gary and Trump amass enough votes to win the nomination
>McAfee becomes Secretary of Cyber Warfare
>America becomes great again
>>69641637
Honestly reading up on the model it seems sound but I'm a little confused how he predicted 2012 based off of NH when Obama had no opposition.
His model is 100x better than shit like this >>69641519
which was literally based off of nothing.
>>69641628
A republic is a representative democracy by definition, and representative republic is a nonsensical/redundant title.
>>69641637
>primary performance
You're talking about raw vote totals either way, and there is NO predictive relationship there. FUCK OFF.
>>69636904
FOOLS
This is just to force the RNC to back away from a Contested Convention.
A Bluff.
A Ruse.
Donald J. Trump will become POTUS.
>>69640540
Didn't he say he would not go 3rd party IF the establishment treated him fairly? That has gone out the window for sure.
>>69641804
I could see this.
I'm legally blind, but hey, I could see it.
>>69638302
>>>@(YOU)
>>69641840
He predicted it right because incumbent presidents rarely lose.
http://primarymodel.com/comfort-for-obama-history-is-on-his-side-in-2012/
>>69641855
>You're talking about raw vote totals either way, and there is NO predictive relationship there.
Except there is a relationship between how strong a candidate does in his/her primary and how well they do in their general election. In terms of votes, Trump is a lot more dominant than Clinton (Sanders is much more competitive than Cruz). The 8 year election cycle is also in favor of Trump. It is extremely unlikely that dems will win again unless the Republicans take the nomination away from Trump.
>>69636904
At this point, fuck it. End it all. I would rather have Hillary who will back track on all of her fake socialist angles to appease her corporate interests than let the republicans get away with this shit.
>>69637597
>>69637704
>>69640843
Yup. Pic related
>>69640821
i bet he wishes he stuck with the data
instead he ruined his career
>its all about the data
>fuck this trump data tho
he cucked himself
>>69642216
Also, Trump should threaten the third party run and say he won't support the candidate, this is the way he can actually ensure the nomination.
>>69638557
the Reps and Trump would split all the conservative votes.
this scenario is exactly what the Dems want at this point.
>>69642287
>THE POLLS ARE WRONG THE POLLS ARE WRONG THE POLLS ARE WRONG
t. Nate Silver.
He was literally saying this leading up to the primaries because of course early polls are usually not that accurate but all of a sudden now polls are gospel to him.
He's a shill. He seemed impartial in 2012 but now he's going full shill.
All he does is state by state analysis.
>>69640771
If they throw the election by fucking over Trump, could any trump supporter EVER vote R again? I think I may have voted for a democrat only once or twice for any office ever, at any level of government. (Libertarian, sure), otherwise I vote nearly straight 'R'. But if they fuck over Trump for their own desperate hold on power, could I or you or anyone support any republican candidate ever again?
It won't be Trump killing the party, it will be the establishment in trying to retain control of it.
The GOP is the Government of the People. Not the government of rich old fags that think they own the place.
>>69639776
Runo has pulled over millions of democrats... not to mention the fact that 90% of all Bernie supporters HATE Hillary and would much rather have a Trump, especially if internet culture somehow educates the people before then...
BUILD WALL
>>69639248
>this level of denial of the inevitable
>>69642198
The model is shit. It relies on two huge assumptions that are not supported by reality. First it assumes that there's a relationship between primary performance and general election performance when there isnt. Trump is more dominant in the GOP because the GOP race had the votes spread out among multiple candidates and the Dems only had 2 legit contenders. Second it relies on the assumption that the GOP should win just because they're not democrats and we're at the end of an 8 year cycle, which is a completely asinine assumption to make. There are so many other factors involved that the whole idea is a joke.
>>69636904
>over
shut the fuck up
>>69640280
>JIM MELENDEZ
who you kiddin paco?
you have to go back.
The Republicans have been cucking Trump for a long time now. I think he should go independent just to give them a middle finger.
>>69637269
Maybe not, that might lead to the ascendance of the Libertarian party if they become seen as a good candidate
>>69642644
>First it assumes that there's a relationship between primary performance and general election performance when there isnt.
