Explain this shit, conservatards.
How can a country prioritize circumcising all newborn infants and NOT addressing rampant gun crime?
>>69538155
One is a private cost with personal accountability the other is a federal cost practically designed to get rid of personal accountability.
>>69538249
How can a country prioritize circumcising all newborn infants and NOT addressing rampant gun crime?
Dammit, Australia, you're really off your game as of late.
>>69538320
Addressing gun crime would mean getting rid of niggers.
While that's something I'd be all for I don't think it's feasible yet.
This is some Canada tier shitposting, well, attempting at shitposting. Do you want a do-over?
>>69538155
First is true, second is false, OP is faggot
>>69538472
Abortions in the 90s worked.
Less people born in low income families means less people committing crime. Just thin the ghettos out, it's easy.
>>69538597
How is it false?
>>69538472
lol no
it's not like jamal is in a major criminal syndicate that would have access to contraband firearms
reduce the ubiquity of guns and you'd have less gun violence, period
>>69538654
Yes, at the expense of the blacks joining the police and do exactly what they were doing before.
>mfw liberals compare "everyone has the ability to buy a gun" to "everyone has the right to force someone to perform medical aid on them"
Other people buying guns doesn't cost me any of my tax dollars and keeps me safer
>>69538155
explain why i can't have both
>>69538320
There is no rampant gun crime.
Do countries with socialized education not teach statistics?
I'm just here for the Auzzie bitches.
>>69538155
You don't have to fill a Jew's pockets every month to buy a gun.
>>69538654
Niggers are the vast majority of "people" who abuse gun rights.
Get rid of them and all that's left is a majority of responsible white people who just want to protect their homes.
Yes, getting rid of guns would get rid of gun crime but that kind of retarded logic can lead to all kinds of stupid ideas
>lets ban cars to get rid of drunk drivers :D
>lets ban elevators so people don't get trapped during fires :D
>lets ban X to get rid of [small minority of bad thing within X]
I don't doubt your motives but your logic is simple, childish and punishes those who have done nothing wrong.
>insurance
>health care
>>69538393
I think they're upset over Tay. They're not used to being out-bantered. Canada has tried to fill the void but it's just not the same.
>>69538155
I will explain.
It's called a strawman argument. It is a very pathetic form of defense used by idiots.
>>69539508
Actually there is nothing wrong with strawman arguments, it helps to paint a picture to an otherwise ignoranus.
>>69538155
Country should be more focused on not letting anyone vote who is under the age of 25, unless they serve in the military.
>>69538882
Well, don't you have both now?
A real comparison would be giving free guns to poor people, and that is just as retarded.
>>69539580
>Liberals.
>>69539791
I know pseudointellectuals like yourself like to pretend its all very clever to point out things which seem to be 'fallacies' from your list of fallacies but normal debate and argument doesn't care for such imginary rules.
>>69539580
>There is nothing wrong with fallacies.
The Market WILL fall hard VERY SOON.
Anbang, a Chinese holding company has abandoned its $14B acquistion of Starwood Hotels (real estate/travel is very cyclical).
Hillary is facing momentum from Bernie, and needs to seal the deal.
However, even though she's almost sure to win the Democratic nomination, Trump is almost guaranteed to win as well.
Given conditions in the global markets, unrest in the Middle East and Northern Europe is only a matter of time away. Oil's exposure on Norway's balance sheet will bring European markets to shit, and German Banks are already under extreme pressure.
Investors do not expect high growth rates from markets and all the conditions for a collapse are present.
Hedge funds have performed terribly and it's only a matter of time before they collude to collapse the global market. It's a winning bet for those who participate.
A market collapse heavily falls in line with Democratic Party's goals. It's almost guaranteed to put Hillary in office, because 'she gunna fix da 'conomy jus' like Bama did!'
Pic related, your next President.
>>69539842
>actually thinking arguing against a fictional point is a valid strategy
Wow everyone. Look at this baby fucker. He actually wants to get rid of guns so he can fuck babies without the risk of being shot!
>>69540177
That is defamatory.