Except there is as I have repeatedly stated and the model has successfully used for elections dating back to 1912.
>Trump is more dominant in the GOP because the GOP race had the votes spread out among multiple candidates and the Dems only had 2 legit contenders.
So what? That means that Trump is the stronger candidate than Hillary which points in his favor. If Democrats had winner take all states and didn't have superdelegates, Sanders would have a decent shot at winning the nomination.
>Second it relies on the assumption that the GOP should win just because they're not democrats and we're at the end of an 8 year cycle, which is a completely asinine assumption to make.
Except 8 year cycles of parties are very reliable and supported by history.
Basically your whole post is just
>increasingly nervous man
>>69641927
>making up THIS level of excuse
>>69642810
I'll just request an absentee ballot and vote for Gary Johnson. That way I don't stand in line to vote and I don't support the GOP.
I'll vote for my local representative, I actually have seen him and he's a pretty cool guy.
>>69642962
Yeah and your whole post is a logical fallacy so fuck off.
>muh college professor
>muh primary performance
>muh 8 years
Kill yourself
>Cruz: Trump is a sore loser
>leading everyone by 300+ points
Fuck I can't take this shit anymore man, what type of mental gymnastics does the RNC do every fucking day to accomplish this level of bullshittery?
>>69636904
> breaking
he said that days ago you dildo
>>69643131
Give it a rest nate.
>>69643131
>I'll just call his argument a (unspecified) logical fallacy and quote the main points back to him, that'll show him!
>I've clearly won this argument
>>69638268
They are gonna change the rules to whatever they want.
In what universe was trunp dominant anyways? More republican voters voted for someone other than trump. On the other hand, clinton has won crushing majorities in many states.
>>69643443
>unspecified
Try reading the thread, retard. His entire argument is "this professor says he's always right, so i win!"
>>69644384
Our universe. The votes on the Republican side are split across many more candidates which is why we haven't gotten majorities on the Republican side. Trump's roughly 2 million vote lead is a lot more impressive than Clintons (roughly) 2 million lead because he did it in an extremely crowded field of candidates.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/R
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D
>>69644503
>it's all one epic trick
okay buddy
>>69644958
So you admit you're using raw primary votes, which simply ARE NOT predictive for a general election.
>>69642776
>thinks april fools id's are real
lol when you going back to mexico paco?
I just want a good name so I can feel loved
>>69636904
they better not retain this shit from thread to thread
>>69641417
that guys voice sounds like something out of a 1920 movie, what do you call that old sounding accent, so cooool
Trump vs Cruz vs Hilary vs Bernie Fatal 4-Way
who wins
>>69636904
If the RNC fucks him, they deserve to lose in a 3-way.
Fuck them, they've tanked their chances the last 3 elections. Fuck the Republican elite.
>>69637269
This is actually a good point
>>69647213
>who wins
>>69638572
fucking epic....truly a legend of our time
Am I the only one that thinks America deserves it shitty fate if America doesn't elect Trump?
>>69639425
I know you don't have morals over in Canuck land but here in God's Country we believe in the sanctity of life.
>>69637269
>>69642954
Let's fucking do this! /pol/, this is our chance to truly become the illuminati! We trick the establishment shills into shilling the libertarian party to "stop Trump" which makes the libertarian party become mainstream!
Say what you want about the two party system, but it's suicide for our country if Trump runs third party. All you have to do is look back at history, when Theodore Roosevelt ran under his Bull Moose Party, which got us elected a president that put us on the shitty path we are on today (Woodrow Wilson).
>>69638208
The gop is as hostile to their base as the Democrats. When I heard them saying that they pick the candidates and not the people, they deserve to burn
>>69640170
Exactly! I hope he does run third party if they fuck him. If he loses normally, he would be the asshole. That would be the honorable thing to do. Fuck the GOP and make them irrelevant. I'm sticking with Trump the whole way.
>>69642505
I'm usually independent. I have voted Democrat once back in 2004.
Hillary will be in Prison
>>69637269
Bullshit. Johnson won't go anywhere - there is like 4 libertarian candidates running, and the only one who can make a dent is John Mcafee, because he's not politically correct and he's crazy, but a guy like that is likely to get in behind trump