Besides, you can't even fuck babies. The mechanics of their body do not allow it (holes too small) so if you did, you would severely injure or kill them
>>69538155
>>69540300
I know you're Australian but surely you didn't completely miss the point of that post?
>>69540388
What point?
>>69540103
Looks like you accidentally uploaded the wrong picture lad...
>>69539423
First computers beat Russians at chess. Then computers win Jeopardy. Then computers beat the Chinks at Go. Then computers beat Australians at banter and shitposting. What next?
>>69540513
The point that just making shit up about your opponent is not a valid basis for argument, you dense baby fucker.
Does anyone on this board even use Obamacare?
>>69540968
Yes it is though. You don't get to make up rules for debate, mate.
>>69541113
Literally everyone does, mate. Obamacare is just a method of buying normal insurance.
>>69541204
I really want to believe you aren't this retarded.
Please let me dream.
Socialized Healthcare is hot shit. There's been so many times I've been on the top tier if a waiting list and still had to wait over a year for treatment. If i had something like cancer, I'd be dead. Not to mention the cost of taxes here for essentially "free" doctors visits for them to prescribe you placebos. If you're not a retard in the US, you can get insurance for cheaper and still get faster service than socialized countries. Even then, I'd rather be in debt than dead.
>>69538900
>America
>third world tier math scores
>still talks shit
>>69541113
>>69541233
its actually just a set of laws and regulations
the only tangible part is the exchange which you don't even have to use
>>69538155
>if you dont want it provided by the government, you dont want it to exist
“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.”
― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law
>>69538654
You know that more people die from drunk drivers then from firearm related homicides every year?
>>69541428
delete this
>>69541288
>Canada
>Doesn't understand that's all niggers
>We beat leaf bastards without them
>Doesn't know how to break down statistics
>A Fucking Leaf
>>69541428
>tfw Americans still don't understand socialism
>>69541113
I have to or else I get fined
>>69541233
"Hello, my fellow americanmates"
This planet needs less people, not more. Those two examples are environment friendly. The less people there is, the better quality of life everyone can afford. I would recommend killing 50% of the human population. Can't wait for another WW desu.
POSITIVE VS NEGATIVE RIGHTS
Learn the fucking difference, faggot.
>>69541605
>TFW faggots like you don't understand it has to be enforced by the government
>TFW you faggots don't understand that most of us know this, its bernie bots who need to be educated.
>>69541605
And who enforces common ownership of property?...
>>69541605
>>69541793
>Wants 50% human pop killed in next WW.
>Lives in Finland.
welp, nice knowing you.
>>69541288
>utterly fail at statistics
>trying to claim Americans are bad at math
>>69541898
"The people" of course comrade!
>>69538155
Yeah, it's called the economy.
Fucking liberals think money grows on trees.
>>69538155
I support both.
Fuck you anti-freedom faggots and fuck you muh economy faggots.
I'll just put this here
https://youtu.be/q2jijuj1ysw
>>69538654
You'd have to seal off the borders with Mexico for that plan to stand a chance, and I'm pretty sure you lefties are against that.
Also, you'd have people like this Democrat State Senator
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee
Voting for gun-control while illegally smuggling fully-automatic rifles and handheld RPGs into the country
>>69542292
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9il52dlnnc
>>69542078
Ah yes The People™
Creators of all great economic and philosophical movements.
>>69538155
bill of rights. /thread
>>69538155
Guns are cheaper, you're not required to have one nor are you required to pay for your neighbor to have one.
>>69541898
It can only work if it doesn't need to be enforced.
Which is one of the reasons it doesn't work.
>>69538155
hmmm, one is literally listed in the most sacrosanct of government documents as an important freedom to be preserved
and
one is a bunch of people wanting so much free shit as to literally bankrupt the government AND ruin the healthcare industry in one fell swoop
yeah, i wonder why conservatives would prefer the first and not the second. oh wait, i have at least two brain cells to rub together, so i can actually think past "FREE SHIT = GOOD YAY".
>>69542383
Mexico doesn't even factor into this on any measurable scale.
Americans literally build machine shops in their garages that rival the entire output of third world nations.
You don't even need particularly advanced machinery to manufacture a quality firearm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiHdV5slQps
